Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/528,306

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR INITIAL ACCESS USING NON-ORTHOGONAL MULTIPLE ACCESS IN COMMUNICATION NETWORK

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 04, 2023
Examiner
LING, CHHIAN
Art Unit
2446
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
ELECTRONICS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS RESEARCH INSTITUTE
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allow Rate
382 granted / 441 resolved
+28.6% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+27.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
460
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
12.9%
-27.1% vs TC avg
§103
57.0%
+17.0% vs TC avg
§102
10.9%
-29.1% vs TC avg
§112
9.5%
-30.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 441 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION 2. This Office Action is in response to application filed on 12/04/2023. Claims 1-20 were previously pending. Claims 1-20 are rejected. Information Disclosure Statement 3. The information disclosure statement(s) (IDS) submitted on 12/04/2023 is/are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the IDS(s) is/are being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 4. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. 4.1. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 4.2. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. 4.3. Claims 1-8, 10-13, 15-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over by Chae et al., (“Chae”, US 2017/0251462 A1) in view of Zhu et al., (“Zhu”, US 2015/0351081 A1). Regarding Claim 1, Chae teaches, a method of a base station, comprising: receiving a signal including a first message of a first terminal and a first message of a second terminal in one random access channel (RACH) occasion (RO) (Chae, FIG.7, BS 603, UEs 605 607, S727, [0101]: Near UE #1 607 may also transmit a signal (for example, an RACH signal) to the serving BS 603 in S72; far UE 605 may also transmit a signal (for example, an RACH signal) to the serving BS 603 in S731); determining the first terminal as a near terminal based on preconfigured criteria (Chae, [0062]: UE#1 607 having a high minimum required received SINR is referred to as a near UE); determining the second terminal as a far terminal based on the preconfigured criteria (Chae, [0062]: UE 605 having a low minimum required received SINR is referred to as a far UE). Chae does not expressly teach transmitting, to the first terminal and the second terminal, one or more downlink configuration information (DCIs) including a non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) indicator indicating that second messages, which are responses to the first messages of the first terminal and the second terminal, are to be respectively transmitted in a NOMA scheme; and transmitting the second messages to the first terminal and the second terminal based on the one or more DCIs . Zhu teaches transmitting, to the first terminal and the second terminal, one or more downlink configuration information (DCIs) including a non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) indicator indicating that second messages, which are responses to the first messages of the first terminal and the second terminal, are to be respectively transmitted in a NOMA scheme (Zhu, FIG.1, UE 110, 115, eNB 130, [0012, 43]: The eNB 130 selects at least two UE for NOMA communications, with a UE 110 (“1st UE”) to receive a higher power NOMA subframe and a UE 115 (“2nd UE”) to receive a lower power subframe, FIG.2, DCI 202, 203, NOMA data 206, 208, [0021]: first DCI 202 and first higher power NOMA data 206 may be directed to UE 110 (“1ST UE”) from eNB 130, and 2nd DCI 203 may be associated with 1st lower power NOMA data 208 and directed to UE 115 (“2nd UE”)); and transmitting the second messages to the first terminal and the second terminal based on the one or more DCIs (Zhu, FIG.2, subframe 201, [0013, 45]: The eNB130 transmits the first NOMA subframe 201 to UE 110 and UE 115 based on the DCIs) . Prior to the effective filing date of invention, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to implement the “dynamic NOMA communications” of Zhu into the invention of Chae. The suggestion/motivation would have been for performing dynamic NOMA communications to improve eNB throughput (Zhu, [0017]). Including the “dynamic NOMA communications” of Zhu into the invention of Chae was within the ordinary ability of one of ordinary skill in the art based on the teachings of Zhu. Regarding Claim 2, Chae-Zhu teaches, the method according to claim 1, wherein when a first reception power of the first message of the first terminal is equal to a target reception power, the first terminal is determined as the near terminal, and when a second reception power of the first message of the second terminal is less than the target reception power, the second terminal is determined as the far terminal (Chae, FIG.6A, [0090]: the serving BS 603 is close to near UE #1 607 (“1st UE”) and is spaced apart from the far UE 605 (“2nd UE”). Accordingly, strength of power of the serving BS 603 received from near UE #1 607 is larger than strength of power received from the far UE 605). Regarding Claim 3, Chae-Zhu teaches, the method according to claim 1, wherein when a same transmission power is configured for the first messages of the first