Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/537,192

OPERATING DEVICE FOR WORKING VEHICLE

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Dec 12, 2023
Priority
Dec 27, 2022 — JP 2022-210887 +1 more
Examiner
SOOFI, YAZAN A
Art Unit
3668
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Kubota Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allowance Rate
736 granted / 827 resolved
+37.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
838
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.4%
-34.6% vs TC avg
§103
49.8%
+9.8% vs TC avg
§102
40.0%
+0.0% vs TC avg
§112
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 827 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions Status of Claims Claims 1-20 of U.S. Application No. 18/537192 filed on 12/12/2023 have been examined. Office Action is in response to the Applicant's amendments and remarks filed05/28/2026. Claims 2, 7 and 12 were amended. Claims 2-20 are presently pending and are presented for examination. Response to Remarks/Arguments In regards to rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 102 (b): Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 2-20 have been fully considered and are not persuasive. Applicant is reminded that claims must be given their broadest reasonable interpretation. Applicant argues that Berg does not teach or suggest “the operating lever is pivotally supported and is configured such that one or more functions of the working vehicle to be performed in accordance with an instruction received by the operating lever being pivoted vary depending on the operation mode selected via the selector” Examiner respectfully disagrees. The examiner interprets the following section to clearly illustrate these features ([see at least Fig. 2A, 0034, 0039-0041, 0156 and 0174], “The operating lever 41 is a lever to cause the working vehicle 1 to perform various functions. Furthermore, the operating lever 41 is pivotally supported and is pivotable in at least one direction”, “As illustrated in FIGS. 2, 5, and 6, the operating device 40 includes a selector 51 to be operated to select an operation mode of the operating lever 41. The selector 51 is located in a vicinity of the operating lever 41 in the first region 16a. The selector 51 is, for example, a physical switch, and is a push-button switch (tactile switch) operated by being pressed, a dial-like switch such as a selector switch having a plurality of switching positions, or the like. In the present example embodiment, the selector 51 is a tactile switch. The operating lever 41 sequentially switches the operation mode in response to an operation of the tactile switch…The operating lever 41 is configured such that function(s) to be performed in accordance with an instruction received by the operating lever 41 vary(varies) depending on an operation mode selected via (by the operation of) the selector 51. In this way, the operating lever 41 can be operated to operate various functions of the working vehicle 1...”). Applicant also argues that Berg does not teach or suggest in claim 12 “the operating lever: ... is configured such that one or more functions of the working vehicle to be performed in accordance with an instruction received by the operating lever being pivoted vary depending on the operation mode selected via the selector," and "the operating lever is operable to, in the selected operation mode: receive an instruction to perform a predetermined standard function among the functions when the at least one operating switch is operated; and when the changeover switch is operated, receive an instruction to perform an expanded function of the working vehicle that is different from the standard function instead of the standard function when the at least one operating switch is operated", Examiner respectfully disagrees. The examiner interprets the following section to clearly illustrate these features ([see at least 0240, 0241 and 0242], “ Assume that functions to be performed in accordance with an instruction that is received by the operating lever 41 by the operation of the operating switch 42, based on the standard tables (the first to fourth standard tables) corresponding to the operation modes (the first to fourth modes), are each referred to as a “standard function”. The operating lever 41 can receive instruction(s) to operate function(s) (expanded function(s)) of the working vehicle 1 different from the standard functions upon operation of the operating switch(s) 42 instead of the standard function(s), in accordance with the operation of the changeover switch 53. That is, the operating lever 41 receives an instruction to perform a predetermined standard function among the functions by the operation of the operating switch 42 and, after the operation of the changeover switch 53, receives an instruction to perform an expanded (additional) function of the working vehicle 1 different from the standard function by the operation of the operating switch 42 instead of the standard function. In this way, a single operating switch 42 can receive instructions to operate a plurality of functions in accordance with the operation of the changeover switch 53. This makes it unnecessary to provide as many operating switches 42 as the number of functions of the working vehicle 1 on the operating lever 41. This can make operations of the operating switches 42 less complicated, thus further improving operability of the operating lever 