Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/531,186

System and Method for Joint Communication and Radar Sensing

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Dec 06, 2023
Examiner
DWYER, MATTHEW JAMES
Art Unit
2649
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 0% of cases
0%
Career Allow Rate
0 granted / 0 resolved
-62.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
19
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
62.8%
+22.8% vs TC avg
§102
30.2%
-9.8% vs TC avg
§112
7.0%
-33.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 0 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on FILLIN "Enter date IDS was filed" \* MERGEFORMAT 12/06/2023 has been considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis ( i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale , or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 9-13 , 19 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 FILLIN "Insert either \“(a)(1)\” or \“(a)(2)\” or both. If paragraph (a)(2) of 35 U.S.C. 102 is applicable, use form paragraph 7.15.01.aia, 7.15.02.aia or 7.15.03.aia where applicable." \d "[ 2 ]" (a)(1) as being FILLIN "Insert either—clearly anticipated—or—anticipated—with an explanation at the end of the paragraph." \d "[ 3 ]" anticipated by FILLIN "Insert the prior art relied upon." \d "[ 4 ]" Zhang et al. (US 2022/0295237 A1, hereinafter Zhang.) Regarding claim 1, Zhang discloses a system for joint communication and radar sensing ( [F igure 3, 310 ] and [0052] the wireless device 310 may be a radar device for determining radio frequency sensing information , [0002] capable of supporting communication with multiple users, i.e. joint communication ) comprising: at least one communication transmitter unit ([F igure 3, 318 ] transmitter) ) configured to transmit at least one communication pilot signal; at least one radar transmitter unit configured to transmit at least one radar pilot signal ([Figure 3] , [0048] and [0052] Some of the transmissions may carry reference (pilot) signals (RS) , i.e. the transmitter and receiver may be configured to send pilot signals , and a transmitter/receiver 318 with a corresponding transmit processor 316 and receive processor 370 that are configured to perform radar transmission and measurement ) ; a control unit ([Figure 3 , 375 ] ) configured to schedule a transmission of the at least one communication transmitter unit ([Figure 7, 720] and [0070] The first radar 702 may transmit, at 718, the transmission schedule to the second radar 704 and/or the first radar 702 may transmit, at 718, the transmission schedule to the third radar) or the at least one radar transmitter unit using a time delay ( [Figure 4] and [0060] FIG. 4 item 402 may measure a time delay between transmission of the radar signal and reception of the return signal. That is, transmissions may use a time delay ) ; and at least one receiver unit configured to receive the at least one radar pilot signal with the time delay with respect to the at least one communication pilot signal ([Figure 4 ] and [ 00 60 ] reception of the return signal for determining a distance to the object from which the return signal was reflected ) . Regarding claim 9, Zhang discloses at least one communication pilot signal or the at least one radar pilot signal correspond to a waveform with a prefix ([0046] The symbols on DL may be cyclic prefix. [0048] S ome of the transmissions may carry reference (pilot) signals (RS). That is, signal transmission symbols may be cyclic prefix on a pilot signal) . Regarding claim 10 , Zhang discloses the prefix is a cyclic prefix ([0046] The symbols on DL may be cyclic prefix) . Regarding claim 11, Zhang discloses the control unit ([Figure 3, 375]) is configured to generate the time delay corresponding to a predefined time range within the prefix ([0060] A time delay may be measured corresponding to a predefined time range within [0046] a cyclic prefix) . Regarding claim 12, Zhang discloses the control unit ([Figure 3, 375]) is configured to schedule transmissions by scheduling the at least one communication transmitter unit and the at least one radar transmitter unit using a time delay ([Figure 7, 720] and [0070] The first radar 702 may transmit, at 718, the transmission schedule to the second radar 704 and/or the first radar 702 may transmit, at 718, the transmission schedule to the third radar. That is, a radar group may transmit signals on [0019] a transmission schedule, based on [0060] a time delay, via [0048] pilot signals from the transmitters) such that a separation of the radar and communication pilot signals is determinable at the at least one receiver unit by range-domain orthogonality at the at least one receiver unit ( [0056] Channel estimates derived by a channel estimator 358, may be provided to different antennas 352 via separate transmitters 354TX, i.e. the ability to separate communication and radar sensing channels) . Regarding claim 1 3 , the claimed limitations of the claim are rejected as the same reasons as set forth in claim 1. Regarding claim 1 9 , the claimed limitations of claim are rejected as the same reasons as set forth in the combination of claim s 9 and 11 . Regarding claim 20 , the claimed limitations of claim are rejected as the same reasons as set forth in claim 10 . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness . This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 2, 7, 8, 14 , 17 and 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhang et al. (US 2022/0295237 A1, hereinafter Zhang) in view of Sahin et al. ( US 2022 / 0350009 A1 , hereinafter Sahin .) Regarding claim 2, Zhang disclose s the control unit ([Figure 3, 375]) . Zhang does not specifically disclose to generate a frequency shift for the at least one communication transmitter unit or the at least one radar transmitter unit, and wherein the at least one receiver unit is further configured to receive the at least one radar pilot signal with the frequency shift with respect to the at least one communication pilot signal. However, Sahin discloses a system for ( [0003] modulating joint radar communication signals via the use of frequency shifting . [Figure 3] and [ 006 4 ] -[ 0066] a f requency shift may be applied to the reference signal waveform (i.e., the reference signal 304 of FIG. 3) , i.e. a frequency shift is related to the radar pilot signal . That is, a receiver /transmitter unit is configured to receive /transmit a pilot signal with a frequency shift ) . Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to modify Zhang to generate a frequency shift for the at least one communication transmitter unit or the at least one radar transmitter unit, and wherein the at least one receiver unit is further configured to receive the at least one radar pilot signal with the frequency shift with respect to the at least one communication pilot signal , as taught by Sahin , in order to enhance data communication capabilities ( [0012] ) . Regarding claim 7, Zhang discloses the control unit ([Figure 3, 375]) is configured to: generate the time delay using a digital pilot modulation; or generate the time delay using one or more time delay units ([0060] A time delay may be measured between transmission of the radar signal and reception from another signal for determining a distance to the object from which the return signal was received, i.e. generating a time delay using multiple time delay units measured from multiple signals) . Regarding claim 8, Zhang discloses the control unit ([Figure 3, 375]) . Zhang does not specifically disclose to generate the frequency shift using a digital pilot modulation; or generate the frequency shift using one or more frequency offsets . However, Sahin discloses ( [Figure 3] and [0065] frequency shifting the reference signal waveform , i.e. the reference signal 304 of FIG. 3 , read on generating the frequency shift via a digital pilot modulation signal. ) Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to modify Zhang to generate the frequency shift using a digital pilot modulation; or generate the frequency shift using one or more frequency offsets , as taught by Sahin , in order to enhance data communication capabilities ([0012]) . Regarding claim 14, the claimed limitations of claim are rejected as the same reasons as set forth in claim 2. Regarding claim 17, the claimed limitations of claim are rejected as the same reasons as set forth in claim 7. Regarding claim 18, the claimed limitations of claim are rejected as the same reasons as set forth in claim 8. Claims 3 - 5, 15 and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhang et al. (US 2022/0295237 A1, hereinafter Zhang) and Sahin et al. (US 2022/0350009 A1, hereinafter Sahin ) as applied in claims above, and further in view of Trainin et al. ( US 2021 / 0173065 A1 , hereinafter Trainin .) Regarding claim 3 , Zhang discloses the control unit ([Figure 3, 375]) and wherein the at least one receiver unit is configured to perform channel estimation based on the time delay or the frequency shift in order to separate communication and radar sensing channels. ( [0054] E ach receiver may perform d ecisions based on channel estimates computed by the channel estimator 358 using [0060] a time dela y or [0065] frequency shift. [0056] Channel estimates derived by a channel estimator 358, may be provided to different antennas 352 via separate transmitters 354TX, i.e. the ability to separate communication and radar sensing channels ) . The combination of Zhang and Sahin does not specifically disclose to transmit the time delay or the frequency shift to the at least one receiver unit prior to the reception of the at least one communication pilot signal and the at least one radar pilot signal . However , Trainin discloses ( [0075] the radar transmitter 710 may transmit a radar alert frame followed by a codeword sequence to the radar receiver 720 prior to transmitting the radar pulses 712. T he radar alert frame may include timing information such as in dicat ing a timing offset or delay . That is, a time delay or frequency shift may be transmitted prior to transmitting communication or radar pilot signals via the radar alert frame.) Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to modify the combination of Zhang and Sahin to include, transmitting a time delay or frequency shift to a receiver prior to receiving a communication and radar pilot signal , as taught by Trainin , in order to improve radar signals be ing implemented by existing wireless communication systems and networks and thus improve system performance. Regarding claim 4, Zhang discloses at least one receiver unit ([Figure 3] and [0052] Transmitter/receiver 318) is configured to: perform the channel estimation in range-domain based on the time delay; or perform the channel estimation in Doppler-domain based on the frequency shift. ([Figure 1] and [0028] A radar device 103 may transmit a wireless signal 105 and use information about the signal to image an environment or determine information about a target 107 based on range, doppler, and/or angle information determined from the wireless signal. [Figure 7, 702] and [0074] Radar device 702 may perform operations such as range estimation, direction estimation, Doppler estimation, etc. That is, the receiver unit may be configured to perform estimations such as range-domain or Doppler-domain based on a [0060] time delay or [0065] frequency shift ) . Regarding claim 5, Zhang discloses at least one receiver unit is configured to generate range profiles based on the channel estimation in the Doppler-domain based on the frequency shift. ([Figure 1] and [0028] a radar device 103 may transmit a wireless signal 105 and use information about the signal to image an environment or determine information about a target 107 based on range, doppler, and/or angle information determined from the wireless signal. [Figure 3] and [0055] The controller/processor 359 can be associated with a memory 360 that stores program codes and data. That is, range can be calculated from the channel estimation from the Doppler-domain and frequency shift. The range can then be stored in memory as a range profile) . Regarding claim 15, the claimed limitations are rejected as the same reasons as set forth in claim 3. Regarding claim 16, the claimed limitations of claim are rejected as the same reasons as set forth in claim 4. Claim 6 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhang et al. (US 2022/0295237 A1, hereinafter Zhang ,) Sahin et al. (US 2022/0350009 A1, hereinafter Sahin ,) and Trainin et al. (US 2021/0173065 A1, hereinafter Trainin ) as applied to claims above, and further in view of Laghezza et al. ( US 2020 / 0348389 A1 , hereinafter Laghezza .) Regarding claim 6 , Zhang discloses the at least one receiver unit ([Figure 3] and [0052] Transmitter/receiver 318) . The comb ination of Zhang , Sahin , and Trainin do not specifically disclose to combine the range profiles to generate a range-Doppler map, a range-velocity map, a delay- Doppler map, or a delay-velocity map. However, Laghezza discloses the range-Doppler map is calculated ([0046]) , from the range profile of the radar signal ([0027]) . Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to modify the combination of Zhang , Sahin , and Trainin to include, generating a range-Doppler map, as taught by Laghezza , in order to enhance data communication ([0009]) . Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Manolakos , Alexandros et al. (2022). Communication system radar signaling (US 2022 / 0283262 A1). Filed 2021-03-08. Discloses a communication device that includes a transceiver, memory and processor. The device may be capable of receiving and measuring wireless radar signal positions in accordance to power levels, and transmitting an indication of the positioning measurement to a network. (Figure 8 and Abstract) Guenach , Mamoun et al. (2022). System and method for providing distributed wireless communication (US 2022 / 0150909 A1). Filed 2021-11-10. Discloses a scheduling unit configured to schedule wireless communication units for radar sensing for distributing wireless communication with respect to a UE dealing with radar sensing information. (Abstract) Chen, Chulong et al. (2020). Methods and apparatus to implement compact time-frequency division multiplexing for mimo radar (US 2020 / 0233076 A1). Filed 2019-06-27. Discloses compact time-frequency division multiplexing for Multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) radar systems . (Abstract) Yu, Zhibin et al. (2020). Device radar sensing (US 2020 / 0072963 A1). Filed 2017-03-31. Discloses a control system for radar signal transmitting based on a communication signal between two devices. (Abstract and Claim 1) Tigrek , Recep Firat et al. (2009). Method for measuring the radial velocity of a target with a doppler radar (US 2009 / 0237292 A1). Filed 2009-02-23. Discloses transmitting a waveform signal with frequency carrier signals in order to improve Doppler response. (Abstract) Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FILLIN "Examiner name" \* MERGEFORMAT MATTHEW JAMES DWYER whose telephone number is FILLIN "Phone number" \* MERGEFORMAT (571)272-5121 . The examiner can normally be reached FILLIN "Work Schedule?" \* MERGEFORMAT M-F 8-5 . Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, FILLIN "SPE Name?" \* MERGEFORMAT Yuwen Pan can be reached at FILLIN "SPE Phone?" \* MERGEFORMAT (571) 272-7855 . The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MATTHEW JAMES DWYER/ Examiner, Art Unit 2649 /GEORGE ENG/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2699
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 06, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 17, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
Grant Probability
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 0 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month