Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/526,564

Color-Changing Food Product and Method of Making a Color-Changing Food Product

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Dec 01, 2023
Examiner
LI, CHANGQING
Art Unit
1791
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Sensient Colors LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
29%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
63%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 29% of cases
29%
Career Allowance Rate
92 granted / 314 resolved
-35.7% vs TC avg
Strong +34% interview lift
Without
With
+33.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
78 currently pending
Career history
391
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
§103
53.2%
+13.2% vs TC avg
§102
11.2%
-28.8% vs TC avg
§112
28.2%
-11.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 314 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I (e.g., claims 1-8) and species I (e.g., marbit or marshmallow) in the reply filed on 07/01/2026 is acknowledged. Claims 9-20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Claim status Claims 1-20 filed 12/01/2023 are pending in the application. Claims 1-8 are originally presented. Claims 9-20 are withdrawn without traverse in response to the restriction requirement. Claims 1-8 are hereby examined on the merits. Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: “wherein the at least one primary colorant and at least one additional colorant” in line 6 should read “wherein the at least one primary colorant and the at least one additional colorant”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites “high heat” in line 4 and 9, however, absent a standard, it is unclear what level of heat is considered high heat and what is not. Clarification is required. Claims 2-8 ultimately depend from claim 1 and therefore necessarily incorporate the indefinite subject matter therein. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Julie, Superfood Turmeric Marshmallows (paleo, AIP) [Online], published April 10, 2017, [retrieved on 2026-07-08]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: https://jshunterfiction.com/superfood-marshmallows-paleo-aip/> (hereinafter referred to as Julie) in view of Battista US Patent No. 3,162,541 (hereinafter referred to as Battista), Cross US Patent Application Publication No. 2002/0022077 A1 (hereinafter referred to as Cross) and Golosinec US Patent No. 3,220,853 (hereinafter referred to as Golosinec). Regarding claims 1-8, Julie teaches a method of making a colored marshmallow, the method comprising mixing food ingredients (e.g., gelatin, honey, water, etc.) with a colorant (e.g., turmeric), followed by beating and refrigerating to form the marshmallow (“Ingredients” and “Instructions”). Julie is silent regarding that the marshmallow contains other colorants including Red# 3, Yellow # 6, Red#40, and Blue # 1. In the same field of endeavor, Battista teaches that it is suitable to use colorants Red # 1-4, Blue # 1-2, Yellow # 5-6, etc. or various blends thereof to color food such as marshmallow (column 5, line 4-14; column 4, line 69-75); Cross teaches that Red #40 is suitable for coloring marshmallow (0032); and Golosinec teaches that colorants such as Red #2, Red #4, Yellow # 5-6, and Blue #1 can be used to color a marshmallow, and those colorants can also be combined with one another in different amounts to provide variously colored marshmallows (column 2, line 7-33). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to have modified Julie by combing other colorants including Red# 3, Yellow # 6, Red#40, and Blue # 1 with the turmeric colorant to make variously colored marshmallows with reasonable expectation of success, for the reason that prior art has established that different colorants can be combined to provide variously colored marshmallows. Further, as stated in MPEP 2144.06, "it is prima facie obvious to combine two compositions each of which is taught by the prior art to be useful for the same purpose, in order to form a third composition to be used for the very same purpose.... [T]he idea of combining them flows logically from their having been individually taught in the prior art." In re Kerkhoven, 626 F.2d 846, 850, 205 USPQ 1069, 1072 (CCPA 1980). On the limitation that the amounts of the primary and additional colorants are effective to provide a color to the food product (e.g., marshmallow) that changes from one color to another color upon exposure to high heat, Battista teaches that the color concentration in the food is conventional, generally ranging from as low as 0.0015 up to 0.002, 0.007, 0.03, or 0.05% by weight. The color concentration may be even higher, say to 0.1, 0.5, or 1.0% (column 7, line 10-13); Cross teaches an amount of 0.1% Red #40 in a marshmallow (e.g., 0.2% Red #40 in 50% solution; 0032), and Golosinec teaches that the colorant can be combined with one another in different amounts to provide variously colored marshmallows, and the colorants are normally added to the white marshmallow mix in an amount of 0.02-0.03% (column 2, line 29-33). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to have varied the amounts of different colorants so as to provide variousLY colored marshmallows, provided that the total amount of colorants in the marshmallow is in the range of 0.0015- 1% as suggested by the prior art. As such, the limitation as recited above is merely an obvious variant of the prior art. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHANGQING LI whose telephone number is (571)272-2334. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, NIKKI H DEES can be reached at 571-270-3435. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHANGQING LI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1791
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 01, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 31, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12723217
FILTER FOR INHIBITING DEGRADATION OF EDIBLE OILS, AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAME
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12667126
MALONYL STEVIOL GLYCOSIDES AND THEIR COMESTIBLE USE
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12653217
COMPOSITION FOR ENHANCING UMAMI COMPRISING TYROSINE-AMINO ACID PEPTIDE AND USE THEREOF
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12642285
DIETARY SUPPLEMENT DERIVED FROM THE RUMINAL CONTENT OF BOVINES AND SHEEP AND THE CAECAL CONTENT OF RABBIT
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12635718
FLAVANONE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR USE AS SWEETNESS ENHANCERS
4y 3m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
29%
Grant Probability
63%
With Interview (+33.6%)
3y 8m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 314 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month