Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/528,515

AUTONOMOUS DRIVING ROBOT AND ARTICLE TRANSPORT METHOD USING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Dec 04, 2023
Priority
Dec 09, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0171864
Examiner
HAGEMAN, MARK C
Art Unit
3652
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
574 granted / 776 resolved
+22.0% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
799
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
66.1%
+26.1% vs TC avg
§102
14.3%
-25.7% vs TC avg
§112
17.4%
-22.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 776 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Applicant is advised that should claim 4 be found allowable, claim 13 will be objected to under 37 CFR 1.75 as being a substantial duplicate thereof. When two claims in an application are duplicates or else are so close in content that they both cover the same thing, despite a slight difference in wording, it is proper after allowing one claim to object to the other as being a substantial duplicate of the allowed claim. See MPEP § 608.01(m). It seems likely that claim 13 should depend from claim 12, but as drafted it depends from claim 1. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US 10,343,881 to Guo. Regarding claim 1 Guo discloses an autonomous driving robot comprising: a storage unit comprising a housing (combination of side walls of shelves and base portion), which provides a space for storing an article, and a shelf (182/184) which is provided inside the housing and configured such that the article is loaded on the shelf (figure 1); a manipulator (140) comprising a linear actuator (vertical movement mechanism) which is provided inside the housing and extends in a vertical direction (see figure 1), and a selective compliance articulated robot arm (SCARA arm) (142), which is coupled to the linear actuator; and a transport unit (124) coupled to the storage unit and configured to move the storage unit, wherein a plurality of shelves are provided in the storage unit, some of the shelves are provided adjacent to one inner wall of the housing and spaced apart from each other in the vertical direction (182), and the other shelves are provided adjacent to another inner wall which faces the one inner wall and spaced apart from each other in the vertical direction, and wherein the plurality of shelves extend in a horizontal direction toward a central axis of the housing (184 and figure 1), the central axis extending vertically at a center of the housing, and the plurality of shelves do not vertically overlap the central axis of the housing (see figure 1). Regarding claim 2 Guo discloses the transport unit is coupled to a bottom surface of the storage unit and configured to move on a floor (figure 1). Regarding claim 3 Guo discloses the SCARA arm comprises a first arm (see figure 1 section with pivots on both ends) and a second arm (outer section to which 144 is connected), one end of the first arm is coupled to the linear actuator (see figure 1), and the other end of the first arm at the opposite end from the one end is coupled to one end of the second arm (figure 1) the first arm is configured to rotate, on an X-Y plane, about a first axis that is located at an end portion of the first arm adjacent to the one end of the first arm at which the first arm is coupled to the linear actuator, and the second arm is configured to rotate, on an X-Y plane, about a second axis that is located at another end portion of the first arm adjacent to the other end of the first arm at which the second arm is coupled to the first arm. When the arm is located in a horizontal plane/position it meets the claim language. Regarding claim 4 Guo discloses the second arm is coupled to a bottom surface of the other end of the first arm. When the arm is located in a horizontal plane/position it meets the claim language. Regarding claim 13 see discussion of claims 3 and 4 above. Regarding claim 5 Guo discloses the SCARA arm further comprises a hand (144) that is coupled to the second arm, and the hand is configured to be coupled to or detached from the article (col. 2 lines 45-50). Regarding claims 6 and 15 Guo discloses an opening is formed in one side of the housing (see figure 1), the opening of the housing is configured such that the article is carried in or taken out (area where arm extends), through the opening, the housing comprises a pair of first side walls perpendicular to the side of the housing including the opening (ends of 182/184), some of the shelves are arranged adjacent to one of the first side walls (see figure 1), and the other shelves are arranged adjacent to the other first side wall that faces the one of the first side walls (figure 1), and an area of each of the first side walls is smaller than an area of a side wall perpendicular to each of the first side walls (see figure 1, the perpendicular side wall also includes the lower portion below the opening). Regarding claims 7, 11 and 17, these claims are directed to the article being handled which is not a required element of the claim and does not limit the structure of the apparatus. See MPEP 2115. Guo is capable of handling an article with a door, and the door of the article is configured to face the first side wall adjacent to the shelf when the article is loaded on the shelf and the article comprises a front open unified pod (FOUP) and thus reads on the claims as currently drafted. Regarding claims 8 and 16 Guo discloses four shelves are provided in the storage unit, and two of the four shelves are provided on one of the first side walls of the housing, and the other two shelves are provided on the other first side wall that faces the one of the first side walls (see figure 1 showing more than 4 shelves arranged on both sides). Regarding claims 9 and 14 Guo discloses the storage unit further comprises a coupling member which is provided inside the housing and configured to connect the manipulator and the housing to each other (see connection between 140 and 124). Regarding claim 10 Guo discloses coupling member further comprises a frame which is coupled to one inner wall of the housing and configured to be coupled to and detached from the linear actuator (see figure 1 and rotatable base of 