Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/529,364

ELECTROMECHANICAL CONNECTORS

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Dec 05, 2023
Priority
Dec 22, 2022 — provisional 63/434,547 +2 more
Examiner
LEE, PING
Art Unit
2695
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Cirrus Logic International Semiconductor Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% — above average
65%
Career Allowance Rate
455 granted / 696 resolved
+3.4% vs TC avg
Strong +30% interview lift
Without
With
+29.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
720
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
76.5%
+36.5% vs TC avg
§102
4.8%
-35.2% vs TC avg
§112
4.3%
-35.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 696 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Invention I in the reply filed on 3/10/2026 is acknowledged. Claims 16-20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 3/10/2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 1, the preamble states “detecting … connected to a first jack plug inserted into a first jack port”. However, the body of the claim does not refer back to the preamble. Thus, it is unclear how the claimed “a 3-pole jack plug” in the body (lines 5-6) is related to “a first jack plug” recited in the preamble, or they are being different from each other. Regarding claim 3, if there is no audio signal present in response to the microphone bias, other possible determination, other than the claimed “determine that the type of accessory is a headphone and/or a line load”, could be no accessory being connected to the jack port. The claimed limitation does not clearly define how the claimed invention with the claimed feature “determine that the type of accessory is a headphone and/or a line load” would result. The similar ambiguity is also present in claim 10. Regarding claim 3, the claimed feature includes the combination of a headphone and a line load be present simultaneously. It is unclear how could this be possible. The similar ambiguity is also present in claim 10. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 and 13-15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Patterson et al. (US 20040081099 A1; hereafter Patterson). Regarding claim 1, Patterson discloses circuitry (30 in Fig. 1) for detecting a type of accessory connected to a first jack plug (26 in Fig. 1; “…connectors 26 which may be any form of terminal such as jacks for example…” in [0045]) inserted into a first jack port, the circuitry being configured to: determine whether an audio signal is present at the tip or the ring of the first jack plug (“the excitation circuit may supply a test signal to the tip contact and the response analyzer circuit may respond to the ring contact” in [0021]); and, if there is an audio signal present at the tip or the ring of the first jack plug, determine that the type of accessory is a stereo line-in accessory connected to a 3- pole jack plug (“the device is identified as a stereo microphone” in [0055]). Regarding claim 13, Patterson shows that the circuitry further comprising: a first jack plug detect module (40 in Fig. 2) configured to detect whether the first jack plug is received in the first jack port ([0047]). Regarding claim 14, Patterson shows a first circuitry module and a second circuitry module, wherein the first circuitry module comprises at least one of: left audio out circuitry (e.g., 88 or 90); right audio out circuitry; impedance measurement circuitry; microphone biasing circuitry; microphone and ground switching circuitry; and microphone input circuitry; and wherein the second circuitry module comprises at least one of: a first stereo input circuitry; a second stereo input circuitry; impedance measurement circuitry; microphone biasing circuitry (e.g., 112, 80, 82); and ground circuitry. Regarding claim 15, Patterson shows at least one of a first source of voltage bias (VREF). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Poulsen et al. teach using ultrasonic generator as a test tone for detecting an audio accessory. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PING LEE whose telephone number is (571)272-7522. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Vivian Chin can be reached at 571-272-7848. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PING LEE/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2695
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 05, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12676136
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ACTIVE NOISE CANCELLATION
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12658169
RECURSIVE TRAINING OF ADAPTIVE FILTERS FOR ACTIVE NOISE CONTROL (ANC) SYSTEMS
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12641385
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ADJUSTMENT OF AUDITORY PROSTHESES BASED ON TACTILE RESPONSE
4y 7m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12633280
AUTOMATIC PARAMETER TUNING FOR ACTIVE ROAD NOISE CANCELLATION
2y 1m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12627942
VIRTUAL ENGINE SOUND CONTROL SYSTEM AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+29.5%)
3y 3m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 696 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month