Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/529,622

REGISTRATION OF A SENSING TARGET

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 05, 2023
Examiner
MAKHDOOM, SAMARINA
Art Unit
3648
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
95 granted / 132 resolved
+20.0% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+29.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
81 currently pending
Career history
202
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
§103
73.1%
+33.1% vs TC avg
§102
23.3%
-16.7% vs TC avg
§112
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 132 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on June 29, 2026 has been entered. Claims 1, 13-14, 17, 26, and 29-30 amended. Claims 1-8 and 10-30 are pending this application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-3, 10, and 29 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cheng et al (MDPI, August 2023) in view of Takahashi et al (WO 2023/112349 A1) and Park et al (US 2022/0038864 A1). Regarding Claim 1, Cheng teaches a method of operating a network component, comprising [page 1 abstract for RF sensing platform for detecting humans (objects) with page 9, second paragraph]: determining a physical presence detection of a target object and a set of attributes associated with the target object [page 1 abstract for RF sensing platform for detecting humans (objects) with page 9, second paragraph]; and in association with a target object identifier and the set of attributes [page 10, 4th paragraph for identifying human object with attributes (friendly/non-friendly) and page 15, figure 11 for using unique ID number (identifier) for human object]. Cheng fails to explicitly teach and registering the target object in a target object database in response to the determination. Takahashi has a target monitoring device (abstract) and teaches and registering the target object in a target object database in response to the determination [page 5, paragraphs 3-4 and paragraph 15]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the applicant’s invention for modifying the RF sensing techniques, as disclosed by Cheng, further including the database calculations as taught by Takahashi for the purpose to integrate and register target data (Takahashi, page 5 last paragraph). Chen fails to explicitly teach wherein the target object identifier is globally unique, or unique to a particular region, or unique to a particular network. Park has UEs each detect a target associated with a deflection point (abstract) and teaches wherein the target object identifier is globally unique, or unique to a particular region, or unique to a particular network [0219 for multicast, to the first UE and the second UE, a sensing-tracking reference signal and 0225, 0239 for using a network identifier]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the applicant’s invention for modifying the RF sensing techniques, as disclosed by Cheng, further including the broadcast calculations as taught by Park for the purpose to multicast, to the first UE and the second UE, a sensing-tracking reference signa (Park, 0219). Regarding Claim 29 Cheng teaches a network component, comprising: one or more memories [page 1 abstract for RF sensing platform for detecting humans (objects) with page 9, second paragraph]; one or more transceivers [page 3, figure 1, and last paragraph for radar, and transmitter receivers]; and one or more processors communicatively coupled to the one or more memories and the one or more transceivers, the one or more processors, either alone or in combination, configured to [page 3, figure 1 for a controller (processing means)]: determine a physical presence detection of a target object and a set of attributes associated with the target object [page 1 abstract for RF sensing platform for detecting humans (objects) with page 9, second paragraph]; and in association with a target object identifier and the set of attributes [page 10, 4th paragraph for identifying human object with attributes (friendly/non-friendly) and page 15, figure 11 for using unique ID number (identifier) for human object]. Cheng fails to explicitly teach and register the target object in a target object database in response to the determination. Takahashi has a target monitoring device (abstract) and teaches and register the target object in a target object database in response to the determination [page 5, paragraphs 3-4 and paragraph 15]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the applicant’s invention for modifying the RF sensing techniques, as disclosed by Cheng, further including the database calculations as taught by Takahashi for the purpose to integrate and register target data (Takahashi, page 5 last paragraph). Chen fails to explicitly teach wherein the target object identifier is globally unique, or unique to a particular region, or unique to a particular network. Park has UEs each detect a target associated with a deflection point (abstract) and teaches wherein the target object identifier is globally unique, or unique to a particular region, or unique to a particular network [0219 for multicast, to the first UE and the second UE, a sensing-tracking reference signal and 0225, 0239 for using a network identifier]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the applicant’s invention for modifying the RF sensing techniques, as disclosed by Cheng, further including the broadcast calculations as taught by Park for the purpose to multicast, to the first UE and the second UE, a sensing-tracking reference signa (Park, 0219). Regarding Claim 2, Cheng teaches the physical presence detection is based on a radio frequency for sensing (RF-S) operation, computer vision, manual user entry, or any combination thereof [page 1 abstract for RF sensing platform for detecting humans (objects) with page 9, second paragraph]. Regarding Claim 3, Cheng teaches the set of attributes comprises: a shape of the target object [page 10 figure 7 for determining if target is human and its body gestures], or a size of the