41. Specifically, the operating lever 41 receives an instruction to perform a standard function by the operation of the operating switch 42 during a period where the changeover switch 53 is not being operated, and receives an instruction to perform an expanded function by the operation of the operating switch 42 during a period in which the changeover switch 53 is being operated. Since the operating switch 42 receives an instruction to perform an expanded function only in a period where the changeover switch 53 is being operated, the operator is less likely to mistakenly operate an expanded function”). Therefore Lim still meets the scope of the limitation as currently claimed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 2-20 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Berg et al. [US 2006/0137931 A1], hereinafter referred to as Berg. As to Claim 2, Berg discloses an operating device for a working vehicle, the operating device comprising: an operating lever to cause the working vehicle to perform various functions ([see at least Fig. 1A, Fig. 2A, Fig. 2B, Fig. 2C, 0017, 0028, 0032-0037, 0039, 0040 and 0041]); and a selector to select an operation mode of the operating lever ([see at least 0041 and 0048]); wherein the operating lever is configured such that one or more functions of the working vehicle to be performed in accordance with an instruction received by the operating lever vary depending on the operation mode selected via the selector ([see at least 0039, 0174 and 0175], “As illustrated in FIGS. 2, 5, and 6, the operating device 40 includes a selector 51 to be operated to select an operation mode of the operating lever 41. The selector 51 is located in a vicinity of the operating lever 41 in the first region 16a. The selector 51 is, for example, a physical switch, and is a push-button switch (tactile switch) operated by being pressed, a dial-like switch such as a selector switch having a plurality of switching positions, or the like. In the present example embodiment, the selector 51 is a tactile switch. The operating lever 41 sequentially switches the operation mode in response to an operation of the tactile switch…The operating lever 41 is configured such that function(s) to be performed in accordance with an instruction received by the operating lever 41 vary(varies) depending on an operation mode selected via (by the operation of) the selector 51. In this way, the operating lever 41 can be operated to operate various functions of the working vehicle 1... ) The operating lever is pivotally supported and is configured such that one or more functions of the working vehicle to be performed in accordance with an instruction received by the operating lever being pivoted vary depending on the operation mode selected via the selector ([see at least Fig. 2A, 0034, 0039-0041, 0156 and 0174], “The operating lever 41 is a lever to cause the working vehicle 1 to perform various functions. Furthermore, the operating lever 41 is pivotally supported and is pivotable in at least one direction”, “As illustrated in FIGS. 2, 5, and 6, the operating device 40 includes a selector 51 to be operated to select an operation mode of the operating lever 41. The selector 51 is located in a vicinity of the operating lever 41 in the first region 16a. The selector 51 is, for example, a physical switch, and is a push-button switch (tactile switch) operated by being pressed, a dial-like switch such as a selector switch having a plurality of switching positions, or the like. In the present example embodiment, the selector 51 is a tactile switch. The operating lever 41 sequentially switches the operation mode in response to an operation of the tactile switch…The operating lever 41 is configured such that function(s) to be performed in accordance with an instruction received by the operating lever 41 vary(varies) depending on an operation mode selected via (by the operation of) the selector 51. In this way, the operating lever 41 can be operated to operate various functions of the working vehicle 1...”). As to Claim 3, Berg discloses an operating device, wherein a plurality of the operation modes include a first mode in which at least one or more work functions relating to work among the functions of the working vehicle are performed and a second mode in which at least one or more traveling functions relating to travel among the functions of the working vehicle are performed; the operating lever is operable to, in the first mode, receive an instruction to perform the one or more work functions by being pivoted; and the operating lever is operable to, in the second mode, receive an instruction to perform the one or more traveling functions by being pivoted([see at least Fig. 2A, 0034, 0039-0041, 0156 and 0174], “The operating lever 41 is a lever to cause the working vehicle 1 to perform various functions. Furthermore, the operating lever 41 is pivotally supported and is pivotable in at least one direction”, “As illustrated in FIGS. 2, 5, and 6, the operating device 40 includes a selector 51 to be operated to select an operation mode of the operating lever 41. The selector 51 is located in a vicinity of the operating lever 41 in the first region 16a. The selector 51 is, for example, a physical switch, and is a push-button switch (tactile switch) operated by being pressed, a dial-like switch such as a selector switch having a plurality of switching positions, or the like. In the present example embodiment, the