Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/533,496

LIQUID SEAL TYPE VIBRATION ISOLATION DEVICE, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING LIQUID SEAL TYPE VIBRATION ISOLATION DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Dec 08, 2023
Priority
Dec 27, 2022 — JP 2022-210539
Examiner
SAHNI, VISHAL R
Art Unit
3616
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Toyo Tire Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
738 granted / 978 resolved
+23.5% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
1020
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
74.7%
+34.7% vs TC avg
§102
21.8%
-18.2% vs TC avg
§112
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 978 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION This is a first Non-Final Office Action on the merits in response to the application filed 12/08/23, with foreign priority to a corresponding JP application filed 12/27/22. Claims 1-9 are currently pending yet all are rejected due to the 102-rejection detailed below. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 1-9 are rejected because both independent claims 1 and 9 define a plurality of “wall portions” on the partition’s outer edge. “Wall portions” could means sections (i.e., “portions”) of a single wall. Does Applicant intend to use this broad terminology or is the Applicant seeking to define a plurality of --walls-- that radially extend from a radially outer periphery of the partition and are arranged in a circumferential direction? For the sake of moving prosecution forward, the latter/narrower construction is being used in examining the claims. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Furusawa Claim(s) 1-9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Furusawa et al. (U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2016/0186831). Furusawa is directed to a liquid-sealed antivibration device. See Abstract. Claim 1: Furusawa discloses a liquid seal type vibration isolation device [Figs. 1, 4A-5B] comprising: a first member (2) and a tubular second member (3); a vibration-isolating base body which is made of a rubbery elastic body (4) and connects the first member and the second member; a diaphragm (10) which forms a liquid chamber (6), in which liquid is sealed, between the diaphragm and the vibration-isolating base body; an annular member (10b), is fixed to an outer edge of the diaphragm, and is held on an inner circumference side of the second member; and a partition (20-22) which partitions the liquid chamber into a first liquid chamber (6a) on the vibration-isolating base body side and a second liquid chamber (6b) on the diaphragm side, wherein the partition is formed in a plate shape extending in a radial direction, and includes, on an outer edge of the partition, a plurality of wall portions (opposite sides of 222a) arranged in a circumferential direction, the annular member is formed to have a thickness in the radial direction thinner than that in the axial direction [see Fig. 2A], and the diaphragm includes a contact portion (portion of 10b at 222a), and the contact portion comes into contact with the wall portions on an inner circumference side of the annular member [see Figs. 3A, 5A, 5B], to regulate an inclination of the annular member to the partition. See Figs. 1, 4A-5B. Claim 2: Furusawa discloses that the contact portion is formed continuously in the circumferential direction. See Figs. 4A, 5A, 5B. Claim 3: Furusawa discloses that the contact portion is a protrusion protruding to the partition side relative to an axial end surface of the annular member. See Figs. 4A, 5A, 5B. Claim 4: Furusawa discloses that the diaphragm includes a groove-shaped recess which is formed between the annular member and the contact portion and is continuous in the circumferential direction. See Figs. 4A, 5A, 5B. Claim 5: Furusawa discloses that an axial end portion of the second member is caulked to the inner circumference side. See para 0030, 0054. Claim 6: Furusawa discloses that when viewed from a cross section including an axis of the annular member, the contact portion is formed in an arc shape protruding to the wall portions side, and the recess is formed in an arc shape recessed in a direction away from the wall portions while being continuous with an outer edge of the contact portion. See Figs. 4A, 5A, 5B. Claim 7: Furusawa discloses that the dimension of a portion, protruding relative to the axial end surface of the annular member, of the contact portion is not more than 10% of the dimension in the axial direction of the annular member. See Figs. 4A, 5A, 5B. Claim 8: Furusawa discloses that the wall portions are arranged at unequal intervals in the circumferential direction of the partition. See Fig. 4A (top of 220). Claim 9: see claim 1 above. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to VISHAL R SAHNI whose telephone number is (571)270-3838. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7am-3pm PST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Robert Siconolfi can be reached at 571-272-7124. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. VISHAL SAHNI Primary Examiner Art Unit 3657 /VISHAL R SAHNI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3616 February 3, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 08, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12630135
Brake System for a Motor Vehicle and Trailer Control Module
4y 0m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12630131
HYDRAULIC PRESSURE CONTROL UNIT
3y 4m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12623723
UNIT MOUNTING IN A VEHICLE
4y 6m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12617383
ELECTROMECHANICAL BRAKE SYSTEM AND METHOD OF OPERATING THE SAME
3y 3m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12600335
TRAILER BRAKING THROUGH TRAILER SUPPLY LINE
3y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+19.2%)
2y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 978 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month