Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/533,412

KEY MANAGER, QUANTUM CRYPTOGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, QKDN CONTROL DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, KEY MANAGEMENT METHOD, QKDN CONTROL METHOD, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND PROGRAM PRODUCT

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 08, 2023
Examiner
ULLAH, SHARIF E
Art Unit
2495
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Kabushiki Kaisha toshiba
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
380 granted / 451 resolved
+26.3% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+22.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
473
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
14.6%
-25.4% vs TC avg
§103
57.6%
+17.6% vs TC avg
§102
5.9%
-34.1% vs TC avg
§112
13.2%
-26.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 451 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group 1 (Claims 1-6, 10-11, & 13-14) is acknowledged. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 12/08/2023; 07/31/2024; and 11/19/2025 are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-3, 10-11 & 13-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C 103 as being unpatentable over Kaoru Kenyoshi NICT Japan: “Proposed modifications to the draft Recommendation ITU-T Y.QKDN_KM “Key management for quantum key distribution Network”;C119 [Provided by Examiner]), hereon referred to as Kaoru, in view of Wang et al. (US 2021/0119788), and hereon referred to as Wang. In regards to claims 1, 10-11 & 13-14 Kaoru discloses a communication interface configured to receive, from a source application of a user network, request information of an application key including first identification information for identifying the source application, second identification information for identifying a destination application, and a requested amount of the application key used for encrypting or decrypting communication in the user network (Identifying boundary between KSA and cryptographic application to demarcate responsibility for management and consumption of keys; reception of key request from the cryptographic application including information on a required security level; Pgs.11-14); determine a sharing amount of the application key from the requested amount of the application key (KMA picks up the required amount of key form the storage of KMA-key data, taking into account the metatdata on relay encryption based on the requests security level and key supply policy; Pgs.14-16); cause the communication interface to transmit the application key to the key manager as the sharing destination, the application key to be transmitted having been encrypted by using the link key and satisfying the sharing amount and cause the communication interface to transmit the application key of the requested amount to the source application identified by the first identification information (When relaying the key to the next destination node it is encrypted; the key is shared between KMA1 and KMA3; once the keys are supplied to the cryptographic application; Pages 14-16; Fig.4). However, Kaoru does not disclose a processor configured to identify a key manager as a sharing destination of the application key from the second identification information. In an analogous art Kaoru discloses a processor configured to identify a key manager as a sharing destination of the application key from the second identification information (The quantum key manager may transfer the first quantum key and the first quantum key identifier from the QKD client of the first network node to the protocol stack of the first network node; the quantum key manager may identify the third quantum key based on the second quantum key and the first quantum key; the quantum key manager may transfer the first quantum key and the first quantum key identifier from the QKD client of the first network node to a key management layer of the first network node; Paragraphs 0165-0170). At the time before the effective filing date of the invention, it would have been obvious to the one with ordinary skill in the art to combine the teachings disclosed by Kaoru, with the teachings disclosed by Wang regarding a processor configured to identify a key manager as a sharing destination of the application key from the second identification information. The suggestion/motivation of the combination would have been to provide additional security in distributing quantum keys to encrypt communications between a central node and one or more remote nodes (Wang; Paragraph 0004). In regards to claim 2, the combination of Kaoru, and Wang discloses wherein the request information of the application key further includes a provision time at which the application key is to be transmitted, and the communication interface is configured to transmit the application key of the requested amount to the source application by the provision time (The elements presented in the claim(s) do not contain any additional features, do not present any inventive step or novelty not addressed/presented in the combination of Kaoru, and Wang. Examiner takes official notice, that these elements are commonly known, minor design details that are derivable from the prior art and are well known, and obvious to an ordinary skill in the art. The additional features of these claims represent normal design options, which the skilled person would implement the combination of Kaoru, and Wang, depending on the circumstances, without exercising any inventive activity). In regards to claim 3, Wang discloses wherein the communication interface is configured to communicate with a quantum key distribution network (QKDN) control device in which mapping information is stored, the mapping information including the second identification information and third identification information correlated with each other, the third identification information being used for identifying a key manager transmitting the application key to the destination application, and acquire the mapping information from the QKDN control device, and the processor is configured to identify the key manager as the sharing destination of the application key from the mapping information (The quantum key manager may transfer the first quantum key and the first quantum key identifier from the QKD client of the first network node to the protocol stack of the first network node; the quantum key manager may identify the third quantum key based on the second quantum key and the first quantum key; the quantum key manager may transfer the first quantum key and the first quantum key identifier from the QKD client of the first network node to a key management layer of the first network node; Paragraphs 0165-0170). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-6 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHARIF E ULLAH whose telephone number is (571)272-5453. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 7:00-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Farid Homayounmehr can be reached at 571-272-3739. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SHARIF E ULLAH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2495
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 08, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 25, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Feb 12, 2026
Interview Requested
Apr 01, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602518
INTEGRATING A DOCUMENT SIGNATURE SYSTEM WITH AN ACCOUNT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603863
Hybrid Cryptography Virtual Private Networks
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598062
METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR A 2-QUBIT MULTI-USER QUANTUM KEY DISTRIBUTION PROTOCOL
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592827
PAIRING METHODS IN ZERO-TRUST NETWORKS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12574226
NATIVE CONTINUOUS-VARIABLE QUANTUM REPEATER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+22.4%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 451 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month