target object, or a material type of the target object, or an object category of the target object, or an orientation of the target object, or a mobility associated with the target object, or location information associated with the target object, or any combination thereof [page 10, 4th paragraph for identifying human object with attributes (friendly/non-friendly)]. Regarding Claim 10, Cheng teaches the registration of the target object is associated with a set of validity constraints [page 14, first two paragraphs for using machine learning and training for valid data]. Claims 4-8 and 11-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cheng et al (MDPI, August 2023) in view of Takahashi (WO 2023/112349 A1) and Park et al (US 2022/0038864 A1) as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of 3GPP (EP 3588128 A1). Regarding Claim 4, Cheng fails to explicitly teach receiving a registration request message from a wireless node that comprises an indication of the set of attributes, wherein the determination is based on the registration request message. 3GPP has non-access stratum procedures in the 5G system (page 23, Scope) and teaches receiving a registration request message from a wireless node that comprises an indication of the set of attributes, wherein the determination is based on the registration request message [3GPP, page 228, Section 5.5.1.2 for registering a UE (functionally equivalent to registering targets)]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the applicant’s invention for modifying the RF sensing techniques, as disclosed by Cheng, further including the message calculations as taught by 3GPP for the purpose to initiates the registration procedure for initial registration by sending a message (3GPP, page 228 fourteenth paragraph). Regarding Claim 5, Cheng fails to explicitly teach the wireless node corresponds to a sensing node that transmits, or measures, or both, one or more wireless signals associated with the physical presence detection of the target object, or wherein the registration request message requests that the network component register the target object with the target object identifier, or wherein the registration request message is received in association with a capability exchange procedure, or any combination thereof. 3GPP has non-access stratum procedures in the 5G system (page 23, Scope) and teaches the wireless node corresponds to a sensing node that transmits, or measures, or both, one or more wireless signals associated with the physical presence detection of the target object, or wherein the registration request message requests that the network component register the target object with the target object identifier, or wherein the registration request message is received in association with a capability exchange procedure, or any combination thereof [page 3, figure 1 for using wireless RF signals from emitter and transponder with target object human]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the applicant’s invention for modifying the RF sensing techniques, as disclosed by Cheng, further including the message calculations as taught by 3GPP for the purpose to initiates the registration procedure for initial registration by sending a message (3GPP, page 228 fourteenth paragraph). Regarding Claim 6, Cheng teaches receiving a presence indication message from the wireless node that indicates detection of the physical presence detection of the target object [page 3, figure 1 for using wireless RF signals from emitter and transponder with target object human]; Cheng fails to explicitly teach determining that the target object is not yet registered in the target object database; and transmitting a registration initiation message to the wireless node in response to the determination that the target object is not yet registered in the target object database, wherein the registration request message is received in response to the registration initiation message. 3GPP has non-access stratum procedures in the 5G system (page 23, Scope) and teaches determining that the target object is not yet registered in the target object database; and transmitting a registration initiation message to the wireless node in response to the determination that the target object is not yet registered in the target object database, wherein the registration request message is received in response to the registration initiation message [3GPP, page 228, Section 5.5.1.2 for registering a UE (functionally equivalent to registering targets)]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the applicant’s invention for modifying the RF sensing techniques, as disclosed by Cheng, further including the message calculations as taught by 3GPP for the purpose to initiates the registration procedure for initial registration by sending a message (3GPP, page 228 fourteenth paragraph). Regarding Claim 7, Cheng fails to explicitly teach transmitting an announcement message that comprises information associated with candidate target objects for registration, wherein the registration request message is received in response to the announcement message. Park has UEs each detect a target associated with a deflection point (abstract) and teaches transmitting an announcement message that comprises information associated with candidate target objects for registration, wherein the registration request message is received in response to the announcement message [0106]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the applicant’s invention for modifying the RF sensing techniques, as disclosed by Cheng, further including the broadcast calculations as taught by Park for the purpose to change the directionality of the RF signal when transmitting, a network node (Park, 0106). Regarding Claim 8, Cheng fails to explicitly teach the announcement message transmitted via multicast or broadcast, or wherein the announcement message is transmitted via assistance data, or a combination thereof. Park has UEs each detect a target associated with a deflection point (abstract) and