Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/539,309

METHOD AND DEVICE FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 14, 2023
Examiner
KAYAL, DAVID M
Art Unit
2464
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Bunker Hill Technologies LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
38 granted / 45 resolved
+26.4% vs TC avg
Strong +30% interview lift
Without
With
+30.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
73
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
§103
62.3%
+22.3% vs TC avg
§102
24.6%
-15.4% vs TC avg
§112
7.4%
-32.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 45 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 1-2, 10, 12-13, and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim et al. (US 2022/0408388 A1; hereinafter Kim) in view of Lee et al. (US 2021/0195543 A1; hereinafter Lee). Regarding claims 1 and 20, Kim teaches first node (read as device) for wireless communications (¶ [0233] Wireless communication may be established between wireless devices .), comprising: a first receiver (read as UE 2), which receives a first signal, the first signal comprising a first message (¶ [0136] UE 1 may transmit sidelink control information (SCI) to UE 2.); and the first message indicating a first sidelink frequency list (read as positions/number of time/frequency resources) (¶ [0154] The transmitting UE may transmit some or all of the following information to the receiving UE through the first SCI.; ¶ [0155] Resource allocation information, for example, the positions/number of time/frequency resources.), the first sidelink frequency list comprising a first frequency, the first frequency (read as sub-channel) being used for sidelink communication (¶ [0149] The UE may indicate to another UE one or more sub-channels used by the UE, using SCI.); and receives a first synchronization signal from the synchronization reference determined (¶ 0104] The UE may acquire detailed synchronization using the S-PSS and the S-SSS.; ¶ [0174] The UE may be synchronized with a BS directly or with another UE which has been time/frequency synchronized with the BS.; ¶ [0174] The UE may provide synchronization information to another neighboring UE.; ¶ [0175] The BS may provide a synchronization configuration for a carrier used for sidelink communication. The UE may follow the synchronization configuration received from the BS.); and a first transmitter, which transmits a second synchronization signal (¶ [0107] The transmitting UE may transmit one or more S-SSBs to the receiving UE.); a reception timing for the first synchronization signal being used to determine a transmission timing of the second synchronization signal (¶ [0131] SL signal transmission timing (e.g., transmission at the reception time of the synchronization reference signal).; ¶ [0136] The BS may schedule an SL resource to be used by the UE for the SL transmission. The BS may perform resource scheduling for UE 1 and UE 1 may perform SL communication with UE 2 according to the resource scheduling. For example, UE 1 may transmit sidelink control information (SCI) to UE 2.; ¶ [0198] The UE may transmit the sidelink synchronization signal at a timing point aligned based on the timing of the common synchronization reference.). Kim does not explicitly teach determines a synchronization reference according to at least whether the first message is transmitted via a direct path; In analogous art, Lee teaches determines a synchronization reference according to at least whether the first message is transmitted via a direct path (Table 11 illustrates that the priority level is set according to whether the path is direct or indirect; ¶ [0249] The UE may be synchronized with a BS directly or with another UE which has been time/frequency synchronized with the BS.; ¶ [0252] A sidelink synchronization source may be related to a synchronization priority.); Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine selection of a synchronization reference taught by Lee with sidelink timing and synchronization as taught by Kim. One would have been motivated to do so in order to improve sidelink communication performance, reduce retransmissions and latency caused by mismatch by using Lee’s synchronization reference selection to choose an appropriate timing source for sidelink operation and applying Kim’s timing adjustment techniques based on synchronization signals and timing advance to align sidelink transmission and reception timing, which reduces interference (Lee: ¶¶ [0015]-[0029]). Regarding claim 2, Kim teaches the first receiver, which performs cell search to determine in coverage of at least a first cell (¶ [0174] The UE may follow a cell associated with a corresponding frequency (when within the cell coverage in the frequency), a primary cell, or a serving cell (when out of cell coverage in the frequency), for synchronization and DL measurement.; ¶ [0175] When the UE fails in detecting any cell.); wherein the first message is not transmitted via a direct path (¶ [0136] The BS may schedule an SL resource to be used by the UE for SL transmission. For example, the BS may perform scheduling for UE 1 and UE 1 may perform SL communication with UE 2 according to the scheduling. UE 1 may transmit sidelink control information (SCI) to UE 2.); ¶ [0174] The UE may be synchronized