Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/538,010

INTEGRATED DRILLING INJECTION AND EXTRACTION DEVICE AND METHOD

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Dec 13, 2023
Examiner
SALONE, BAYAN
Art Unit
3726
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Hypertunnel Ip Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
603 granted / 795 resolved
+5.8% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+17.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
817
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
48.2%
+8.2% vs TC avg
§102
30.6%
-9.4% vs TC avg
§112
18.5%
-21.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 795 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 4 and 6-9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Zhang et al. (CN 107905827, herein referenced by the EPO English Machine Translation). RE Claim 1, Zhang discloses an integrated drilling and injection device 1, comprising: a longitudinal shank 1 having an internal passage (not labeled, see figures 2, 3 and 5) extending from an open first end of the shank 1 along an axis of the shank toward a second end of the shank 1; a drill bit 13 located at a second end of the shank 1 opposite the first end (See figures 2-5); at least one outlet (not labeled, the outlet is in the tip of the drill bit 13, as may be seen in figures 2 and 3; Pars. 0042, 0043 and 0051) in fluid communication between the internal passage and an exterior surface of the shank 1; and a valve 9, 92, 93 within the internal passage, the valve 9, 92, 93 configured to control passage of material within the internal passage (Pars. 0059 and 0099, Figs. 2, 5 and 6). RE Claim 4, Zhang discloses a seal 4 disposed on the shank 1, spaced from the drill bit 13, the seal 4 configured to form a barrier around the shank 1, between the shank 1 and a channel 12 bored out by the drill bit 13 (Par. 0097, Figs. 1-4). RE Claim 6, Zhang discloses the shank 1 comprises a plurality of shank sections (See figures 2-5). RE Claim 7, Zhang discloses the device comprising embedded tools/technology 2, 3 therein (Pars. 0035, 0084 and 0100-0103, Figs. 2-6). RE Claim 8, Zhang discloses a system for injection of material into a substrate 11, the system comprising: the device according to claim 1; an access surface through which the device is to be deployed (See figure 1); and a device deployment apparatus (an anchor drill, not shown, Par. 0048) for driving the device through the access surface into a substrate 11 and injecting material into the internal passage (Pars. 0048, 0056 and 0084-0088, Figs. 1-6). RE Claim 9, Zhang discloses a method of injecting material into a substrate 11, the method comprising the steps of: providing the device of claim 1; driving the device into a substrate 11; and injecting material into the internal passage (Pars. 0042, 0043, 0051, 0059 and 0083-0106, Figs. 1-6). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 2 and 3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhang et al. (CN 107905827), in view of Fischer (US 5096344). RE Claim 2, Zhang discloses a blade that is configured to cut in a first rotational direction (the outer blades of the drill bit 13, see figs. 2 and 3). Zhang does not explicitly disclose the drill bit comprises: a secondary flute on the shank, the secondary flute having a helical shape; the secondary flute is spaced from the drill bit and twists in the first rotational direction such that when the device is rotated in the first rotational direction, material such as water is drawn toward the blade. Fischer discloses a drilling device having a shank 5 having a first end and a second end (see figure 1); a drill bit 1; a blade 3, 4 that is configured to cut in a first rotational direction and a secondary flute 8 on the shank 5, the secondary flute 8 having a helical shape (See figs. 1 and 2); the secondary flute 8 is spaced from the drill bit and twists in the first rotational direction (Col. 3, Lines 19-32, Figs. 1-3), for the benefit of drilling a cylindrical hole without jamming (Col. 1, Lines 29-34). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the invention of Zhang by providing a secondary flute on the shank, the secondary flute having a helical shape; the secondary flute is spaced from the drill bit and twists in the first rotational direction, as disclosed by Fischer, for the benefit of drilling a cylindrical hole without jamming. Note: the limitation “such that when the device is rotated in the first rotational direction, material such as water is drawn toward the blade” is not given patentable weight, as the preamble of the claim refers to an apparatus and the aforementioned limitation refers to a method step. Re Claim 3, the combination as applied to claim 2 remains as previously applied. The combination discloses the secondary flute 8 is located on a flute portion of the shank 5 spaced from the first end of the shank 5, the flute portion of the shank 5 having a diameter substantially greater than a diameter of the shank at the first end of the shank 5 (See figures 1 and 2). Claim(s) 5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhang et al. (CN 107905827), in view of Rinklake et al. (DE 3708764, herein referenced by the EPO English Machine Translation). Re Claim 5, Zhang does not explicitly disclose the seal is frangibly connected to the shank. Rinklake discloses a drilling device 1 comprising: a shank 2 having a first end and a second end (see figures 1-9); and a seal 29; the seal is frangibly connected to the shank 2 (Pars. 0018-0025 and 0031, Figs. 1-3 and 9). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the invention of Zhang by making the seal frangibly connected to the shank as disclosed by Rinklake for the benefit of separating the device from the seal. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BAYAN SALONE whose telephone number is (571)270-7739. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-60 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, David Bryant can be reached at (571)272-4526. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BAYAN SALONE/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3726
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 13, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603416
A MOUNTING ASSEMBLY FOR AN INTEGRATED BASE STATION ANTENNA AND AN INTEGRATED BASE STATION ANTENNA
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594097
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ORTHOPEDIC TOOL CONNECTORS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589470
SOCKET SYSTEMS AND METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583255
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATED CONTAINER WHEEL ASSEMBLY MANUFACTURING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12578243
METHOD OF DESIGNING A BOLTED JOINT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+17.3%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 795 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month