terminal and the second terminal, and a first reception power of the first message of the first terminal is greater than a second reception power of the first message of the second terminal, the first terminal is determined as the near terminal, and the second terminal is determined as the far terminal (Chae, FIG.6A, [0090]: the serving BS 603 is close to near UE #1 607 and is spaced apart from the far UE 605. Accordingly, strength of power of the serving BS 603 received from near UE #1 607 is larger than strength of power received from the far UE 605). Regarding Claim 4, Chae-Zhu teaches, the method according to claim 1, wherein a number of the one or more DCIs is 1, and one DCI belonging to the one or more DCIs further includes resource allocation information and a power allocation coefficient for transmission of the second message based on the NOMA scheme (Zhu, [0044]: determining a first power ratio associated with the higher power NOMA communications and a second power ratio associated with the lower power NOMA communications; creating a first DCI 202 for the first UE 110, a second DCI 203 for the second UE 115, and generating the transmission data 206, 208 by scaling the data for each UE with the appropriate power ratio, and then summing the scaled data). Regarding Claim 5, Chae-Zhu teaches, the method according to claim 4, wherein the transmitting of the second messages to the first terminal and the second terminal based on the one or more DCIs comprises: transmitting, to the first terminal, the second message using a first transmission power determined based on a value indicated by the power allocation coefficient on a physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH) indicated by the resource allocation information included in the one DCI; and transmitting, to the second terminal, the second message using a second transmission power determined based on (1 - the value indicated by the power allocation coefficient) on the PDSCH indicated by the resource allocation information included in the one DCI (Zhu, FIG.2, air interface 120, subframe 201, [0045]: transmitting the first NOMA subframe 201 via an air interface 120 as a first wireless signal to the first UE 110 and the second UE 115; Zhu, [0020]: A power ratio of 1 means that there was no summing of multiple signals and a signal is therefore not a NOMA signal as described herein). Regarding Claim 6, Chae-Zhu teaches, the method according to claim 1, wherein a number of the one or more DCIs is 2, a first DCI among the one or more DCIs further includes first resource allocation information and a terminal indicator indicating the near terminal, and a second DCI among the one or more DCIs further includes second resource allocation information and a terminal indicator indicating the far terminal (Zhu, [0043]: selecting a first UE 110 (“far UE”) associated with the eNB 130 to receive higher power NOMA communications; a second UE 115 (“near UE”) different than the first UE110 to receive lower power NOMA communications as part of a NOMA pair with the first UE 110 (“near UE”)). Regarding Claim 7, Chae-Zhu teaches, the method according to claim 6, wherein the transmitting of the second messages to the first terminal and the second terminal based on the one or more DCIs comprises: transmitting the second message to the first terminal on a first PDSCH indicated by the first resource allocation information included in the first DCI; and transmitting the second message to the second terminal on a second PDSCH indicated by the second resource allocation information included in the second DCI (Zhu, FIG.2, air interface 120, subframe 201, [0045]: transmitting the first NOMA subframe 201 via an air interface 120 as a first wireless signal to the first UE 110 and the second UE 115). Regarding Claim 8, Chae-Zhu teaches, the method according to claim 1, wherein a number of the one or more DCIs is 1, and one DCI belonging to the one or more DCIs further includes common resource allocation information for the near terminal and the far terminal and additional resource allocation information for the far terminal (Zhu, FIG.2, subframe 221, DCI 222, OFDMA data 226, [0022]: subframe 221 includes DCI 222. DCI 222 is associated with OFDMA data 226, and may be directed to UE 110). Regarding Claim 10, Chae-Zhu teaches, the method according to claim 8, wherein the transmitting of the second messages to the first terminal and the second terminal based on the one or more DCIs comprises: transmitting the second message to the first terminal on a first PDSCH indicated by the common resource allocation information included in the one DCI (Zhu, FIG.2, subframe 221, DCI 222, [0022]: A single UE may receive NOMA data and OMA data from the same eNB as part of the same frame of data, for example Subframe 221 includes fifth DCI 222. Fifth DCI 222 is associated with OFDMA data 226, and may be directed to UE 110); and transmitting the second message to the second terminal on a second PDSCH indicated by the common resource allocation information and the additional resource allocation information included in the one DCI (Zhu, FIG.2, [0022]: a single frame of data may include many combinations of data types, including NOMA data to the second UE and a OMA data in the same frame). Regarding Claim 11, Chae-Zhu teaches, the method according to claim 1, wherein the first message of each of the first terminal and the second