Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/536,620

MULTI FUNCTIONAL FOOTBALL TRAINING RACK

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Dec 12, 2023
Examiner
WALTER, AUDREY BRADLEY
Art Unit
3711
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Yongkang Fodo Sports Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allow Rate
943 granted / 1163 resolved
+11.1% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+23.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
1196
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.8%
-37.2% vs TC avg
§103
34.8%
-5.2% vs TC avg
§102
30.8%
-9.2% vs TC avg
§112
28.8%
-11.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1163 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claims 1-4 are objected to because of the following informalities: Regarding claim 1, where a claim sets forth a plurality of elements or steps, each element or step of the claim should be separated by a line indentation. See MPEP 608.01(i). Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 1, lines 1, 4, and 5 recite “a support rod,” “one support rod,” and “two support rods,” respectively, leading to confusion as to how many support rods are required. It is suggest to change “a support rod” in line 2 to two support rods, “one support rod” in line 4 to each support rod, and “two support rods” in line 5 to the two support rods to remedy this rejection. Regarding claim 2, line 4, “a connector (10) provided in the connection holes (9)” is indefinite. The claim recites multiple connection holes in line 3. It is unclear if the connector is provided in all of the multiple connection holes or provided in a selected subset of the multiple connection holes. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Wang (CN 213285585 U using machine translation). Regarding claim 1, Wang discloses a multifunctional football training rack (Figure 1), comprising: a ball net stand [14], a horizontal arc-shaped guide rod [11] (specifically see upper arc connecting rod in Figures 1-2), a limit rod [12], a support rod [13], an angle adjustment rod [11] (specifically see lower and middle arc connecting rods in Figures 1-2), and a ball net [7]; left and right sides of the ball net stand [14] are respectively connected to an upper end of one support rod [13], the horizontal arc-shaped guide rod [11] (specifically see upper arc connecting rod in Figures 1-2) and the limit rod [12] are both connected between two support rods [13] (as viewed from the front of the device; also wherein the longitudinal connecting rods [12] are connected to the arc connecting rods [11] which are connected between the two vertical rods [13]), the horizontal arc-shaped guide rod [11] (specifically see upper arc connecting rod in Figures 1-2) is located between the ball net stand [14] and the limit rod [12] (as viewed from above), a lower side of the support rod [13] is connected to the ball net stand [14] through the angle adjustment rod [11] (specifically see lower and middle arc connecting rods in Figures 1-2) (wherein a lower side of the vertical rods [13] is integrally connected to the elongated vertical rods [14] through the arc connecting rods [11], the longitudinal connecting rods [12] and the arc-shaped rods [16]), the ball net [7] is set on the ball net stand [14] (page 3 and Figures 1-2). Regarding claim 2, Wang discloses the multifunctional football training rack according to claim 1, wherein the angle adjustment rod [11] (specifically see lower and middle arc connecting rods in Figures 1-2) comprises a first rod [11] (specifically see lower arc connecting rod in Figures 1-2) and a second rod [11] (specifically see middle arc connecting rod in Figures 1-2), both of which are provided with multiple connection holes (see “holes” in annotated Figure 2 below), and the first rod [11] (specifically see lower arc connecting rod in Figures 1-2) and the second rod [11] (specifically see middle arc connecting rod in Figures 1-2) are connected by a connector (see “connector” in annotated Figure 2 below) provided in the connection holes (see “holes” in annotated Figure 2 below) (page 3, Figures 1-2, and annotated Figure 2 below). PNG media_image1.png 328 539 media_image1.png Greyscale Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 3 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wang as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Daffer, Jr. (US 4,083,561). Regarding claim 3, Wang does not disclose a U-shaped ground nail provided on the ball net stand and/or the limit rod. Daffer, Jr., however, teaches a similar football (soccer) training rack comprising a ball net stand [15, 17] and limit rod [25], wherein a U-shaped ground nail [35] is provided on the limit rod [25] (col. 1 line 62 – col. 2 line14, col. 3 lines 9-11, and Figures 1-3). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide a U-shaped ground nail on Wang’s limit rod because Daffer, Jr. teaches that this configuration anchors the goal to the ground at a desired playing position (col. 2 lines 5-11 and col. 3 lines 9-11). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 4 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See Wan (CN 207076080 U), Wan (CN 217119286 U), Yu (CN 210874022 U), Zhu et al. (CN 207477917 U) which disclose similar football (soccer) training racks having arc-shaped ball return means. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AUDREY B. WALTER whose telephone number is (571)270-5286. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday: 8:30 am - 4:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eugene Kim can be reached at (571)272-4463. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AUDREY B. WALTER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3711
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 12, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12584477
Packing Leakage Detection System and Method
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12569810
A SELECTIVE CATALYTIC REDUCTION CATALYST AND A PROCESS FOR PREPARING A SELECTIVE CATALYTIC REDUCTION CATALYST
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12571378
GEOTHERMAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AND SILICA SCALE DEPOSITION CONTROL METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12553374
EXHAUST PIPE, METHOD FOR OPTIMIZING AND DESIGNING EXHAUST PIPE, AND ENGINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12546247
INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE ARRANGEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+23.6%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1163 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month