Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/531,804

CURRENT SENSING DEVICE AND DIRECT-CURRENT (DC)/DC CONVERTER INCLUDING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Dec 07, 2023
Examiner
TORRES-RIVERA, ALEX
Art Unit
2838
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
HL Mando Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
648 granted / 752 resolved
+18.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
784
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
52.8%
+12.8% vs TC avg
§102
27.7%
-12.3% vs TC avg
§112
16.4%
-23.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 752 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION This action is in response to the Application filed on 12/07/2023. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant's claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d). Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement(s) (IDS) submitted on 11/18/2025 and 12/07/2023 is/are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement(s) is/are being considered by the examiner. Specification The lengthy specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. Applicant’s cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. Drawings The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, the “a current direction limiting circuit that electrically connects the both ends of the secondary side to the sensing voltage generation circuit” must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). As shown in Fig. 2, diode 131 is only connected to a single end. No new matter should be entered. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1 – 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The term “distinguishable manner” in claims 1 and 10, is a relative term which renders the claim indefinite. The term “distinguishable manner” is not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. For examination purpose, it is assumed that the voltage limiting circuit limits a voltage applied to the both ends of the secondary side according to a direction of the output current. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 - 4, 6 - 7, 10 – 13 and 15 – 16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by US Pub. No. 2016/0161530; (hereinafter Lee), cited by Applicant(s). Regarding claim 1, Lee [e.g. Fig. 1] discloses a current sensing device for sensing an alternating current, the current sensing device comprising: a current transformer [e.g. 8] that comprises a primary side constituting at least a part of a path, through which a sensing target current flows in a sensing target circuit [e.g. current output of source Vin], and a secondary side, and is configured to generate, to the secondary side, an output current [e.g. current through secondary winding of 8] according to characteristics of the sensing target current; a voltage limiting circuit [e.g. 1, 2] that is connected to both ends of the secondary side and configured to provide a path, through which at least a part of the output current flows [e.g. as shown], and to limit a voltage applied to the both ends of the secondary side in a distinguishable manner according to a direction of the output current [e.g. paragraph 031 recites “The current sensing circuit 100 functions to sense current by means of the magnitude of voltage inducted at the first resistor 5. A forward current (i.e., positive current) flows through the first current path, and a reverse current (i.e., negative current) flows through the second current path. Since the reverse current is much less than the forward current, the resistance value of the second resistor 1 is much greater than that of the first resistor 5 so that the voltage-second balance condition may be maintained. That is, when the voltage-second balance condition is satisfied, the magnitudes of a positive voltage applied to the first resistor 5 and a negative voltage applied to the second resistor 1 are equal to each other.” As shown the branch 1, 2 is in parallel to the secondary winding, where parallel branches maintain same (limited) voltage]; a sensing voltage generation circuit [e.g. resistor 5] configured to generate a sensing voltage based on at least one of the output current or a voltage of the voltage limiting circuit [e.g. voltage across resistor 5]; and a current direction limiting circuit [e.g. diode 3 and line paralleled to diode 3 connected to ground] that electrically connects the both ends of the secondary side to the sensing voltage generation circuit, and is configured to limit a direction of a current transferred from the both ends of the secondary side to the sensing voltage generation circuit [e.g. limit a reverse current from 5 to secondary winding according to the diode’s polarity (anode/cathode)]. Regarding claim 10, Lee [e.g. Fig. 1] discloses a direct-current (DC)/DC converter comprising: an input side to which an input voltage [e.g. Vin] is applied; an output side to which an output voltage [e.g. output part of 10] generated from the input voltage is applied; and a current sensing device [e.g. 100] configured to constitute, in any one of the input side and the output side, at least a part of a path through which a current flows and to sense the current that flows [e.g. paragraph 031], wherein the current sensing device comprises: a current transformer [e.g. 8] that comprises a primary side constituting, in any one of the input side and the output side, at least a part of a path through which a sensing target current flows [e.g. current output of source Vin] and a secondary side, and is configured to generate, to the secondary side, an output current [e.g. current through secondary winding of 8] according to characteristics of the sensing target current; a voltage limiting circuit [e.g. 1, 2] that