Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/534,833

FOLDING MULTIMEDIA DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 11, 2023
Examiner
BOLOTIN, DMITRIY
Art Unit
2623
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Cfph LLC
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allow Rate
901 granted / 1116 resolved
+18.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+12.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
1137
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.2%
-36.8% vs TC avg
§103
43.1%
+3.1% vs TC avg
§102
26.2%
-13.8% vs TC avg
§112
16.5%
-23.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1116 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION It would be of great assistance to the Office if all incoming papers pertaining to a filed application carried the following items: 1. Application number (checked for accuracy, including series code and serial no.). 2. Group art unit number (copied from most recent Office communication). 3. Filing date. 4. Name of the examiner who prepared the most recent Office action. 5. Title of invention. 6. Confirmation number (See MPEP § 503). Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 11/05/2025 has been entered. Status of Claims Claim 2 has been amended, claims 1 and 6 – 12 have been canceled, and claims 2 – 5 are now pending. Specification The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: Paragraphs [0039] and [0041] refer to figure 2, however, the listed elements and description corresponds to figure 1, therefore the reference should be changed to figure 1. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: (a) A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 2 – 5 rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Branson (US 2003/0071832) in view of Bove (US 4,958,671). As to claim 2, Branson discloses an electronic device comprising: a first housing (housing of display portion 102 of fig. 5C) having a first side (side containing the display 102 of fig. 5C) and a second side (side opposite the side containing the display 102 of fig. 5C) a second housing (housing of display portion 103 of fig. 5C) having a first side (side containing the display 103 of fig. 5C) and a second side (side opposite the side containing the display 103 of fig. 5C), wherein the first housing is rotatably coupled with the second housing (folding operation along the vertical portion 110 of fig. 5C); and a flexible display screen (display device 100 may be manufactured with the display is flexible liquid crystal display (LCD) panels [0027]) having a first area (102 of fig. 5C) and a second area (103 of fig. 5C) continuous with the first area (the display 102 and 103 display continuous image 113 of fig. 5C), wherein the first area of the flexible display screen (102 offig.5C) is disposed on the first side of the first housing (side containing the display 102 of fig. 5C), and the second area of the flexible display screen (103 of fig. 5C) is disposed on the first side of the second housing (side containing the display 103 of fig. 5C), and wherein, the first area (102 offig.5C) of the flexible display and the second area (103 offig.5C) of the flexible display are connected at an axis (vertical portion 110 of fig. 5C), wherein the display device maybe folded and unfolded [0022], wherein the flexible display (display device 100 may be manufactured with the display is flexible liquid crystal display (LCD) panels [0027]) occupies corners of the first side (side containing the display 102 of fig. 5C) of the first housing (housing of display portion 102 of fig. 5C) formed by parallel edges of the first housing and the axis (vertical portion 110 of fig. 5C), and corners of the first side (side containing the display 103 of fig. 5C) of the second housing (housing of display portion 103 of fig. 5C) formed by parallel edges of the second housing and the axis (vertical portion 110 of fig. 5C), but does not explicitly disclose that the first area and the second area of the flexible display are configured to move 360 degrees about the axis. In the same filed of foldable presentation displays, Bove discloses a device comprising a display having a continuous display surface (TITLE) having a first area and a second area (multiple display areas with front surface 24 of sections A – H of fig. 1) connected by an axis (axis correspondent to hinge 60 between portions A and B of fig. 1), wherein the first area and the second area of the display are configured to move 360 degrees about the axis (display portions are rotatable 360 degrees so that front surfaces 24 of adjacent support frames are facing each other or, after rotation, rear surfaces 26 of adjacent support frames are facing each other, col. 10, lines 1 – 41). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention was made to combine the teachings of Branson and the teachings of Bove such that the first area and the second area of the flexible display were configured to move 360 degrees about the axis with motivation to provide a foldable and portable display system which is reconfigurable from a folded portable position to an unfolded display position and which is adapted to display a substantially continuous, unbroken graphic or display surface consisting of a plurality of individual display panels (Bove, col 1, line 15). As to claim 3, (dependent on 2), Branson discloses the electronic device, wherein, when the electronic device is in an open state (fig. 5C), the first side of the first housing and the first side of the second housing substantially form a single plane (single plane of fig. 5C), and the flexible display screen is disposed about the single plane (single plane of fig. 5C ) . As to claim 4, (dependent on 2), Branson discloses the electronic device, wherein the first area of the flexible display screen occupies substantially an entirety of the first side of the first housing (area of 102 of fig. 5C), and the second area of the flexible display screen occupies substantially an entirety of the first side of the second housing (area of 103 of fig. 5C). As to claim 5, (dependent on 2), Branson discloses the electronic device, further comprising at least one processor (CPU 610 of fig. 6), and wherein the flexible display screen is configured to provide electronic signals to the at least one processor in response to touching the flexible display screen (a portion of the display area D may be used as a touch screen [0023 – 0024], inherently data is output to the processor). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 2 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DMITRIY BOLOTIN whose telephone number is (571)270-5873. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9AM - 5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chanh Nguyen can be reached at (571)272-7772. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DMITRIY BOLOTIN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2623
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 11, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 29, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 12, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Sep 23, 2024
Interview Requested
Oct 02, 2024
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Oct 05, 2024
Examiner Interview Summary
Oct 07, 2024
Response Filed
Jan 09, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Apr 11, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 14, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 18, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jul 21, 2025
Response Filed
Aug 02, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Nov 05, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Nov 14, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 15, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603040
Pixel Circuit and Display Device Including the Same
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12591404
HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERFACE-DRIVEN DEMAND-AWARE SCREEN SHARING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592167
CURVATURE VARIABLE DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592190
PIXEL CIRCUIT, DISPLAY PANEL COMPRISING THE PIXEL CIRCUIT, AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12585357
ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND METHOD OF DRIVING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+12.8%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1116 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month