Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/532,231

MICRO-LED PIXEL CIRCUIT AND DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Dec 07, 2023
Examiner
MERCEDES, DISMERY E
Art Unit
2627
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
LG Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
4 (Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allow Rate
740 granted / 964 resolved
+14.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
993
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.8%
-37.2% vs TC avg
§103
52.1%
+12.1% vs TC avg
§102
21.5%
-18.5% vs TC avg
§112
17.6%
-22.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 964 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-2,4-9, 11, 13-14, 16-22 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Baek et al. (US 2019/0371250) in view of Cho et al. (US 2023/0335056), further in view of Kang et al. (US 2023/0206813). As to Claim 1, Baek et al. discloses A micro-LED pixel circuit comprising: a driving transistor configured to generate a current path in response to a data voltage (fig.2, driving transistor TR11; para.0051,0102); an emission transistor configured to be turned on in response to an emission signal and generate the current path together with the driving transistor (fig.2, transistor TR15; para.0055, 0102), a micro-LED configured to emit light based on a magnitude of a current flowing in the current path (fig.2, LED, para.0051,0055,0061); and a precharge transistor configured to bias an anode electrode of the micro-LED with a precharge voltage corresponding to a luminance band in response to a precharge signal, wherein, during a precharge period preceding an emission period, the precharge signal is enabled prior to the emission signal to precharge the anode electrode with the precharge voltage, when an image to be displayed corresponds to a low gray-scale, and wherein, during the emission period, a same data voltage is applied to each pixel, and a pulse width of the emission signal is modulated according to a gray-scale of an image to be displayed, thereby controlling a duration of current flow through the micro-LED and adjusting a gray-scale value of each pixel (para.0039; fig.10, para.0124- the light emission control signal generation unit 150 may adjust the luminance of the image by controlling the pulse width of the light emission signal ELS corresponding to the luminance that is changed according to the expanded frame period EFL.. The light emission control signal generation unit 150 receives a signal of whether the image signal ImS includes the gray level of the high gray or the gray level of the low gray from the data generation unit 120; para.0126-0127-when the image signal ImS includes the gray level of the high gray, the light emission control signal generation unit 150 generates the light emission control signal CONT3 so that the light emission period t3 of the (N+1)-th frame is shorter than the light emission period t2 in the reference frame period RFL of the N-th frame; 0132-when the image signal ImS includes the gray level of the low gray, the light emission control signal generation unit 150 generates the light emission control signal CONT3 so that the emission period t13 of the (N+1)-th frame is longer than the light emission period t12 in the reference frame period RFL of the N-th frame; para. 0155). Baek et al. discloses where it is determined when the image Ims includes low gray level of the low gray (para.0124, 0132, 0155). Baek et al. does not expressly disclose a micro-LED; a precharge transistor configured to bias an anode electrode of the micro-LED with a precharge voltage corresponding to a luminance band in response to a precharge signal, wherein, during a precharge period preceding an emission period, the precharge signal is enabled prior to the emission signal to precharge the anode electrode with the precharge voltage, when an image to be displayed corresponds to a low gray-scale. Cho et al. discloses a pixel circuit comprising a micro-LED (fig.3, para.0079- light emitting element may be a micro light emitting diode), a precharge transistor configured to bias an anode electrode of the micro-LED with a precharge voltage [corresponding to a luminance band] in response to a precharge signal (fig.3, transistor M8 provides a pre-charging voltage Vpre to the anode of light emitting element LD in response to a scan signal S5i; para.0068, 0095-0097), wherein, during a precharge period preceding an emission period, the precharge signal is enabled prior to the emission signal to precharge the anode electrode with the precharge voltage (fig.4, during precharge period P4 preceding emission period EPI, precharge signal S5i is enabled before the emission signal Ei is enabled, transistor M8 is turned on to supply the pre-charging voltage Vpre to the fourth node N4 (anode)); para.0095, 0136-0137). It would have been obvious s to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Baek et al. with the teachings of Cho et al, the motivation being so that the light emitting element may emit light with a fast response speed, and the luminance non-uniformity phenomenon according to a deterioration deviation of the light emitting element LD may be improved. Baek et al. in view of Cho et al. do not expressly disclose where the precharge voltage corresponds to a luminance band. Kang et al. discloses where a precharge voltage is adjusted based on grayscale value of the target LED (para.0064-0065,0067-0068; When the grayscale value Dg1 of the target LED falls within the “low grayscale interval”, the driving parameter determination circuit 450 may dynamically increase the precharge voltage parameter applied to the target LED). It would have been obvious s to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device disclosed by Baek et al. in view of Cho et al, with the teachings of Kang et al., such that when the image corresponds to low gray scale (of Baek), a precharge voltage dynamically adjusted corresponding