Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 18/538,250

DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 13, 2023
Priority
Dec 29, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0189353
Examiner
KNUDSON, BRAD ALLAN
Art Unit
2817
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
LG Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
101 granted / 119 resolved
+16.9% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+18.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
151
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
55.0%
+15.0% vs TC avg
§102
25.0%
-15.0% vs TC avg
§112
17.1%
-22.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 119 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
672DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment The Amendment filed August 12, 2026 has been entered. Applicant' s Amendment to claim 20 has overcome the objection set forth in the Non-Final Office Action mailed May 14, 2026, and the objection is withdrawn. Claims 1, 2, 4, and 6-20 remain pending in the application. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see pages 8-9 of Remarks, filed August 12, 2026, with respect to the rejections of claims 1-4, 13, and 18-20 have been fully considered in view of the Amendment and are persuasive. Therefore the rejections have been withdrawn. In regards to the amended claims 8 and 10, although they were indicated as having allowable subject matter in the prior office action, upon an updated search and consideration, a new grounds of rejection is made in view of newly identified prior art. Please see the claim rejections below. Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. The following title is suggested: Display Panel Including an Opening/Closing Module Configured to Open a When an Image is Output from a Pixel in a Light-Transmitting Region Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 8 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Bang; Joohyuk et al. (US 2022/0189373; hereinafter Bang) in view of Chen, Yu-huai (CN 111863922 A; hereinafter Chen). Regarding claim 8, Bang discloses a display device, comprising: a display panel (10A; Figs 1-3; ¶ [0058-59]) including: a first display region (120A; Figs 1-3; ¶ [0060]) in which a plurality of first pixels (PX2; Fig 3; ¶ [0063]) are disposed, a second display region (110A/110A2; Figs 1-3/6-7; ¶ [0020,0080-81]) including pixel regions (31; Fig 6; ¶ [0074,0081]) and a plurality of light-transmitting regions (32; Fig 6; ¶ [0074,0081]), wherein a plurality of second pixels (PX1; Fig 3; ¶ [0062]) are disposed in the pixel regions, and an opening/closing module (20A Figs 1-3; ¶ [0058]) configured to control light passing through the plurality of light transmitting regions (¶ [0064]); and an optical sensor disposed below the display panel (30A; Figs 1-3; ¶ [0058,0067]), wherein the opening/closing module is configured to open the light-transmitting region when the optical sensor is driven (20A in transparent state when 30A driven; ¶ [0068]) and block the light-transmitting region when the optical sensor is not driven (20A in opaque state when 30A not driven; ¶ [0068]), wherein the light-transmitting region includes: a buffer layer (11; Fig 6; ¶ [0077]) disposed on a substrate (1; Fig 6; ¶ [0075]); a gate insulating film (12; Fig 6; ¶ [0077]) disposed on the buffer layer. Bang does not disclose wherein the light-transmitting region includes: a cathode disposed on the gate insulating film, and wherein the opening/closing module is disposed on the cathode. In the same field of endeavor Chen discloses a display panel comprising a light transmitting region (052; Figs 13,18; ¶ [0056,0060 {pages 31-32}]) including: a cathode (110; Fig 13; ¶ [0056,0062 {page 37}]) and an opening/closing module (electrochromic layer 090; Fig 13,18; ¶ [0056,0060 {page 32}]) disposed on the cathode. Accordingly, it would have been obvious to combine the disclosure of Chen with that of Bang to satisfy the further limitation of claim 8. One would have been motivated to do this as a means to incorporate the opening/closing module into the display panel, since Bang provides limited detail regarding the structure of the opening/closing module. A cathode and gate insulating film are disclosed by both Bang and Chen; the matter of whether each is included in the light-transmitting region is a design choice, since both may comprise transparent materials known in the art and therefore enable the light-transmitting region to function as intended. One would have had a reasonable expectation of success due to the similar structures of the display panels of Bang and Chen. Claim 10 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Bang; Joohyuk et al. (US 2022/0189373; hereinafter Bang) in view of Park; SungHee et al. (US 2014/0183479; hereinafter Park). Regarding claim 10, Bang discloses a display device, comprising: a display panel (10A; Figs 1-3; ¶ [0058-59]) including: a first display region (120A; Figs 1-3; ¶ [0060]) in which a plurality of first pixels (PX2; Fig 3; ¶ [0063]) are disposed, a second display region (110A/110A2; Figs 1-3/6-7; ¶ [0020,0080-81]) including pixel regions (31; Fig 6; ¶ [0074,0081]) and a plurality of light-transmitting