Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/541,888

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DELAY-AWARE TRAFFIC PROVISIONING FOR BURSTY WIRELESS NETWORK COMMUNICATION TRAFFIC

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 15, 2023
Examiner
LI, GUANG W
Art Unit
2478
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Meta Platforms Technologies, LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 7m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allow Rate
488 granted / 629 resolved
+19.6% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+24.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
669
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.0%
-35.0% vs TC avg
§103
45.6%
+5.6% vs TC avg
§102
24.6%
-15.4% vs TC avg
§112
17.1%
-22.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 629 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Claims 1-20 are pending in this application. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Oath/Declaration The applicant’s oath/declaration has been reviewed by the examiner and is found to conform to the requirements prescribed in 37 C.F.R. 1.63. Priority This application has a provision application number 63/446207 filed on 02/16/2023. Drawings The applicant’s drawings submitted are acceptable for examination purposes. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Fujishiro et al. (US 2025/0048187 A1). Regarding claim 1, Fujishiro teaches a device (UE 100 see Fujishiro: Fig.2) , comprising: a wireless communications interface to communicate a plurality of data packets to a network device (UE 100 includes receiver 110 and transmitter 120 communicate traffic information with gNB 200 see Fujishiro: Fig.2 and Fig.6); and one or more processors (Controller 130 see Fujishiro: Fig.2) to: generate the plurality of data packets according to a timing characteristic of the plurality of data packets (UE generate XR assistance information according to traffic information from upper layer and traffic information includes time difference and traffic pattern “In step S11, the UE 100 transmits the XR assistance information including the traffic information to the gNB 200” see Fujishiro: ¶[0087-0088]; ¶[0094]; ¶[0097]); provide an indication of the timing characteristic to the network device (UE provide traffic information including time difference between the CG configuration and actual packet arrive time and indicating traffic model type see Fujishiro: ¶[0097]; ¶[0119]); receive a communication rate from the network device (UE100 receive configuration information (includes a bit rate) from gNB 200 see Fujishiro: Fig.6; ¶[0101]; ¶[0094]); and cause the wireless communications interface to communicate the plurality of data packets to the network device according to the communication rate (applying the configuration information (such as bit rate) “In step S14, the UE 100 applies the configuration information” see Fujishiro: ¶[0101]). Regarding claim 2, Fujishiro taught the device of claim 1 as described hereinabove. Fujishiro further teaches wherein the plurality of data packets are representative of video frames, and the timing characteristic corresponds to a compression of the video frames being intra-frame compression or inter-frame compression (first and second stream are I frame or P frame and those frames are intra frame or interframe see Fujishiro: ¶[0062-0065]). Regarding claim 3, Fujishiro taught the device of claim 2 as described hereinabove. Fujishiro further teaches wherein the one or more processors are to generate the indication based at least on the inter-frame compression having a greater data usage than the inter-frame compression (indication of traffic pattern on burst interval “The transmission period and/or the reception period may indicate a duration of one burst or a burst interval” see Fujishiro: ¶[0094]). Regarding claim 4, Fujishiro taught the device of claim 1 as described hereinabove. Fujishiro further teaches wherein the timing characteristic corresponds to the plurality of data packets being representative of periodic data (traffic information include number of transmission bits per burst and traffic pattern see Fujishiro: ¶[0092]; ¶[0094]). Regarding claim 5, Fujishiro taught the device of claim 4 as described hereinabove. Fujishiro further teaches wherein the one or more processors are to generate a user assistance information (UAI) signal comprising the indication of the timing characteristic and transmit the UAI signal to the network device to provide the indication of the timing characteristic to the network device (UE100 providing XR assistant information to gNB 200 include traffic information see Fujishiro: Fig.6; ¶[0087]; ¶[0094]; ¶[0097]). Regarding claim 6, Fujishiro taught the device of claim 5 as described hereinabove. Fujishiro further teaches wherein the one or more processors are to communicate the indication to the network device using radio resource control (RRC) signaling (The UE 100 may include the XR assistance information in the RRC message to transmit to the gNB 200 see Fujishiro: ¶[0088]). Regarding claim 7, Fujishiro taught the device of claim 1 as described hereinabove. Fujishiro