is connected to both ends of the secondary side and configured to provide a path, through which at least a part of the output current flows [e.g. as shown], and to limit a voltage applied to the both ends of the secondary side in a distinguishable manner according to a direction of the output current [e.g. paragraph 031 recites “The current sensing circuit 100 functions to sense current by means of the magnitude of voltage inducted at the first resistor 5. A forward current (i.e., positive current) flows through the first current path, and a reverse current (i.e., negative current) flows through the second current path. Since the reverse current is much less than the forward current, the resistance value of the second resistor 1 is much greater than that of the first resistor 5 so that the voltage-second balance condition may be maintained. That is, when the voltage-second balance condition is satisfied, the magnitudes of a positive voltage applied to the first resistor 5 and a negative voltage applied to the second resistor 1 are equal to each other.” As shown the branch 1, 2 is in parallel to the secondary winding, where parallel branches maintain same (limited) voltage]; a sensing voltage generation circuit [e.g. resistor 5] configured to generate a sensing voltage based on at least one of the output current or a voltage of the voltage limiting circuit [e.g. voltage across resistor 5]; and a current direction limiting circuit [e.g. diode 3 and line paralleled to diode 3 connected to ground] that electrically connects the both ends of the secondary side to the sensing voltage generation circuit, and is configured to limit a direction of a current transferred from the both ends of the secondary side to the sensing voltage generation circuit [e.g. limit a reverse current from 5 to secondary winding according to the diode’s polarity (anode/cathode)]. Regarding claim 2 and claim 11, Lee [e.g. Fig. 1] discloses wherein the voltage limiting circuit comprises: a first voltage generation circuit [e.g. 1] configured to generate a voltage proportional to a magnitude of at least a part of an output current of the current transformer in a first direction [e.g. direction as shown in Fig. 1], or a magnitude of at least a part of an output current of the current transformer in a second direction; and a second voltage generation circuit [e.g. 2] that is connected in series to the first voltage generation circuit between the both ends of the secondary side, and is configured to, upon the current transformer generating the output current in the first direction, generate a voltage corresponding to a preset first voltage [e.g. forward voltage drop of the diode (ON)] regardless of the magnitude of the output current in the first direction, and upon the current transformer generating the output current in the second direction, generate a voltage corresponding to a preset second voltage regardless of the magnitude of the output current in the second direction [e.g. reverse bias diode voltage (OFF)], and the preset first voltage and the preset second voltage are different from each other [e.g. forward voltage and reverse bias diode voltage are different levels]. Regarding claim 3 and claim 12, Lee [e.g. Fig. 1] discloses wherein an absolute value of the preset second voltage is greater than an absolute value of the preset first voltage [e.g. the forward voltage is less than the breakdown reverse bias voltage of a diode]. Regarding claim 4 and claim 13, Lee [e.g. Fig. 1] discloses wherein the voltage applied to the both ends of the secondary side corresponds to a sum of the voltage generated by the first voltage generation circuit and the voltage generated by the second voltage generation circuit [e.g. 1 and 2 are in series connected in parallel to the secondary winding. Therefore, the sum of 1 and 2 corresponds to the secondary winding voltage]. Regarding claim 6 and claim 15, Lee [e.g. Fig. 1] discloses wherein the current direction limiting circuit [e.g. 3] comprises a first current direction limiting circuit [e.g. 3] configured to allow a flow of at least a part of an output current in a first direction generated by the current transformer to the sensing voltage generation circuit [e.g. forward direction to 5], and to limit a flow of at least a part of an output current in a second direction generated by the current transformer to the sensing voltage generation circuit [e.g. diode 3 limit current in the reverse direction (from 5 to transformer)]. Regarding claim 7 and claim 16, Lee [e.g. Fig. 1] discloses wherein the sensing voltage generation circuit [e.g. 5] comprises a third voltage generation circuit [e.g. resistor 5] configured to generate a voltage proportional to a magnitude of a current flowing through the sensing voltage generation circuit [e.g. the voltage across resistor 5 corresponds to a current through the resistor by Ohm’s Law]. Examiner’s Note Examiner has cited particular columns and line numbers in the references applied to the claims above for the convenience of the applicant. Although the specified citations are representative of the teachings of the art and are applied to specific limitations within the individual claim, other passages and figures may apply as well. It is respectfully requested from the applicant in preparing responses, to fully consider the references in their entirety as potentially teaching all or part of the claimed invention, as well as the context of the passage as taught by the prior art or disclosed by the Examiner. In the case of amending the claimed invention, Applicant is respectfully requested to indicate the portion(s) of the specification which dictate(s) the structure relied on for proper interpretation and also to verify and ascertain the metes and bounds of the claimed invention. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5, 8, 9, 14 and 17 – 18 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The primary reason for the indication of the allowability of claim 5 is the inclusion therein, in combination as currently claimed as a whole, of the limitation of “wherein the voltage limiting circuit further comprises a second current direction limiting circuit configured to limit a flow of a current in the first direction through the voltage limiting circuit and allow a flow of a current in the second direction”. The primary reason for the indication of the allowability of claim 8 is the inclusion therein, in combination as currently claimed as a whole, of the limitation of “wherein, in response to the current transformer generating an output current in a first direction, the voltage limiting circuit is further configured to allow a voltage at the both ends of the secondary side to be a third voltage as at least a part of the output current in the first direction flows through the voltage limiting circuit, the current direction limiting circuit is further configured to allow a remaining part of the output current in the first direction to flow to the sensing voltage generation circuit, and the sensing voltage generation circuit is11urtherr configured to generate a first sensing voltage proportional to a magnitude of the remaining part of the output current in the first direction. The primary reason for the indication of the allowability of claim 9 is the inclusion therein, in combination as currently claimed as a whole, of the limitation of “wherein, in response to the current transformer generating an output current in a second direction, the voltage limiting circuit is further configured to allow a voltage at the both ends of the secondary side to be a fourth voltage as at least a part of the output current in the second direction flows through the voltage limiting circuit, the current direction limiting circuit is further configured to limit a flow of the output current in the second direction to the sensing voltage generation circuit, and the sensing voltage generation circuit is further configured to generate a second sensing voltage according to the fourth voltage. The primary reason for the indication of the allowability of claim 14 is the inclusion therein, in combination as currently claimed as a whole, of the limitation of “wherein the voltage limiting circuit further comprises a second current direction limiting circuit configured to limit a flow of a current in the first direction through the voltage limiting circuit and allow a flow of a current in the second direction. The primary reason for the Indication of the allowability of claim 17 is the inclusion therein, in combination as currently claimed as a whole, of the limitation of “wherein, in response to the current transformer generating an output current in a first direction, the voltage limiting circuit is further configured to allow a voltage at the both ends of the secondary side to be a third voltage as at least a part of the output current in the first direction flows through the voltage limiting circuit, the current direction limiting circuit is further configured to allow a remaining part of the output current in the first direction to flow to the sensing voltage generation circuit, and the sensing voltage generation circuit is further configured to generate a first sensing voltage proportional to a magnitude of the remaining part of the output current in the first direction. The primary reason for the indication of the allowability of claim 18 is the inclusion therein, in combination as currently claimed as a whole, of the limitation of “wherein, in response to the current transformer generating an output current in a second direction, the voltage limiting circuit is further configured to allow a voltage at the both ends of the secondary side to be a fourth voltage as at least a part of the output current in the second direction flows through the voltage limiting circuit, the current direction limiting circuit is further configured to limit a flow of the output current in the second direction to the sensing voltage generation circuit, and the sensing voltage generation circuit is further configured to generate a second sensing voltage according to the fourth voltage. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US Pub. No. 2002/0131224 discloses an input current sense circuit adapted in an overcurrent protection for a switching power converter. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Alex Torres-Rivera whose telephone number is (571)272-5261. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00-5:30 ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, MONICA LEWIS can be reached at (571) 272-1838. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALEX TORRES-RIVERA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2838
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 07, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 17, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112
Apr 07, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597859
POWER CONVERSION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12573962
ISOLATED POWER SUPPLY CONTROL CIRCUIT AND ISOLATED POWER SUPPLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12567739
ELECTROSTATIC PROTECTION CIRCUIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12567792
SWITCHING REGULATOR AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12562655
DEVICE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING INVERTER
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+11.9%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 752 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month