DETAILED ACTION
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Response to Arguments
Applicant's arguments filed June 25, 2026, have been fully considered but they are not persuasive.
On pages 10-11 of Remarks, Applicant argues that the prior art of Mizuno (US Publication 2022/0285100) fails to disclose side margins that are part of the capacitive formation portion that includes an end of the internal electrodes.
The Examiner respectfully disagrees with the above assertion. To clarify the margin portion of Mizuno, the Examiner has reproduced Figure 2 of Mizuno with Examiner’s Comments (Figure 2EC) in the Instant Rejection. The margin portion is shown as M1 in Figure 2EC. Claim 1 requires a second region to be included within the margin portion. As explained in the rejection herein, the second region is an area where M1 and 17a coincide (See Figure 2EC and Figure 3 of Mizuno). The Applicant has not claimed that the claimed elements of the second region are distributed throughout the whole first margin portion.
On page 11, the Applicant argues that Mizuno fails to disclose the limitations of amended claim 1. In particular, the Applicant argues that Mizuno does not disclose a second region that is included in the first margin portion and not in the second margin portion.
The Examiner respectfully disagrees with the above assertion. The Applicant has not described a location of the second margin portion. Therefore, any portion outside of the first margin and capacitance forming portion can be considered the second margin portion. In the rejection herein, the Examiner has shown that the margin portion can be M2 seen in Figure 2EC.
Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 17 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. The prior art of Cha (US Publication 2019/0180936) is relied upon to disclose a content of sodium.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b):
(b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention.
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph:
The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention.
Claim 10 and its depending claims are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Line 32 states “ a second margin portion”. However, line 22 of Claim 10 has already introduced a second margin portion. It is unclear if the Applicant is introducing a new margin portion or referring to a previously existing margin portion. The claim will be examined as best understood.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status.
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
Claim(s) 1-3, 6, 10, 11, and 17-18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Mizuno (US Publication 2022/0285100) in view of Cha et al. (US Publication 2019/0180936).
PNG
media_image1.png
311
406
media_image1.png
Greyscale
Figure 2 of Mizuno with Examiner’s Comments (Figure 2EC)
In re claim 1, Nishikawa discloses a multilayer electronic component comprising:
a body (11 – Figure 2, Figure 3, ¶44) having first and second surfaces (top and bottom surfaces of 11 – Figure 2, Figure 3) opposing each other in a first direction (‘Z’ direction – Figure 2), third and fourth surfaces (surfaces of 11 opposing in the ‘X’ direction – Figure 1, Figure 2) connected to the first and second surfaces and opposing each other in a second direction (Figure 1, Figure 2), and fifth and sixth surfaces (surfaces of 11 opposing in the ‘Y’ direction – Figure 1, Figure 2) connected to the first to fourth surfaces and opposing each other in a third direction (Figure 1, Figure 2), and including a dielectric layer (20 – Figure 2, ¶57) and first and second internal electrodes (12, 13 – Figure 2, ¶61) alternately disposed in the first direction while having the dielectric layer interposed therebetween (Figure 2);
a first external electrode (14 – Figure 1, Figure 2) disposed on the third surface and connected to the first internal electrode (12 – Figure 1); and
a second external electrode (15 – Figure 1, Figure 2, ¶46) disposed on the fourth surface and connected to the second internal electrode (13 – Figure 2),
wherein the body includes a capacitance formation portion (18 – Figure 2, ¶53) where the first and second internal electrodes overlap each other in the first direction (Figure 2),
the body includes a first margin portion (M1 – Figure 2EC; Note that M1 includes 17a and 17b at the end surface – Figure 3, ¶48) that is disposed on one side surface (note that 17a extends to the surfaces opposing in the ‘X’ direction – Figure 2, Figure 3) or the other side surface of the capacitance formation portion in the second direction (‘X’ direction – Figure 2) and that includes an end of the first or second internal electrode (12, 13 – Figure 2, Figure 3),
the dielectric layer (20 – Figure 3) includes a first region (R1 – Figure disposed at a center region of the dielectric layer that is included in the capacitance formation portion (region in 18 - Figure 3), and a second region (region where M1 and 17a/17b overlap – Figure 2EC, Figure 3)included in the first margin portion (region where M1 and 17a overlap – Figure 2EC, Figure 3), and
at least one element of magnesium (Mg), silicon (Si), aluminum (Al), lithium (Li), copper (Cu), sodium (Na), bismuth (Bi), manganese (Mn), chromium (Cr), vanadium (V), iron (Fe), nickel (Ni), cobalt (Co), tin (Sn), indium (In), gallium (Ga), zinc (Zn), lead (Pb), silver (Ag), palladium (Pd), platinum (Pt), Iridium (Ir), ruthenium (Ru), osmium (Os), yttrium (Y), erbium (Er), ytterbium (Yb), terbium (Tb), holmium (Ho), erbium (Er), and dysprosium (Dy) is included in the second region, and not substantially included in the first region (¶67, ¶71, ¶75),
vanadium (V) is not substantially included in the first region (¶54-55), and
the second region (region where M1 and 17a/17b overlap – Figure 2EC, Figure 3) is not included in a second margin portion (M2 – Figure 2EC).
