Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/531,372

FUEL OVERFILL RECOVERY APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 29, 2023
Examiner
AVILA, STEPHEN P
Art Unit
3615
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 1m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
1541 granted / 1921 resolved
+28.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
1961
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
61.3%
+21.3% vs TC avg
§102
9.8%
-30.2% vs TC avg
§112
9.1%
-30.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1921 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 5-9 and 18-19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Langlois (US 5322099) in view of Fenton (US 3988997). With respect to claim 1, 7-8, 18-19, Langlois discloses the basic claimed structure including a fuel overfill recovery apparatus for a watercraft with a container with an aperture and a vent. Not disclosed by Langlois are the details of the container including first 18 and second walls 20 with their perimeters being joined to define a reservoir and a coupled connector extending around a periphery of an aperture. Fenton teaches a container 10 (Figure 1) including first and second flat flexible walls with their perimeters being joined to define a reservoir and a coupled connector (triangle flap at periphery of grommet 17) extending around a periphery of an aperture 17 and an integral handle 16. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to form the device of Langlois with the container including first and second flexible flat walls with their perimeters being joined to define a reservoir and a coupled connector extending around a periphery of an aperture and a handle as taught by Fenton with a high likelihood of success for improved economy and ease of manufacturing by using just two sheets of material and ease of handling. The combination combines known features to achieve predictable results. Further, a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of claimed invention of designing complex fuel recovery systems would have some years of experience and would be familiar with various containers and connectors and would have found the combination to have been obvious. With respect to claim 5, to provide an additional vent would have been an obvious choice of engineering design to provide improved venting and is merely a duplication of parts (note MPEP 2144.04 VI B) and to form the container to be transparent for ease of letting a user know the amount of fluid in the container. Note that transparent containers are well known. Claim(s) 2-4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Langlois (US 5322099) in view of Fenton (US 3988997), as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Kenna (US 2017/0065014). With respect to claims 2-4, Langlois does not disclose an adhesive and liner connector. Kenna teaches a connector with adhesive and a liner (claim 4). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to form the device of Langlois with the connector including adhesive and a removable liner as taught by Kenna with a high likelihood of success for improved ease of attachment and reduced labor cost. The combination combines known features to achieve predictable results. Further, a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of claimed invention of designing complex fuel recovery systems would have some years of experience and would be familiar with various connectors and would have found the combination to have been obvious. With respect to claim 2, the adhesive of the combination would inherently provide sealing. Claims 10-17 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 20 is allowed. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Hansen (US 2068951) shows a fuel system. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STEPHEN AVILA whose telephone number is (571)272-6678. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Thu 6-4. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Samuel J. Morano can be reached at 571-272-6684. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. STEPHEN AVILA Primary Examiner Art Unit 3617 /STEPHEN P AVILA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3615
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 29, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600450
STERN DRIVES HAVING STEERABLE GEARCASE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600449
MARINE VESSELS HAVING A FIRST MARINE DRIVE AND A SECOND MARINE DRIVE AND METHODS FOR CONTROLLING THEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595036
RIM-DRIVEN MOTOR FOR PERSONAL WATERCRAFT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594799
AMPHIBIOUS VEHICLE WITH ADJUSTABLE COMPONENTS FOR USE IN A LIQUID MANURE LAGOON
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12583567
SMALL MARINE VESSEL CAPABLE IN WHICH ACTION POSITION OF THRUST FORCE IS CHANGEABLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+10.1%)
2y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1921 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month