Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/533,305

JOINING METHOD

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 08, 2023
Priority
Dec 14, 2022 — JP 2022-199379
Examiner
AMPONSAH, OSEI K
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
514 granted / 710 resolved
+12.4% vs TC avg
Strong +33% interview lift
Without
With
+33.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
756
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
69.5%
+29.5% vs TC avg
§102
16.9%
-23.1% vs TC avg
§112
8.6%
-31.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 710 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 12-08-2023 and 10-18-2024 are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1-6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over JP 2017-097969 A hereinafter Watanabe [cited in IDS filed 10-18-2024] in view of U.S. Pre-Grant Publication No. 2014/0227622 hereinafter Nishiyama. Regarding Claims 1-6, Watanabe teaches a method of manufacturing a fuel cell (paragraph 16), the method comprising: joining two adjacent separators in a fuel cell stack that includes unit cells stacked together (paragraphs 3, 36), each of the unit cells comprising a membrane electrode assembly and a pair of separators sandwiching the membrane electrode assembly, wherein the two adjacent separators are a first separator covering a cathode of a first membrane electrode assembly and a second separator covering an anode of a second membrane electrode assembly (paragraphs 37-42), the method further comprising: bringing the first separator and the second separator into contact with each other; bringing a first welding electrode into contact with the separator; bringing a second welding electrode into contact with the separator; and welding the assembly together by causing a current to flow between the first welding electrode and the second welding electrode (paragraphs 150-166). Watanabe teaches a welding process including bringing the first separator and the second separator together such that the cathode of the first membrane electrode assembly and the anode of the second membrane electrode assembly are welded together but does not specifically describe the outward ridges formed on the surface of the separators as claimed. However, Nishiyama teaches a fuel cell and a method for forming the fuel cell, wherein the fuel cell comprises a power generation unit [12] that includes a first metal separator [14], a first membrane electrode assembly [16a], a second metal separator [18], a second membrane electrode assembly [16b], and a third metal separator [20]. Nishiyama further teaches that the metal separators are formed by corrugating metal thin plates by press forming to have a corrugated shape in cross section and a wavy or serpentine shape on the surface, and the separator comprises a plurality of corrugated and wavy flow grooves (outward ridges) (paragraphs 29, 35-42). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to form such corrugated and wavy flow grooves on the surface of the separators before the effective filing date of the claimed invention because Nishiyama discloses that such configuration can form a separator with anti-corrosive surface and gas flow fields (paragraph 29). The combination teaches that the plurality of portions where the first outward ridges and the second outward ridges are in contact with each other are welded by causing the current to flow between the first welding electrode and the second welding electrode, and after the first outward ridges of the first separator and the second outward ridges of the second separator are joined, laser welding is performed in a marginal portion of the first separator and a marginal portion of the second separator (paragraphs 166-169 of Watanabe). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to OSEI K AMPONSAH whose telephone number is (571)270-3446. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 8:00 am - 5:00 pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, NICHOLAS A SMITH can be reached at (571)272-8760. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /OSEI K AMPONSAH/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1752
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 08, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749715
NON-AQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE AND SECONDARY BATTERY, BATTERY MODULE, BATTERY PACK AND ELECTRICAL DEVICE CONTAINING THE SAME
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12731811
Battery Module Including Foldable Side Plate and Method for Manufacturing Same
5y 9m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12725834
HIGH-CONCENTRATION HIGH-ENTROPY ELECTROLYTE, METHOD FOR PREPARING THE SAME, AND BATTERY
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12725835
ELECTROLYTE SYSTEMS INCLUDING PERFORMANCE-ENHANCING ADDITIVES, AND ELECTROCHEMICAL CELLS INCLUDING THE SAME
1y 3m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12719091
METHOD OF IMPROVING FIRE-RESISTANCE OF A LITHIUM BATTERY
8y 3m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+33.1%)
3y 3m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 710 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month