Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/536,640

ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 12, 2023
Examiner
LE, THANH TAM T
Art Unit
2831
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Aptiv Technologies AG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 11m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
1221 granted / 1413 resolved
+18.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
1449
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
34.3%
-5.7% vs TC avg
§102
40.9%
+0.9% vs TC avg
§112
20.4%
-19.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1413 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification Applicant is reminded of the proper language and format for an abstract of the disclosure. The abstract should be in narrative form and generally limited to a single paragraph on a separate sheet within the range of 50 to 150 words in length. The abstract should describe the disclosure sufficiently to assist readers in deciding whether there is a need for consulting the full patent text for details. The language should be clear and concise and should not repeat information given in the title. It should avoid using phrases which can be implied, such as, “The disclosure concerns,” “The disclosure defined by this invention,” “The disclosure describes,” etc. In addition, the form and legal phraseology often used in patent claims, such as “means” and “said,” should be avoided. The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-6, 8-9 and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Falchetti (6,773,271). Regarding claims 1 and 11, Falchetti discloses a cable harness, comprising: an electrical connector, comprising: a housing (31, Fig. 1) with a terminal module (6) inserted in the housing in an axial direction; an electrical terminal (41) fixed in the terminal module; a cover (1 and 24) latched with the housing; and a spring (55 and 56, Fig. 7) that biases the terminal module in the axial direction (Figs. 9 and 10). Regarding claim 2, Fig. 9 shows the spring (55 and 56) is provided between the cover (5 and 25) and the terminal module (6). Regarding claim 3, Fig. 7 shows the spring is integrally formed with the cover. Regarding claim 4, Fig. 7 shows the spring (55 and 56) is formed as an arc- shaped web. Regarding claim 5, Fig.7 shows the spring (55 and 56) has a Y-shaped cross- section. Regarding claim 6, Fig. 7 shows the spring is formed by a web spanning an aperture (an aperture between 55 and 56). Regarding claim 8, Figs. 9 and 10 show the spring urges the terminal module towards the cover. Regarding claim 9, Fig. 7 shows the spring is a separate part. Claims 1, 7 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Jenkins (6,027,360). Regarding claim 1, Jenkins discloses an electrical connector, comprising: a housing (74, Fig. 1) with a terminal module (18) inserted in the housing in an axial direction; an electrical terminal (19, Fig. 2) fixed in the terminal module; a cover (88, Fig. 1) latched with the housing; and a spring (65, Fig. 2) that biases the terminal module in the axial direction (by 64, Fig. 2). Regarding claim 7, the spring urges the terminal module away from the cover. Regarding claim 10, Fig. 2 shows the terminal module (18) has biasing element (64) that urges the electrical terminal in the axial direction against an abutment (a protrusion from an inner wall of 18) of the terminal module. Claims 1 and 12-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Rutkowski (4,032, Regarding claim 1209). , Rutkowski discloses an electrical connector, comprising: a housing (10, Fig. 1) with a terminal module (11) inserted in the housing in an axial direction; an electrical terminal (37, Fig. 1) fixed in the terminal module; a cover (a half 45 of a left side), Fig. 1) latched with the housing; and a spring (a half 45 of a right side, Figs. 1 and 3) that biases the terminal module in the axial direction (Fig. 2). Regarding claims 12 and 14, a mating connector (13, Fig. 1), wherein the electrical connector is fully inserted and latched in the mating connector (Fig. 2) and wherein the spring urges the terminal module in the axial direction against an abutment (one of 41, Fig. 1) of the mating connector. Regarding claim 13, Fig. 1 shows a terminal mating module (14) is inserted in a housing (another half of 45 of the right side and the left side) of the mating connector and an electrical terminal (another of 41) is fixed in the terminal mating module, wherein the abutment (the one of 41) of the mating connector is provided on the terminal mating module of the mating connector. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THANH TAM T LE whose telephone number is (571)272-2094. The examiner can normally be reached 9AM-6PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Abdul Riyami can be reached at 571-270-3119. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /THANH TAM T LE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2831 03/10/26 thanh-tam.le@uspto.gov
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 12, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603460
QUICK RELEASE SAFETY ASSEMBLY FOR AIR AND ELECTRICAL CONNECTIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597748
ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR AND BASE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597749
REPLACEABLE LOW VOLTAGE CONNECTOR ADAPTER WITH INTEGRATED FUSE DESIGN
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592737
DOCKING SLEEVE WITH ELECTRICAL ADAPTER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12567696
Connector Assembly
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+13.8%)
1y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1413 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month