Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/536,524

MAGNETIC DEVICE AND A METHOD FOR FORMING THE MAGNETIC DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 12, 2023
Examiner
YEUNG LOPEZ, FEIFEI
Art Unit
2899
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Southern University Of Science And Technology
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
78%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allow Rate
858 granted / 1060 resolved
+12.9% vs TC avg
Minimal -3% lift
Without
With
+-3.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
47 currently pending
Career history
1107
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
52.0%
+12.0% vs TC avg
§102
26.1%
-13.9% vs TC avg
§112
17.6%
-22.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1060 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1 and 9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over O’Brien et al (PG Pub 2021/0013397 A1). Regarding claim 1, O’Brien teaches a magnetic device comprising: a magnetic layer (116, fig. 1A, paragraph [0036]) having a ferromagnetic phase to support magnetic skyrmions and an antiferromagnetic phase to annihilate magnetic skyrmions (fig. 1B, paragraph [0034]), the magnetic layer being capable of transiting between the ferromagnetic phase and the antiferromagnetic phase (paragraph [0036]); a ferroelectric layer (104) adapted to magnetoelectrically couple (paragraphs [0042] to [0044] and abstract) with the magnetic layer to cause the magnetic layer to transit between the ferromagnetic phase and the antiferromagnetic phase in response to a polarization state of the ferroelectric layer, the polarization state includes a first polarization state corresponding to the ferromagnetic state and a second polarization state corresponding to the antiferromagnetic state (paragraphs [0042] to [0044] and abstract); and a first electrode and a second electrode (120/102) sandwiching the magnetic layer and the ferroelectric layer; electron current causes switching the polarization state of the ferroelectric layer to control a phase transition of the magnetic layer between the ferromagnetic phase and the antiferromagnetic phase to create or annihilate magnetic skyrmions in the magnetic layer (paragraphs [0043][0044]). Although O’Brien does not explicitly teach a voltage is being applied to the electrodes to create/annihilate the skyrmions, paragraph [0044], for example, teaches electron current changes the magnetization of the free layer 104; and paragraph [0043] teaches that the skyrmions is coupled to the free layer 104 and can be switched with current. The two paragraphs imply that electron current creates and annihilates the skyrmions. Thus, it would have been obvious to the skilled in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to adapt the first electrode and the second electrode to receive an applied voltage for the benefit of creating electron current. Regarding claim 9, O’Brien teaches (see claim 1) a method for forming a magnetic device, the method comprising: forming a magnetic layer having a ferromagnetic phase to support magnetic skyrmions and an antiferromagnetic phase to annihilate magnetic skyrmions, the magnetic layer being capable of transiting between the ferromagnetic phase and the antiferromagnetic phase; forming a ferroelectric layer adapted to magnetoelectrically couple with the magnetic layer to cause the magnetic layer to transit between the ferromagnetic phase and the antiferromagnetic phase in response to a polarization state of the ferroelectric layer, the polarization state includes a first polarization state associated with the ferromagnetic state and a second polarization state associated with the antiferromagnetic state; and forming a first electrode and a second electrode sandwiching the magnetic layer and the ferroelectric layer, the first electrode and the second electrode being adapted to receive an applied voltage for altering the polarization state of the ferroelectric layer to control a phase transition of the magnetic layer between the ferromagnetic phase and the antiferromagnetic phase to create or annihilate magnetic skyrmions in the magnetic layer. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-8 and 10-17 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Prior art does not teach “wherein the magnetic layer includes a (La,Ba)MnO3 (LBMO) layer” (claims 2 and 10); nor “the magnetic layer is formed immediately adjacent to the ferroelectric layer” (claims 8 and 17). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FEIFEI YEUNG LOPEZ whose telephone number is (571)270-1882. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 8am to 4pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dale Page can be reached at 571 270 7877. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /FEIFEI YEUNG LOPEZ/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2899
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 12, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604577
MICRO-LED ENCAPSULATED STRUCTURE INCLUDING TWO POLYMERIC LAYERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598839
LIGHT EMITTING DEVICE FOR DISPLAY AND DISPLAY APPARATUS HAVING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598950
ELECTROSTATIC CHUCK HEATER AND FILM DEPOSITION APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589462
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12593727
DISPLAY DEVICE USING SEMICONDUCTOR LIGHT-EMITTING DIODES, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
78%
With Interview (-3.0%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1060 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month