Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/531,905

PNEUMATIC DISMANTLING DEVICE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Dec 07, 2023
Examiner
NEJAD, MAHDI H
Art Unit
3723
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Soartec Industrial Corp.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 12m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allow Rate
442 granted / 602 resolved
+3.4% vs TC avg
Strong +30% interview lift
Without
With
+29.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 12m
Avg Prosecution
46 currently pending
Career history
648
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
40.8%
+0.8% vs TC avg
§102
31.5%
-8.5% vs TC avg
§112
25.4%
-14.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 602 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 7 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 7, line 2, “holeis” should read --hole is--. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 10 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 10 recites the limitation “an end of the compartment space remote from the assembling portion includes an assembling hole” in lines 9-11. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Because “an end of the compartment space” is earlier recited in claim 1 which is referring to the same lower closed end. Claims 9 and 10 recite “an end of the compartment space facing toward the assembling portion” which is the upper open end of the compartment space.Examiner suggests amending claims 1, 9 and 10 as below to overcome the rejection and ambiguity regarding the two ends of the compartment space.-- 1. A pneumatic dismantling device, including: a main body, including a compartment space, a chamber, an air intake portion and an assembling portion, a first end of the compartment space being closed by a radial wall, the radial wall and the main body being integrally formed of one piece, the chamber being located between and in communication with the compartment space and the assembling portion, an end of the chamber opposite to the radial wall being closed by the assembling portion, a hammer block being slidably received in the compartment space, a valve body being disposed in the chamber, the air intake portion being in communication with the chamber, the air intake portion being configured to be in communication with a high pressure gas source to make the valve body on or off reciprocatingly so that the hammer block is driven by the high pressure gas source to reciprocate in the compartment space; a disassembling assembly, including a position-limiting member and a connection member, the connection member being rotatably assembled to the assembling portion and isolated from the chamber by the assembling portion, the position-limiting member being assembled to the assembling portion and blocking the connection member, the connection member being configured to be assembled with a dismantling tool.---- 9. The pneumatic dismantling device of claim 1, wherein the main body further includes a first intake passage and a second intake passage, the first intake passage is in communication with a second end of the compartment space facing toward the assembling portion, the second intake passage is in communication with a side of the compartment space, the valve body is reciprocatable to control the first intake passage and the second intake passage to be in communication with the air intake portion alternatively.---- 10. The pneumatic dismantling device of claim 3, wherein the connection member includes a head portion and an insertion portion having a diametric dimension smaller than a diametric dimension of the head portion, the head portion is rotatably received in the assembling portion, the position-limiting member includes a through hole, the insertion portion is disposed through the through hole and protrusive beyond the position-limiting member, and the position-limiting member is blocked by the head portion; the insertion portion includes a second outer threaded portion, and the second outer threaded portion is configured to be screwed with the dismantling tool; the first end of the compartment space remote from the assembling portion includes an assembling hole, and a cover detachably covers the assembling hole; an end of the main body remote from the assembling portion includes a third outer threaded portion, the cover is screwed with the third outer threaded portion, and at least one pin is disposed through the cover and abutted radially against the main body; the air intake portion extends in a direction transverse to a direction in which the compartment space extends; the main body further includes a first intake passage and a second intake passage, the first intake passage is in communication with the second end of the compartment space facing toward the assembling portion, the second intake passage is in communication with a side of the compartment space, the valve body is reciprocatable to control the first intake passage and the second intake passage to be in communication with the air intake portion alternatively; the position-limiting member includes a second annular wall and a blocking wall, the blocking wall includes the through hole, and the second annular wall includes the inner threaded portion.-- Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-9 are allowed. Claim 1 is allowed for disclosing “the radial wall and the main body being integrally formed of one piece”. The closest prior art to the claimed invention of claim 1 is Kobayashi (US 20100139940 A1). Regarding claim 1, Kobayashi teaches a power driven hammer tool with a main body, including a compartment space (18), a chamber (space inside 14), an air intake portion (86) and an assembling portion (102), an end of the compartment space being closed by a radial wall (34), an end of the chamber opposite to the radial wall being closed by the assembling portion, a hammer block (20) being slidably received in the compartment space, a valve body (40) being disposed in the chamber, the air intake portion being in communication with the chamber, he air intake portion being configured to be in communication with a high pressure gas source to make the valve body on or off reciprocatingly so that the hammer block is driven by the high pressure gas source to reciprocate in the compartment space (par. 0015: “moving the valve body 58 away from the forward seat 54 and toward the rearward seat 56, blocking the passage 62 and opening the passage 60”); a disassembling assembly, including a position-limiting member (threaded cap 120) and a connection member (threaded stud 106), the connection member being rotatably assembled (threaded to it) to the assembling portion and isolated from the chamber by the assembling portion, the position-limiting member being assembled to the assembling portion (via body 14) and blocking the connection member (seals the connection member), the connection member being configured to be assembled with a dismantling tool (106 can be threaded into 40 with a dismantling tool like a plier). However making the radial wall (34) and the main body integrally formed of one piece make the device inoperable. PNG media_image1.png 1117 1237 media_image1.png Greyscale Claims 2-9 are allowed due to dependency on allowed claim 1. Claim 10 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MAHDI H NEJAD whose telephone number is (571)270-0464. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7:30am-4pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, David Posigian can be reached at (313) 446-6546. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. MAHDI H. NEJAD Examiner Art Unit 3723 /MAHDI H NEJAD/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3723
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 07, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12589508
ROBOT HAND, ROBOT, ROBOT SYSTEM, AND TRANSFER METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589468
ELECTRIC VISE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589469
LEVELING KNOB SYSTEM AND MECHANISM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583063
PRESS PLATE MODULE, PRODUCTION LINE, AND CONTROL METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12575378
WAFER HANDLING DEVICE AND SUCKER MODULE THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+29.9%)
2y 12m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 602 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month