Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/530,969

ROTOR

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Dec 06, 2023
Examiner
SETZER, NICHOLAS LEE
Art Unit
2834
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
2 (Final)
63%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 63% of resolved cases
63%
Career Allow Rate
26 granted / 41 resolved
-4.6% vs TC avg
Strong +50% interview lift
Without
With
+50.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
75
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
49.7%
+9.7% vs TC avg
§102
25.4%
-14.6% vs TC avg
§112
24.1%
-15.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 41 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This Office Action is responsive to the Applicant's communication filed January 16, 2026. In view of this communication and the amendment concurrently filed: claims 1-9 were previously pending; claim 7-8 were cancelled and no claims were added by amendment; and thus, claims 1-6 and 9 are now pending in the application. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed January 16, 2026 have been fully considered. The Applicant's first point (page 5-6 of Remarks) amends claim one to include the limitations of previously presented claim 8. The Applicant goes on to argue that KITAO does not teach, “a pawl section which… inclines or bends along the axial direction of the rotor core.” The Examiner asserts that under broadest reasonable interpretation, as outlined in MPEP 2111, the limitation, “inclines or bends” is taught by KITAO. Paragraph [0116] of KITAO states a, “protrusion 60 extending in the axial direction,” which clearly teaches, a pawl section which… inclines along the axial direction of the rotor core, wherein the incline is parallel with the axial direction. Therefore, KITAO teaches the limitation of claim 1, and the 102 rejection stands. The Applicant's second point (page 6-7 of Remarks) argues that a 103 rejection of claim 1 would not have been obvious to modify KITAO. The Applicant asserts that protrusions 60 of KITAO are specifically designed to extend continuously straight in the axial direction. The Applicant then quotes paragraph [0125] of KITAO however the Examiner finds no evidence to support the idea that protrusions 60 are specifically designed to extend continuously straight. In fact, paragraph [0155] of KIAO mentions the , “meandering flow path” which would imply the use of bends, inclines, and curves along the path created by protrusion 60. Therefore, if necessary, a 103 rejection of claim 1 could be obvious to modify with KITAO. Such as using the bending protrusions taught in SUGIYAMA (JP 2011172441 A), and shown in Fig 2. PNG media_image1.png 331 485 media_image1.png Greyscale Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by KITAO (US 20200186007 A1). Regarding claim 1, KITAO teaches: A rotor(Fig 1; 20), comprising: a rotor shaft(Fig 1; 21); a rotor core (Fig 1; 22)attached to the rotor shaft (Fig 1; 21)[0034]and comprising a plurality of magnet slots(Fig 2; 30) and magnets(Fig 2; 23), wherein at least one magnet of the magnets (Fig 2; 23)has an elongated cross-sectional shape(rectangle [0040]) and is fixed by being pressed against a part of an inner surface defining at least one corresponding magnet slot(Fig 2; 30b) of the magnet slots of the rotor core(magnet surface 23b and hole surface 30b make contact[0040]), wherein the rotor (Fig 1; 20)is configured so that coolant flowing through the rotor shaft(Fig 1; 36) reaches a surface of a long side of the at least one magnet that is exposed inward in a radial direction(Fig 2; 23a) of the rotor core in the at least one corresponding magnet slot and moves along an axial direction (Fig 1; 35)of the rotor core[0048]; and further comprising a pawl(Fig 10; 60) section which extends from the inner surface of the rotor core (Fig 10; 30aa) defining a radially inner side of the at least one corresponding magnet slot(Fig 10; 30Aa), contacts the long-side surface(Fig 10; 23a), and inclines or bends along the axial direction of the rotor core[0116], and thereby fixes the at least one magnet 5(Fig 10; 23). PNG media_image2.png 677 542 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image3.png 540 741 media_image3.png Greyscale PNG media_image4.png 559 757 media_image4.png Greyscale Regarding claim 2, KITAO teaches the rotor according to claim 1, further comprising: a first flow path (Fig 1; 38)which communicates with a coolant flow path flowing through inside the rotor shaft (Fig 1; 36)and extends to be oriented outward in the radial direction toward the long-side surface (Fig 2;23a)in the rotor core; and a second flow path (Fig 2; 44)which extends from the first flow (Fig 1; 38)path outward in the radial direction along the long-side surface(Fig 2;23a)[0042]. Regarding claim 3, KITAO teaches the rotor according to claim 2, further comprising: wherein the second flow path (Fig 2;44)extends from radially inside the long-side surface (Fig 2;23a)to radially outside the long-side surface(Fig 2;23a)(flows along 44 from 35 to 33[0042]). Regarding claim 4, KITAO teaches the rotor according to claim 2, further comprising: wherein the second flow path (Fig 2; 44)extends from the long-side surface (Fig 2;23a)to a short-side surface(Fig 2;23c) of the at least one magnet (Fig 2; 23)which is exposed continuously to a radially outer side in the at least one corresponding magnet slot(Fig 2;30) in the radial direction of the rotor core(Fig 2; 22). Regarding claim 5, KITAO teaches the rotor according to claim 2, further comprising: wherein the second flow path(Fig 2; 44) comprises a coolant flow blocker (Fig 2; 32)which blocks the coolant from flowing inward in the radial direction of the rotor core(Fig 2; 22). Regarding claim 6, KITAO teaches the rotor according to claim 2, further comprising: wherein the first flow path (Fig 1; 38)comprises a flow path which extends straight to the long-side surface(Fig 2; 23a)(first flow path 38 flows to cooling hole 35 [0042] which feeds second flow path 44 along long side 23c[0042]) . Regarding claim 9, KITAO teaches the rotor according to claim 1, further comprising: wherein one magnet (Fig 2; 23)and another adjacent magnet (Fig 2; 23) among the magnets are arranged in a substantially V-shape [0035]where ends of the one and the other magnets are close to each other on an inner side in the radial direction of the rotor core(Fig 2; 22). Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NICHOLAS L SETZER whose telephone number is (571)272-3021. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri, 8am-5pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Oluseye Iwarere can be reached at (571) 270-5112. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /N.L.S./Examiner, Art Unit 2834 /OLUSEYE IWARERE/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 06, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Jan 16, 2026
Response Filed
Feb 04, 2026
Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12589880
ROTOR, AND PROPELLER DRIVING DEVICE AND AIRCRAFT USING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592605
COOLING SYSTEM FOR DRIVE DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12580436
STATOR ASSEMBLY FOR AN ELECTRIC MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12573895
ROTOR PUNCHING SHEET, MOTOR ROTOR, MOTOR AND VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12558707
TRANSDUCER AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
63%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+50.0%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 41 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month