terminal is a Msg1 or MsgA, and the second message is a Msg2 or MsgB (Chae, FIG.7, BS 603, UEs 605 607, S727,S731 [0101]: Near UE #1 607 may also transmit a signal (an RACH signal) (“Msg1”) to the serving BS 603 in S727. far UE 605 may also transmit a signal (for example, an RACH signal) (“Msg1”) to the serving BS 603 in steps 731. Zhu, [0013, 45]: The eNB130 transmits the generated higher power NOMA data (“Msg2”) to UE 110, or lower power NOMA data (“Msg2”) to UE 115). Regarding Claim 12, Chae teaches, a method of a terminal, comprising: transmitting a first message to a base station in a random access channel (RACH) occasion (RO) (Chae, FIG.7, BS 603, UEs 605 607, S727, S731, [0101]: Near UE #1 607 transmits a signal (for example, an RACH signal) to the serving BS 603 in S727; far UE 605 transmits a signal (for example, an RACH signal) to the serving BS 603 in steps 731); determining a type of the terminal as a near terminal or a far terminal based on preconfigured criteria (Chae, [0062]: UE#1 607 having a high minimum required received SINR is referred to as a near UE; UE 605 having a low minimum required received SINR is referred to as a far UE). Chae does not expressly teach receiving, from the base station, one or more downlink control information (DCIs) for scheduling a second message, which is a response to the first message ; in response to that the one or more DCIs include a non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) indicator indicating that the second message is to be transmitted based on a NOMA scheme; and receiving the second message from the base station based on the determined type. Zhu teaches receiving, from the base station, one or more downlink control information (DCIs) for scheduling a second message, which is a response to the first message (Zhu, FIG.1, UE 110, 115, eNB130, [0012, 43]: The eNB selects at least two UE for NOMA communications, with a UE 110 (“1st UE”) to receive a higher power NOMA subframe and a UE 115 (“2nd UE”) to receive a lower power subframe); in response to that the one or more DCIs include a non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) indicator indicating that the second message is to be transmitted based on a NOMA scheme (Zhu, FIG.2, DCI 202, 203, NOMA data 206, 208, [0021]: first DCI 202 and first higher power NOMA data 206 (“2nd message”) may be directed to UE 110 (“1st UE”) from eNB 130, and 2nd DCI 203 may be associated with 1st lower power NOMA data 208 (“2nd message”) and directed to UE 115 (“2nd UE”); and receiving the second message from the base station based on the determined type (Zhu, FIG.2, subframe 201, [0013, 45]: The eNB130 transmits the first NOMA subframe 201 to UE 110 and UE 115 based on the DCIs). Prior to the effective filing date of invention, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to implement the “dynamic NOMA communications” of Zhu into the invention of Chae. The suggestion/motivation would have been for performing dynamic NOMA communications to improve eNB throughput (Zhu, [0017]). Including the “dynamic NOMA communications” of Zhu into the invention of Chae was within the ordinary ability of one of ordinary skill in the art based on the teachings of Zhu. Regarding Claim 13, Chae-Zhu teaches, the method according to claim 12, wherein when the first message is transmitted using a transmission power less than a maximum transmission power, the terminal is determined as the near terminal, and when the first message is transmitted using a transmission power equal to the maximum transmission power, the terminal is determined as the far terminal (Chae, FIG.6A, [0090]: the serving BS 603 is close to near UE #1 607 (“1st UE”) and is spaced apart from the far UE 605 (“2nd UE”). Accordingly, strength of power of the serving BS 603 received from near UE #1 607 is larger than strength of power received from the far UE 605). Regarding Claim 15, Chae-Zhu teaches, the method according to claim 12, wherein a number of the one or more DCIs is 1, one DCI belonging to the one or more DCIs further includes resource allocation information and a power allocation coefficient for transmission of the second message based on the NOMA scheme (Zhu, [0044]: determining a first power ratio associated with the higher power NOMA communications and a second power ratio associated with the lower power NOMA communications; creating a first DCI 202 for the first UE 110, a second DCI 203 for the second UE 115, and generating the transmission data 206, 208 by scaling the data for each UE with the appropriate power ratio, and then summing the scaled data), the second message is received on a physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH) indicated by the resource allocation information, and the second message is decoded in consideration of the power allocation coefficient (Zhu, FIG.2, air interface 120, subframe 201, [0045]: transmitting the first NOMA subframe 201 via an air interface 120 as a first wireless signal to the first UE 110). Regarding Claim 16, Chae-Zhu teaches, the method according to claim 12, wherein a number of the one or more DCIs is 2, a first DCI among the one or more DCIs further includes first resource allocation information and a terminal indicator indicating the near terminal, a second DCI among the one or more DCIs further includes second resource allocation information and a terminal indicator indicating the far terminal (Zhu, [0043]: selecting a first UE 110 (“far UE”) associated with the eNB 130 to receive higher power NOMA communications; a second UE 115 (“near UE”) different than the first UE110 to receive lower power NOMA communications as part of a NOMA pair with the first UE 110 (“near UE”)), and the second message is received based on a DCI corresponding to the determined type among the first DCI and the second DCI (Zhu, FIG.2, air interface 120, subframe 201, [0045]: transmitting the first NOMA subframe 201 via an air interface 120 as a first wireless signal to the first UE 110 and the second UE 115). Regarding Claim 17, Chae-Zhu teaches, the method according to claim 12, wherein a number of the one or more DCIs is 1, one DCI belonging to the one or more DCIs further includes common resource allocation information for the near terminal and the far terminal and additional resource allocation information for the far terminal (Zhu, FIG.2, subframe 221, DCI 222, OFDMA data 226, [0022]: subframe 221 includes DCI 222. DCI 222 is associated with OFDMA data 226, and may be directed to UE 110), the second message is received on a first PDSCH indicated by the common resource allocation information when the terminal is the near terminal (Zhu, FIG.2, subframe 221, DCI 222, [0022]: A single UE may receive NOMA data and OMA data from the same eNB as part of the same frame of data, for example Subframe 221 includes fifth DCI 222. Fifth DCI 222 is associated with OFDMA data 226, and may be directed to UE 110), and the second message is received on a second PDSCH indicated by the common resource allocation information and the additional resource allocation information when the terminal is the far terminal (Zhu, FIG.2, [0022]: a single frame of data may include many combinations of data types, including NOMA data to the second UE and a OMA data in the same frame). Regarding Claim 18, Chae teaches, a terminal comprising at least one processor, wherein the at least one processor causes the terminal to perform (Chae, FIG.11, controller 1103, [0121]: UE includes transceiver 1101 and a controller 1103): transmitting a first message to a base station in a random access channel (RACH) occasion (RO) (Chae, FIG.7, BS 603, UEs 605 607, S727, S731, [0101]: Near UE #1 607 transmits a signal (for example, an RACH signal) to the serving BS 603 in S727; far UE 605 transmits a signal (for example, an RACH signal) to the serving BS 603 in S731); determining a type of the terminal as a near terminal or a far terminal based on preconfigured criteria (Chae, [0062]: UE#1 607 having a high minimum required received SINR is referred to as a near UE; UE 605 having a low minimum required received SINR is referred to as a far UE). Chae does not expressly teach receiving, from the base station, one or more downlink control information (DCIs) for scheduling a second message, which is a response to the first message; in response to that the one or more DCIs include a non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) indicator indicating that the second message is to be transmitted based on a NOMA scheme; and receiving the second message from the base station based on the determined type. Zhu teaches, receiving, from the base station, one or more downlink control information (DCIs) for scheduling a second message, which is a response to the first message (Zhu, FIG.1, UE 110, 115, eNB130, [0012, 43]: The eNB selects at least two UE for NOMA communications, with a UE 110 (“1st UE”) to receive a higher power NOMA subframe and a UE 115 (“2nd UE”) to receive a lower power subframe); in response to that the one or more DCIs include a non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) indicator indicating that the second message is to be transmitted based on a NOMA scheme (Zhu, FIG.2, DCI 202, 203, NOMA data 206, 208, [0021]: first DCI 202 and first higher power NOMA data 206 (“2nd message”) may be directed to UE 110 (“1ST UE”) from eNB 130, and 2nd DCI 203 may be associated with 1st lower power NOMA data 208 (“2nd message”) and directed to UE 115 (“2nd UE”)); and receiving the second message from the base station based on the determined type (Zhu, [0013, 45]: The eNB130 transmits the generated higher power NOMA data to UE 110, or lower power NOMA data to UE 115). Prior to the effective filing date of invention, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to implement the “dynamic NOMA communications” of Zhu into the invention of Chae. The suggestion/motivation would have been for performing dynamic NOMA communications to improve eNB throughput (Zhu, [0017]). Including the “dynamic NOMA communications” of Zhu into the invention of Chae was within the ordinary ability of one of ordinary skill in the art based on the teachings of Zhu. Regarding Claim 19, Chae-Zhu teaches, the terminal according to claim 18, wherein when the first message is transmitted using a transmission power less than a maximum transmission power, the terminal is determined as the near terminal, and when the first message is transmitted using a transmission power equal to the maximum transmission power, the terminal is determined as the far terminal (Chae, FIG.6A, [0090]: the serving BS 603 is close to near UE #1 607 (“1st UE”) and is spaced apart from the far UE 605 (“2nd UE”). Accordingly, strength of power of the serving BS 603 received from near UE #1 607 is larger than strength of power received from the far UE 605). Regarding