with another UE which has been time/frequency synchronized with the BS.), and a synchronization priority order indicated by the first message is a base station (¶ [0177] A sidelink synchronization source may be related to synchronization priority. The relationship between synchronization sources and synchronization priorities may be defined as shown in Tables 5 and 6.; Note: Tables 5 and 6 show base station at priority P0 for BS-Based synchronization (eNB/gNB-based synchronization).), and the synchronization reference determined is a synchronization reference User Equipment (UE) (¶ [0120] When network equipment such as a BS transmits and receives signals according to a communication scheme between UEs, the BS may also be regarded as a kind of UE.; ¶ [0174] The UE may be synchronized with another UE which has been time/frequency synchronized with the BS. The UE may provide synchronization information to another neighboring UE.; ¶ [0177] The relationship between synchronization sources and synchronization priorities may be defined as shown in Tables 5 and 6.; ¶ [0179] The UE may derive its transmission timing from an available synchronization reference with the highest priority.). Regarding claim 10, Kim teaches the first node is in RRC_CONNECTED state (¶ [0080] Once an RRC connection is established between the RRC layer of the UE and the RRC layer of the E-UTRAN, the UE is placed in RRC_CONNECTED state.). Regarding claim 12, Kim teaches the first synchronization signal and the second synchronization signal are in a same frequency (¶ [0174] The UE may provide synchronization information to another neighboring UE. When a BS timing is set as a synchronization reference, the UE may follow a cell associated with a corresponding frequency for synchronization.). Regarding claim 13, Kim teaches the first synchronization signal and the second synchronization signal are in different frequencies (¶ [0017] A first user equipment (UE) in a wireless communication system supporting sidelink may include forming a first sidelink together with a second user equipment (UE) in a first frequency band; estimating a second reception timing point related to a second sidelink formed in a second frequency band.; ¶ [0106] The S-PSS, S-SSS, and PSBCH may be included in a block format (S-SSB). The transmission bandwidth thereof may be within a (pre)set sidelink BWP (SL BWP). The frequency position of the S-SSB may be (pre)set.; ¶ [0220] The first sidelink and the second sidelink are formed in frequency bands adjacent to each other.) Claims 3-4 and 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim in view of Lee further in view of 3GPP TS 36.331 version 16.4.0 Release 16 (LTE; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Radio Resource Control (RRC); Protocol Specification; hereinafter 3GPP TS 36.331). Regarding claim 3, Kim teaches a synchronization signal identity corresponding to the first synchronization signal is a first identity (¶ [0104] The UE may detect a synchronization signal ID.; ¶ [0115] Each SLSS may have an SL synchronization identifier (SLSS ID).; ¶ [0116] The value of the SLSS ID may be any one of 0 to 335.); wherein the first message is used for indicating transmission timing information of the second synchronization signal (¶ [0105] The basic information may include a subframe offset.; ¶ [0106] The S-PSS, S-SSS, and PSBCH may be included in a block format (S-SSB) supporting periodic transmission.), and Kim and Lee do not explicitly teach the first receiver, which receives a first sidelink master information block (MIB), the first sidelink MIB indicating whether in coverage; the first sidelink MIB and the first identity are used to determine a sequence generating the second synchronization signal; a transmission timing of the second synchronization signal is different from a transmission timing of the first synchronization signal. In analogous art, 3GPP TS 36.331 teaches the first receiver, which receives a first sidelink master information block (MIB) (§ 5.10.9.1-5.10.9.2, Ensure having a valid version of the MasterInformationBlock-SL message of that SyncRefUE. Upon receiving MasterInformationBlock-SL or MasterInformationBlock-SL-V2X.), the first sidelink MIB indicating whether in coverage (§ 6.5.2, MasterInformationBlock-SL = inCoverage BOOLEAN. Value TRUE indicates that the UE transmitting the MasterInformationBlock-SL is in E-UTRAN coverage.); the first sidelink MIB and the first identity are used to determine a sequence generating the second synchronization signal (§ 5.10.7.3, If the UE has a selected SyncRef UE and inCoverage in the MasterInformationBlock-SL or MasterInformationBlock-SL V2X message received from this UE is set to TRUE or FALSE, select the same SLSSID as the SLSSID of the selected SyncRef UE. Select the SLSSID from the set defined for out of coverage having an index that is 168 more than the index of the SLSSID of the selected SyncRefUE.); a transmission timing of the second synchronization signal is different from a transmission timing of the first synchronization signal (§ 5.10.7.3, Select the subframe in which to transmit the SLSS according to syncOffsetIndicator1 or syncOffsetIndicator2, such that the subframe timing is different from the SLSS of the selected SyncRefUE.). