Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026
Application No. 18/540,408

QUICK-CHANGE COLLET

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Dec 14, 2023
Priority
Dec 20, 2022 — provisional 63/476,208 +1 more
Examiner
SNYDER, ALAN W
Art Unit
3722
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Techtronic Power Tools Technology Limited
OA Round
2 (Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
585 granted / 712 resolved
+12.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
744
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
53.8%
+13.8% vs TC avg
§102
22.9%
-17.1% vs TC avg
§112
20.4%
-19.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 712 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3, 5-7 and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kanaan (US 5944327). Regarding claim 1, Kanaan discloses a collet (chuck) 10 for a tool 62. The collet comprises an outer nut 26 including a grip 50 and defining a collet bore configured to receive a chuck (collet) 22 therein, and having a collet engagement surface 43 engageable with the chuck to selectively secure a tool accessory. A spring 52 including an extension portion 54 is engageable with an external part of an output shaft (press-fit onto output shaft assembly 12/30) and provides feedback to a user regarding securement of the collet (Col. 5, Lines 10-30). Regarding claim 2, Kanaan discloses the collet bore including a threaded portion (internal surface of the outer nut, including 27) configured to engage the output shaft. Regarding claim 3, Kanaan discloses the outer nut defining one or more apertures (individual recesses 56) engageable by the spring. Regarding claim 5, Kanaan discloses the outer nut including one or more apertures (individual recesses 56) and the spring including a corresponding quantity of extension portions 55, wherein the one or more apertures are defined in an unthreaded portion of the outer nut (i.e. a portion of the internal surface of the outer nut not occupied by threads 27). Regarding claim 6, Kanaan discloses the feedback including an audible or tactile feedback (Col. 5, Lines 26-30). Regarding claim 7, Kanaan discloses the extension portion being engageable (i.e. pressed into) a groove of the output shaft (the reduced diameter portion at shoulder 46 illustrated in Figs. 1-2) on rotation of the outer nut. Regarding claim 11, Kanaan discloses a sleeve 60 being coupled to the outer nut and at least partially enclosing the spring (i.e. in the axial direction, see e.g. Fig. 1). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 4 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 21-32 are allowed. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 09/22/2026 with respect to claims 1-3, 5-7 and 11 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues that the chuck device of Kanaan does not disclose the claimed limitation ‘engageable with an external part of an output shaft of the tool’. This argument is respectfully traversed. As outlined in the rejection above, Kanaan discloses the spring 52 being press-fit onto sleeve member 30 which is part of the output shaft 12 of the tool. As a press-fit requires an interference/engagement between the two parts, such an arrangement reads on the claim(s) as written. Within the broadest reasonable interpretation of the claim(s), the Final Paragraph of claim 1 is interpreted to include a spring including an extension portion, said spring being engageable with an external part of an output shaft of the tool and providing the claimed feedback. Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 26-32, filed 09/22/2026, specifically regarding the limitation of claim 4 being incorporated into new independent claim 26 have been fully considered and are persuasive. The rejection of claim 4 has been withdrawn and claim 26 is found to be Allowable. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Alan Snyder whose telephone number is (571)272-4603. The examiner can normally be reached M-R 7:00a - 5:00p. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sunil K Singh can be reached at 571-272-3460. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Alan Snyder/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3722
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 14, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Sep 22, 2026
Response Filed
Oct 05, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12766619
DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MACHINING A WORKPIECE, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR CONTROLLING A DEVICE FOR MACHINING A WORKPIECE
3y 1m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12766602
MACHINE TOOL SYSTEM
3y 0m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12766609
Tool Rest and Machine Tool
2y 4m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12746609
TOOL FOR THE ROTARY AND CUTTING MACHINING OF WORKPIECES
5y 3m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12740371
WAFER CHUCK APPARATUS WITH AIR MEMBER AND METHOD OF FABRICATING A SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE USING THE SAME
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+12.3%)
2y 7m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 712 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month