selector 51 is a tactile switch. The operating lever 41 sequentially switches the operation mode in response to an operation of the tactile switch…The operating lever 41 is configured such that function(s) to be performed in accordance with an instruction received by the operating lever 41 vary(varies) depending on an operation mode selected via (by the operation of) the selector 51. In this way, the operating lever 41 can be operated to operate various functions of the working vehicle 1...”). As to Claim 4, Berg discloses an operating device, wherein the operating lever includes at least one operating switch and is configured such that a function of the working vehicle to be performed in accordance with an instruction received by the operating lever by an operation of the at least one operating switch varies depending on the operation mode selected via the selector ([see at least Fig. 2A, 0034, 0039-0041, 0156 and 0174], “The operating lever 41 is a lever to cause the working vehicle 1 to perform various functions. Furthermore, the operating lever 41 is pivotally supported and is pivotable in at least one direction”, “As illustrated in FIGS. 2, 5, and 6, the operating device 40 includes a selector 51 to be operated to select an operation mode of the operating lever 41. The selector 51 is located in a vicinity of the operating lever 41 in the first region 16a. The selector 51 is, for example, a physical switch, and is a push-button switch (tactile switch) operated by being pressed, a dial-like switch such as a selector switch having a plurality of switching positions, or the like. In the present example embodiment, the selector 51 is a tactile switch. The operating lever 41 sequentially switches the operation mode in response to an operation of the tactile switch…The operating lever 41 is configured such that function(s) to be performed in accordance with an instruction received by the operating lever 41 vary(varies) depending on an operation mode selected via (by the operation of) the selector 51. In this way, the operating lever 41 can be operated to operate various functions of the working vehicle 1...”). As to Claim 5, Berg discloses an operating device, wherein the plurality of operation modes include a third mode in which the one or more traveling functions and the one or more work functions are performed ([see at least 0041 and 0048]); the operating lever is operable to, in the third mode, receive an instruction to perform the one or more traveling functions by being pivoted ([see at least 0025, 0041 and 0048]); and a function of the working vehicle to be performed in accordance with an instruction received by the operation of the at least one operating switch in the third mode is different from a function of the working vehicle to be performed in accordance with an instruction received by the operation of the at least one operating switch in the second mode ([see at least Fig. 2A, 0034, 0039-0041, 0156 and 0174], “The operating lever 41 is a lever to cause the working vehicle 1 to perform various functions. Furthermore, the operating lever 41 is pivotally supported and is pivotable in at least one direction”, “As illustrated in FIGS. 2, 5, and 6, the operating device 40 includes a selector 51 to be operated to select an operation mode of the operating lever 41. The selector 51 is located in a vicinity of the operating lever 41 in the first region 16a. The selector 51 is, for example, a physical switch, and is a push-button switch (tactile switch) operated by being pressed, a dial-like switch such as a selector switch having a plurality of switching positions, or the like. In the present example embodiment, the selector 51 is a tactile switch. The operating lever 41 sequentially switches the operation mode in response to an operation of the tactile switch…The operating lever 41 is configured such that function(s) to be performed in accordance with an instruction received by the operating lever 41 vary(varies) depending on an operation mode selected via (by the operation of) the selector 51. In this way, the operating lever 41 can be operated to operate various functions of the working vehicle 1...”). As to Claim 6, Berg discloses an operating device, wherein the plurality of operation modes include a fourth mode; and the operating lever is operable to, in the fourth mode: not receive an instruction to perform a function of the working vehicle even when pivoted; and receive an instruction to perform a function of the working vehicle when the at least one operating switch is operated ([see at least 0156, 0174, 0179 and 0198]). As to Claim 7, Berg discloses an operating device, further comprising an indicator to provide an indication differently based on the operation mode selected via the selector ([see at least 0049]). As to Claim 8, Berg discloses an operating device, wherein the indicator is provided on the operating lever ([see at least 0027, 0049 and 0052]). As to Claim 9, Berg discloses an operating device, wherein the indicator includes a lamp to change a color thereof according to the operation mode selected via the selector ([see at least 0027, 0049 and 0052]). As to Claim 10, Berg discloses an operating device, wherein the selector includes a physical switch ([see at least Fig. 2A, Fig. 2B, Fig. 2C]). As to Claim 11, Berg discloses an operating device, wherein the selector includes a display image displayed on a display screen to receive an instruction to perform an operation ([see at least 0027, 0042 and 0049]). As to Claim 12, Berg discloses an operating device for a working vehicle, the operating device comprising: an operating lever to cause the working vehicle to perform various functions; and an operable changeover switch; wherein the operating lever ([see at least 0156, 0174, 0179 and 0198]): includes at least one operating switch, and is operable to receive an instruction to perform a predetermined standard function among the functions when the at least one operating switch is operated ([see at least 0025, 0041, 0048. 