regions (32; Fig 6; ¶ [0074,0081]), wherein a plurality of second pixels (PX1; Fig 3; ¶ [0062]) are disposed in the pixel regions, and an opening/closing module (20A Figs 1-3; ¶ [0058]) configured to control light passing through the plurality of light transmitting regions (¶ [0064]); and an optical sensor disposed below the display panel (30A; Figs 1-3; ¶ [0058,0067]), wherein the opening/closing module is configured to open the light-transmitting region when the optical sensor is driven (20A in transparent state when 30A driven; ¶ [0068]) and block the light-transmitting region when the optical sensor is not driven (20A in opaque state when 30A not driven; ¶ [0068]), wherein the light-transmitting region includes: a buffer layer (11; Fig 6; ¶ [0077]) disposed on a substrate (1; Figs 1,6; ¶ [0075]); a gate insulating film (12; Fig 6; ¶ [0077]) disposed on the buffer layer, and wherein the opening/closing module is disposed below the substrate (20A may be provided on a side of the rear surface of display panel 10A; Fig 1; ¶ [0065]). Bang does not disclose wherein the light-transmitting region includes a cathode disposed on the gate insulating film; however, a cathode on a gate insulating film in a light-transmitting region is known in the art. In the same field of endeavor Park discloses a display panel comprising a light transmitting region (TA; Fig 3; ¶ [0045-48]) including: a cathode (313; Fig 3; ¶ [0058]) on a gate insulating film. Accordingly, it would have been obvious to have included the cathode on gate insulating film structure in the light-transmitting region as taught by Park in the display panel of Bang. One would have been motivated to do this in order to simplify the manufacturing process for a case where the cathode is a transparent film, as is known in the art, rather than removing the cathode from the light-transmitting region. One would have had a reasonable expectation of success due to the similar structures of the display panels of Bang and Park. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1, 2, 4, 6-7, 9, 11-20 allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 1, the prior art of record, either singularly or in combination, does not disclose or suggest the combination of limitations including “wherein the opening/closing module is configured to open the light-transmitting regions when an image is output from the third pixels”, in combination with the other limitations of the claim. The prior art Choi (Choi; Nak Cho et al. {US 2022/0165984}) discloses a display panel (Figs 1-3,4-6; ¶ [0048-99], in particular; entire document) including: a first display region (DA1; Fig 3; ¶ [0053]) in which a plurality of first pixels (PX in PA1; Figs 3,8; ¶ [0069-71]) are disposed, a second display region (DA2; Fig 3; ¶ [0053]) including pixel regions (PA2; Fig 3,9; ¶ [0069-72]) and a plurality of light-transmitting regions (TA; Fig 3,9; ¶ [0069, 0073]), wherein a plurality of second pixels are disposed in the pixel regions; and an optical sensor (40; Fig 2; ¶ [0065]) disposed below the display panel, but Choi does not disclose an opening/closing module configured to control light passing through the plurality of light- transmitting regions. The prior art Liu (Liu; Yuhao et al. {US 2021/0091147}) discloses a display panel including a plurality of pixels (P1; Figs 2,6; ¶ [0030-35]) disposed in a light-transmitting region (AA1; Fig 6; ¶ [0029, 0046-51]), wherein an opening/closing module (state switching layer 104; Figs 2,6, 8; ¶ [0031]) is configured to close the light-transmitting regions when an image is output from the pixels and an optical sensor not driven (¶ [0035]), which teaches away from the limitation of claim 1 by closing the light-transmitting regions rather than opening them when an image is output from the pixels. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRAD KNUDSON whose telephone number is (703)756-4582. The examiner can normally be reached Telework 9:30 -18:30 ET; M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eliseo Ramos Feliciano can be reached at 571-272-7925. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /B.A.K./Examiner, Art Unit 2817 /ELISEO RAMOS FELICIANO/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2817
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 13, 2023
Application Filed
May 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Aug 12, 2026
Response Filed
Oct 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12772889
TUNABLE FILTER HAVING A 3-D INDUCTOR AND A CAVITY-EMBEDDED DIE WHICH INCLUDES A VARACTOR AND A CAPACITOR
3y 9m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12772806
Multi-Layer Structures and Methods of Forming
3y 3m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12765090
IMAGE SENSING DEVICE
3y 2m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12757407
IMPROVED REPLACEMENT ELECTRODE PROCESS FOR 3D FERROELECTRIC MEMORY
4y 0m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12751231
Edge structure of semiconductor wafer and manufacturing method thereof
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+18.6%)
3y 3m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 119 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month