Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/541,727

RAZOR WITH CUTTING BLADE ROTATABLE ABOUT MULTIPLE AXES

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 15, 2023
Priority
Aug 11, 2010 — provisional 61/372,662 +4 more
Examiner
PRONE, JASON D
Art Unit
3724
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Sphere Usa LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allowance Rate
760 granted / 1230 resolved
-8.2% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+24.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
1266
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
56.4%
+16.4% vs TC avg
§102
7.7%
-32.3% vs TC avg
§112
34.1%
-5.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1230 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election with traverse of Species A (Fig. 1) in the reply filed on 4-13-26 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-3, 5, 7-10, 12, and 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over KR 200389026 Y1 (Lee) in view of DE 202006011254 U1 (Otten). With regards to claims 1-3, 5, 7-10, 12, and 14, the Examiner has adopted the rejections from the Ex Parte Reexamination (90/015,564) Ground 1 provided via the I.D.S. received 3-16-26. Also see the U.S. Reexamination Application No. 90/105,494 provided via the I.D.S. received 11-5-25 and the Ex Parte Reexamination (90/015,494) provided via the I.D.S. received 3-16-26. Claims 4 and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over KR 200389026 Y1 (Lee) in view of DE 202006011254 U1 (Otten) as applied to claims 1 and 10 above, and further in view of Tomassetti et al. (2004/0177519) and Gray (D444,267). With regards to claims 4 and 11, the Examiner has adopted the rejections from the Ex Parte Reexamination (90/015,564) Ground 2 provided via the I.D.S. received 3-16-26. Also see the U.S. Reexamination Application No. 90/105,494 provided via the I.D.S. received 11-5-25 and the Ex Parte Reexamination (90/015,494) provided via the I.D.S. received 3-16-26. Claims 5 and 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over KR 200389026 Y1 (Lee) in view of DE 202006011254 U1 (Otten) as applied to claims 1 and 10 above, and further in view of FR 2639280 A1 (Izoard). With regards to claims 5 and 12, the Examiner has adopted the rejections from the Ex Parte Reexamination (90/015,564) Ground 3 provided via the I.D.S. received 3-16-26. Also see the U.S. Reexamination Application No. 90/105,494 provided via the I.D.S. received 11-5-25 and the Ex Parte Reexamination (90/015,494) provided via the I.D.S. received 3-16-26. Claims 1, 2, 5-8, 10, and 12-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over DE 3635552 A1 (Köppen) in view of Ma (6,685,147) and Huppmann-Valbella (442,585). With regards to claims 1, 2, 5-8, 10, and 12-14, the Examiner has adopted the rejections from the Ex Parte Reexamination (90/015,564) Ground 5 provided via the I.D.S. received 3-16-26. Also see the U.S. Reexamination Application No. 90/105,494 provided via the I.D.S. received 11-5-25 and the Ex Parte Reexamination (90/015,494) provided via the I.D.S. received 3-16-26. Claims 4 and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over DE 3635552 A1 (Köppen) in view of Ma (6,685,147) and Huppmann-Valbella (442,585) as applied to claims 1 and 10 above, and further in view of Tomassetti et al. (2004/0177519) and Gray (D444,267). With regards to claims 4 and 11, the Examiner has adopted the rejections from the Ex Parte Reexamination (90/015,564) Ground 6 provided via the I.D.S. received 3-16-26. Also see the U.S. Reexamination Application No. 90/105,494 provided via the I.D.S. received 11-5-25 and the Ex Parte Reexamination (90/015,494) provided via the I.D.S. received 3-16-26. Claims 5 and 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over DE 3635552 A1 (Köppen) in view of Ma (6,685,147) and Huppmann-Valbella (442,585) as applied to claims 1 and 10 above, and further in view of FR 2639280 A1 (Izoard). With regards to claims 5 and 12, the Examiner has adopted the rejections from the Ex Parte Reexamination (90/015,564) Ground 7 provided via the I.D.S. received 3-16-26. Also see the U.S. Reexamination Application No. 90/105,494 provided via the I.D.S. received 11-5-25 and the Ex Parte Reexamination (90/015,494) provided via the I.D.S. received 3-16-26. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JASON DANIEL PRONE whose telephone number is (571)272-4513. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday: 7:00 am-3:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Boyer D Ashley can be reached on (571)272-4502. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. 14 May 2026 /Jason Daniel Prone/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3724
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 15, 2023
Application Filed
May 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12636802
A SHAVING UNIT AND AN ELECTRIC SHAVER HAVING THE SHAVING UNIT
3y 9m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12635613
SINGLE-PIECE CRANKSHAFT
2y 11m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12623365
RAZOR CARTRIDGE WITH ONE OR MORE SKIN SUPPORT ELEMENTS
1y 11m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12605857
INTELLIGENT SHAVING SYSTEM HAVING SENSORS
9m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12599264
Citrus Peeler
3y 7m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+24.9%)
2y 11m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1230 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month