to a low grayscale interval is applied to the target LED (as disclosed by Kang). The motivation being to dynamically adjust the precharge voltage parameter according to the level of the grayscale, thereby preventing blanking from being too long (Kang-para.0064). As to Claim 2, Baek et al. in view of Cho et al., as modified by Kang et al., disclose wherein the data voltage is set to a value corresponding to a luminance band of each of R, G, and B pixels (Baek-para.0061, 0082; Cho-para.0063). As to Claim 4, Baek et al. in view of Cho et al., as modified by Kang et al., disclose wherein the emission transistor is configured to generate the current path in response to the emission signal having the pulse width modulated based on the gray-scale of the displaying image (Baek-para.0047, 0124, 0132, 0136). As to Claim 5, Baek et al. in view of Cho et al., as modified by Kang et al., disclose wherein the precharge transistor is configured to bias the anode electrode with the precharge voltage varying based on a threshold voltage of the micro-LED (Cho-para.0079, 0097). As to Claim 6, Baek et al. in view of Cho et al., as modified by Kang et al., disclose wherein the precharge transistor is configured to bias the anode electrode with the precharge voltage set to a level lower than the threshold voltage of the micro-LED (Cho-para.0097). As to Claim 7, Baek et al. in view of Cho et al., as modified by Kang et al., disclose wherein the precharge transistor is configured to bias the anode electrode of the micro-LED with the precharge voltage in a low gray-scale operation in which the gray-scale of the displaying image is lower than a reference gray-scale (Baek-para.0101,0124; Kang-para. 0064-0065,0067-0068). As to Claim 8, Baek et al. discloses A display device comprising: a display panel including a pixel circuit having a micro-LED (fig.1-2, pixels PX including LED); a voltage generator configured to generate a precharge voltage corresponding to a luminance band and supply the generated precharge voltage to the display panel; and a driving circuit configured to apply an emission signal, a precharge signal and a data voltage to the pixel circuit to drive the display panel (fig.1, para.0040, signal controller 100 applies light emission control signal CONT3 to emission control driver 400 and data signal DAT to data driver 200; gamma voltage control signal CONT4 to gamma voltage generator 350; para.0045,0047- pixels receive data voltages via data lines DL and emission signals via emission lines EL), and apply the precharge signal to the pixel circuit to bias an anode electrode of the micro-LED with the precharge voltage, wherein, during a precharge period preceding an emission period, the precharge signal is enabled prior to the emission signal, to precharge the anode electrode with the precharge voltage, when an image to be displayed corresponds to a low gray-scale, and wherein, during the emission period, a same data voltage is applied to each pixel, and a pulse width of the emission signal is modulated according to a gray-scale of an image to be displayed, thereby controlling a duration of current flow through the micro-LED and adjusting a gray-scale value of each pixel (para.0039; fig.10, para.0124- the light emission control signal generation unit 150 may adjust the luminance of the image by controlling the pulse width of the light emission signal ELS corresponding to the luminance that is changed according to the expanded frame period EFL.. The light emission control signal generation unit 150 receives a signal of whether the image signal ImS includes the gray level of the high gray or the gray level of the low gray from the data generation unit 120; para.0126-0127-when the image signal ImS includes the gray level of the high gray, the light emission control signal generation unit 150 generates the light emission control signal CONT3 so that the light emission period t3 of the (N+1)-th frame is shorter than the light emission period t2 in the reference frame period RFL of the N-th frame; 0132-when the image signal ImS includes the gray level of the low gray, the light emission control signal generation unit 150 generates the light emission control signal CONT3 so that the emission period t13 of the (N+1)-th frame is longer than the light emission period t12 in the reference frame period RFL of the N-th frame; para. 0155) Baek et al. does not expressly disclose a micro-LED; a voltage generator configured to generate a precharge voltage corresponding to a luminance band and supply the generated precharge voltage to the display panel; and a driving circuit configured to apply a precharge signal; and apply the precharge signal to the pixel circuit to bias an anode electrode of the micro-LED with the precharge voltage, wherein, during a precharge period preceding an emission period, the precharge signal is enabled prior to the emission signal, to precharge the anode electrode with the precharge voltage, when an image to be displayed corresponds to a low gray-scale, Baek et al. discloses where it is determined when the image Ims includes low gray level of the low gray (para.0124, 0132, 0155). Cho et al. discloses a pixel circuit comprising a micro-LED (fig.3, para.0079- light emitting element may be a micro light emitting diode), a voltage generator configured to generate a precharge voltage [corresponding to a luminance band] and supply the generated precharge voltage to the display panel (fig.1,3; power supply 500, precharge voltage Vpre; transistor M8; para.0054,0095-0097); a driving circuit configured to apply a precharge signal (fig.1,3; precharge signal S5i), and apply the precharge signal to the pixel circuit to bias an anode electrode of the micro-LED with the precharge voltage (fig.3, transistor M8 provides a pre-charging voltage Vpre to the anode of light emitting element LD in response to a scan signal S5i; para.0068, 0095-0097), wherein, during a precharge period preceding an emission period, the precharge signal is enabled