Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/540,534

METHOD FOR OPERATING AN ELECTRO SURGICAL GENERATOR

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Dec 14, 2023
Examiner
BOCK, ABIGAIL MARIE
Art Unit
3794
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Olympus Winter & Ibe GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allow Rate
136 granted / 147 resolved
+22.5% vs TC avg
Minimal +5% lift
Without
With
+4.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
169
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.8%
-37.2% vs TC avg
§103
53.0%
+13.0% vs TC avg
§102
19.7%
-20.3% vs TC avg
§112
16.6%
-23.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 147 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of the restriction requirement to two distinct inventions in the reply filed on 03/04/2026 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the grounds that the two inventions are identical and would necessitate the same field of search. This is persuasive because the field of search would be similar and while the claims are still directed to two distinct inventions (a method and an apparatus), the same claimed limitations are within claim 1 and 12. The requirement is therefore withdrawn. Double Patenting Claims 1 and 12 of this application is patentably indistinct from claims 1-2 of Application No. 18/541,868. While not identical, claims 1 and 12 of the instant application is taught by claims 1 and 2 of U.S. Application No. 18/541,868, as this application describes the same claimed limitations using a different vocabular, detailing an electrosurgical generator with regular modules, outputs for said modules to connect electrosurgical instruments, inverter modules for generating feed signals, and communication models between electrosurgical generators. Although the claims are not identical, they do describe the same claimed invention, and therefore, are subject to a provisional non-statutory double patenting rejection. This is a provisional nonstatutory double patenting rejection because the patentably indistinct claims have not in fact been patented. Pursuant to 37 CFR 1.78(f), when two or more applications filed by the same applicant or assignee contain patentably indistinct claims, elimination of such claims from all but one application may be required in the absence of good and sufficient reason for their retention during pendency in more than one application. Applicant is required to either cancel the patentably indistinct claims from all but one application or maintain a clear line of demarcation between the applications. See MPEP § 822. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-11 and 13-15 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if overcoming the rejection of claim 1. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Abigail M Bock whose telephone number is (571)272-8856. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30am - 5:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Linda Dvorak can be reached at 5712724764. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ABIGAIL BOCK/Examiner, Art Unit 3794 /LINDA C DVORAK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3794
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 14, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594016
Conductive Electrode
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588947
An Electrosurgical Device with Automatic Shut-Off
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12582461
NEURAL ABLATION PROBE AND TEMPERATURE SENSING DEVICE AND RELATED SYSTEMS AND METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12582804
TORQUE TRANSFER UNIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12575872
Plasma Probe And Method For Assembly Of Its Electrode
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+4.9%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 147 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month