Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/540,621

HIV PRE-IMMUNIZATION AND IMMUNOTHERAPY

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Dec 14, 2023
Priority
Jul 08, 2016 — provisional 62/360,185 +5 more
Examiner
KINSEY WHITE, NICOLE ERIN
Art Unit
1672
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
American Gene Technologies International Inc.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
58%
Grant Probability
Moderate
2-3
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
74%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 58% of resolved cases
58%
Career Allowance Rate
509 granted / 876 resolved
-1.9% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
907
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.6%
-36.4% vs TC avg
§103
33.0%
-7.0% vs TC avg
§102
15.9%
-24.1% vs TC avg
§112
30.9%
-9.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 876 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after allowance or after an Office action under Ex Parte Quayle, 25 USPQ 74, 453 O.G. 213 (Comm'r Pat. 1935). Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, prosecution in this application has been reopened pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 5/4/2026 has been entered. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1, 2, and 5-10 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-10 of U.S. Patent No. 12370253. The instant claims are directed to a method of treating cells, the method comprising: (a) positively selecting HIV-specific CD4+ T cells from PBMC isolated from a subject infected with HIV; (b) contacting the CD4+ T cells with a therapeutically effective amount of a stimulatory agent, wherein the contacting is carried out ex vivo, wherein the stimulatory agent comprises a peptide, a mixture of peptides, or a vaccine; (c) transducing the CD4+ T cells ex vivo with a viral delivery system encoding at least one genetic element, wherein the at least one genetic element comprises (i) a sequence having at least 90% sequence identity with SEQ ID NO: 6, and (ii) a sequence having at least 90% sequence identity with SEQ ID NO: 7, wherein the at least one genetic element does not comprise any small RNA targeting HIV sequences other than Vif and Tat; and (d) culturing the transduced CD4+ T cells for at least 1 day. The patented claims are directed to a method for treating HIV infection in a subject in need thereof comprising: (a) ex vivo contacting peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) isolated from a subject with a stimulatory agent; (b) transducing the PBMC ex vivo with a viral delivery system encoding at least one genetic element; and (c) culturing the transduced PBMC for at least 1 day, wherein the at least one genetic element comprises (i) a sequence having at least 90% sequence identity with SEQ ID NO: 6, (ii) a sequence having at least 90% sequence identity with SEQ ID NO: 7, and (iii) a sequence having at least 90% sequence identity with SEQ ID NO: 97, wherein the at least one genetic element does not comprise any small RNA targeting HIV sequences other than Vif and Tat. Patented claim 3 is directed to the method above and further comprising infusing transduced CD4+ T cells into a subject. The specification of the patent teaches that the above method may further include enrichment of the PBMC, for example, by preferably enriching the PBMC for CD4+ T cells (see col. 24, lines 12-24). Thus, the CD4+ T cells of patented claim 3 are obtained by enriching or positively selecting CD4+ T cells from PBMC isolated from the infected subject [step (a) of instant claim 1]. In order to transduce the selected CD4+ T cells, one would have to follow the method steps of patented claim 1: (b) ex vivo contacting the selected CD4+ T cells with a stimulatory agent; (c) transducing the selected CD4+ T cells with a viral delivery system encoding at least one genetic element; and (d) culturing the transduced CD4+ T cells for at least 1 day, wherein the at least one genetic element comprises (i) a sequence having at least 90% sequence identity with SEQ ID NO: 6, (ii) a sequence having at least 90% sequence identity with SEQ ID NO: 7, and (iii) a sequence having at least 90% sequence identity with SEQ ID NO: 97, wherein the at least one genetic element does not comprise any small RNA targeting HIV sequences other than Vif and Tat. Instant claims 1 and 2 are taught by patented claims 1 and 3. Instant claim 5 is taught by patented claim 6. Instant claim 6 is taught by patented claim 7. Instant claim 7 is taught by patented claim 8. Instant claim 10 is taught by patented claim 10. Regarding instant claims 8 and 9, the patent specification defines the genetic element as being a small RNA, a microRNA, a shRNA or a microRNA cluster (see col. 3, lines 21-36). Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other. Conclusion No claim is allowed. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Nicole Kinsey White whose telephone number is (571)272-9943. The examiner can normally be reached M to Th 6:30 am to 6:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Thomas Visone can be reached at 571-270-0684. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NICOLE KINSEY WHITE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1672
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 14, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 02, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP
Dec 02, 2025
Response Filed
May 04, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
May 05, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12735752
Methods Of Identifying Subjects Having An Increased Risk Of Developing A Coronavirus Infection And Treatment Thereof
4y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12735755
COMPOSITION, KIT, AND METHOD FOR DETECTING AND TYPING CORONAVIRUSES
4y 0m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12734235
AAV5-BASED VACCINE AGAINST SARS-COV-2
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12723261
A PROCESS FOR PRODUCING A PLURALITY OF NEDDYLATION SITE MODIFIED AAV VECTORS
5y 3m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12724028
SELF-ASSEMBLING PROTEIN NANOCAGE DECORATED WITH ANTIBODIES (SAPNA) AND PARTS THEREOF
4y 10m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
58%
Grant Probability
74%
With Interview (+16.4%)
3y 3m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 876 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month