teaches the announcement message transmitted via multicast or broadcast, or wherein the announcement message is transmitted via assistance data, or a combination thereof [0106]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the applicant’s invention for modifying the RF sensing techniques, as disclosed by Cheng, further including the broadcast calculations as taught by Park for the purpose to change the directionality of the RF signal when transmitting, a network node (Park, 0106). Regarding Claim 11, Cheng fails to explicitly teach the set of validity constraints comprises at least one of a geographic constraint, a time constraint, or both. 3GPP has non-access stratum procedures in the 5G system (page 23, Scope) and teaches the set of validity constraints comprises at least one of a geographic constraint, a time constraint, or both [3GPP page 230, paragraphs 4 and 9 for having UE in a registration area]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the applicant’s invention for modifying the RF sensing techniques, as disclosed by Cheng, further including the message calculations as taught by 3GPP for the purpose to initiates the registration procedure for initial registration by sending a message (3GPP, page 228 fourteenth paragraph). Regarding Claim 12, Cheng fails to explicitly teach transmitting a registration confirmation message to a wireless node that comprises an indication of the target object identifier. 3GPP has non-access stratum procedures in the 5G system (page 23, Scope) and teaches transmitting a registration confirmation message to a wireless node that comprises an indication of the target object identifier [3GPP page 232, figure 5.5.1.2.2.1 for having a registration request and registration accept message]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the applicant’s invention for modifying the RF sensing techniques, as disclosed by Cheng, further including the message calculations as taught by 3GPP for the purpose to initiates the registration procedure for initial registration by sending a message (3GPP, page 228 fourteenth paragraph). Regarding Claim 13, Cheng fails to explicitly teach the registration confirmation message comprises an indication that the target object identifier is globally unique, or unique to the particular region, or unique to the particular network. 3GPP has non-access stratum procedures in the 5G system (page 23, Scope) and teaches the registration confirmation message comprises an indication that the target object identifier is globally unique, or unique to the particular region, or unique to the particular network [3GPP, page 228, last 5 paragraphs for using GUTI – globally unique temporary identifiers]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the applicant’s invention for modifying the RF sensing techniques, as disclosed by Cheng, further including the message calculations as taught by 3GPP for the purpose to initiates the registration procedure for initial registration by sending a message (3GPP, page 228 fourteenth paragraph). Regarding Claim 14, Cheng fails to explicitly teach the registration confirmation message comprises an indication of a set of validity constraints associated with the registration of the target object. 3GPP has non-access stratum procedures in the 5G system (page 23, Scope) and teaches the registration confirmation message comprises an indication of a set of validity constraints associated with the registration of the target object [page 237, 9th paragraph]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the applicant’s invention for modifying the RF sensing techniques, as disclosed by Cheng, further including the message calculations as taught by 3GPP for the purpose to initiates the registration procedure for initial registration by sending a message (3GPP, page 228 fourteenth paragraph). Regarding Claim 15, Cheng fails to explicitly teach deregistering the target object from the target object database; and transmitting a deregistration message to a wireless node that indicates that the target object is no longer registered in the target object database. 3GPP has non-access stratum procedures in the 5G system (page 23, Scope) and teaches deregistering the target object from the target object database [page 303, section 5.5.2.1]; and transmitting a deregistration message to a wireless node that indicates that the target object is no longer registered in the target object database [page 304, first 5 paragraphs]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the applicant’s invention for modifying the RF sensing techniques, as disclosed by Cheng, further including the message calculations as taught by 3GPP for the purpose to inform the UE that it is deregistered for 5GS services over 3GPP access (3GPP, page 303, section 5.5.2.1). Regarding Claim 16, Cheng fails to explicitly teach receiving, from a wireless node, a deregistration request that requests removing registration of the target object from the target object database; and deregistering the target object from the target object database in response to the deregistration request. 3GPP has non-access stratum procedures in the 5G system (page 23, Scope) and teaches receiving, from a wireless node, a deregistration request that requests removing registration of the target object from the target object database [page 303, section 5.5.2.1]; and deregistering the target object from the target object database in response to the deregistration request [page 304, first 5 paragraphs]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the applicant’s invention for modifying the RF sensing techniques, as disclosed by Cheng, further including the message calculations as taught by 3GPP for the purpose to inform the UE that it is deregistered for 5GS services over 3GPP access (3GPP, page 303, section 5.5.2.1). Claims 17-28 and 30 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cheng et al (MDPI, August 2023) in view of 3GPP (EP 3588128 A1) and Takahashi (WO 2023/112349 A1) and further in view of Park (US 2022/0038864 A1). Regarding Claim 17, Cheng teaches a method of operating a wireless node, comprising [page 1 abstract for RF sensing platform for detecting humans (objects) with page 9, second paragraph]: transmitting a message to a network component that comprises an indication of a set of attributes associated with a target object associated with a physical presence detection [page 1 abstract for RF sensing platform for detecting humans (objects) with page 9, second paragraph]; and receiving, from the network component that comprises an indication of a target object identifier [page 10, 4th paragraph for identifying human object with attributes (friendly/non-friendly) and page 15, figure 11 for using unique ID number (identifier) for human object]. Cheng fails to explicitly teach in response to the registration request message, a registration confirmation message. 