Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/529,527

HEMODYNAMIC SUPPORT SYSTEMS AND METHODS

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Dec 05, 2023
Examiner
BAYS, PAMELA M
Art Unit
3796
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4y 3m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allow Rate
403 granted / 560 resolved
+2.0% vs TC avg
Strong +37% interview lift
Without
With
+37.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 3m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
597
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.1%
-35.9% vs TC avg
§103
41.6%
+1.6% vs TC avg
§102
18.5%
-21.5% vs TC avg
§112
23.4%
-16.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 560 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 12-20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected Species A-H, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 16 December 2025 of Species I (Fig.12 of the Drawings), which are readable on Claims 1-11. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 2 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding Claim 2, the claim recites “wherein the inflatable portion comprises an oblong torus when inflated, and wherein the web portion is within the oblong torus”. However, it is unclear within Fig. 12 of the Drawings (as elected by the Applicant in the reply filed 16 December 2025) which section is considered an ‘oblong torus’. From the Specification/Drawings, it appears that this was intended to be a cross-sectional shape. For purposes of examination, the Examiner is interpreting this limitation as “wherein the inflatable portion comprises an oblong torus shape within a cross-sectional portion, when inflated, and wherein the web portion is within the oblong torus shape within the cross-sectional portion.” Appropriate correction or clarification is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 7-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Evans (US Publication No. 2013/0303831). Regarding Claim 7, Evans discloses a medical pump (Paragraph 0006, 0066, 0073-0076; Abstract) comprising: an elongate drive shaft (408/406, Figs. 4A-B; 508/518, Figs. 5A-E; 610/612, Figs. 6-7) defining a lumen (central lumen can be seen in Figs. 4B, 5B, 5E, 7B; hollow center, Paragraph 0159, 0174); and an impeller (400, Figs. 4A-B; 500, Figs. 5A-E and 6; Paragraph 0091, 0095-0098, 0105-0108) attached to a distal end portion of the drive shaft (408/406, Figs. 4A-B; 508/518, Figs. 5A-E; 610/612, Figs. 6-7) and comprising: a first inflatable blade member (blades, 502, Figs. 5-6; Paragraph 0087, 0090, 0094, 0095, 0107, 0123; multiple blades, Paragraph 0187; inflatable/expandable, Paragraph 0077, 0087, 0174, 0190) extending spirally (see spiral shapes of blade members 502, Figs. 4-6; Paragraph 0095-0100) between a proximal end and a distal end of the first inflatable blade member, wherein the proximal and distal ends of the first inflatable blade member (blades, 502, Figs. 5-6; Paragraph 0087, 0090, 0094, 0095, 0107, 0123; multiple blades, Paragraph 0187; inflatable/expandable, Paragraph 0077, 0087, 0174, 0190) are each attached to the distal end portion of the drive shaft (attached at distal end portion of drive shaft, 408/406/16, Figs. 4A-B; 508/518, Figs. 5A-E; 610/612, Figs. 6-7); a second inflatable blade member (blades, 502, Figs. 5-6; Paragraph 0087, 0090, 0094, 0095, 0107, 0123; multiple blades, Paragraph 0187; inflatable/expandable, Paragraph 0077, 0087, 0174, 0190) extending spirally (see spiral shapes of blade members 502, Figs. 4-6; Paragraph 0095-0100) between a proximal end and a distal end of the second inflatable blade member, wherein the proximal end distal ends of the second inflatable blade member (blades, 502, Figs. 5-6; Paragraph 0087, 0090, 0094, 0095, 0107, 0123; multiple blades, Paragraph 0187; inflatable/expandable, Paragraph 0077, 0087, 0174, 0190) are each attached to the distal end portion of the drive shaft (attached at distal end portion of drive shaft, 408/406/416, Figs. 4A-B; 508/518, Figs. 5A-E; 610/612, Figs. 6-7); a first noninflatable web portion (flexible web material attached to blade portions and distal end portion of shaft, see web/material sections 402, Figs. 4A-B; 504, Figs. 5-6, Paragraph 0073, 0078, 0083, 0087, 0089-0091, 0104-0108, 0123-0125) attached to the first inflatable blade member and to the distal end portion of the drive shaft; and a second noninflatable web portion (flexible web material attached to blade portions and distal end portion of shaft, see web/material sections 402, Figs. 4A-B; 504, Figs. 5-6, Paragraph 0073, 0078, 0083, 0087, 0089-0091, 0104-0108, 0123-0125) attached to the second inflatable blade member and to the distal end portion of the drive shaft. Regarding Claim 8, Evans discloses a medical pump (Paragraph 0006, 0066, 0073-0076; Abstract) further wherein the impeller further comprises: a third inflatable blade member (multiple blades, such as 2-4 blades, Paragraph 0187; inflatable/expandable, Paragraph 0077, 0087, 