Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/529,275

Pin and Grommet Assembly

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Dec 05, 2023
Priority
Dec 06, 2022 — provisional 63/430,406 +1 more
Examiner
BATES, ZAKIYA W
Art Unit
3674
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Illinois Tool Works Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allowance Rate
1165 granted / 1311 resolved
+36.9% vs TC avg
Minimal -2% lift
Without
With
+-2.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
1332
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§103
33.8%
-6.2% vs TC avg
§102
37.2%
-2.8% vs TC avg
§112
14.6%
-25.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1311 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, claims 1-12 in the reply filed on 7/21/26 is acknowledged. Specification The abstract of the disclosure is objected to because the term “Disclosed is” is stated in line 1. A corrected abstract of the disclosure is required and must be presented on a separate sheet, apart from any other text. See MPEP § 608.01(b). Applicant is reminded of the proper language and format for an abstract of the disclosure. The abstract should be in narrative form and generally limited to a single paragraph on a separate sheet within the range of 50 to 150 words in length. The abstract should describe the disclosure sufficiently to assist readers in deciding whether there is a need for consulting the full patent text for details. The language should be clear and concise and should not repeat information given in the title. It should avoid using phrases which can be implied, such as, “The disclosure concerns,” “The disclosure defined by this invention,” “The disclosure describes,” etc. In addition, the form and legal phraseology often used in patent claims, such as “means” and “said,” should be avoided. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by GOKAVI ET AL (US 20210239147). With respect to claim 1, GOKAVI ET AL discloses a pin and grommet (P&G) fastener assembly 100 for forming a connection between a first component 500 and a second component 502, the P&G fastener assembly comprising: a grommet 102 comprising a body 106 and a collar 108, wherein the body is configured to couple with the second component via an opening therein; and a fastener 104 comprising a head portion 126 and a shank portion 124 extending therefrom, wherein the fastener is configured to retain the first component relative to the second component via the grommet, and wherein the shank portion defines a shaft comprising a first shaft portion 124 having a first diameter and a second shaft portion (128, 130) having a second diameter that is less than the first diameter. See especially Fig. 1 and 5. With respect to claim 2, GOKAVI ET AL teaches wherein the second shaft portion (128, 130) comprises a ratcheting feature configured to engage the grommet. With respect to claim 3, GOKAVI ET AL teaches wherein the ratcheting feature comprises a plurality of annular valleys (128, 130). With respect to claim 4, GOKAVI ET AL teaches wherein the body comprises a first body portion 114 and a second body portion 106 having a diameter that is less than that of the first body portion. With respect to claim 7, GOKAVI ET AL teaches wherein the shank portion defines a sloped portion between the first shaft portion and the second shaft portion to provide a smooth transition between the first diameter and the second diameter. See especially Fig. 1. With respect to claim 11, GOKAVI ET AL teaches wherein the shank portion defines a conical tip at a distal end of the second shaft portion, wherein a maximum diameter of the conical tip is less than or equal to the second diameter. See especially Fig. 1. With respect to claim 12, GOKAVI ET AL teaches wherein the head portion is configured to couple with a doghouse structure of the first component. See especially Figs. 5 and 6. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 5, 6, and 8-10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over GOKAVI ET AL alone, or in the alternative in view of SANTAPURI ET AL (US 20240077099). With respect to claim 5, GOKAVI ET AL fails to explicitly teach wherein the first body portion comprises one or more retention wings configured to engage the second component via the opening as claimed. However, flexible snaps 114 provide the same function as the instantly claimed. Therefore, it would be considered an obvious substitution. With respect to claim 6, GOKAVI ET AL fails to explicitly teach wherein the second body portion comprises one or more pawls configured to engage the fastener via a ratcheting feature formed in or on the second shaft portion as claimed. However, flexible snaps 114 provide the same function as the instantly claimed. Therefore, it would be considered an obvious substitution. With respect to claim 8, GOKAVI ET AL fails to explicitly teach further comprising a flexible seal that is integrally coupled with the collar as claimed. However, GOKAVI ET AL teaches proving a seal for a waterproof fastener. SANTAPURI ET AL teaches a pin and grommet fastener assembly flexible seal 28 for the purpose of to seal the interface between the grommet 16 and the pin 18. See SANTAPURI ET AL, Fig. 5, [0063]. Therefore, it would be considered obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the present application to provide for a seal in order seal the interface between the grommet and pin/fastener. With respect to claim 9, GOKAVI ET AL in view of SANTAPURI ET AL teaches wherein the flexible seal is fabricated from a first material and the grommet is fabricated from a second material that is different from the first material as claimed. See SANTAPURI ET AL, Fig. 5, [0063], [0066]. With respect to claim 10, GOKAVI ET AL in view of SANTAPURI ET AL fails to explicitly teach wherein the grommet and the flexible seal are fabricated to form a grommet assembly via a two-shot injection process or an over-molding process as claimed. However, it would be considered an obvious expedient to form such an assembly via any known method in the art. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 2007/0172327 teaches a fastener assembly that includes a grommet and a pin. The grommet may include a collar integrally formed with a plurality of legs, wherein an opening is formed through the collar. The pin is moveable through the opening between pre-driven and driven positions. The pin may include a plurality of flexible pin compression members connected to a ramp. The plurality of flexible pin compression members and the ramp spread the legs open in the driven position. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ZAKIYA W BATES whose telephone number is (571)272-7039. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:30am - 5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Doug Hutton can be reached at 5712724137. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ZAKIYA W BATES/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3674 9/16/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 05, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12736077
SCREW
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12722144
LARGE SCALE SYNTHESIS OF OXIDATIVE DEHYDROGENATION CATALYST
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12715777
METHODS FOR MAKING ZEOLITE-Y PARTICLES
2y 9m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12716022
METHOD FOR SINGLE-STAGE TREATMENT OF SILICEOUS SUBTERRANEAN FORMATIONS
1y 6m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12704146
METHOD FOR FASTENING PIERCING NUT TO STACKED BODY OF PLATE-SHAPED WORKPIECES
2y 8m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (-2.1%)
2y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1311 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month