3GPP has non-access stratum procedures in the 5G system (page 23, Scope) and teaches in response to the registration request message, a registration confirmation message [3GPP, page 228, Section 5.5.1.2 for registering a UE (functionally equivalent to registering targets) with page 232, figure 5.5.1.2.2.1]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the applicant’s invention for modifying the RF sensing techniques, as disclosed by Cheng, further including the message calculations as taught by 3GPP for the purpose to initiates the registration procedure for initial registration by sending a message (3GPP, page 228 fourteenth paragraph). Cheng fails to explicitly teach that is registered in association with the target object in a target object database. Takahashi has a target monitoring device (abstract) and teaches that is registered in association with the target object in a target object database [page 5, paragraphs 3-4 and paragraph 15]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the applicant’s invention for modifying the RF sensing techniques, as disclosed by Cheng, further including the database calculations as taught by Takahashi for the purpose to integrate and register target data (Takahashi, page 5 last paragraph). Chen fails to explicitly teach wherein the target object identifier is globally unique, or unique to a particular region, or unique to a particular network. Park has UEs each detect a target associated with a deflection point (abstract) and teaches wherein the target object identifier is globally unique, or unique to a particular region, or unique to a particular network [0219 for multicast, to the first UE and the second UE, a sensing-tracking reference signal and 0225, 0239 for using a network identifier]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the applicant’s invention for modifying the RF sensing techniques, as disclosed by Cheng, further including the broadcast calculations as taught by Park for the purpose to multicast, to the first UE and the second UE, a sensing-tracking reference signa (Park, 0219). Regarding Claim 30, Cheng teaches a wireless node, comprising: one or more memories [page 1 abstract for RF sensing platform for detecting humans (objects) with page 9, second paragraph]; one or more transceivers; and one or more processors communicatively coupled to the one or more memories and the one or more transceivers, the one or more processors, either alone or in combination, configured to [page 3 last paragraph and figure 1 for means for transmitting, receiving, and signal processing]: transmit, via the one or more transceivers, a message to a network component that comprises an indication of a set of attributes associated with a target object associated with a physical presence detection [page 1 abstract for RF sensing platform for detecting humans (objects) with page 9, second paragraph]; and receive, via the one or more transceivers, in response to the message, a message from the network component that comprises an indication of a target object identifier [page 10, 4th paragraph for identifying human object with attributes (friendly/non-friendly) and page 15, figure 11 for using unique ID number (identifier) for human object]. Cheng fails to explicitly teach in response to the registration request message, a registration confirmation message. 3GPP has non-access stratum procedures in the 5G system (page 23, Scope) and teaches in response to the registration request message, a registration confirmation message [3GPP, page 228, Section 5.5.1.2 for registering a UE (functionally equivalent to registering targets) with page 232, figure 5.5.1.2.2.1]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the applicant’s invention for modifying the RF sensing techniques, as disclosed by Cheng, further including the message calculations as taught by 3GPP for the purpose to initiates the registration procedure for initial registration by sending a message (3GPP, page 228 fourteenth paragraph). Cheng fails to explicitly teach that is registered in association with the target object in a target object database. Takahashi has a target monitoring device (abstract) and teaches that is registered in association with the target object in a target object database [page 5, paragraphs 3-4 and paragraph 15]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the applicant’s invention for modifying the RF sensing techniques, as disclosed by Cheng, further including the database calculations as taught by Takahashi for the purpose to integrate and register target data (Takahashi, page 5 last paragraph). Chen fails to explicitly teach wherein the target object identifier is globally unique, or unique to a particular region, or unique to a particular network. Park has UEs each detect a target associated with a deflection point (abstract) and teaches wherein the target object identifier is globally unique, or unique to a particular region, or unique to a particular network [0219 for multicast, to the first UE and the second UE, a sensing-tracking reference signal and 0225, 0239 for using a network identifier]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the applicant’s invention for modifying the RF sensing