Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/541,813

TRANSMISSION MANAGEMENT APPARATUS

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Dec 15, 2023
Priority
Feb 28, 2011 — JP 2011-042365 +7 more
Examiner
EL-ZOOBI, MARIA
Art Unit
2692
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Ricoh Company, Ltd.
OA Round
4 (Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
873 granted / 1108 resolved
+16.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
1127
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.5%
-35.5% vs TC avg
§103
54.5%
+14.5% vs TC avg
§102
14.5%
-25.5% vs TC avg
§112
12.6%
-27.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1108 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, filed on 8/7/2026, with respect to claims have been fully considered and are persuasive. The rejection has been withdrawn. However, applicant’s amendment triggers 112 rejection “see detailed rejection”. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 1, 5, 8, 14 include the limitation “major terminal”, it is not clear and confusing what “ major terminal refereeing to or how it is different form other terminals. In applicant specification, “Paragraph 154”, applicant defined it “a transmission terminal that is the transmission source of sound data representing the voice, in the received sound data as a major terminal among the transmission terminals”, correction to further clarify this limitation is required. During search, examiner found the following related arts: Anderson (US 20120182384) teaches server apparatus (Fig. 1, el. 102 and Paragraph 147: web server) and a first terminal (Fig. 1, el. 104, 106), the server apparatus includes: a network interface coupled to, via a network (Fig. 1, el. 101), at least the first terminal and a second terminal (Fig. 1, el. 104, 106, 107, 105); a memory to store a first name and a first attendance state which are associated with the first terminal, and to store a second name and a second attendance state which are associated with the second terminal (Paragraph 146, 370, 372: name and Paragraph 138, 202-203: state and 146); update the first attendance state to a state indicating that the first terminal is attending a video communication, based on an attendance request to attend the video communication which is sent from the first terminal (Paragraph 63, 283, 289, 233: status icon is update to indicate the status); update the second attendance state to a state indicating that the second terminal is attending the video communication, when the second terminal attends the video communication (Paragraph 233, 236, 283); and send, to the first terminal via the network, a list including the first name and the second name, the first name corresponding to the first terminal which the first attendance state is updated (Fig. 6, el. 609), and the second name corresponding to the second terminal which the second attendance state is updated (Fig. 6, el. 609); receive an instruction to attend the video communication from a user; based on the received instruction, send the attendance request to the server apparatus via the network; receive the list including the first name and the second name from the server apparatus via the network; and in response to receiving a user operation, display the list received on a display (Paragraph 285: the system checks for an attendee request, the system checks for an attendee request, Fig. 12, 6-7). Ludwig (US 20010044826) teaches (display, video images from each terminal attending the video communication (Fig. 2A and 8B). Chang (US 20030149724) teaches a video image of a terminal transmitting sound data among terminals attending a video conference is displayed on a screen that displays the list (Paragraph 7: Another technique involves a "talker and graphic contention resolution process" to display only one talker's (participating location's) image based upon an algorithm which selects only one talker and only one graphic image However, none of the cited arts alone or in reasonable combination teaches {in response to receiving a user operation on the screen displaying the video images from each terminal attending the video communication, display the list including the first name and the second name on a screen that also displays the video image from a major terminal attending the video communication} as claimed. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MARIA EL-ZOOBI whose telephone number is (571)270-3434. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7-4. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Carolyn Edward can be reached at (571)270-7136. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MARIA EL-ZOOBI/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2692
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Dec 11, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Dec 11, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Dec 17, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 10, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
May 07, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Aug 07, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 15, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12744847
SYSTEM FOR REQUESTING EMERGENCY SERVICE IN AN ONLINE COLLABORATION CONTEXT
3y 10m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12726883
FIRST RESPONDER NETWORK IMPROVEMENTS FOR HIGH-CAPACITY ENVIRONMENT
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12725509
WEARABLE PANIC BUTTON
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12701638
METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR ASSISTED EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS COMMUNICATION SERVICES (EPCS)
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12696066
WIRELESS NETWORK CALL BLOCKING CONTROL
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+14.2%)
2y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1108 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month