Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/537,430

HAND TOOL SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 12, 2023
Examiner
GUADALUPE, YARITZA
Art Unit
2855
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Stanley Black & Decker Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allow Rate
943 granted / 1143 resolved
+14.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
1163
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
37.8%
-2.2% vs TC avg
§102
47.5%
+7.5% vs TC avg
§112
7.1%
-32.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1143 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on December 12, 2023 and December 27, 2023 were filed in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Drawings The drawings filed December 12, 2023 are accepted. Abstract The Abstract filed December 12, 2023 is accepted. Specification The specification filed December 26, 2024 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 – 6, 8, 10, 14 and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Szumer et al. (US 7,290,346). With respect to claim 1, Szumer et al. discloses a hand tool system (Figure 1), comprising a first hand tool part (i.e. center piece); a second hand tool part (12) configured to be releasably connected together with the first hand tool part (i.e. center piece) to form a combination hand tool (See Figure 1); wherein the first hand tool part comprises a main body (2, 3, 4) and a first connection part (13), and the second hand tool part (12) comprises a main body (19A, 19B) and a second connection part (42), wherein the first connection part (13) and the second connection part (42) are configured to be releasably connected together in a state of compression (Columns 3 and 4, lines 61 – 67 and 1 - 19); and wherein at least one of the first connection part (13) or the second connection part (42) comprises a compression member configured to releasably apply compression to the second connection part or the first connection part to releasably connect the first connection part and the second connection part together (Columns 3 and 4, lines 61 – 67 and 1 - 19). PNG media_image1.png 496 742 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 448 670 media_image2.png Greyscale Referring to claim 2, Szumer et al. sets forth a hand tool system wherein the compression member comprises a clamp member (42). In regards to claim 3, Szumer et al. teaches a hand tool system wherein at least one of the first hand tool part (2, 3, 4) or the second hand tool part (12) comprises a hand tool (2, 3, 4) that is operational without connection to the other hand tool part. With respect to claim 4, Szumer et al. shows a hand tool system wherein the second hand tool part (12) comprises a part that is not operational without connection to the other hand tool part (i.e. extension segment is not operational unless used in combination with the level 1). Regarding claim 5, Szumer et al. shows a hand tool system wherein the first hand tool part (2, 3, 4) has a first hand tool functionality (i.e. level) and the second hand tool part (12) has a second hand tool functionality (i.e. extension). With regards to claim 6, Szumer et al. discloses a hand tool system wherein the first hand tool functionality (i.e. level) is different to the second hand tool functionality (i.e. extension). Referring to claim 8, Szumer et al. sets forth a hand tool system wherein the first hand tool part (2, 3, 4) comprises a level. In regards to claim 10, Szumer et al. teaches a hand tool system wherein the first connection part (13) and the second connection part (42) are configured to be releasably connected together in a state of tension (Columns 3 and 4, lines 61 – 67 and 1 - 19). Regarding claim 14, Szumer et al. shows a hand tool system, comprising a first hand tool part (2, 3, 4); a second hand tool part (12) configured to be releasably connected together with the first hand tool part (2, 3, 4) to form a combination hand tool (See Figure 1); wherein the first hand tool part comprises a main body (2, 3, 4) and a first connection part (31), and the second hand tool part comprises a main body (12) and a second connection part (26), wherein the first connection part (31) and the second connection part (26) are configured to be releasably connected together; wherein the first hand tool part (2, 3, 4) has a first hand tool functionality (i.e. lever) and the second hand tool part (12) has a second hand tool functionality (i.e. extension). With regards to claim 15, Szumer et al. discloses a hand tool system wherein the first hand tool functionality (i.e. level) is different to the second hand tool functionality (i.e. extension). Claims 1, 5 and 7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Anderson et al. (US 1,182,730). With respect to claim 1, Anderson et al. discloses a hand tool system (Figure 1), comprising a first hand tool part (1); a second hand tool part (2) configured to be releasably connected together with the first hand tool part to form a combination hand tool (See Figure 1); wherein the first hand tool part comprises a main body (1) and a first connection part (11), and the second hand tool part comprises a main body (2) and a second connection part (12, 13), wherein the first connection part (11) and the second connection part (12, 13) are configured to be releasably connected together in a state of compression (See Figures 1 and 6; page 1 of the specification, lines 78 - 83); and wherein at least one of the first connection part (11) or the second connection part (12, 13) comprises a compression member (i.e. spring pressed lock bolt) configured to releasably apply compression to the second connection part or the first connection part to releasably connect the first connection part and the second connection part together (see Figure 6). PNG media_image3.png 488 674 media_image3.png Greyscale Regarding claim 5, Anderson et al. shows a hand tool system wherein the first hand tool part (1) has a first hand tool functionality (i.e. level) and the second hand tool part (2) has a second hand tool functionality (i.e. level). Referring to claim 7, Anderson et al. sets forth a hand tool system wherein the first hand tool functionality (i.e. level) is the same as the second hand tool functionality (i.e. level). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 9, 11 – 13 and 16 - 20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Claims 9 and 11 – 12 are allowable because the prior art fails to teach or suggest a hand tool system wherein the first hand tool part comprises an electronic hand tool and wherein the first connection part comprises a first electrical connector and the second connection part comprises a second electrical connector; wherein the first electrical connector and the second electrical connector are configured to form an electrical connection between the first hand tool part and the second hand tool part when the first hand tool part and the second hand tool part are connected together in combination with the remaining limitations of the claims. Claim 13 is allowable because the prior art fails to teach or suggest a hand tool system comprising a third hand tool part configured to be releasably connected to at least one of the first hand tool part or the second hand tool part to form another combination hand tool in combination with the remaining limitations of the claims. Claims 16 – 17 are allowable because the prior art fails to teach or suggest a hand tool system wherein the first hand tool part comprises an electronic hand tool and wherein the first connection part comprises a first electrical connector and the second connection part comprises a second electrical connector; wherein the first electrical connector and the second electrical connector are configured to form an electrical connection between the first hand tool part and the second hand tool part when the first hand tool part and the second hand tool part are connected together in combination with the remaining limitations of the claims. Claims 18 - 20 are allowable because the prior art fails to teach or suggest a hand tool system comprising a hand tool system, comprising a first hand tool part; wherein the first hand tool part comprises a first electrical connector and the second hand tool part comprises a second electrical connector; wherein the first electrical connector and the second electrical connector are configured to form an electrical connection between the first hand tool part and the second hand tool part when the first hand tool part and the second hand tool part are connected together in combination with the remaining limitations of the claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The following references are considered relevant but fail to teach the combination as claimed: Chisholm et al. (US 8,087,177) Kasche (US 7,028,411) Hildebrant (US 1,655,766) Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to YARITZA GUADALUPE-MCCALL whose telephone number is (571)272-2244. The examiner can normally be reached Mon -Thu, 8:00am - 6:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Laura E Martin can be reached at 571-272-2160. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. YARITZA GUADALUPE-MCCALL Primary Examiner Art Unit 2855 February 15, 2026 /YARITZA GUADALUPE-MCCALL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2855
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 12, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601581
Generator Rotor Centering Device
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603976
FOUNDATION PROJECTION LINE-DRAWING DEVICE AND A LINE-DRAWING METHOD FOR A SPORTS FIELD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595995
ELECTRONIC SCALE RULER AND VERNIER CALIPER, AND USE METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595994
SPOOLED MARKING APPARATUS AND METHODS THEREFOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590790
MULTIFUNCTIONAL SPEED SQUARE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+14.6%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1143 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month