techniques, as disclosed by Cheng, further including the broadcast calculations as taught by Park for the purpose to multicast, to the first UE and the second UE, a sensing-tracking reference signa (Park, 0219). Regarding Claim 18, Cheng teaches the physical presence detection is based on a radio frequency for sensing (RF-S) operation, computer vision, manual user entry, or any combination thereof [page 1 abstract for RF sensing platform for detecting humans (objects) with page 9, second paragraph]. Regarding Claim 19, Cheng teaches the set of attributes comprises: a shape of the target object [page 10 figure 7 for determining if target is human and its body gestures], or a size of the target object, or a material type of the target object, or an object category of the target object, or an orientation of the target object, or a mobility associated with the target object, or location information associated with the target object, or any combination thereof [page 10, 4th paragraph for identifying human object with attributes (friendly/non-friendly)]. Regarding Claims 20, Cheng teaches the wireless node corresponds to a sensing node that senses the target object [page 3, last paragraph and figure 1]. Regarding Claims 21, Cheng fails to explicitly teach the registration request message requests that the network component register the target object with the target object identifier. 3GPP has non-access stratum procedures in the 5G system (page 23, Scope) and teaches the registration request message requests that the network component register the target object with the target object identifier [3GPP, page 228, Section 5.5.1.2 for registering a UE (functionally equivalent to registering targets) and using GUIT for identifiers with registration request with page 232, figure 5.5.1.2.2.1]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the applicant’s invention for modifying the RF sensing techniques, as disclosed by Cheng, further including the message calculations as taught by 3GPP for the purpose to initiates the registration procedure for initial registration by sending a message (3GPP, page 228 fourteenth paragraph). Regarding Claims 22, Cheng fails to explicitly teach the registration request message is transmitted in association with a capability exchange procedure. 3GPP has non-access stratum procedures in the 5G system (page 23, Scope) and teaches the registration request message requests that the network component register the target object with the target object identifier [3GPP, page 228, Section 5.5.1.2 for registering a UE (functionally equivalent to registering targets) and using GUIT for identifiers with registration request with page 232, figure 5.5.1.2.2.1]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the applicant’s invention for modifying the RF sensing techniques, as disclosed by Cheng, further including the message calculations as taught by 3GPP for the purpose to initiates the registration procedure for initial registration by sending a message (3GPP, page 228 fourteenth paragraph). Regarding Claims 23, Cheng teach transmitting a presence indication message to the network component that indicates the physical presence detection of the target object [page 3, figure 1 for using wireless RF signals from emitter and transponder with target object human]. Cheng fails to explicitly teach and receiving a registration initiation message to the wireless node in response to the presence indication message, wherein the registration request message is transmitted in response to the registration initiation message. 3GPP has non-access stratum procedures in the 5G system (page 23, Scope) and teaches receiving a registration initiation message to the wireless node in response to the presence indication message, wherein the registration request message is transmitted in response to the registration initiation message [3GPP, page 228, Section 5.5.1.2 for registering a UE (functionally equivalent to registering targets) and using GUIT for identifiers with registration request with page 232, figure 5.5.1.2.2.1]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the applicant’s invention for modifying the RF sensing techniques, as disclosed by Cheng, further including the message calculations as taught by 3GPP for the purpose to initiates the registration procedure for initial registration by sending a message (3GPP, page 228 fourteenth paragraph). Regarding Claims 24, Cheng fails to explicitly teach receiving an announcement message that comprises information associated with candidate target objects for registration, wherein the registration request message is transmitted in response to the announcement message. Park has UEs each detect a target associated with a deflection point (abstract) and teaches receiving an announcement message that comprises information associated with candidate target objects for registration, wherein the registration request message is transmitted in response to the announcement message [0106]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the applicant’s invention for modifying the RF sensing techniques, as disclosed by Cheng, further including the broadcast calculations as taught by Park for the purpose to change the directionality of the RF signal when transmitting, a network node (Park, 0106). Regarding Claims 25, Cheng fails to explicitly teach the announcement message received via multicast or broadcast, or wherein the announcement message is received via assistance data, or a combination thereof. Park has UEs each detect a target associated with a deflection point (abstract) and teaches the announcement message received via multicast or broadcast, or wherein the announcement message is received via assistance data, or a combination thereof [0106]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the applicant’s invention for modifying the RF sensing techniques, as disclosed by Cheng, further including the broadcast calculations as taught by Park for the purpose to change the directionality of the RF signal when transmitting, a network node (Park, 0106). Regarding Claims 26, Cheng fails to explicitly teach the registration confirmation message comprises an indication that the target object identifier is globally unique, or unique to a particular region, or unique to a particular network, or wherein the registration confirmation message comprises an indication a set of validity constraints associated with the registration of the target object, or a combination thereof. 