Mizuno does not disclose a content of silicon (Si) in the first region is less than 0.5 at% of total elements in the first region.
Cha discloses that lowering the silicon content in the capacitance region results in a higher dielectric constant (¶87).
It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to lower the amount of Silicon in the capacitance forming region to achieve a device having increased capacitance, since it has been held that discovering an optimum value of a result effective variable involves only routine skill in the art. In re Boesch, 617 F.2d 272, 205 USPQ 215 (CCPA 1980).
In re claim 2, Mizuno in view of Cha discloses the component of claim 1, as explained above. Mizuno further discloses wherein the center region is from 1/5 point to 4/5 point when a region of the dielectric layer (20 – Figure 3) that is included in the capacitance formation portion (18 – Figure 2, Figure 3) is divided into five parts in the second direction (‘X’ direction - Figure 3), and is from 1/3 point to 2/3 point when the region of the dielectric layer (20 – Figure 3) that is included in the capacitance formation portion is divided into third parts in the first direction (‘Z’ direction – Figure 3).
In re claim 3, Mizuno in view of Cha discloses the component of claim 1, as explained above. Mizuno further discloses wherein magnesium (Mg) is the element included in the second region and not substantially included in the first region (¶67, ¶71, ¶75).
In re claim 6, Mizuno in view of Cha discloses the component of claim 5, as explained above. Mizuno does not disclose wherein silicon (Si) is not substantially included in the first region.
Cha discloses that lowering the silicon content in the capacitance region results in a higher dielectric constant (¶87).
It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to lower the amount of Silicon in the capacitance forming region to achieve a device having increased capacitance, since it has been held that discovering an optimum value of a result effective variable involves only routine skill in the art. In re Boesch, 617 F.2d 272, 205 USPQ 215 (CCPA 1980).
In re claim 10, Mizuno discloses a multilayer electronic component comprising:
a body (11 – Figure 2, Figure 3, ¶44) having first and second surfaces (top and bottom surfaces of 11 – Figure 2, Figure 3) opposing each other in a first direction (‘Z’ direction – Figure 2), third and fourth surfaces (surfaces of 11 opposing in the ‘X’ direction – Figure 1, Figure 2) connected to the first and second surfaces and opposing each other in a second direction (Figure 1, Figure 2), and fifth and sixth surfaces (surfaces of 11 opposing in the ‘Y’ direction – Figure 1, Figure 2) connected to the first to fourth surfaces and opposing each other in a third direction (Figure 1, Figure 2), and including a dielectric layer (20 – Figure 2, ¶57) and first and second internal electrodes (12, 13 – Figure 2, ¶61) alternately disposed in the first direction while having the dielectric layer interposed therebetween (Figure 2);
a first external electrode (14 – Figure 1, Figure 2) disposed on the third surface and connected to the first internal electrode (12 – Figure 1); and
a second external electrode (15 – Figure 1, Figure 2, ¶46) disposed on the fourth surface and connected to the second internal electrode (13 – Figure 2),
wherein the body includes a capacitance formation portion (18 – Figure 2, ¶53) where the first and second internal electrodes overlap each other in the first direction (Figure 2),
the body includes a first margin portion (M1 – Figure 2EC) that is disposed on one side surface (note that 17a extends to the surfaces of 11 opposing in the ‘X’ direction – Figure 2, Figure 3) or the other side surface of the capacitance formation portion in the second direction (‘X’ direction – Figure 2, Figure 3) and that includes an end of the first or second internal electrode (12, 13 – Figure 3),
the body includes a second margin portion (17b – Figure 3) that is disposed on one surface or the other surface of the capacitance formation portion (Figure 3) in the third direction (‘Y’ direction – Figure 3),
the dielectric layer (20 – Figure 3) includes a first region (R1 – Figure 2EC) disposed at a center region of the dielectric layer that is included in the capacitance formation portion (region in 18 - Figure 3), and a second region (region where M1 and 17a overlap – Figure 2EC, Figure 3) included in the first margin portion (M1 – Figure 2EC),
a third region included in the second margin portion (region within 17b – Figure 3),