prior to the emission signal, to precharge the anode electrode with the precharge voltage, when an image to be displayed corresponds to a low gray-scale (fig.4, during precharge period P4 preceding emission period EPI, precharge signal S5i is enabled before the emission signal Ei is enabled, transistor M8 is turned on to supply the pre-charging voltage Vpre to the fourth node N4 (anode)); para.0095, 0136-0137 It would have been obvious s to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Baek et al. with the teachings of Cho et al, the motivation being so that the light emitting element may emit light with a fast response speed, and the luminance non-uniformity phenomenon according to a deterioration deviation of the light emitting element LD may be improved. Baek et al. in view of Cho et al. do not expressly disclose where the precharge voltage corresponds to a luminance band. Kang et al. discloses where a precharge voltage is adjusted based on grayscale value of the target LED (para.0064-0065,0067-0068; When the grayscale value Dg1 of the target LED falls within the “low grayscale interval”, the driving parameter determination circuit 450 may dynamically increase the precharge voltage parameter applied to the target LED). It would have been obvious s to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device disclosed by Baek et al. in view of Cho et al, with the teachings of Kang et al., such that when the image corresponds to low gray scale (of Baek), a precharge voltage dynamically adjusted corresponding to a low grayscale interval is applied to the target LED (as disclosed by Kang). The motivation being to dynamically adjust the precharge voltage parameter according to the level of the grayscale, thereby preventing blanking from being too long (Kang-para.0064). As to Claims 9, 11, 13-14, 16-19 have limitations similar to those of Claims 1, 2, 4-7, and are met by the references as set forth above. As to Claim 20, Baek et al. in view of Cho et al., as modified by Kang et al., disclose wherein the driving circuit is configured to modulate the pulse width of the emission signal based on the gray-scale (Baek- para.0039, 0124), select the data voltage based on the luminance band, and apply the selected data voltage to the driving transistor (Baek-para.0060-0061, 0082; Cho-para.0063). As to Claims 21 and 22 have limitations similar to those of Claims 8, 20 and 7, and are met by the references as set forth above. Claim(s) 3,10,15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Baek et al. (US 2019/0371250) in view of Cho et al. (US 2023/0335056), further in view of Kang et al. (US 2023/0206813), and further in view of David et al. (US 2022/0310000). As to Claim 3, Baek et al. in view of Cho et al., as modified by Kang et al., do not expressly disclose, but David et al. discloses: wherein the precharge transistor is configured to bias the anode electrode with the precharge voltage varying based on the luminance band of each of the R, G, and B pixels (para.0079-0081). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device disclosed by , Baek et al. in view of Cho et al., as modified by Kang et al., with the teachings of David et al., the motivation being to provide Mura compensation, thereby reducing non-uniformities in the display panel. As to Claims 10, 15 have limitations similar to those of Claim 3 and are met by the references as set forth above. Claim(s) 12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Baek et al. (US 2019/0371250) in view of Cho et al. (US 2023/0335056), further in view of Kang et al. (US 2023/0206813), and further in view of Cho et al. (US 2011/0102410, hereinafter Cho410). As to Claim 12, Baek et al. in view of Cho et al., as modified by Kang et al., do not expressly disclose, but Cho410 discloses: a buffer buffering the precharge voltage output from the voltage generator and providing the buffered precharge voltage to the display panel (fig.2, para.0017). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device disclosed by Baek et al. in view of Cho et al., as modified by Kang et al., with the teachings of Cho410, the motivation being to provide buffered precharge voltages to the anodes of the corresponding light emitting diodes through transistors for threshold voltage detection. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1, 8, 21 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection applied as necessitated by amendment. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DISMERY E. MERCEDES whose telephone number is (571)272-7558. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 9am-5pm, EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ke Xiao can be reached at 571-272-7776. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DISMERY MERCEDES/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2627
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 07, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 28, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Mar 03, 2025
Response Filed
May 10, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Aug 14, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 15, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Nov 26, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 01, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602863
HAND-BASED LIGHT ESTIMATION FOR EXTENDED REALITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12602130
ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603031
DISPLAY DEVICE AND CONTROLLER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597374
FOLDABLE DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD FOR COMPENSATING FOR DETERIORATION OF FLEXIBLE DISPLAY PANEL
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597387
DISPLAY PANEL, DISPLAY DEVICE AND PIXEL REPAIR METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+10.6%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 964 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month