Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/533,297

Stochastic Control Subject to Generative AI-Based Disturbance

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Dec 08, 2023
Examiner
PATEL, JIGNESHKUMAR C
Art Unit
2116
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allow Rate
346 granted / 439 resolved
+23.8% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+21.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
467
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
14.2%
-25.8% vs TC avg
§103
47.0%
+7.0% vs TC avg
§102
19.5%
-20.5% vs TC avg
§112
14.7%
-25.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 439 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of the Application 2. Claim 1-20 have been examined in this application. This communication is the first action on the merits. Drawings 3. The drawings filed on 12/8/23 are acceptable for examination proceedings. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 4. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. 5. Claim 1, and 13 recites the limitation "and controlling the mechanical system using a predictive controller that determines control commands changing a state of the operation of the mechanical system using the probability of at least some of the predicted values of the disturbance". The claimed limitation includes the “controlling using a predictive controller….”, the limitation includes controlling using predictive controller, control command, and using some of the predicted values of the disturbance. The claimed scope is indefinite due to variety of options claimed in a way to read and understand the limitation difficult and unclear. The limitation needs to re-write in a way to make it understandable and definite. Claim 2-12 and 14-20 are also rejected under 112(b) rejection due to their direct/indirect dependency over the claim 1, and 13, respectively. Remarks: Claim should be re-written as below: determining a control commands by a predictive controller based on the probability of at least some of the predicted values of the disturbance; and controlling the mechanical system by changing a state of the operation of the mechanical system based on the control command generated by the predictive controller. Pertinent Art Cited The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Min (Pub: 2022/0222520) disclose applications of Machine Learned and Artificial Intelligence models for use solving a problem of generating optimal samples for achieving a target outcome, and leverages a variational autoencoder (VAE) model to generate as realistic samples of a data space as possible (Para. [0001]). Qiu (Pub: 2022/0100877) disclose a method, apparatus, and electronic device for preventing model theft during classification using a service classification model. The service classification model is a deep neural network for predicting a category of a service object, including an input layer, multiple intermediate layers, and an output layer that are sequentially stacked. The method includes: obtaining feature information of a service object; inputting the feature information into the service classification model for initial prediction to obtain a category corresponding to a maximum initial prediction probability as a target category; determining, based on the target category, disturbance data corresponding to a target layer selected in advance from the input layer, the multiple intermediate layers, and the output layer; inputting the feature information into the service classification model for subsequent prediction, including adding the corresponding disturbance data to data to be input into the target layer; and outputting the target category and a maximum subsequent prediction probability (Abstract). Llani (Pub: 2021/0096518) disclose a method for controlling a plant that exhibits nonlinear dynamics. The method includes training a neural network model during an offline learning period using historical plant data representing a plurality of different historical states of the plant. The method further includes using the neural network model during online operation of the plant to generate a linear predictor as a function of a current state of the plant, the linear predictor defining a linearization of the nonlinear dynamics localized at the current state of the plant. The method further includes controlling equipment that operate to affect the current state of the plant by performing a predictive control process that uses the linear predictor to generate values of one or more manipulated variables provided as inputs to the equipment (Para. [0014]). Drees (Pub: 2019/0041811) disclose a database, a trust region identifier configured to perform a cluster analysis technique to identify trust regions, and a regression model predictor configured to utilize a regression model technique to calculate a regression model prediction. The building management system further includes a distance metric calculator configured to calculate a distance metric, an artificial neural network model predictor configured to utilize an artificial neural network model technique to calculate an artificial neural network model prediction, and a combined prediction calculator configured to determine a combined prediction based on the distance metric, the regression model prediction, and the artificial neural network model prediction (Para. [0004]). Allowable Subject Matter The claim 1 and its dependent claim 2-12, independent claim 13 and its dependent claim 14-20 are allowable once the outstanding 35 U.S.C 112(b) rejection is overcome as discussed above. For independent claim 1, none of the prior art on record taken either alone or in obvious combination disclose “collecting a deep generative decoder model defining a mapping from a latent space of latent representations of time-series values of the disturbance affecting the mechanical system over the time horizon to a measurement space of the partial observations of the disturbance; determining, using the deep generative decoder model, a conditional probabilistic distribution of the latent representations of the disturbance conditioned on the partial observations of the disturbance; sampling the conditional probabilistic distribution of the latent representations to produce a latent sample of the time-series values of the disturbance affecting the mechanical system over the time horizon; decoding the latent sample with the deep generative decoder model to produce predicted values of the disturbance acting on the system within the time horizon with a probability of the latent sample on the conditional probabilistic distribution of the latent representations.” Independent claim 13 also recites the same allowable subject matter as claim 1. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JIGNESHKUMAR C PATEL whose telephone number is (571)270-0698. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 7:00 AM - 5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kenneth M. Lo can be reached at (571)272-9774. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JIGNESHKUMAR C PATEL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2116
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 08, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603503
Information Processing System and Information Processing Method For Matching A Power-Feeding Vehicle And A Selected Area Selected By A User Of The Power-Feeding Vehicle From A Plurality Of Off-Grid Area
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596337
ELECTRONIC DEVICE TO CONTROL AN APPLICATION BASED ON PREDICTED USE OF THE APPLICATION AND OPERATING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12583071
TOOL MEASURING SYSTEM, AND CONTROL METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12585264
WORK MACHINE AND WORK MACHINE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM TRANSMITTING INFORMATION ACCORDING TO PRIORITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12566411
CONTROL ASSISTANCE DEVICE, CONTROL SYSTEM, AND FILTER ADJUSTMENT METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+21.6%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 439 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month