at least one element of silicon (Si), aluminum (Al), lithium (Li), copper (Cu), sodium (Na), bismuth (Bi), manganese (Mn), chromium (Cr), vanadium (V), iron (Fe), nickel (Ni), cobalt (Co), tin (Sn), indium (In), gallium (Ga), zinc (Zn), lead (Pb), silver (Ag), palladium (Pd), platinum (Pt), Iridium (Ir), ruthenium (Ru), osmium (Os), yttrium (Y), erbium (Er), ytterbium (Yb), terbium (Tb), holmium (Ho), erbium (Er), and dysprosium (Dy) is included in the second region, and not substantially included in the first region and the third region (¶67, ¶71, ¶75),
vanadium (V) is not substantially included in the first region (¶54-55), and
the second region (region where M1 and 17a overlap – Figure 2EC) is not included in the second margin portion (17b – Figure 2EC). Note that the Examiner is only taking the region where M1 and 17a overlap as the first region.
Mizuno does not disclose a content of silicon (Si) in the first region is less than 0.5 at% of total elements in the first region.
Cha discloses that lowering the silicon content in the capacitance region results in a higher dielectric constant (¶87).
It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to lower the amount of Silicon in the capacitance forming region to achieve a device having increased capacitance, since it has been held that discovering an optimum value of a result effective variable involves only routine skill in the art. In re Boesch, 617 F.2d 272, 205 USPQ 215 (CCPA 1980).
In re claim 11, Mizuno in view of Cha discloses the component of claim 10, as explained above. Mizuno further discloses wherein the center region is from 1/5 point to 4/5 point when a region of the dielectric layer that is included in the capacitance formation portion (18 – Figure 2, Figure 3) is divided into five parts in the second direction or third direction (Figure 2, Figure 3), and is from 1/3 point to 2/3 point when the region of the dielectric layer (20 – Figure 2, Figure 3) that is included in the capacitance formation portion is divided into third parts in the first direction (‘Z’ direction – Figure 2, Figure 3).
In re claim 17, Mizuno discloses a multilayer electronic component comprising:
a body (11 – Figure 2, Figure 3, ¶44) having first and second surfaces (top and bottom surfaces of 11 – Figure 2, Figure 3) opposing each other in a first direction (‘Z’ direction – Figure 2), third and fourth surfaces (surfaces of 11 opposing in the ‘X’ direction – Figure 1, Figure 2) connected to the first and second surfaces and opposing each other in a second direction (Figure 1, Figure 2), and fifth and sixth surfaces (surfaces of 11 opposing in the ‘Y’ direction – Figure 1, Figure 2) connected to the first to fourth surfaces and opposing each other in a third direction (Figure 1, Figure 2), and including a dielectric layer (20 – Figure 2, ¶57) and first and second internal electrodes (12, 13 – Figure 2, ¶61) alternately disposed in the first direction while having the dielectric layer interposed therebetween (Figure 2);
a first external electrode (14 – Figure 1, Figure 2) disposed on the third surface and connected to the first internal electrode (12 – Figure 1); and
a second external electrode (15 – Figure 1, Figure 2, ¶46) disposed on the fourth surface and connected to the second internal electrode (13 – Figure 2),
wherein the body includes a capacitance formation portion (18 – Figure 2, ¶53) where the first and second internal electrodes overlap each other in the first direction (Figure 2),
the body includes a second margin portion (17b – Figure 3) that is disposed on one surface or the other surface of the capacitance formation portion (Figure 3) in the third direction (‘Y’ direction – Figure 3),
the dielectric layer (20 – Figure 3) includes a first region disposed at a center region of the dielectric layer that is included in the capacitance formation portion (region in 18 - Figure 3), and a third region included in the second margin portion (region in 17b – Figure 3),
at least one element of silicon (Si), aluminum (Al), lithium (Li), copper (Cu), sodium (Na), bismuth (Bi), manganese (Mn), chromium (Cr), vanadium (V), iron (Fe), nickel (Ni), cobalt (Co), tin (Sn), indium (In), gallium (Ga), zinc (Zn), lead (Pb), silver (Ag), palladium (Pd), platinum (Pt), Iridium (Ir), ruthenium (Ru), osmium (Os), yttrium (Y), erbium (Er), ytterbium (Yb), terbium (Tb), holmium (Ho), erbium (Er), and dysprosium (Dy) is included in the second region, and not substantially included in the first region and the third region (¶67, ¶71, ¶75),
vanadium (V) is not substantially included in the first region (¶54-55),
the third region further includes titanium (Ti) (¶54, ¶62).
