Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/536,610

HEAT SHIELD FOR A GAS TURBINE ENGINE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 12, 2023
Examiner
HARRINGTON, ALYSON JOAN
Art Unit
3741
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
General Electric Company
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
137 granted / 180 resolved
+6.1% vs TC avg
Strong +62% interview lift
Without
With
+61.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
216
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
44.9%
+4.9% vs TC avg
§102
24.2%
-15.8% vs TC avg
§112
26.3%
-13.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 180 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I (claims 1-15) and Species A (Figs. 4-8C) in the reply filed on 01/20/2026 is acknowledged. Claims 9-20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected species and/or invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 01/20/2026. Claims 1-8 are currently being examined. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-4 are is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Borns et al. 6792757. Regarding independent claim 1, Borns teaches a heat shield (36 Fig. 2) for a combustor (30 Fig. 2) of a gas turbine engine (col 1 lines 6-8), the heat shield comprising: an annular ring (as shown in Fig. 4a, 36 is an annular ring) having an axial direction (direction into page in center of 36 perpendicular to radial direction in annotated Fig. 4a), a radial direction (labeled in annotated Fig. 4a), and a circumferential direction (labeled in annotated Fig. 4a), the annular ring including a plurality of circumferential segments (labeled in Fig. 5), each circumferential segment of the plurality of circumferential segments being disconnected from an adjacent circumferential segment of the plurality of circumferential segments (each of the circumferential segments in annotated Fig. 5 are disconnected from each other due to slot 47 between the adjacent segments) to allow for thermal growth of each circumferential segment during operation of the combustor (the slot between adjacent circumferential segments allow each circumferential segment to thermally expand, i.e., grow during operation of combustor 30). PNG media_image1.png 814 624 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 665 758 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding claim 2, Borns further teaches the annular ring includes a plurality of radial slots (as seen in Fig. 5, there are a plurality of radial slots 47), adjacent circumferential segments of the plurality of circumferential segments being disconnected from each other by one of the radial slots of the plurality of radial slots (adjacent circumferential segments in annotated Fig. 5 are disconnected from each other by one of the radial slots 47). Regarding claim 3, Borns further teaches the annular ring has a width (labeled in annotated Fig. 5) in the radial direction and includes a radially outer edge (labeled in annotated Fig. 5), each radial slot extending inward from the radially outer edge a distance (labeled in annotated Fig. 5) that is less than the width of the annular ring in the radial direction (distance is less than width in radial direction as shown in annotated Fig. 5). PNG media_image3.png 665 758 media_image3.png Greyscale Regarding claim 4, Borns further teaches the annular ring includes an inner ring portion (labeled in annotated Fig. 5), the inner ring portion being an inner portion of the annular ring (inner ring portion is an inner portion of annular ring of heat shield 36) that is free from the plurality of radial slots (inner ring portion is free of plurality of lots 47 in annotated Fig. 5), each circumferential segment of the plurality of circumferential segments extending radially outward from the inner ring portion (each circumferential segment extends radially outward from the inner ring portion in annotated Fig. 5). PNG media_image4.png 665 758 media_image4.png Greyscale Allowable Subject Matter Claim 5-8 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Borns does not teach the limitations of claim 5 and it would not be obvious to modify a hot side of a distal end of a fuel nozzle tip of fuel nozzle 31 shown in Fig. 1 to have the distal end of the fuel nozzle tip include a plurality of projections with each projection extending into a corresponding one of the radial slots. Prior art Polyzopoulos et al. 10982853 listed on IDS filed 12/12/2023 teaches a fuel nozzle 110 in Fig. 3 with a heat shield 160 including slots 174 shown in Fig. 11. Polyzopoulos does not teach the limitations of claim 5 and it would not be obvious to modify a hot side of a distal end of a fuel nozzle tip of fuel nozzle 110 to have the distal end of the fuel nozzle tip include a plurality of projections with each projection extending into a corresponding one of the radial slots. Claims 6-8 being dependent directly or indirectly upon claim 5 include the allowable subject matter of claim 5 and would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALYSON JOAN HARRINGTON whose telephone number is (571)272-2359. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9 am - 5 pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Phutthiwat Wongwian can be reached at (571) 270-5426. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /A.J.H./Examiner, Art Unit 3741 /LORNE E MEADE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3741
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 12, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12590560
VANE HEATING SYSTEM AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12571351
GAS TURBINE ENGINE DEFINING A ROTOR CAVITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12504171
PREMIXER FOR A COMBUSTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 23, 2025
Patent 12486784
TURBINE OVERSPEED PROTECTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 02, 2025
Patent 12480447
REAL-TIME OPTICAL COKING SENSOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 25, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+61.8%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 180 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month