Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/537,538

AERIAL LIFT SLOPE ADJUSTMENT SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Dec 12, 2023
Priority
Jun 17, 2021 — provisional 63/211,813 +2 more
Examiner
MATTEI, BRIAN DAVID
Art Unit
3635
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Time Manufacturing Company
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allowance Rate
490 granted / 727 resolved
+15.4% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
13 currently pending
Career history
738
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
87.0%
+47.0% vs TC avg
§102
4.9%
-35.1% vs TC avg
§112
5.4%
-34.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 727 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION This Office Action is in response to the application filed December 12, 2023. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-19 are pending. Claims 10-18 are withdrawn as set forth below. Claims 1-9 and 19 stand rejected as set forth below. Election/Restrictions Claims 10-18 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on February 23, 2026. Drawings The drawings are objected to as failing to comply with 37 CFR 1.84(p)(4) because reference character “8” has been used to designate both the slope sensor and the boom rest. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: the term “sensor” is misspelled in line 19. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 7 is objected to because of the following informalities: the term “lift” is misspelled in line 2. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 9 is objected to because of the following informalities: the phrase in line 1 is assumed to be “an LED panel”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 1-9 and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the horizontal surface" in line 11. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Applicant should note claims 2-9 and 19 stand rejected as being dependent on a rejected claim. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the chassis surface" in line 13. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the top" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the bottom" in line 9. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Regarding claim 1, the phrase “measuring/updating” in indefinite as it is unclear if the applicant intends the slash to represent an “or”, “and” or “and/or”. Appropriate correction is required. Regarding claim 7, the phrase “if the aerial life is equipped with a suitable set of stabilizers” is indefinite as it is unclear what defines the “suitability” of a set of stabilizers. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-9 and 19 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The closest prior art Mourlam (US 10,435,283) discloses a slope adjustment system for an aerial lift (Figs 1, 2) comprising a pedestal (56) sitting on a movable chassis, a turret (54) connected to a top of the pedestal and able to rotate horizontally (Figs 4a-c), a lower boom (22) connected to an upper boom (24) with a knuckle therebetween (Fig 2); the adjustment system comprising a sensor (52) to measure in real-time a chassis angle that is the angle of the chassis relative to a horizontal surface (col 6, lines 32-45), a hydraulic control valve (44) for controlling levelling (col 5, lines 25-38), and a control module (70) which receives real-time values of the chassis angle as measured by the sensor and switches the hydraulic valve on or off based on the values received and an algorithm (col 9, lines 22-58) (Fig 5). Mourlam does not disclose the sensor as a plurality of sensors, a slope sensor located on a bottom of the turret and a lower boom sensor on the lower boom; the hydraulic enable valve being on the turret to raise or lower the boom and a boom rest having a mechanical stow switch on its top for stopping the slope sensor from measuring or updating the chassis angle. Since the devices of Mourlam is able to level the turret even if the ground is not level there would be no reason to modify the boom of Mourlam to be prevented from being raised when the ground is not level. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See list of references on PTO-892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Brian Mattei whose telephone number is (571)270-3238. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday 8:00 to 5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Namrata Boveja can be reached at 571-272-8105. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRIAN D MATTEI/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3635
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 12, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
May 02, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12577777
PANELED WALL SYSTEM COMPRISING A DUAL GASKET ASSEMBLY
2y 10m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12560027
MODULAR LADDER FOR STEALTH CELL TOWERS
3y 6m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12540508
Pipe Adapter for Ladder Placement
3y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12523099
SAFETY LADDER
3y 2m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Patent 12435517
TOGGLE BOLT CONNECTOR SYSTEM FOR HOLLOW JOIST
2y 11m to grant Granted Oct 07, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+15.3%)
1y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 727 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month