0174; see blades, 502, Figs. 5-6; Paragraph 0087, 0090, 0094, 0095, 0107, 0123) extending spirally (see spiral shapes of blade members 502, Figs. 4-6; Paragraph 0095-0100) between a proximal end and a distal end of the third inflatable blade member, wherein the proximal end distal ends of the third inflatable blade member (blades, 502, Figs. 5-6; Paragraph 0087, 0090, 0094, 0095, 0107, 0123; multiple blades, Paragraph 0187; inflatable/expandable, Paragraph 0077, 0087, 0174) are each attached to the distal end portion of the drive shaft (attached at distal end portion of drive shaft, 408/406/416, Figs. 4A-B; 508/518, Figs. 5A-E; 610/612, Figs. 6-7); and a third noninflatable web portion (flexible web material attached to blade portions and distal end portion of shaft, see web/material sections 402, Figs. 4A-B; 504, Figs. 5-6, Paragraph 0073, 0078, 0083, 0087, 0089-0091, 0104-0108, 0123-0125) attached to the third inflatable blade member and to the distal end portion of the drive shaft. Regarding Claim 9, Evans discloses a medical pump (Paragraph 0006, 0066, 0073-0076; Abstract) further wherein the impeller is reconfigurable between a deflated low-profile delivery configuration and an inflated operable configuration that is radially expanded in comparison to the low-profile delivery configuration (deflated, low-profile configuration for implantation, and expanded configuration for blood flow/pumping after deployment, Paragraphs 0066-0070, 0076-0077, 0087-0090, 0094, 0105-106, 0110, 0174, 0190). Regarding Claims 10 and 11, Evans discloses a medical pump (Paragraph 0006, 0066, 0073-0076; Abstract) further wherein, when the impeller is in the inflated operable configuration (expanded configuration for blood flow/pumping after deployment, Paragraphs 0066-0070, 0076-0077, 0087-0090, 0094, 0105-106, 0110, 0174, 0190), the first and second impeller blades each spiral around (see spiral shapes of blade members 502, Figs. 4-7; Paragraph 0095-0100) the distal end portion of the drive shaft by at least 120° or by at least 180° (blades 502 spiral around drive shaft by at least 180 degrees, see Figs. 4-6; blade angles, see Paragraph 0098-0105). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 1-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Evans (US Publication No. 2013/0303831) in view of McBride et al. (US Publication No. 2013/0066140). Regarding Claim 1, Evans discloses a medical pump (Paragraph 0006, 0066, 0073-0076; Abstract) comprising an elongate drive shaft (408/406, Figs. 4A-B; 508/518, Figs. 5A-E; 610/612, Figs. 6-7) defining a lumen (central lumen can be seen in Figs. 4B, 5B, 5E, 7B; hollow center, Paragraph 0159, 0174) and an impeller (400, Figs. 4A-B; 500, Figs. 5A-E and 6; Paragraph 0091, 0095-0098, 0105-0108) attached to a distal end of the drive shaft (408/406/416, Figs. 4A-B; 508/518, Figs. 5A-E; 610/612, Figs. 6-7) and comprising: an inflatable portion (inflatable/expandable, Paragraph 0077, 0087, 0174, 0190) and a noninflatable web portion (flexible web, 402, Figs. 4A-B; 504, Figs. 5-6, Paragraph 0073, 0078, 0083, 0087, 0089-0091, 0104-0108, 0123-0125) attached to the inflatable portion (Paragraph 0077, 0087, 0174). Although Evans discloses that the impeller has inflatable portions and noninflatable web portions that are attached to one another (Paragraph 0073, 0078, 0083, 0087, 0089-0091, 0104-0108, 0123-0125), and that the inflatable portions may be inflated with a fluid using conduits (Paragraph 0077, 0174, 0190), Evans does not explicitly disclose wherein the inflatable portion is fluidly coupled to the lumen; and that the noninflatable web portion is peripherally surrounded by the inflatable portion. McBride et al. teaches a medical pump (Abstract; Paragraph 0006) comprising an elongate drive shaft (630, Fig. 15A; Paragraph 0137, 0152-0154) defining a lumen (internal lumen 670, Fig. 23A; Paragraph 0137), and an impeller (605, Figs. 15A, 23A-C; Paragraph 0137-0138, 0148, 0155) comprising an inflatable portion which is fluidly coupled to the lumen (liquid/gas infused through lumen of shaft to inflate impeller 605, Paragraph 0174); and a noninflatable material portion is peripherally surrounded by the inflatable portion (flexible material portion surrounds inflated portion as impeller remains inflated, Paragraph 0059, 0086-0093, 0174; see Fig. 15A, 23A). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to configure the medical pump disclosed by Evans to have the inflatable portion be fluidly coupled to the lumen; and the noninflatable web portion be peripherally surrounded by the inflatable portion, as taught by McBride et al., in order to allow for the expansion of the impeller with the attached web portions to form a spiral surface to allow for fluid/blood flow by the impeller, as taught by both Evans (Paragraph 0006, 0066, 0073-0076; Abstract) and McBride et al. (Abstract; Paragraph 0006). Furthermore, this this would merely require rearranging the lumen/web portion in the medical pump, and it has been held that rearranging parts of an invention involves only routine skill in the art. In re Japikse, 86 USPQ 70. Regarding Claim 2, Evans discloses a medical pump (Paragraph 0006, 0066, 0073-0076; Abstract) further wherein the a cross section of the inflatable portion comprises a variety of shapes when expanded/inflated (see 400, Figs. 4A-B; 500, Figs. 5A-E and 6; Paragraph 0077, 0174, 0190), including sections which may be considered an oblong torus shape (e.g., see Figs. 4A, 4B, 5A, 5B, 5C, 6), wherein the noninflatable web portion (flexible web, 402, Figs. 4A-B; 504, Figs. 5-6, Paragraph 0073, 0078, 0083, 0087, 0089-0091, 0104-0108, 0123-0125) is within the cross section. See 35 USC 112(b) rejection made above, as interpreted by the Examiner. Although Evans does not explicitly disclose wherein the inflatable portion comprises an oblong torus when inflated, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to configure the inflatable portion to comprise an oblong torus when inflated, since such a modification would have involved a mere change in the form or shape of a component (e.g. the inflatable portion). A change in form or shape is generally recognized as being within the level of ordinary skill in the art. In re Dailey, 149 USPQ 47 (CCPA 1976). Regarding Claim 3, Evans discloses a medical pump (Paragraph 0006, 0066, 0073-0076; Abstract) further wherein the inflatable portion comprises a first inflatable blade member (blades, 502, Figs. 5-6; Paragraph 0087, 0090, 0094, 0095, 0107, 0123; multiple blades, Paragraph 0187; inflatable/expandable, Paragraph 0077, 0087, 0174) extending from the distal end of the drive shaft (408/406, Figs. 4A-B; 508/518, Figs. 5A-E; 610/612, Figs. 6-7) and a second inflatable blade member (blades, 502, Figs. 5-6; Paragraph 0087, 0090, 0094, 0095, 0107, 0123; multiple blades, Paragraph 0187; inflatable/expandable, Paragraph 0077, 0087, 0174) extending from the distal end of the drive shaft (408/406, Figs. 4A-B; 508/518, Figs. 5A-E; 610/612, Figs. 6-7), and wherein distal end portions of the first and second inflatable blade members are conjoined at a distal end of the inflatable portion (distal ends of blades 502 are conjoined at a distal end, see Figs. 4A, 5A, 5B, 6, 7; Paragraph 0095, 0097, 0123). Regarding Claim 4, Evans discloses a medical pump (Paragraph 0006, 0066, 0073-0076; Abstract) further wherein the first and second inflatable blade members (blades, 502, Figs. 5-6; Paragraph 0087, 0090, 0094, 0095, 0107, 0123; multiple blades, Paragraph 0187; inflatable/expandable, Paragraph 0077, 0087, 0174) extend along spiral paths from the distal end of the drive shaft (408/406, Figs. 4A-B; 508/518, Figs. 5A-E; 610/612, Figs. 6-7) to the distal end of the inflatable portion (see spiral shapes of blade members 502, Figs. 4-7; Paragraph 0095-0100). Regarding Claims 5 and 6, Evans discloses a medical pump (Paragraph 0006, 0066, 0073-0076; Abstract) further wherein the inflatable portion comprises three or more inflatable blade members (multiple blades, such as 2-4 blades, Paragraph 0187; inflatable/expandable, Paragraph 0077, 0087, 0174; see blades, 502, Figs. 5-6; Paragraph 0087, 0090, 0094, 0095, 0107, 0123) that each extend from the distal end of the drive shaft (408/406, Figs. 4A-B; 508/518, Figs. 5A-E; 610/612, Figs. 6-7) and that conjoin at a distal end of the inflatable portion (distal ends of blades 502 are conjoined at a distal end, see Figs. 4A, 5A, 5B, 6, 7; Paragraph 0095, 0097, 0123), wherein the three or more inflatable blade members (multiple blades, such as 2-4 blades, Paragraph 0187; inflatable/expandable, Paragraph 0077, 0087, 0174; see blades, 502, Figs. 5-6; Paragraph 0087, 0090, 0094, 0095, 0107, 0123) extend along spiral paths from the distal end of the drive shaft to the distal end of the inflatable portion (see spiral shapes of blade members 502, Figs. 4-7; Paragraph 0095-0100). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PAMELA M BAYS whose telephone number is (571)270-7852. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00am - 6:00pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer McDonald can be reached at 571-270-3061. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PAMELA M. BAYS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3796
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 05, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599339
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AFFECTING CARDIAC CONTRACTILITY AND/OR RELAXATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12589236
An Implantable Artificial Heart
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12569692
WIRELESS NEUROSTIMULATORS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12564355
Micro Motion Detection for Determining at least one Vital Sign of a Subject
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12558539
DETECTING AND TREATING DISORDERED BREATHING
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+37.2%)
4y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 560 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month