140). Regarding claim 12 Guo discloses an autonomous driving robot comprising: a storage unit comprising a housing, which provides a space for storing an article, and a shelf which is provided inside the housing and configured such that the article is loaded on the shelf (combination of side walls of shelves and base portion and figure 1); a manipulator (140) comprising a linear actuator (vertical slide of 140), which is provided inside the housing and extends in a vertical direction (figure 1), and a selective compliance articulated robot arm (SCARA arm) (142), which is coupled to the linear actuator; and a transport unit (124) coupled to a bottom surface of the storage unit and configured to move on a floor, wherein a plurality of shelves are provided in the storage unit, some of the shelves are provided adjacent to one inner wall of the housing and spaced apart from each other in the vertical direction, and the other shelves are provided adjacent to another inner wall which faces the one inner wall and spaced apart from each other in the vertical direction, and the plurality of shelves extend horizontally toward a central axis of the housing (see figure 182/184 and figure 1), the central axis extending vertically at a center of the housing, and the plurality of shelves do not vertically overlap the central axis of the housing (see figure 1), wherein the SCARA arm comprises at least two horizontal joints (see figure 1 when arm is in horizontal position). Claim(s) 1-2, 6-12, 14-19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US 2022/0258658 to Iwamoto (citation below of US 12,030,715 for any col/line numbering). Regarding claim 1 Iwamoto discloses an autonomous driving robot comprising: a storage unit comprising a housing (140a and 140b in figure 1), which provides a space for storing an article, and a shelf (50) which is provided inside the housing and configured such that the article is loaded on the shelf (142); a manipulator (120) comprising a linear actuator (vertical movement mechanism) which is provided inside the housing and extends in a vertical direction (see figure 1), and a selective compliance articulated robot arm (SCARA arm) (124), which is coupled to the linear actuator; and a transport unit (111) coupled to the storage unit and configured to move the storage unit, wherein a plurality of shelves are provided in the storage unit, some of the shelves are provided adjacent to one inner wall of the housing and spaced apart from each other in the vertical direction (140a), and the other shelves are provided adjacent to another inner wall which faces the one inner wall and spaced apart from each other in the vertical direction, and wherein the plurality of shelves extend in a horizontal direction toward a central axis of the housing (140b and figure 1), the central axis extending vertically at a center of the housing, and the plurality of shelves do not vertically overlap the central axis of the housing (see figure 1). Regarding claim 2 Iwamoto discloses the transport unit is coupled to a bottom surface of the storage unit and configured to move on a floor (figure 1). Regarding claims 6 and 15 Iwamoto discloses an opening is formed in one side of the housing (see figure 1), the opening of the housing is configured such that the article is carried in or taken out (central area), through the opening, the housing comprises a pair of first side walls perpendicular to the side of the housing including the opening (ends of 140) some of the shelves are arranged adjacent to one of the first side walls (see figure 1), and the other shelves are arranged adjacent to the other first side wall that faces the one of the first side walls (figure 1), and an area of each of the first side walls is smaller than an area of a side wall perpendicular to each of the first side walls (see figure 1, the perpendicular side wall also includes the lower portion below the opening). Regarding claims 7, 11 and 17, these claims are directed to the article being handled which is not a required element of the claim and does not limit the structure of the apparatus. See MPEP 2115. Iwamoto is capable of handling an article with a door, and the door of the article is configured to face the first side wall adjacent to the shelf when the article is loaded on the shelf and the article comprises a front open unified pod (FOUP) and thus reads on the claims as currently drafted. Regarding claims 8 and 16 Iwamoto discloses four shelves are provided in the storage unit, and two of the four shelves are provided on one of the first side walls of the housing, and the other two shelves are provided on the other first side wall that faces the one of the first side walls (see figure 1 showing more than 4 shelves arranged on both sides). Regarding claims 9 and 14 Iwamoto discloses the storage unit further comprises a coupling member which is provided inside the housing and configured to connect the manipulator and the housing to each other (see connection between 120 and 111). Regarding claim 10 Iwamoto discloses coupling member further comprises a frame which is coupled to one inner wall of the housing and configured to be coupled to and detached from the linear actuator (see connection between 120 and 111). Regarding claim 12 Iwamoto discloses an autonomous driving robot comprising: a storage unit comprising a housing, which provides a space for storing an article, and a shelf which is provided inside the housing and configured such that the article is loaded on the shelf (140a and 140b in figure 1); a manipulator (120) comprising a linear actuator (vertical slide of 120), which is provided inside the housing and extends in a vertical direction (figure 1), and a selective compliance articulated robot arm (SCARA arm) (124), which is coupled to the linear actuator; and a transport unit (111) coupled to a bottom surface of the storage unit and configured to move on a floor, wherein a plurality of shelves are provided in the storage unit, some of the shelves are provided adjacent to one inner wall of the housing and spaced apart from each other in the vertical direction, and the other shelves are provided adjacent to another inner wall which faces the one inner wall and spaced apart from each other in the vertical direction, and the plurality of shelves