Mizuno does not disclose a content of silicon (Si) in the first region is less than 0.5 at% of total elements in the first region.
Cha discloses that lowering the silicon content in the capacitance region results in a higher dielectric constant (¶87).
It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to lower the amount of Silicon in the capacitance forming region to achieve a device having increased capacitance, since it has been held that discovering an optimum value of a result effective variable involves only routine skill in the art. In re Boesch, 617 F.2d 272, 205 USPQ 215 (CCPA 1980).
Mizuno does not disclose at least one of silicon (Si), aluminum (Al), lithium (Li), copper (Cu), sodium (Na), and bismuth (Bi) is the element included in the second region and not substantially included in the first region, and a content of at least one of aluminum (Al), lithium (Li), copper (Cu),sodium (Na), and bismuth (Bi), included in the second region, is 2 moles or more and 7 moles or less relative to 100 moles of titanium (Ti).
Cha discloses and at least one of silicon (Si), aluminum (Al), lithium (Li), copper (Cu), sodium (Na), and bismuth (Bi) is the element included in the second region and not substantially included in the first region, and a content of at least one of aluminum (Al), lithium (Li), copper (Cu),sodium (Na), and bismuth (Bi) (¶95), included in the second region, is 2 moles or more and 7 moles or less relative to 100 moles of titanium (Ti) (Table 1: Sample 12).
It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before effective filing date of the invention to adjust the sodium concentration in the margin and main body portion to improve the reliability of the capacitor (¶96: Cha).
In re claim 18, Mizuno in view of Cha discloses the component of claim 17, as explained above. Mizuno further discloses wherein the center region is from 1/5 point to 4/5 point when a region of the dielectric layer that is included in the capacitance formation portion (18 – Figure 2, Figure 3) is divided into five parts in the third direction (Figure 2, Figure 3), and is from 1/3 point to 2/3 point when the region of the dielectric layer (20 – Figure 2, Figure 3) that is included in the capacitance formation portion is divided into third parts in the first direction (‘Z’ direction – Figure 2, Figure 3).
Claim(s) 4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Mizuno (US Publication 2022/0285100) in view of Cha et al. (US Publication 2019/0180936) and in further view of Isota et al. (US Publication 2022/0102076).
In re claim 4, Mizuno in view of Cha discloses the component of claim 3, as explained above. Mizuno does not disclose wherein the second region further includes titanium (Ti), and a content of magnesium (Mg) included in the second region is 1 mole or more and 5 moles or less relative to 100 moles of titanium (Ti)
Isota further discloses wherein the second region further includes titanium (Ti) (¶21, ¶33), and a content of magnesium (Mg) included in the second region is 1 mole or more and 5 moles or less relative to 100 moles of titanium (Ti) (¶52).
It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to incorporate the magnesium content as described by Isota to improve humidity load resistance (¶52: Isota).
Claim(s) 5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Mizuno (US Publication 2022/0285100) in view of Cha et al. (US Publication 2019/0180936) and in further view of Nishikawa et al. (US Publication 2018/0301282) and in further view of Cha ‘898 et al. (US Publication 2022/0277898).
In re claim 5, Mizuno in view of Cha discloses the component of claim 1, as explained above. Mizuno further discloses wherein the second region further includes titanium (Ti) (¶54, ¶91).