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine sidelink Master Information Block as taught by 3GPP TS 36.331 with selection of a synchronization reference taught by Lee and sidelink timing and synchronization as taught by Kim. One would have been motivated to do so in order to improve sidelink synchronization accuracy and communication reliability, which would increase user satisfaction, by using the Master Information Block framework to convey sidelink synchronization information, using Lee’s priority based synchronization reference selection to choose an appropriate timing source, and applying Kim’s synchronization signal and timing advance based timing adjustment to reduce interference. Regarding claim 4, Kim teaches a synchronization signal identity corresponding to the first synchronization signal is a first identity (¶ [0104] The UE may detect a synchronization signal ID.; ¶ [0115] Each SLSS may have an SL synchronization identifier (SLSS ID).; ¶ [0116] The value of the SLSS ID may be any one of 0 to 335.); wherein the first message is used for indicating transmission timing information of the second synchronization signal (¶ [0105] The basic information may include a subframe offset.; ¶ [0106] The S-PSS, S-SSS, and PSBCH may be included in a block format (S-SSB) supporting periodic transmission.), and Kim and Lee do not explicitly teach the first receiver, which receives a first sidelink master information block (MIB), the first sidelink MIB indicating whether in coverage; the first sidelink MIB and the first identity are used to determine a sequence generating the second synchronization signal; wherein the first message is used for indicating transmission timing information of the second synchronization signal, and a transmission timing of the second synchronization signal is different from a transmission timing of the first synchronization signal. In analogous art, 3GPP TS 36.331 teaches the first receiver, which receives a first sidelink master information block (MIB) (§ 5.10.9.1-5.10.9.2, Ensure having a valid version of the MasterInformationBlock-SL message of that SyncRefUE. Upon receiving MasterInformationBlock-SL or MasterInformationBlock-SL-V2X.), the first sidelink MIB indicating whether in coverage (§ 6.5.2, MasterInformationBlock-SL = inCoverage BOOLEAN. Value TRUE indicates that the UE transmitting the MasterInformationBlock-SL is in E-UTRAN coverage.); the first sidelink MIB and the first identity are used to determine a sequence generating the second synchronization signal (§ 5.10.7.3, If the UE has a selected SyncRef UE and inCoverage in the MasterInformationBlock-SL or MasterInformationBlock-SL V2X message received from this UE is set to TRUE or FALSE, select the same SLSSID as the SLSSID of the selected SyncRef UE. Select the SLSSID from the set defined for out of coverage having an index that is 168 more than the index of the SLSSID of the selected SyncRefUE.); a transmission timing of the second synchronization signal is different from a transmission timing of the first synchronization signal (§ 5.10.7.3, Select the subframe in which to transmit the SLSS according to syncOffsetIndicator1 or syncOffsetIndicator2, such that the subframe timing is different from the SLSS of the selected SyncRefUE.). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine sidelink Master Information Block as taught by 3GPP TS 36.331 with selection of a synchronization reference taught by Lee and sidelink timing and synchronization as taught by Kim. One would have been motivated to do so in order to improve sidelink synchronization accuracy and communication reliability, which would increase user satisfaction, by using the Master Information Block framework to convey sidelink synchronization information, using Lee’s priority based synchronization reference selection to choose an appropriate timing source, and applying Kim’s synchronization signal and timing advance based timing adjustment to reduce interference. Regarding claim 9, Kim teaches the first transmitter, which transmits a second sidelink MIB; the second sidelink MIB being transmitted along with the second synchronization signal (¶ [0105] A physical sidelink broadcast channel (PSBCH may be a channel on which basic information that the UE needs to know first before transmission and reception of an SL signal is transmitted. For example, the basic information may include SLSS related information.; ¶ [0106] The S-PSS, S-SSS, and PSBCH may be included in a block format, S-SSB.; ¶ [0171] Master information block-sidelink-V2X (MIB-SL-V2X) may be used for V2X synchronization.; ¶ The UE may provide synchronization to another neighboring UE.); wherein GNSS is determined as a synchronization reference (¶ [0173] A UE may be synchronized with a GNSS. When the GNSS is configured as a synchronization source.); the first message comprises second transmission timing information (¶ [0199] When transmitting and receiving data, each of the UEs may have a reception time aligned with the common synchronization reference. The transmission UE may broadcast or multicast the TA information applied to a signal to be transmitted.); and Kim and Lee do not explicitly teach the second transmission timing information is used to indicate transmission timing information of the second synchronization signal; whether the first message comprises the second transmission timing information is used to determine whether the second sidelink MIB indicates in coverage. In analogous art, 3GPP TS 36.331 teaches the second transmission timing information is used to indicate transmission timing information of the second synchronization signal (§ 5.10.7.3, Use syncOffsetIndicator. Select the subframe(s) indicated by syncOffsetIndicator.); whether the first message comprises the second transmission timing information is used to determine whether the second sidelink MIB indicates in coverage (§ 5.10.7.4, The UE shall set the contents of the MasterInformationBlock-SL or MasterInformationBlock-SL-V2X message as follows. SyncOffsetIndicator3 is not included in SL-V2X-Preconfiguration: set inCoverage to TRUE.). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine sidelink Master Information Block as taught by 3GPP TS 36.331 with selection of a synchronization reference taught by Lee and sidelink timing and synchronization as taught by Kim. One would have been motivated to do so in order to improve sidelink synchronization accuracy and communication reliability, which would increase user satisfaction, by using the Master Information Block framework to convey sidelink synchronization information, using Lee’s priority based synchronization reference selection to choose an appropriate timing source, and applying Kim’s synchronization signal and timing advance based timing adjustment to reduce interference. Claims 11 and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim in view of Lee further in view of Kang et al. (KR 20220052809A; hereinafter Kang). Regarding claims 11 and 16, Kim teaches the first signal is transmitted via a sidelink (¶ [0136] UE 1 may transmit sidelink control information (SCI) to UE 2 on a physical sidelink control channel (PSCCH), and then transmit data based on the SCI to UE 2.); being not transmitted via a direct path includes being transmitted via relay (¶ [0174] When the UE is in network coverage, the UE may receive synchronization information provided by the BS. Thereafter, the UE may provide synchronization information to another neighboring UE.). Kim and Lee do not explicitly teach the first message is a System Information Block 12 (SIB12); In analogous art, Kang teaches the first message is a System Information Block 12 (SIB12) (¶ [0106] System information messages configured to enable transmission of system information messages through a relay may include, for example, system information messages containing configuration information for a terminal to perform sidelink communication, including SIB12.). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine System Information Block 12 (SIB12) taught by Kang with selection of a synchronization reference taught by Lee and sidelink timing and synchronization as taught by Kim. One would have been motivated to do so in order to improve reliability and efficiency of sidelink operation, which would increase user satisfaction, by conveying sidelink configuration information through SIB12, selecting an appropriate synchronization reference, and adjusting sidelink timing based on synchronization signals and timing advance so that user equipment operate with better timing alignment and reduced interference (Kang: ¶¶ [0012]-[0013]). Claim 14 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim in view of Lee further in view of Blasco Serrano (US 2019/0357166 A1; hereinafter Blasco Serrano). Regarding claim 14, Kim and Lee do not explicitly teach the second synchronization signal is used to indicate a type of the synchronization reference; when a sidelink synchronization signal identity corresponding to the second synchronization signal is equal to 0, it is indicated that the type of the synchronization reference is GNSS; when a sidelink synchronization signal identity corresponding to the second synchronization signal is unequal to 0, it is indicated that the type of the synchronization reference is not GNSS. In analogous art, Blasco Serrano teaches the second synchronization signal is used to indicate a type of the synchronization reference (¶ 0049] The hierarchy may apply between GNSS, NW, and UE signals but also between UE signals with different origins. Priority level 3 are synchronization signals originating from GNSS. Priority level 4 are synchronization signals originating from a UE directly synchronized to GNSS.; ¶ [0051] The synchronization signals associated with different priorities must have some feature that allows for distinguishability.; ¶ [0052] Synchronization signals transmitted from UEs (i.e., SLSS synchronization signals) have several distinguishing factors in this regard. One factor includes the SLSS identity (SLSSID).; when a sidelink synchronization signal identity corresponding to the second synchronization signal is equal to 0, it is indicated that the type of the synchronization reference is GNSS (¶ [0053] Transmission synchronization signals by UEs are selected according to the below rules, so that receivers will be able to distinguish the priority levels of the signals. If the UE is in coverage, using GNSS as synchronization source, the UE is to transmit a synchronization signal with SLSSID=0.); when a sidelink synchronization signal identity corresponding to the second synchronization signal is unequal to 0, it is indicated that the type of the synchronization reference is not GNSS (¶ [0053] Transmission synchronization signals by UEs are selected according to the below rules, so that receivers will be able to distinguish the priority levels of the signals. If the UE is in coverage, using GNSS as synchronization source, the UE is to transmit a synchronization signal with SLSSID=0.; ¶ [0059] UE C also transmits its own synchronization signal. UE C does so according to rule 5B (i.e., with SLSSID=X). