Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/539,545

AUTOMATIC CONFIGURATION OF A LOAD CONTROL DEVICE

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Dec 14, 2023
Examiner
WELLS, KENNETH B
Art Unit
2842
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Lutron Technology Company LLC
OA Round
2 (Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 0m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
1201 granted / 1394 resolved
+18.2% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+2.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
45 currently pending
Career history
1439
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
40.0%
+0.0% vs TC avg
§102
32.9%
-7.1% vs TC avg
§112
20.2%
-19.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1394 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Response to Amendment 1. Applicant's amendment filed on 12/19/25 has been received and entered in the case. The amendments to the claims do not overcome the outstanding non-enablement rejection set forth in the previous office action, for the reasons set forth below. Claim Objections 2. Claims 1, 10 and 19 are objected to because of the following informalities: On the last two lines of claim 1, "the operating parameter of the of an operatively coupled electric load device" is grammatically incorrect, i.e., it appears that this should be changed to --the operating parameter of the operatively coupled electric load device--. In claims 10 and 19, the same change noted above should apparently be made in these two claims, i.e., on lines 17-18 of claim 10, and on lines 15-16 of claim 19. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112(a) 3. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. Claims 1-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claims contain subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or inventor, at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. The originally filed specification, drawings and claims do not support what is now recited in the claims. Specifically, in independent claim 1, the limitations which are not supported by the originally filed specification, drawings and claims are (1) authenticating the first device using the data representatives of the identifier associated with the first device, (2) responsive to the successful authentication of the first device, causing a first adjustment of an operating parameter of an operatively coupled electric load device of an operating parameter of an operatively coupled electric load device, (3) authenticating the second device using the data representative of the identifier associated with the second device, and (4) responsive to the successful authentication of the second device, causing a second adjustment of the operating parameter of the operatively coupled electric load device. These limitations in claims 10 and 19 are similarly not supported by the originally filed specification, drawings and claims. Response to Arguments 4. Applicant's arguments filed on 12/19/25 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues that support for the above-noted limitations is found in paragraph [0026] of publication 2024/0130023, but such is incorrect, i.e., paragraph [0026] of publication 2024/0130023 merely indicates that the daylight sensor 130 is assigned to the dimmer switch 110 which wirelessly transmits messages to the dimmer switch 110, that such messages include the serial number of the daylight sensor, and that the dimmer switch 110 is responsive to such messages. This disclosure in paragraph [0026] of publication 2024/0130023 does not, however, provide support for the above-noted limitations in the claims, i.e., It does not provide support for (1) authenticating the first device using the data representatives of the identifier associated with the first device, (2) responsive to the successful authentication of the first device, causing a first adjustment of an operating parameter of an operatively coupled electric load device of an operating parameter of an operatively coupled electric load device, (3) authenticating the second device using the data representative of the identifier associated with the second device, and (4) responsive to the successful authentication of the second device, causing a second adjustment of the operating parameter of the operatively coupled electric load device. As such, the new limitations added to independent claims 1, 10 and 19 constitute prohibited new matter which should be canceled in response to this office action. Action is Final 5. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Conclusion 6. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KENNETH B WELLS whose telephone number is (571)272-1757. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 8:30am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, LINCOLN DONOVAN can be reached at (571)272-1988. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KENNETH B WELLS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2842 December 31, 2025
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 14, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Dec 19, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 31, 2025
Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604385
HIGH-EFFICIENCY, ENERGY-SAVING, SAFE DUAL-COLOR LED CONTROL CIRCUIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594876
HEADLAMP CONTROL DEVICE, HEADLAMP CONTROL METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592695
SWITCH DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592683
VARIABLE CURRENT DRIVE FOR ISOLATED GATE DRIVERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12593491
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES WITH SCHOTTKY BARRIERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+2.1%)
2y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1394 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month