Mizuno does not disclose at least one of aluminum (Al), lithium (Li), copper (Cu), sodium (Na), and bismuth (Bi) is the element included in the second region and not substantially included in the first region.
Nishikawa discloses at least one of aluminum (Al), lithium (Li), copper (Cu), sodium (Na), and bismuth (Bi) is the element included in the second region and not substantially included in the first region (¶47-48), and
It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to incorporate the sintering additive concentrations as described by Nishikawa to lower the sintering temperature of the margin portions (¶28: Nishikawa).
Mizuno does not disclose a content of at least one of aluminum (Al), lithium (Li), copper (Cu),sodium (Na), and bismuth (Bi), included in the second region, is 2 moles or more and 7 moles or less relative to 100 moles of titanium (Ti).
Cha ‘898 discloses a content of at least one of aluminum (Al), lithium (Li), copper (Cu),sodium (Na), and bismuth (Bi), included in the second region, is 2 moles or more and 7 moles or less relative to 100 moles of titanium (Ti) (Table 1: Sample 2).
It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to include the element of lithium into the side margin portions to prevent insulation breakdown (¶95: Cha ‘898).
Claim(s) 7-9, 12-16, and 20-21 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Mizuno (US Publication 2022/0285100) in view of Cha et al. (US Publication 2019/0180936) and in further view of Nishikawa et al. (US Publication 2018/0301282).
In re claim 7, Mizuno in view of Cha discloses the component of claim 1, as explained above. Mizuno further discloses wherein the second region further includes titanium (Ti) (¶54, ¶91),
at least one of manganese (Mn), chromium (Cr), vanadium (V), iron (Fe), nickel (Ni), cobalt (Co) , tin (Sn), indium (In) , gallium (Ga) , zinc (Zn) , lead (Pb) , silver (Ag),palladium (Pd), platinum (Pt), Iridium (Ir), ruthenium (Ru),osmium (Os), yttrium (Y), erbium (Er), ytterbium (Yb),terbium (Tb), holmium (Ho), and dysprosium (Dy) is the element included in the second region and not substantially included in the first region (¶67, ¶71, ¶75).
Mizuno does not disclose a content of at least one of manganese (Mn), chromium (Cr), vanadium (V), iron (Fe), nickel (Ni), cobalt (Co), tin (Sn), indium (In), gallium (Ga), zinc (Zn), lead (Pb), silver (Ag), palladium (Pd), platinum (Pt), Iridium (Ir), ruthenium (Ru), osmium (Os), yttrium (Y), erbium (Er), ytterbium (Yb),terbium (Tb), holmium (Ho), and dysprosium (Dy), included in the second region, is 1 mole or more and 3 moles or less relative to 100 moles of titanium (Ti).
Nishikawa discloses a content of at least one of manganese (Mn), chromium (Cr), vanadium (V), iron (Fe), nickel (Ni), cobalt (Co), tin (Sn), indium (In), gallium (Ga), zinc (Zn), lead (Pb), silver (Ag), palladium (Pd), platinum (Pt), Iridium (Ir), ruthenium (Ru), osmium (Os), yttrium (Y), erbium (Er), ytterbium (Yb),terbium (Tb), holmium (Ho), and dysprosium (Dy), included in the second region, is 1 mole or more and 3 moles or less relative to 100 moles of titanium (Ti) (See Mn concentration in ¶45, ¶48).
It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to incorporate the sintering additive concentrations as described by Nishikawa to lower the sintering temperature of the margin portions (¶28: Nishikawa).
In re claim 8, Mizuno in view of Cha and in further view of Nishikawa discloses the component of claim 7, as explained above. Mizuno further discloses wherein manganese (Mn) is the element included in the second region and not substantially included in the first region (¶67, ¶71, ¶75).
In re claim 9, Mizuno in view of Cha discloses the component of claim 1, as explained above. Mizuno further discloses wherein the second region further includes titanium (Ti) (¶54, ¶91), magnesium and manganese are included in the second region and not substantially included in the first region (¶67, ¶71, ¶75).
Mizuno does not explicitly disclose wherein silicon (Si) is not substantially included in the first region.
Cha discloses that lowering the silicon content in the capacitance region results in a higher dielectric constant (¶87).
