Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/539,503

NON-INVASIVE LIQUID DETECTION METHOD BASED ON ACOUSTIC WAVE FEATURES AND APPARATUS THEREOF

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 14, 2023
Priority
Mar 07, 2023 — CN 202310256153.1
Examiner
DAVIS-HOLLINGTON, OCTAVIA L
Art Unit
2855
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Shenzhen Research Institute
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
967 granted / 1134 resolved
+17.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
1168
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
72.7%
+32.7% vs TC avg
§102
22.1%
-17.9% vs TC avg
§112
2.6%
-37.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1134 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTIONNotice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 – 8 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Yang et al. (“HearLiquid: Non-intrusive Liquid Fraud Detection Using Commodity Acoustic Devices”, hereinafter Yang – See IDS filed 11/18/25). Regarding claim 1, Yang discloses an apparatus comprising collecting acoustic waves penetrating a liquid to be tested using a microphone, and extracting acoustic absorption-transmission curve features from the acoustic waves to generate a liquid fingerprint, wherein the acoustic absorption-transmission curve features represent a ratio of an energy of an acoustic signal penetrating the liquid to an energy of an acoustic signal emitted across a plurality of frequencies; and inputting the liquid fingerprint into a trained neural network model for detection processing, and outputting detection results, wherein the trained neural network model is trained with a plurality of sets of data, each of the plurality of sets of data comprises acoustic absorption-transmission curve features and a label identifying a feature in the acoustic absorption-transmission curve features meeting a detection requirement (See Pg. 1, Para. 1, “Introduction” and Pg. 8, Para. 4.1, “Hardware”). Regarding claim 2, the step of collecting acoustic waves penetrating the liquid to be tested, and extracting acoustic absorption-transmission curve features from the acoustic waves to generate a liquid fingerprint comprises collecting acoustic waves penetrating the liquid to be tested and pre-processing the acoustic waves to obtain an acoustic wave signal with background noise removed; performing a fast Fourier transform on the processed acoustic wave signal and extracting a frequency domain amplitude at each frequency; and dividing the frequency domain amplitude by a corresponding amplitude in a spectrum to obtain the acoustic absorption-transmission curve features (See Pg. 1, Para. 1, “Introduction” and Pg. 2, Para. 2.1, “Liquid’s Absorption of the Acoustic Signal”). Regarding claim 3, the step of collecting acoustic waves penetrating the liquid to be tested and pre-processing the acoustic waves to obtain an acoustic wave signal with background noise removed comprises pre-processing the collected acoustic waves by a high-pass filter with a cutoff frequency of 18 kHz to remove the background noise (See Pg. 5, Para. 3.2, “Acoustic Signal Generation” and Para. 3.3, “Signal Pre-processing and AATC Extraction”). Regarding claim 4, before the step of performing a fast Fourier transform on the processed acoustic wave signals and extracting a frequency domain amplitude at each frequency, the method comprises processing the acoustic wave signal with background noise removed by a hamming window function (See Pg. 5, Para. 3.3, “Signal Pre-processing and AATC Extraction”). Regarding claim 5, in the neural network model, the acoustic absorption-transmission curve features obtained in different containers are processed by a frequency-sensitive regularizer and a variational auto-encoder, to obtain a standard acoustic absorption-transmission curve feature of the liquid to be tested (See Pg. 1, Para. 1, “Introduction”). Regarding claim 6, the step of inputting the liquid fingerprints into a trained neural network model for detection processing, and outputting detection results, comprises the neural network model comprises a 5-layer fully connected neural network having 32 neurons in each layer of the neural network (See Pg. 6, Para. 3.4, “AATC Calibration: Tackling the Effect of Different Acoustic Devices” and Para. 3.5, “Data Augmentation: Tackling the Effect of Different Relative Device container Positions”). Regarding claim 7, before the step of inputting the liquid fingerprint into a trained neural network model for detection processing, and outputting detection results, the method further comprises selecting a corresponding neural network model according to a received detection instruction; wherein the detecting instruction comprises detecting a quality of liquid; each set of data for training the neural network model comprises: acoustic absorption-transmission curve features, and a label identifying the quality of liquid in that acoustic absorption-transmission curve features (See Pg. 1, Para. 1, “Introduction” and Pg. 8, Para. 3.6, “Liquid Detection”). Regarding claim 8, the apparatus comprises a base (liquid container), a sound outputting section (speaker) provided on the base for emitting sound; a sound receiving section (microphone) provided on the base and set opposite the sound outputting section, between the sound receiving section and the sound outputting section a liquid to be tested is placed, the sound receiving section is configured to receive sound waves penetrating the liquid to be tested; and a control computing component, the control computing component electrically connected to the sound outputting section and the sound receiving section (See Pg. 1, Para. 1, “Introduction” and Pg. 8, Para. 4.1, “Hardware”). Regarding claim 10, the control computing assembly comprises a display and control panel, the display and control panel is provided on the base; a computing unit, the computing unit is provided on the base and electrically connected to the display and control panel (See Pg. 8, Para. 4.1, “Hardware”). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 9 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims.6. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The primary reasons for indicating allowable subject matter is that the prior art does not anticipate or make obvious the provisions of “the base comprises a base plate; a movable section, the movable section is movably provided on the base plate in a first predetermined direction by a slide guide assembly, the sound receiving section is provided on the movable section; a fixed section, the fixed section is fixedly provided on the base plate and spaced apart from the movable section, the sound outputting section is provided on the fixed section; and an adjustment limit member, the adjustment limit member is configured to fix the movable section after position adjustment” in combination with the other limitations presented in claim 1. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure.8. Fang et al. (CN113984741) disclose a liquid identification system and method based on deep learning and sound signal. Thiruvenkatanathan (CN113330185) discloses event detection using machine learning using das characteristics. Panchalan et al. (20210262963) disclose a graphene based chemical sensing device and system. Muldoon et al. (10,705,017) disclose characterization of liquids in sealed containers. Effelsberg et al. (DE102020108063) disclose acquisition of information in containers with liquid medium by means of acoustic waves from the environment. Guo et al. (CN103487506) disclose a portable liquid food quality ultrasonic wave detector and method. Mifsud et al. (WO9839648) disclose an apparatus and method for characterizing liquids. 9. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to OCTAVIA HOLLINGTON whose telephone number is (571)272-2176. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, John Breene can be reached at 5712724107. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /OCTAVIA HOLLINGTON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2855 2/17/26
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 14, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
May 13, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12638609
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CALIBRATING TILT SENSOR AND COMPASS OF SENSOR DEVICE FOR MAGNETIC ORIENTATION
4y 0m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12638379
System and Method to Measure Material Ductility and Toughness Using Cutting Blades
3y 1m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12631522
MULTI-SPECTRUM FUSION DECISION FAULT DIAGNOSIS METHOD FOR HIGH-SPEED ELECTRIC MULTIPLE-UNIT BEARING
2y 4m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12625438
INTERFACE PLATE, INSPECTION SYSTEM AND METHOD OF INSTALLING AN INSPECTION SYSTEM
3y 7m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12625066
Detecting a Mixture Ratio of Two Components of a Textile Fiber Structure
2y 7m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+5.5%)
2y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1134 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month