3GPP has non-access stratum procedures in the 5G system (page 23, Scope) and teaches the registration confirmation message comprises an indication that the target object identifier is globally unique, or unique to a particular region, or unique to a particular network, or wherein the registration confirmation message comprises an indication a set of validity constraints associated with the registration of the target object, or a combination thereof [3GPP, page 228, Section 5.5.1.2 for registering a UE (functionally equivalent to registering targets) and using GUIT for identifiers with registration request with page 232, figure 5.5.1.2.2.1]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the applicant’s invention for modifying the RF sensing techniques, as disclosed by Cheng, further including the message calculations as taught by 3GPP for the purpose to initiates the registration procedure for initial registration by sending a message (3GPP, page 228 fourteenth paragraph). Regarding Claims 27, Cheng fails to explicitly teach receiving a deregistration message from the network component that indicates that the target object is no longer registered in the target object database. 3GPP has non-access stratum procedures in the 5G system (page 23, Scope) and teaches receiving a deregistration message from the network component that indicates that the target object is no longer registered in the target object database [page 303, section 5.5.2.1 with page 304, first 5 paragraphs]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the applicant’s invention for modifying the RF sensing techniques, as disclosed by Cheng, further including the message calculations as taught by 3GPP for the purpose to inform the UE that it is deregistered for 5GS services over 3GPP access (3GPP, page 303, section 5.5.2.1). Regarding Claims 28, Cheng fails to explicitly teach transmitting, to the network component, a deregistration request that requests removing registration of the target object from the target object database. 3GPP has non-access stratum procedures in the 5G system (page 23, Scope) and teaches transmitting, to the network component, a deregistration request that requests removing registration of the target object from the target object database [page 304, first 5 paragraphs]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the applicant’s invention for modifying the RF sensing techniques, as disclosed by Cheng, further including the message calculations as taught by 3GPP for the purpose to inform the UE that it is deregistered for 5GS services over 3GPP access (3GPP, page 303, section 5.5.2.1). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments fail to comply with 37 CFR 1.111(b) because they amount to a general allegation that the claims define a patentable invention without specifically pointing out how the language of the claims patentably distinguishes them from the references. In applicant’s arguments page 10, second paragraph of applicant’s arguments, the applicant states that claim 9 was identified as novel in the previous examiner interview. The examiner thanks the applicant for the claim amendment, upon further examination and search, Park covers using unique identifiers [Park, 0219 for multicast, to the first UE and the second UE, a sensing-tracking reference signal and 0225, 0239 for using a network identifier]. In applicant’s arguments page 10, third paragraph of applicant’s arguments, the applicant states that all independent claims have been modified to add the limitations of claim 9. Upon further consideration, incorporating the limitation of claim 9 does not overcome prior art, as Park explicitly discloses a network specific identifier for the target [Park, 0013 for multi-casted STRS configuration information comprises a network-specific identifier for the common target], rendering the combination obvious. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SAMARINA MAKHDOOM whose telephone number is (703)756-1044. The examiner can normally be reached Monday – Thursdays from 8:30 to 5:30 pm eastern time. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Resha Desai can be reached on 571-270-7792 The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SAMARINA MAKHDOOM/ Examiner, Art Unit 3648
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 1 earlier event
Jan 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Apr 08, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 30, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jun 23, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jun 23, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jun 29, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 06, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12748205
POSITIONING METHOD USING WIRELESS COMMUNICATION, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR SUPPORTING SAME
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12742893
Device for determining the attitude of a carrier, and associated system for assisting with the piloting of a carrier and determination method
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12744326
RADIO WAVE ABSORBER FOR HIGH-FREQUENCY COMMUNICATION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12738665
RADIO WAVE ABSORBER AND RADIO WAVE ABSORBING COMPOSITION
4y 6m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12736655
SENSOR FUSION-BASED GCS FOR AESA RADAR VIA ADAPTIVE PATTERN NULL FORMING
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+29.3%)
3y 0m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 132 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month