It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to lower the amount of Silicon in the capacitance forming region to achieve a device having increased capacitance, since it has been held that discovering an optimum value of a result effective variable involves only routine skill in the art. In re Boesch, 617 F.2d 272, 205 USPQ 215 (CCPA 1980).
Mizuno does not disclose relative to 100 moles of titanium (Ti) included in the second region, a content of magnesium (Mg) included in the second region is 1 mole or more and 5 moles or less, a content of silicon (Si) included in the second region is 2 moles or more and 7 moles or less, and a content of manganese (Mn) included in the second region is 1 mole or more and 3 moles or less.
Nishikawa discloses relative to 100 moles of titanium (Ti) included in the second region, a content of magnesium (Mg) included in the second region is 1 mole or more and 5 moles or less (¶45, ¶47), a content of silicon (Si) included in the second region is 2 moles or more and 7 moles or less (¶45), and a content of manganese (Mn) included in the second region is 1 mole or more and 3 moles or less (¶45, ¶48). Nishikawa further discloses that adjusting the amount of Si in the second region is correlated to the suppression of cracks and improved humidity resistance (¶30).
It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to incorporate the sintering additive concentrations as described by Nishikawa to lower the sintering temperature of the margin portions (¶28: Nishikawa). Further, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to adjust the amount of Si in the margin portions to create a balance between mechanical strength and manufacturing costs, since it has been held that discovering an optimum value of a result effective variable involves only routine skill in the art. In re Boesch, 617 F.2d 272, 205 USPQ 215 (CCPA 1980).
In re claim 12, Mizuno in view of Cha discloses the component of claim 10, as explained above. Mizuno further discloses wherein the second region or the third region further includes titanium (Ti) (¶54, ¶91).
Mizuno does not disclose at least one of silicon (Si), aluminum (Al), lithium (Li), copper (Cu), sodium (Na), and bismuth (Bi) is the element included in the at least one of the second region and the third region and not substantially included in the first region.
Cha discloses that lowering the silicon content in the capacitance region results in a higher dielectric constant (¶87).
It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to lower the amount of Silicon in the capacitance forming region to achieve a device having increased capacitance, since it has been held that discovering an optimum value of a result effective variable involves only routine skill in the art. In re Boesch, 617 F.2d 272, 205 USPQ 215 (CCPA 1980).
Mizuno does not disclose a content of at least one of silicon (Si), aluminum (Al), lithium (Li), copper (Cu), sodium (Na), and bismuth (Bi), included in the at least one of the second region and the third region, is 2 moles or more and 7 moles or less relative to 100 moles of titanium (Ti).
Nishikawa discloses a content of at least one of silicon (Si), aluminum (Al), lithium (Li), copper (Cu), sodium (Na), and bismuth (Bi), included in the at least one of the second region and the third region, is 2 moles or more and 7 moles or less relative to 100 moles of titanium (Ti) (¶45, ¶48). Nishikawa further discloses that adjusting the amount of Si in the second region is correlated to the suppression of cracks and improved humidity resistance (¶30). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to adjust the amount of Si in the margin portions to create a balance between mechanical strength and manufacturing costs, since it has been held that discovering an optimum value of a result effective variable involves only routine skill in the art. In re Boesch, 617 F.2d 272, 205 USPQ 215 (CCPA 1980).
In re claim 13, Mizuno in view of Cha and in further view of Nishikawa discloses the component of claim 12, as explained above. Mizuno does not disclose wherein silicon (Si) is not substantially included in the first region.
Cha discloses that lowering the silicon content in the capacitance region results in a higher dielectric constant (¶87).
It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to lower the amount of Silicon in the capacitance forming region to achieve a device having increased capacitance, since it has been held that discovering an optimum value of a result effective variable involves only routine skill in the art. In re Boesch, 617 F.2d 272, 205 USPQ 215 (CCPA 1980).
In re claim 14, Mizuno in view of Cha discloses the component of claim 10, as explained above. Mizuno further discloses wherein the second region or the third region further includes titanium (Ti) (¶54, ¶91),
at least one of manganese (Mn), chromium (Cr), vanadium (V), iron (Fe), nickel (Ni), cobalt (Co) , tin (Sn), indium (In) , gallium (Ga) , zinc (Zn) , lead (Pb) , silver (Ag),palladium (Pd), platinum (Pt), Iridium (Ir), ruthenium (Ru),osmium (Os), yttrium (Y), erbium (Er), ytterbium (Yb),terbium (Tb), holmium (Ho), and dysprosium (Dy) is the element included in the at least one of the second region and the third region and not substantially included in the first region (¶67, ¶71, ¶75).