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine sidelink synchronization signal identity (SLSSID) taught by Blasco Serrano with selection of a synchronization reference taught by Lee and sidelink timing and synchronization as taught by Kim. One would have been motivated to do so in order to improve sidelink synchronization accuracy, reduce timing mismatch and interference, and increase reliability of sidelink communications, which would increase user satisfaction, by identifying and prioritizing synchronization signals using SLSSID, selecting a higher priority synchronization reference for sidelink communication, and adjusting sidelink timing based on synchronization signals and timing advance, so that UEs operate with better timing alignment and reduced interference (Blasco Serrano: ¶¶ [0002]-[0004]). Claim 15 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim in view of Lee further in view of Lee et al. (US 2022/0232501 A1; hereinafter Lee ‘2501). Regarding claim 15, Kim teaches the first time offset is indicated by the first message (¶ [0174] The UE may provide synchronization information to another neighboring UE.; ¶ [0179] The UE may derive its transmission timing from an available synchronization reference.; ¶ [0198] The UE having received the sidelink synchronization signal may estimate an STO related to the transmission UE that has transmitted the sidelink synchronization signal based on the timing of the common synchronization reference.). Kim and Lee do not explicitly teach a transmission time of the second synchronization signal is equal to a sum of a reception time of the first synchronization signal and a first time offset, where the first time offset is a non-zero real number. In analogous art, Lee ‘2501 teaches a transmission time of the second synchronization signal is equal to a sum of a reception time of the first synchronization signal and a first time offset, where the first time offset is a non-zero real number (¶ 0125] OOC V2X UE may be allowed to consider an SLSS/(PBSCH) resource (e.g., subframe#K (SF#K)) on which SLSS/(PBSCH) is received and to apply a pre-configured offset value OFFSET_VAL and then derive an (X+1)-th SLSS/(PBSCH) resource (e.g., a subframe #(K+OFFSET_VAL)). Note: Deriving the (X+1)-th resource at K+OFFSET_VAL from received resource K implies OFFSET_VAL is a non-zero real number.). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the timing and synchronization method taught by Lee ‘2501 with selection of a synchronization reference taught by Lee and sidelink timing and synchronization as taught by Kim. One would have been motivated to do so in order to improve sidelink synchronization accuracy, reduce timing mismatch and interference, and increase reliability of sidelink communications, which would increase user satisfaction, by using Lee ‘2501’s resource and signal selection scheme for transmitting or relaying sidelink synchronization information according to the selected synchronization source, using Lee’s synchronization reference selection to choose an appropriate source, and applying Kim’s timing adjustment techniques so that sidelink transmissions and receptions are better time aligned and less likely to suffer from interference (Lee ‘2501: ¶¶ [0009]-[0010]). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5-8 and 17-19 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Dortschy et al. (US 2022/0104155 A1) discloses “IAB Downlink Timing” Khoryaev et al. (US 2022/0140967 A1) discloses “Design of NR Sidelink Synchronization Signal for Enhanced Vehicle-to-Everything Use Cases with Optimized Receiver Processing” Marinier et al. (US 2022/0116097 A1) discloses “Systems and Methods for Beamformed Uplink Transmission” Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID M KAYAL whose telephone number is (703)756-4576. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:30-5:30 ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ricky Ngo can be reached at 571-272-3139. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /D.M.K./Examiner, Art Unit 2464 /RICKY Q NGO/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2464
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 14, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603694
COMPRESSED CHANNEL STATE INFORMATION TRANSFER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598510
METHOD AND DEVICES FOR LINK ADAPTATION FEEDBACK IN WIRELESS LOCAL AREA NETWORKS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588019
Determining Radio Unit DL PRB Scheduling On A Per-Symbol Basis
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12574990
HIERARCHICAL MOBILITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12556888
COMMUNICATION METHOD AND APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+30.4%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 45 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month