Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/541,672

MOCKUP ENGINE BLOCK AND KIT FOR ASSEMBLING SAME

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Dec 15, 2023
Examiner
ROWLAND, STEVE
Art Unit
3715
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Advanced Resources LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allow Rate
823 granted / 1059 resolved
+7.7% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
1083
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
17.2%
-22.8% vs TC avg
§103
32.0%
-8.0% vs TC avg
§102
28.7%
-11.3% vs TC avg
§112
13.5%
-26.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1059 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
Detailed Action Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION. The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claim 20 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(d) as being of improper dependent form for failing to further limit the subject matter of the claim upon which it depends, or for failing to include all the limitations of the claim upon which it depends. Although it depends from claim 18, which recites a kit, claim 20 recites “the mockup engine block of claim 18.” Thus, the claim fails to further limit the claim upon which it depends. Applicant may cancel the claim(s), amend the claim(s) to place the claim(s) in proper dependent form, rewrite the claim(s) in independent form, or present a sufficient showing that the dependent claim(s) complies with the statutory requirements. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: (a) A person shall be entitled to a patent unless— (1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention Claims 10 and 16-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by How To Make A Mini V8 Engine From Paper (as evidenced by Youtube.com and Cardboard_V8.pdf) (“CV8”). Regarding claim 10, CV8 discloses a mockup engine block assembly kit comprising a first and second set of cylinder extension walls (pp. 8-9), first and second face plates (pp. 2-3), wherein the first and second set of cylinder extension walls are configured to be supported between the first and second face plates to form respective first and second cylinder heads (p, 9), and a set of motor mount extensions configured to be supported between the first and second face plates (pp. 4-6). Regarding claim 16, CV8 discloses wherein the first and second set of cylinder extension walls are secured to and supported by the first and second face plates (pp. 8-9). Regarding claim 17, CV8 discloses wherein the first and second set of cylinder extension walls are directly connected to the first and second face plates (pp. 8-9). Regarding claim 18, CV8 discloses a bottom face plate configured to be supported between the first and second face plates (p. 5). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-9 and 19 are allowed. Claims 11-15 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 20 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(d) set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 1, no identified reference discloses “supporting a second set of cylinder extension walls between the first face plate and the second face plate.” Regarding claim 19, no identified reference discloses “a second set of cylinder extension walls with tabs on respective ends that extend into a second set of openings of the first and second face plates.” Claims 11-15 are allowable because they depend from allowable independent claims. Conclusion The prior art considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure and not relied upon is made of record on the attached PTO-892 form. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STEVE ROWLAND whose telephone number is (469) 295-9129. The examiner can normally be reached on M-Th 10-8. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor Dmitry Suhol can be reached at (571) 272-4430. The fax number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is (571) 273-8300. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. Applicant may choose, at his or her discretion, to correspond with Examiner via Internet e-mail. A paper copy of any and all email correspondence will be placed in the appropriate patent application file. Email communication must be authorized in advance. Without a written authorization by applicant in place, the USPTO will not respond via e-mail to any correspondence which contains information subject to the confidentiality requirement as set forth in 35 U.S.C. 122. Authorization may be perfected by submitting, on a separate paper, the following (or similar) disclaimer: PNG media_image1.png 18 19 media_image1.png Greyscale Recognizing that Internet communications are not secure, I hereby authorize the USPTO to communicate with me concerning any subject matter of this application by electronic mail. I understand that a copy of these communications will be made of record in the application file. PNG media_image1.png 18 19 media_image1.png Greyscale See MPEP 502.03 for more information. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /STEVE ROWLAND/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3715
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 15, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12589308
GENERATIVE NARRATIVE GAME EXPERIENCE WITH PLAYER FEEDBACK
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586441
SELECTIVE REDEMPTION OF GAMING ESTABLISHMENT TICKET VOUCHERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12582874
APPARATUS FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE EXERCISE RECOMMENDATION BY ANALYZING DATA COLLECTED BY POSTURE MEASUREMENT SENSOR AND DRIVING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12579757
UPDATING A VIRTUAL REALITY ENVIRONMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12569763
VIRTUAL OBJECT CONTROL METHOD AND RELATED APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+17.6%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1059 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month