Mizuno does not disclose a content of at least one of manganese (Mn), chromium (Cr), vanadium (V), iron (Fe), nickel (Ni), cobalt (Co), tin (Sn), indium (In), gallium (Ga), zinc (Zn), lead (Pb), silver (Ag), palladium (Pd), platinum (Pt), Iridium (Ir), ruthenium (Ru), osmium (Os), yttrium (Y), erbium (Er), ytterbium (Yb),terbium (Tb), holmium (Ho), and dysprosium (Dy), included in the second region, is 1 mole or more and 3 moles or less relative to 100 moles of titanium (Ti).
Nishikawa discloses a content of at least one of manganese (Mn), chromium (Cr), vanadium (V), iron (Fe), nickel (Ni), cobalt (Co), tin (Sn), indium (In), gallium (Ga), zinc (Zn), lead (Pb), silver (Ag), palladium (Pd), platinum (Pt), Iridium (Ir), ruthenium (Ru), osmium (Os), yttrium (Y), erbium (Er), ytterbium (Yb),terbium (Tb), holmium (Ho), and dysprosium (Dy), included in the second region, is 1 mole or more and 3 moles or less relative to 100 moles of titanium (Ti) (See Mn concentration in ¶45, ¶48).
It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to incorporate the sintering additive concentrations as described by Nishikawa to lower the sintering temperature of the margin portions (¶28: Nishikawa).
In re claim 15, Nishikawa in view of Cha and in further view of Nishikawa discloses the component of claim 14, as explained above. Mizuno further discloses wherein manganese (Mn) is the element included in the at least one of the second region and the third region and not substantially included in the first region (¶67, ¶71, ¶75).
In re claim 16, Mizuno in view of Cha discloses the component of claim 10, as explained above. Mizuno further discloses wherein the second region or third region further includes titanium (Ti) (¶54, ¶91), magnesium and manganese are included in the second region or the third region and not substantially included in the first region (¶67, ¶71, ¶75).
Mizuno does not explicitly disclose wherein silicon (Si) is not substantially included in the first region.
Cha discloses that lowering the silicon content in the capacitance region results in a higher dielectric constant (¶87).
It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to lower the amount of Silicon in the capacitance forming region to achieve a device having increased capacitance, since it has been held that discovering an optimum value of a result effective variable involves only routine skill in the art. In re Boesch, 617 F.2d 272, 205 USPQ 215 (CCPA 1980).
Mizuno does not disclose relative to 100 moles of titanium (Ti) included in the second region or the third region, a content of magnesium (Mg) included in the second region or the third region is 1 mole or more and 5 moles or less, a content of silicon (Si) included in the second region or the third region is 2 moles or more and 7 moles or less, and a content of manganese (Mn) included in the second region or the third region is 1 mole or more and 3 moles or less.
Nishikawa discloses relative to 100 moles of titanium (Ti) included in the second region or the third region, a content of magnesium (Mg) included in the second region or the third region is 1 mole or more and 5 moles or less (¶45, ¶47), a content of silicon (Si) included in the second region or the third region is 2 moles or more and 7 moles or less (¶45), and a content of manganese (Mn) included in the second region or the third region is 1 mole or more and 3 moles or less (¶45, ¶48). Nishikawa further discloses that adjusting the amount of Si in the second region or the third region is correlated to the suppression of cracks and improved humidity resistance (¶30).
It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to incorporate the sintering additive concentrations as described by Nishikawa to lower the sintering temperature of the margin portions (¶28: Nishikawa). Further, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to adjust the amount of Si in the margin portions to create a balance between mechanical strength and manufacturing costs, since it has been held that discovering an optimum value of a result effective variable involves only routine skill in the art. In re Boesch, 617 F.2d 272, 205 USPQ 215 (CCPA 1980).
