Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/531,168

TARGETING ANTI-HUMAN PD 1H/VISTA TO TREAT HEMATOLOGIC DISORDERS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Dec 06, 2023
Priority
Dec 09, 2022 — provisional 63/386,707
Examiner
NICKOL, GARY B
Art Unit
1643
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
44%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 4m
Est. Remaining
70%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 44% of resolved cases
44%
Career Allowance Rate
25 granted / 57 resolved
-16.1% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+26.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 9m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
90
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.5%
-37.5% vs TC avg
§103
31.1%
-8.9% vs TC avg
§102
14.9%
-25.1% vs TC avg
§112
33.5%
-6.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 57 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-5 are pending. Claim Objections Claim 5 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 5 refers to the method of “claims 1”. This objection can be obviated by amending the claim to recite, “The method of claim Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3 and 5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Snyder et al. (US 2017/0051061, published February 23, 2017). As to claims 1 and 5, Snyder et al. teach [0013] a method for treating a leukemia in a subject comprising administering to the subject a therapeutically effective amount of an antibody that specifically binds PD-1H (also known as “VISTA”). Specifically, the reference teaches [0013] that in some embodiments, the antibody or antibody fragment binds to VISTA, thereby modulating or enhancing an immunogenic response to cancer wherein the cancer is a leukemia. Snyder et al. further teaches [0121] that the anti-VISTA compounds and therapies described herein are co-administered with one or more immune checkpoint antibodies, such as, for example, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, tremelimumab, ipilimumab, anti-PD-L1 antibody, anti-PD-L2 antibody, anti-TIM-3 antibody, anti-LAG-3v, anti-OX40 antibody and anti-GITR antibody. As to claim 2-3, Snyder et al. further teaches [0013] that the leukemia can be acute myeloid leukemia or a myelodysplastic syndrome. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Snyder et al. (US 2017/0051061, published February 23, 2017) in view of Liu-Dumlao et al. (Curr Oncol Rep (2012) 14:387–394). Snyder et al. teaches as set forth above and further teaches [0013] that the anti-VISTA antibodies can be used to treat lymphocytic leukemias such as “acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)”. As to claim 4, Snyder et al. does not specifically teach that the lymphoblastic leukemia comprises a “Philadelphia positive” acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Liu-Dumlao et al. teach (introduction) that the Philadelphia chromosome (Ph) is the most common cytogenetic abnormality in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), occurring in about 20% to 30% of all cases. The mutation results from a reciprocal translocation between the ABL-1 oncogene on the long arm of chromosome 9 and a breakpoint cluster region (BCR) on the long arm of chromosome 22, resulting in a fusion gene, BCR-ABL, that encodes an oncogenic protein with constitutively active tyrosine kinase activity. Liu-Dumlao et al. further teach (page 388) that with the advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), there has been improvement in response rates and survival of patients with Ph-positive ALL and that it is now standard practice to incorporate TKIs into the frontline regimens for patients with newly diagnosed Ph-positive ALL. One of ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing would consider it prima facie obvious for Snyder et al. to have included acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells that were also Philadelphia positive (Ph+) because this is a common and well-known genetic mutation that occurs in 20-30% of all cases resulting in an oncogenic protein with constitutively active tyrosine kinase activity. Further, one would have been motivated to test for this chromosomal abnormality because Liu-Dumlao et al. teach that with the advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), there has been improvement in response rates and survival of patients with Ph+ ALL and that it is now standard practice to incorporate TKIs into the frontline regimens for patients with newly diagnosed Ph-positive ALL. In fact, Snyder et al. teaches [0123] the inclusion of tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as imatinib, sorafenib and vemurafenib as additional anti-cancer therapies to be used in combination with the anti-VISTA compounds. No claim is allowed. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GARY B NICKOL, Ph.D. whose telephone number is (571)272-0835. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9AM-5:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Julie Wu can be reached at 571-272-5205. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GARY B NICKOL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1643
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 06, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12605425
TNF MUTEINS AND USES THEREOF
4y 4m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12599620
METHOD FOR THE TREATMENT OF CHRONIC FATIGUE SYNDROME USING AN INHIBITORY OR CYTOTOXIC AGENT AGAINST PLASMA CELLS
4y 1m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12577286
T CELL RECEPTORS WHICH RECOGNIZE MUTATED EGFR
5y 4m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12534538
ANTI-HER2 BINDING MOLECULES
4y 4m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12492251
HUMAN BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER TARGETING ANTIBODIES
3y 4m to grant Granted Dec 09, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
44%
Grant Probability
70%
With Interview (+26.4%)
3y 9m (~1y 4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 57 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month