0156, 0174 and 0175]); and is operable to, when the changeover switch is operated, receive an instruction to perform an expanded function of the working vehicle that is different from the standard function instead of the standard function when the at least one operating switch is operated ([see at least 0239, 0240 and 0242]). As to Claim 13, Berg discloses an operating device, wherein the operating lever is operable to: receive an instruction to perform the standard function when the at least one operating switch is operated during a period when the changeover switch is not operated; and receive an instruction to perform the expanded function when the at least one operating switch is operated during a period when the changeover switch is operated ([see at least 0057]). As to Claim 14, Berg discloses an operating device, wherein the at least one operating switch includes a light on an operation surface; and the light is operable to change a manner in which the light provides an indication depending on whether the changeover switch is operated or not ([see at least 0027, 0049 and 0052]). As to Claim 15, Berg discloses an operating device, wherein the light includes: a first light provided on one of opposite portions of the operation surface to indicate the standard function; and a second light provided on the other of opposite portions of the operation surface to indicate the expanded function ([see at least 0027, 0049 and 0052]); the first light is operatable to turn on and the second light is operable to turn off in a case that the changeover switch is not operated; and the first light is operable to turn off and the second light is operable to turn on in a case that the changeover switch is operated ([see at least 0027, 0049 and 0052]). As to Claim 16, Berg discloses an operating device, wherein the first light and the second light extend along an inner periphery of the operation surface and define a portion or an entirety of a contour of the inner periphery of the operation surface ([see at least 0027, 0049 and 0052]). As to Claim 17, Berg discloses an operating device, further comprising an indicator to, when the changeover switch is operated, indicate that the changeover switch is operated ([see at least 0027, 0049 and 0052]). . As to Claim 18, Berg discloses an operating device, wherein the indicator includes a lamp to blink to indicate that the changeover switch is operated ([see at least 0027, 0049 and 0052]). As to Claim 19, Berg discloses an operating device, wherein the operating lever includes: a base portion that is pivotally supported in a vicinity of an operator's seat of the working vehicle ([see at least 0025, 0041, 0048. 0156, 0174 and 0175]); and a grip provided at a distal portion of the base portion ([see at least 0025, 0041, 0048. 0156, 0174 and 0175]); a plurality of the operating switches are provided on a surface of the grip that faces the operator's seat ([see at least 0025, 0041, 0048. 0156, 0174 and 0175]); and the changeover switch is provided on another surface of the grip that is different from the surface on which the plurality of operating switches are provided ([see at least 0025, 0041, 0048. 0156, 0174 and 0175]). As to Claim 20, Berg discloses an operating device, wherein the changeover switch is provided on an upper surface located higher than the surface on which the plurality of operating switches are provided or on an opposite surface opposite the surface on which the plurality of operating switches are provided ([see at least 0025, 0041, 0048. 0156, 0174 and 0175]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to YAZAN A SOOFI whose telephone number is (469)295-9189. The examiner can normally be reached on Flex schedule. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Fadey Jabr can be reached on 572-272-1516. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /YAZAN A SOOFI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3668
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 12, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
May 07, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 23, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12681484
WORK SUPPORT SYSTEM, AUTONOMOUS MOVABLE BODY FOR WORK SUPPORT, AND WORK SUPPORT METHOD
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12681504
WORK VEHICLE, CONTROL DEVICE, CONTROL METHOD, AND SYSTEM
2y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12675111
DEADLOCK PREDICTION FOR TRAFFIC PLANNING
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12675120
CONTROL DEVICE AND CONTROL METHOD FOR MOVING BODY
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12668342
METHOD OF CONTROLLING ROTATIONAL SPEED OF PROPELLER OF SHIP TO REDUCE CAVITATION
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+11.3%)
2y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 827 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month