In re claim 20, Mizuno in view of Cha discloses the component of claim 17, as explained above. Mizuno further discloses wherein the second region or the third region further includes titanium (Ti) (¶54, ¶91),
at least one of manganese (Mn), chromium (Cr), vanadium (V), iron (Fe), nickel (Ni), cobalt (Co) , tin (Sn), indium (In) , gallium (Ga) , zinc (Zn) , lead (Pb) , silver (Ag),palladium (Pd), platinum (Pt), Iridium (Ir), ruthenium (Ru),osmium (Os), yttrium (Y), erbium (Er), ytterbium (Yb),terbium (Tb), holmium (Ho), and dysprosium (Dy) is the element included in the at least one of the second region and the third region and not substantially included in the first region (¶67, ¶71, ¶75).
Mizuno does not disclose a content of at least one of manganese (Mn), chromium (Cr), vanadium (V), iron (Fe), nickel (Ni), cobalt (Co), tin (Sn), indium (In), gallium (Ga), zinc (Zn), lead (Pb), silver (Ag), palladium (Pd), platinum (Pt), Iridium (Ir), ruthenium (Ru), osmium (Os), yttrium (Y), erbium (Er), ytterbium (Yb),terbium (Tb), holmium (Ho), and dysprosium (Dy), included in the second region, is 1 mole or more and 3 moles or less relative to 100 moles of titanium (Ti).
Nishikawa discloses a content of at least one of manganese (Mn), chromium (Cr), vanadium (V), iron (Fe), nickel (Ni), cobalt (Co), tin (Sn), indium (In), gallium (Ga), zinc (Zn), lead (Pb), silver (Ag), palladium (Pd), platinum (Pt), Iridium (Ir), ruthenium (Ru), osmium (Os), yttrium (Y), erbium (Er), ytterbium (Yb),terbium (Tb), holmium (Ho), and dysprosium (Dy), included in the second region, is 1 mole or more and 3 moles or less relative to 100 moles of titanium (Ti) (See Mn concentration in ¶45, ¶48).
It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to incorporate the sintering additive concentrations as described by Nishikawa to lower the sintering temperature of the margin portions (¶28: Nishikawa).
In re claim 21, Mizuno in view of Cha discloses the component of claim 17, as explained above. Mizuno further discloses wherein the second region or third region further includes titanium (Ti) (¶54, ¶91), magnesium and manganese are included in the second region or the third region and not substantially included in the first region (¶67, ¶71, ¶75).
Mizuno does not explicitly disclose wherein silicon (Si) is not substantially included in the first region.
Cha discloses that lowering the silicon content in the capacitance region results in a higher dielectric constant (¶87).
It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to lower the amount of Silicon in the capacitance forming region to achieve a device having increased capacitance, since it has been held that discovering an optimum value of a result effective variable involves only routine skill in the art. In re Boesch, 617 F.2d 272, 205 USPQ 215 (CCPA 1980).
Mizuno does not disclose relative to 100 moles of titanium (Ti) included in the third region, a content of magnesium (Mg) included in the third region is 1 mole or more and 5 moles or less, a content of silicon (Si) included in the third region is 2 moles or more and 7 moles or less, and a content of manganese (Mn) included in the third region is 1 mole or more and 3 moles or less.
Nishikawa discloses relative to 100 moles of titanium (Ti) included in the third region, a content of magnesium (Mg) included in the third region is 1 mole or more and 5 moles or less (¶45, ¶47), a content of silicon (Si) included in the third region is 2 moles or more and 7 moles or less (¶45), and a content of manganese (Mn) included in the third region is 1 mole or more and 3 moles or less (¶45, ¶48). Nishikawa further discloses that adjusting the amount of Si in the second region or the third region is correlated to the suppression of cracks and improved humidity resistance (¶30).
It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to incorporate the sintering additive concentrations as described by Nishikawa to lower the sintering temperature of the margin portions (¶28: Nishikawa). Further, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to adjust the amount of Si in the margin portions to create a balance between mechanical strength and manufacturing costs, since it has been held that discovering an optimum value of a result effective variable involves only routine skill in the art. In re Boesch, 617 F.2d 272, 205 USPQ 215 (CCPA 1980).
Conclusion
The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure.
Fukunaga et al. (US Publication 2020/0126721) [¶12]
Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).
A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action.
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ARUN RAMASWAMY whose telephone number is (571)270-1962. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 9:00 am - 5:00 pm.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Timothy Dole can be reached at 571-272-2229. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/ARUN RAMASWAMY/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2848
