Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026
Application No. 18/533,501

COMMUNICATION APPARATUS, BASE STATION, AND COMMUNICATION METHOD

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Dec 08, 2023
Priority
Jun 10, 2021 — JP 2021-097598 +2 more
Examiner
SHAHEED, KHALID W
Art Unit
2643
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Toyota Motor Corporation
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
731 granted / 878 resolved
+21.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
919
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.8%
-33.2% vs TC avg
§103
53.2%
+13.2% vs TC avg
§102
28.0%
-12.0% vs TC avg
§112
9.5%
-30.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 878 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 9/18/2026 has been entered. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory obviousness-type double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); and In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on a nonstatutory double patenting ground provided the conflicting application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with this application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. Effective January 1, 1994, a registered attorney or agent of record may sign a terminal disclaimer. A terminal disclaimer signed by the assignee must fully comply with 37 CFR 3.73(b). Claims (1-11) are provisionally rejected on the ground of nonstatutory obviousness-type double patenting as being unpatentable claims (1-6) US Patent No. 12/732,999 B2. Although the conflicting claims are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because all the claimed limitations recited in the present application are transparently found in the US Patent No. 12/732,999 B2 with obvious wording variations. Take an example of comparing claim (1) of pending application and claim (1) of US Patent No. 12/732,999 B2: Pending Application (18/533,501) US Patent No. 12/732,999 B2 Analysis 1. (currently amended) A communication apparatus comprising: a receiver configured to: receive, from a base station, a radio resource control (RRC) message including information configuring a duration in unit of slots for skipping of physical downlink control channel (PDCCH) monitoring; and receive, from the base station, a downlink control information (DCI) format including an information field related to the skipping of the PDCCH monitoring; a controller configured to start the skipping of PDCCH monitoring for the duration on a downlink bandwidth part (BWP) of a serving cell in a case where the duration is configured and a value indicating the skipping of the PDCCH monitoring for the duration is set in the information field; and a transmitter configured to transmit, to the base station, a scheduling request (SR); wherein the controller is configured to: resume the PDCCH monitoring in a case where the duration is configured and a positive SR is transmitted on a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) after receiving the DCI format including the information field in which the value indicating the skipping of the PDCCH monitoring for the duration is set; and resume the PDCCH monitoring in a case where the duration is configured and a random access procedure is initiated after receiving the DCI format including the information field in which the value indicating the skipping of the PDCCH monitoring for the duration is set, the random access procedure being initiated in a case where no PUCCH resource is available for transmission of the SR. 1. A communication apparatus comprising: a receiver configured to: receive, from a base station, a radio resource control (RRC) message including first information and second information, the first information configuring a plurality of cell groups, the second information configuring a duration in unit of slots for skipping of physical downlink control channel (PDCCH) monitoring, and receive, from the base station, a downlink control information (DCI) format including an information field related to the skipping of the PDCCH monitoring, a controller configured to start the skipping of the PDCCH monitoring for the duration on a downlink bandwidth part (BWP) of a serving cell in a case where the duration is configured and a value indicating the skipping of the PDCCH monitoring for the duration is set in the information field, and a transmitter configured to transmit, to the base station, a positive scheduling request (SR), wherein the controller is configured to, in a case where the duration is configured and the positive SR is transmitted on a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) after receiving the DCI format including the information field in which the value is set, resume the PDCCH monitoring in all serving cells of a cell group corresponding to the transmission of the positive SR, the cell group being one of the plurality of cell groups configured based on-determined according to the first information. Here, both claims relate to receiving RRC messaging including information related to the configuration of duration and skipping physical downlink control channel (PDCCH). The claims of the application (18/533,501) encompass the same subject matter except the instant claims are identical and encompassed by US Patent No. 12/732,999 B except the instant claims are broader and fully encompassed by US Patent 10,634,460 B2. Specifically, application 14/669,372 discloses a “receive, from a base station, a radio resource control (RRC) message including information configuring a duration in unit of slots for skipping of physical downlink control channel (PDCCH) monitoring” whereas US Patent No. 12/732,999 B2 claims include “receive, from a base station, a radio resource control (RRC) message including first information and second information, the first information configuring a plurality of cell groups, the second information configuring a duration in unit of slots for skipping of physical downlink control channel (PDCCH) monitoring” and “resume the PDCCH monitoring in all serving cells of a cell group corresponding to the transmission of the positive SR”. The aforementioned omissions, however, do not entirely change the results of each invention and both inventions, minus stated variations, have the exact same purpose and provide identical results. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to implement the US Patent No. 12/732,999 B2’s apparatus for “receiving” RRC messaging because it would be an obvious variant or choice to “resume the PDCCH monitoring in all serving cells of a cell group” and incorporate 18/533,501’s apparatus for receiving RRC messaging. Examiner Note: Regarding claim 1, the prior art of reference does not disclose singly or in combination to resume the PDCCH monitoring in a case where the duration is configured and a positive SR is transmitted on a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) after receiving the DCI format including the information field in which the value indicating the skipping of the PDCCH monitoring for the duration is set; and resume the PDCCH monitoring in a case where the duration is configured and a random access procedure is initiated after receiving the DCI format including the information field in which the value indicating the skipping of the PDCCH monitoring for the duration is set, the random access procedure being initiated in a case where no PUCCH resource is available for transmission of the SR. Regarding claim 5, the prior art of reference does not disclose singly or in combination to resume the PDCCH monitoring in a case where the duration is configured and a positive SR is transmitted on a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) after receiving the DCI format including the information field in which the value indicating the skipping of the PDCCH monitoring for the duration is set; and resume the PDCCH monitoring in a case where the duration is configured and a random access procedure is initiated after receiving the DCI format including the information field in which the value indicating the skipping of the PDCCH monitoring for the duration is set, the random access procedure being initiated in a case where no PUCCH resource is available for transmission of the SR. Regarding claim 9, the prior art of reference does not disclose singly or in combination to resume the PDCCH monitoring in a case where the duration is configured and a positive SR is transmitted on a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) after receiving the DCI format including the information field in which the value indicating the skipping of the PDCCH monitoring for the duration is set; and resume the PDCCH monitoring in a case where the duration is configured and a random access procedure is initiated after receiving the DCI format including the information field in which the value indicating the skipping of the PDCCH monitoring for the duration is set, the random access procedure being initiated in a case where no PUCCH resource is available for transmission of the SR. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to K. WILFORD SHAHEED whose telephone number is (469)295-9175. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday 9 am-5pm; CST; ALT Friday. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. The examiner’s Supervisor Jinsong Hu can be reached at (571)272-3965 where attempts to reach the examiner are unsuccessful. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KHALID W SHAHEED/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2643
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 08, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 04, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP
Mar 04, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 23, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §DP
Sep 18, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Sep 23, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12771778
MESSAGE TRANSMISSION METHOD AND CORRESPONDING TERMINAL
3y 0m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12771476
CODE BLOCK GROUP AND CODE BLOCK BUNDLE ALIGNMENT SIGNALING
2y 7m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12764757
METHOD AND APPARATUS OF ANTENNA SWITCHING IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS
2y 9m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12756604
CP-TRANSPARENT OOK OFDM WAVEFORM FOR AN AMBIENT IOT
2y 6m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12750167
METHOD FOR SIDELINK MONITORING AND TERMINAL DEVICE
4y 11m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+14.9%)
2y 7m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 878 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month