Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/530,775

SILYL-BIARYL PHOSPHORAMIDITES AND METHODS OF MAKING

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 06, 2023
Priority
Jul 02, 2020 — provisional 63/047,480 +1 more
Examiner
SANCHEZ, JUSTIN CHRISTOPHER
Art Unit
1622
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Board of Regents of the University of Texas System
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
33 granted / 38 resolved
+26.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
72
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
32.1%
-7.9% vs TC avg
§102
21.4%
-18.6% vs TC avg
§112
30.5%
-9.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 38 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Claims 1-24, submitted 06 December 2023, are pending in the application. Claims 1-8 are under examination in the instant Office Action. Claims 9-24 are currently withdrawn. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, claims 1-8, and the elected species, PNG media_image1.png 132 161 media_image1.png Greyscale , in the reply filed on 03 April 2026 is acknowledged. Claims 9-24 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected Group, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 03 April 2026. The Examiner did not find prior art on the elected species, therefore, the elected species is free of the art. As such, the scope of the search was expanded to include the broader genus. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Reetz et al. ("Binol‐Derived Monodentate Phosphites and Phosphoramidites with Phosphorus Stereogenic Centers: Novel Ligands for Transition‐Metal Catalysis." Angewandte Chemie 117.3 (2005): 416-419.). Reetz teaches compounds, shown below, which read on the limitations of the claimed genus, Formula (II). Scheme 4 taught by Reetz PNG media_image2.png 208 402 media_image2.png Greyscale (pg. 414, Bottom of Left Col.) When the R moiety taught by Reetz is as described in 14d (SiMe3) or 14e (Si(Ph)3), the compounds therein described read on claims 1-7 by teaching the Applicant’s compounds when R1 and R2 together form an aryl, which reads compounds of the sub-genus (IIb) of claim 2. Additionally, Reetz teaches the limitations of claims 3-6 when R3, R4 and R5 are either all methyl or all phenyl. Finally, Reetz teaches the limitation of claim 7 when R6 and R7 are both methyl. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-4 and 6-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Gavrilov et al. ("Palladium-catalyzed enantioselective allylation in the presence of phosphoramidites derived from (S a)-3-SiMe3-BINOL,(R, S)-semi-TADDOL, and (R, R)-TADDOL." Russian Chemical Bulletin 64.7 (2015): 1595-1601.). Gavrilov teaches compounds, shown below, which read on the limitations of the claimed genus, Formula (II). Scheme 2 taught by Gavrilov PNG media_image3.png 167 242 media_image3.png Greyscale (pg. 1596, Top of page) Gavrilov teaches a compound of the invention when the compound is a compound of Applicant’s sub-genus compound (IIb), shown below. Additionally, the compound reads on claims 3-4 and 6 when R3-R5 are methyl and on claim 7 when R6 and R7 are both ethyl. Sub-genus compound (IIb) taught by Applicant PNG media_image4.png 185 242 media_image4.png Greyscale Allowable Subject Matter Claim 8 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: the claimed compounds of instant claim 8 are deemed novel and unobvious over the prior art. The closest prior art is Reetz et al., described above. However, the compounds taught by Reetz are not identical to that of the Applicants and the prior art does not teach nor reasonably suggest wherein the R6 and R7 moieties are PNG media_image5.png 117 67 media_image5.png Greyscale , PNG media_image6.png 116 61 media_image6.png Greyscale , PNG media_image7.png 113 72 media_image7.png Greyscale , PNG media_image8.png 87 74 media_image8.png Greyscale , or PNG media_image9.png 85 75 media_image9.png Greyscale which are substantially different moieties and are non-obvious variants to that taught in the prior art. Conclusion No claims are allowed. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JUSTIN CHRISTOPHER SANCHEZ whose telephone number is (703)756-5336. The examiner can normally be reached Monday -Friday (0730-1700). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, James H Alstrum-Acevedo can be reached at 571-272-5548. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JUSTIN CHRISTOPHER SANCHEZ Examiner Art Unit 1622 /J.C.S./Examiner, Art Unit 1622 /JAMES H ALSTRUM-ACEVEDO/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1622
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 06, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12643882
INHIBITORS OF HUMAN RESPIRATORY SYNCYTIAL VIRUS AND METAPNEUMO VIRUS
3y 0m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12624039
BTK INHIBITORS
3y 10m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12624043
COMPOSITIONS USEFUL FOR TREATING DISORDERS RELATED TO KIT
2y 6m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12616651
Topical Lipolysis Composition and Methods
4y 7m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12612408
Pyrazolone-Fused Pyrimidine Compound, Preparation Method for Same and Applications Thereof
4y 4m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+11.9%)
3y 3m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 38 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month