Claim 20, Chae-Zhu teaches, the terminal according to claim 18, wherein a number of the one or more DCIs is 1, one DCI belonging to the one or more DCIs further includes resource allocation information and a power allocation coefficient for transmission of the second message based on the NOMA scheme (Zhu, [0044]: determining a first power ratio associated with the higher power NOMA communications and a second power ratio associated with the lower power NOMA communications; creating a first DCI 202 for the first UE 110, a second DCI 203 for the second UE 115, and generating the transmission data 206, 208 by scaling the data for each UE with the appropriate power ratio, and then summing the scaled data), the second message is received on a physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH) indicated by the resource allocation information, and the second message is decoded in consideration of the power allocation coefficient (Zhu, FIG.2, air interface 120, subframe 201, [0045]: transmitting the first NOMA subframe 201 via an air interface 120 as a first wireless signal to the first UE 110). 4.4. Claim 9 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over by Chae et al., (“Chae”, US 2017/0251462 A1) in view of Zhu et al., (“Zhu”, US 2015/0351081 A1), and further in view of Zhu et al.. (“Zhu2”, US 2015/0312074 A1). Regarding Claim 9, Chae-Zhu teaches, the method according to claim 8, but not expressly teaches wherein the one DCI further includes first modulation and coding scheme (MCS) information for the near terminal and second MCS information for the far terminal. Zhu2 teaches (Zhu2, [0026]: In each pair of UEs for potential NOMA transmission, the UE with the higher channel gain (e.g., higher SINR, etc.) is the first UE (“near UE1”), while the UE with the lower channel gain (e.g., lower SINR, etc.) is second UE (“far UE2”); Zhu2, [0033]: determine a MCS for the second data signal (e.g., based at least in part on one or more of the SINR of far UE2). Prior to the effective filing date of invention, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to implement the “dynamic NOMA communications” of Zhu2 into the invention of Chae-Zhu. The suggestion/motivation would have been enabled node-B dynamically switches between OMA and NOMA to improve data throughput (Zhu2, [0061]). Including the “dynamic NOMA communications” of Zhu2 into the invention of Chae-Zhu was within the ordinary ability of one of ordinary skill in the art based on the teachings of Zhu2. 4.5. Claim 14 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over by Chae et al., (“Chae”, US 2017/0251462 A1) in view of Zhu et al., (“Zhu”, US 2015/0351081 A1), and further in view of Kim et al., (“Kim”, US 2017/0289921 A1). Regarding Claim 14, Chae-Zhu teaches, the method according to claim 12, but not expressly teaches wherein when a path loss between the terminal and the base station is less than or equal to a reference path loss, the terminal is determined as the near terminal, and when the path loss between the terminal and the base station is greater than the reference path loss, the terminal is determined as the far terminal. Kim teaches (Kim, [0093]: for the mobile terminal that is close to the base station and thus has the small path loss, for the mobile terminal that is far away from the base station and thus has a large path loss). Prior to the effective filing date of invention, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to implement the “controlling uplink transmission power” of Kim into the invention of Chae-Zhu. The suggestion/motivation would have been enabled controlling uplink transmission power of a mobile terminal to reduce battery consumption. Including the “path loss” of Kim into the invention of Chae-Zhu was within the ordinary ability of one of ordinary skill in the art based on the teachings of Kim. Conclusion 5. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant’s disclosure. Wu et al., US 20210/266124 A1, Configuration Of UE For NOMA Transmission By Base Station, Involves Responsive To First Trigger, Configuring, By Base Station, First UE To Perform NOMA Transmission. 6. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHHIAN (AMY) LING whose telephone number is (571)270-1074. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-6 ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, BRIAN J GILLIS can be reached on (571) 272-7952. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272- 1000. /C.L/Examiner, Art Unit 2446 /BRIAN J. GILLIS/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2446
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 04, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598534
PATH STUDY AND ANTENNA LOCATING SYSTEMS AND METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12563322
Method for The Networked Monitoring of At Least One Object
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12556425
PASSING CONNECTED DEVICE IDENTITY TO SERVICE IN CUSTOMER-PREMISES EQUIPMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12527718
Systems and Methods for Controlling Pool/Spa Devices
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Patent 12524280
TECHNIQUES FOR CONSISTENT MULTI-TENANT BEHAVIOR IN MICROSERVICES BASED APPLICATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+27.6%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 441 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month