extend horizontally toward a central axis of the housing (see figure 140a/140b and figure 1), the central axis extending vertically at a center of the housing, and the plurality of shelves do not vertically overlap the central axis of the housing (see figure 1), wherein the SCARA arm comprises at least two horizontal joints (see figure 1). Regarding claim 18 Iwamoto discloses an article transport method comprising: transmitting an operation instruction signal from a central control system to an autonomous driving robot, wherein the autonomous driving robot transmits a response signal to the central control system in response to the operation instruction signal (see col. 2 lines 64-67 and col. 5 lines 10-20); moving the autonomous driving robot to a manual port of a stocker (locating the agv to where a pick up/drop off is to occur); and starting loading or unloading of an article by the autonomous driving robot (handling an article with 120), wherein the autonomous driving robot comprises: a storage unit comprising a housing, which provides a space for storing an article, and a shelf, which is provided inside the housing and on which the article is loaded; a manipulator comprising a linear actuator, which is provided inside the housing and extends in a vertical direction, and a selective compliance articulated robot arm (SCARA arm), which is coupled to the linear actuator; and a transport unit coupled to a bottom surface of the storage unit and configured to move on a floor, wherein the SCARA arm comprises at least two horizontal joints (see discussion above re claim 1 and 12). Regarding claim 19 Iwamoto discloses four shelves are provided in the storage unit, two of the four shelves are provided adjacent to one inner wall of the housing and spaced apart from each other in the vertical direction, and the other two shelves are provided adjacent to another inner wall of the housing, which faces the one inner wall, and spaced apart from each other in the vertical direction (see figure 1 and discussion above). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Iwamoto in view of Guo. Iwamoto discloses all the limitations of the claim except the SCARA arm comprises a first arm and a second arm, one end of the first arm is coupled to the linear actuator, and the other end of the first arm at the opposite end from the one end is coupled to one end of the second arm, the first arm rotates, on an X-Y plane, about a first axis that is located at an end portion adjacent to the one end of the first arm at which the first arm is coupled to the linear actuator, and the second arm rotates, on an X-Y plane, about a second axis that is located at another end portion adjacent to the other end of the first arm at which the second arm is coupled to the first arm, wherein the second arm is coupled to a bottom surface of the other end of the first arm. Guo teaches a system including the SCARA arm comprises a first arm and a second arm, one end of the first arm is coupled to the linear actuator, and the other end of the first arm at the opposite end from the one end is coupled to one end of the second arm, the first arm rotates, on an X-Y plane, about a first axis that is located at an end portion adjacent to the one end of the first arm at which the first arm is coupled to the linear actuator, and the second arm rotates, on an X-Y plane, about a second axis that is located at another end portion adjacent to the other end of the first arm at which the second arm is coupled to the first arm, wherein the second arm is coupled to a bottom surface of the other end of the first arm (see discussion of claims 3, 4, and 13 above) in order to load and unload both articles and shelving units (col. 2 lines 45-50). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of Applicants’ claim to have modified Iwamoto to include the SCARA arm comprises a first arm and a second arm, one end of the first arm is coupled to the linear actuator, and the other end of the first arm at the opposite end from the one end is coupled to one end of the second arm, the first arm rotates, on an X-Y plane, about a first axis that is located at an end portion adjacent to the one end of the first arm at which the first arm is coupled to the linear actuator, and the second arm rotates, on an X-Y plane, about a second axis that is located at another end portion adjacent to the other end of the first arm at which the second arm is coupled to the first arm, wherein the second arm is coupled to a bottom surface of the other end of the first arm, as taught by Guo, in order to load and unload both articles and shelving units. This could include using the Guo system according the control scheme discussed in Iwamoto as such usage is the typical manner in which such AGV systems are utilized to handle articles. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Additional cited references show other AGV with shelves and robotic manipulators/arms. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MARK C HAGEMAN whose telephone number is (571)272-5547. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 8:15-4:45 (PST). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Saul Rodriguez can be reached at 571-272-7097. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MARK C HAGEMAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3652
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 04, 2023
Application Filed
May 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jun 30, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jun 30, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679706
SOLAR PANEL INSTALLATION SYSTEM
2y 12m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12679707
LOW FRICTION SKID BARS FOR MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENT
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673818
Automated Warehouse
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12662359
DEVICES AND METHODS FOR LOADING AN ASSEMBLED SOLAR TABLE ONTO A MOBILE TRANSPORT
3y 7m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12662311
AN AUTOMATED SMALL PARTS SHUTTLE RACKING SYSTEM
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+15.7%)
2y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 776 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month