Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/539,848

MOLDING THICKNESS INSPECTION DEVICE, MOLDING THICKNESS INSPECTION SYSTEM INCLUDING THE SAME, AND MOLDING THICKNESS INSPECTION METHOD

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 14, 2023
Examiner
BRYANT, REBECCA CAROLE
Art Unit
2877
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
ELECTRONICS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS RESEARCH INSTITUTE
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 4m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allow Rate
347 granted / 543 resolved
-4.1% vs TC avg
Strong +32% interview lift
Without
With
+31.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
573
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
§103
39.1%
-0.9% vs TC avg
§102
24.9%
-15.1% vs TC avg
§112
29.1%
-10.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 543 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of claims 1-6, 19, and 20 in the reply filed on 12/16/2025 is acknowledged. Claims 7-18 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected group, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 12/16/2025. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Wack et al. U.S. Publication 2002/0107650. With respect to claims 1, Wack discloses a system for determining critical dimensions comprising: A molding thickness inspection device in which a plurality of illuminance sensors are installed and which accommodates an inspection target product which is illuminated (Figure 6, plurality of illuminance sensors = 46, inspection target product = 40, P.0176-177, P.0014) A control device configured to inspect whether a thickness of the inspection target product is abnormal based on illuminance data measured by the plurality of illuminance sensors (P.0178, Figure 6, control device = 54, P.0075, P.0247) Claim(s) 1, 2, 3, 4, 19, and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Nakayama et al. U.S. Patent #9,890,003. With respect to claims 1, Nakayama discloses a sheet discriminator comprising: A molding thickness inspection device in which a plurality of illuminance sensors are installed and which accommodates an inspection target product which is illuminated (Figure 7 and 8, plurality of illuminance sensors = 110a-110e, inspection target product = sheet P) A control device configured to inspect whether a thickness of the inspection target product is abnormal based on illuminance data measured by the plurality of illuminance sensors (Col.20, l 23-33, abnormal = greater than 300 µm) With respect to claim 2, 3, 4, Nakayama discloses all of the limitations as applied to claim 1 above. In addition, Nakayama disclose: 2- The illuminance data is received from the plurality of illuminance sensors through a communication module, the control device compares the illuminance data with a preset reference illuminance range, when the illuminance data is in the preset reference illuminance range, determines that the thickness of the inspection target product is normal and when the illuminance data is out of the reference illuminance range, determines that the thickness of the inspection target product is defective (communication module = Figure 6, processing unit 130, Col.20, l 23-33, defective = greater than 300 µm, preset reference illuminance range, Col.11, l 5-21) 3- The illuminance data includes illuminance sensor identification information and an illuminance value (Col.11,l 22-25, Figure 6, wherein each sensor 110a-110d outputs “respective electrical signals” to its own converter 132 into processing device, so inherent that the individual sensor information is maintained) 3- The processor acquires a reference illuminance range at a position corresponding to the illuminance sensor identification information from a look-up table in which a reference illuminance range is set according to a position for each product and compares the illuminance value with the acquired reference illuminance range to inspect a thickness for each position of the inspection target product (Col.19, l 44-54) 4- where, when it is determined that the thickness of the inspection target product is defective, the processor outputs thickness abnormality occurrence information of the inspection target product through an output module (Col.20, l 29-33, wherein defective = greater than 300 µm, abnormality occurrence information = calibration value from memory, outputs in step S5) With respect to claims 19 and 20, Nakayama et al. discloses a sheet discriminating method comprising: Receiving by a control device, illuminance data from each of a plurality of illuminance sensors of a molding thickness inspection device in which an inspection target product, which is illuminated, is accommodated (Col.20, l 59-65, control device = processing device 180, illuminance data = light emitted, illuminance sensors = light receiving elements, inspection target product = sheet) Inspecting, by the control device, whether a thickness of the inspection target product is abnormal based on the illuminance data (Col.20, l 23-33, abnormal = greater than 300 µm) In the inspecting, the control device compares the illuminance data with a preset reference illuminance range, when the illuminance data is the preset reference illuminance range, determines that the thickness of the inspection target product is normal, and when the illuminance data is out of the reference illuminance range, determines that the thickness of the inspection target product is defective (processing unit 130, Col.20, l 23-33, defective = greater than 300 µm, preset reference illuminance range, Col.11, l 5-21) Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5 and 6 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art fails to disclose or suggest the inspection target product is selected through an input module and the processor transmits a control signal for moving the illuminance sensor to a position corresponding to the inspection target in combination with the rest of the claimed limitations. Citation The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Shiokawa et al. U.S. Patent #5,684,574 discloses an in-process film thickness monitoring system Nakamura et al. U.S. Publication 2022/0152900 discloses an injection molding machine management system Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to REBECCA CAROLE BRYANT whose telephone number is (571)272-9787. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 12-4 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Uzma Alam can be reached at 5712723995. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /REBECCA C BRYANT/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2877
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 14, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12596064
DYNAMIC 3D LIGHT SCATTERING PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION With Offset Polarization Beams
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12584840
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MEASURING FINE BUBBLE DISPERSION LIQUID
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12578282
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR INSPECTING A GLASS SHEET
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12578188
CALIBRATION APPARATUS, PROCESSING SYSTEM AND CALIBRATION METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12523588
OPTICAL FORCE DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEMS AND METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+31.7%)
3y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 543 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month