Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/534,847

SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Dec 11, 2023
Priority
Dec 21, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0180979
Examiner
SENGDARA, VONGSAVANH
Art Unit
2893
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Nepes Co. Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
669 granted / 931 resolved
+3.9% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+18.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
62 currently pending
Career history
1009
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
83.7%
+43.7% vs TC avg
§102
12.2%
-27.8% vs TC avg
§112
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 931 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed on 04/28/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. It is argued by the applicant that Tsai's purported "parasitic patch antenna" (element 410) is explicitly and physically connected to the active circuitry through a supply line via (element 409) that penetrates the insulating substrate (100A). Tsai expressly states that "a supply line via 409 electrically connects to the parasitic patch antenna 410" (Tsai, [0068]). This physical, conductive through-via constitutes precisely the "physical electrical connection structure" that amended Claim 1 disclaims. The examiner is not persuaded because fig. 16 is embodiment wherein the active antenna pattern 408 and the parasitic antenna pattern 410 are separated by the dielectric layer 100A without any physical electrical connection structure therebetween; par [0068] of Tsai discloses that the antenna structure 400 also includes parasitic patch antennas 410 and directly-driven patch antennas 408 that are electrically connected to feedline vias 409. Note that the directly-driven patch antennas 408 that are electrically connected to feedline vias 409, and not 410. It is argued by the applicant that because Tsai's element 410 is physically and electrically fed through via 409 - and is therefore not a purely parasitic element in the electromagnetic sense - Tsai does not disclose an antenna structure in which the active antenna pattern and the parasitic antenna pattern are "separated by the dielectric layer without any physical electrical connection structure therebetween,". The examiner is not persuaded because nowhere Tsai specification nor fig. 16 drawing discloses that element 410 is physically and electrically fed through via 409. It is argued by the applicant that additionally, Applicant's revised claim 1 further requires that "the dielectric layer of the antenna structure is a carrier on which the first rewiring structure, the molding body, the semiconductor chip, and the second rewiring structure are formed." This limitation reflects another key aspect of the claimed invention: the transparent dielectric layer (glass carrier) serves a dual function - it is both the dielectric substrate of the antenna structure and the carrier upon which the entire semiconductor package is directly built up, eliminating the need for a separate carrier substrate. The examiner is not persuade as shown below, Tsai discloses wherein the dielectric layer 100A of the antenna structure is a carrier on which the first rewiring structure, the molding body, the semiconductor chip, and the second rewiring structure are formed. PNG media_image1.png 448 757 media_image1.png Greyscale Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2 and 4-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Tsai et al. 20200058606. PNG media_image1.png 448 757 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 1, fig. 16 of Tsai discloses a semiconductor package, comprising: an antenna structure 400 which comprises a dielectric layer 100A that is made of a transparent material (par [0016] – glass), an active antenna pattern 408 (par [0068] - patch antennas 408) that is formed on one surface of the dielectric layer and a parasitic antenna pattern 410 (par [0068] - parasitic patch antennas 410) that is formed on the other surface of the dielectric layer opposite to the one surface; a first rewiring structure 409 (par [0068]) which is electrically connected to the active antenna pattern 408 of the antenna structure; a molding body 302 which is formed on one surface of the first rewiring structure; a semiconductor chip 220 which is placed within the molding body; a second rewiring structure 210 which is formed on one surface of the molding body; a vertical connection conductor 214 (fig. 14) which is laterally spaced from the semiconductor chip, penetrates the molding layer, and electrically connects the second rewiring structure and the first rewiring structure; and an external connection terminal 306 which is formed on one surface of the second rewiring structure, wherein the active antenna pattern 408 and the parasitic antenna pattern 410 are separated by the dielectric layer 100A without any physical electrical connection structure therebetween; and wherein the dielectric layer 100A of the antenna structure is a carrier on which the first rewiring structure, the molding body, the semiconductor chip, and the second rewiring structure are formed. Regarding claim 2, Tsai discloses wherein the dielectric layer of the antenna structure is made of a glass material (par [0016] – glass). Regarding claim 4, Tsai discloses wherein the thickness of the dielectric layer is between 100 micrometers and 500 micrometers (par [0016] …The core substrate 101 may have a thickness between about 200 μm and about 1000 μm, such as about 400 μm or about 900 μm). Regarding claim 5, fig. 16 of Tsai discloses further comprising: a protective layer 116 for covering and protecting the other surface of the dielectric layer and the parasitic antenna pattern (see 116 surround 410 and acts as protecting walls). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 6 and 9 are allowed. Claim 9 recites “an inversion step of inverting the carrier and the first rewiring structure, molding body, semiconductor chip and second rewiring structure that are built up on the carrier; a parasitic antenna pattern formation step of forming a parasitic antenna pattern on the other surface of the inverted carrier by aligning the same with the active antenna pattern”, this limitation is not taught by prior of record. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to VONGSAVANH SENGDARA whose telephone number is (571)270-5770. The examiner can normally be reached 9AM-6PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, PURVIS A. Sue can be reached on (571)272-1236. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /VONGSAVANH SENGDARA/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2893
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 11, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Apr 28, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 10, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12684981
DISPLAY DEVICE
4y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12684953
DISPLAY PANEL AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREFOR, AND DISPLAY APPARATUS
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12677568
DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12677560
Display Substrate and Manufacturing Method therefor, and Display Apparatus
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12677474
FinFET Device and Method of Forming Same
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+18.6%)
3y 3m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 931 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month