further teaches wherein the one or more processors are to: communicate the indication of the timing characteristic to the network device, using at least one of an uplink control information (UCI) signal or a media access control (MAC) control element (CE) signal (using MAC CE to transmit XR assistance information “The UE 100 may include the XR assistance information in the MAC CE instead of the RRC message to transmit, or may include the XR assistance information in a PDCP Control Protocol Data Unit (PDU) to transmit” see Fujishiro: ¶[0088]), responsive to a determination that the timing characteristic corresponds to at least one of the plurality of data packets being aperiodic or being receiver-triggered (gNB may request UE to notify the gNB of the XR assistance information see Fujishiro: ¶[0087]). Regarding claim 8, Fujishiro taught the device of claim 1 as described hereinabove. Fujishiro further teaches wherein the plurality of data packets form a data burst (data communication in a transmission burst period “The transmission period and/or the reception period may indicate a duration of one burst or a burst interval” see Fujishiro: ¶[0094]). Regarding claim 9, Fujishiro teaches a system, comprising: a first device (UE100 see Fujishiro: Fig.2), comprising: one or more first processors to generate a plurality of data packets according to a timing characteristic of the plurality of data packets (UE generate XR assistance information according to traffic information from upper layer and traffic information include time difference and traffic pattern “In step S11, the UE 100 transmits the XR assistance information including the traffic information to the gNB 200” see Fujishiro: ¶[0087-0088]; ¶[0094]; ¶[0097]); and a second device (gNB 200 see Fujishiro: Fig.3), comprising: one or more second processors to: receive an indication of the timing characteristic from the first device (In step S12, the gNB 200 performs configuration for the UE 100 based on the XR assistance information include traffic information (time difference and traffic pattern) see Fujishiro: Fig.6; ¶[0099]); and transmit, to the first device, according to the indication of the timing characteristic (In step S13, the gNB 200 transmits the configuration information to the UE 100. The gNB 200 may include the configuration information in an RRC message see Fujishiro: Fig.6 step s13; ¶[0100]), a communication rate for communication of the plurality of data packets from the first device to the second device (UE100 receive configuration information (includes a bit rate) from gNB 200 see Fujishiro: Fig.6; ¶[0101]; ¶[0094]). Regarding claim 10, claim 10 is rejected same reason as the device of claim 2 set forth hereinabove. Regarding claim 11, claim 11 is rejected same reason as the device of claim 3 set forth hereinabove. Regarding claim 12, claim 12 is rejected same reason as the device of claim 4 set forth hereinabove. Regarding claim 13, claim 13 is rejected same reason as the device of claim 5 set forth hereinabove. Regarding claim 14, claim 14 is rejected same reason as the device of claim 7 set forth hereinabove. Regarding claim 15, claim 15 is rejected same reason as the device of claim 1 set forth hereinabove. Claim 15 teaches a method that perform the same functionalities as the device of claim 1 as described hereinabove. Regarding claim 16, claim 16 is rejected same reason as the device of claims 2-3 set forth hereinabove. Regarding claim 17, claim 17 is rejected same reason as the device of claim 4 set forth hereinabove. Regarding claim 18, claim 18 is rejected same reason as the device of claim 5 set forth hereinabove. Regarding claim 19, claim 19 is rejected same reason as the device of claim 7 set forth hereinabove. Regarding claim 20, claim 20 is rejected same reason as the device of claim 8 set forth hereinabove. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GUANG W LI whose telephone number is (571)270-1897. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday - Thursday 7AM-5PMET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joseph Avellino can be reached on (571) 272-3905. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see https://ppair-my.uspto.gov/pair/PrivatePair. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. GUANG W. LI Primary Examiner Art Unit 2478 March 2, 2026 /GUANG W LI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2478
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 15, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598487
SLICING METHOD AND APPARATUS, STORAGE MEDIUM, AND PROCESSOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598022
NOMINAL PACKET PADDING VALUE INDICATION METHOD, DETERMINING METHOD, AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12581529
CONTENTION RESOLUTION IN RANDOM ACCESS PROCEDURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12574143
DYNAMIC PAGING MODE ADAPTATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12531776
EXTENDING ACTIVE MEASUREMENT PROTOCOL WITH OAM CHANNEL
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+24.7%)
3y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 629 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month