Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/542,557

VESSEL NAVIGATION BOUNDARY COLLISION AVOIDANCE METHOD

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Dec 15, 2023
Priority
Dec 08, 2023 — TW 112147908
Examiner
GILBERTSON, SHAYNE M
Art Unit
3665
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Ship And Ocean Industries R&D Center
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
129 granted / 172 resolved
+23.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
194
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.4%
-35.6% vs TC avg
§103
82.3%
+42.3% vs TC avg
§102
6.2%
-33.8% vs TC avg
§112
5.3%
-34.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 172 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 Receipt is acknowledged of a request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) and a submission, filed on 04/14/2026. Response to Amendment The amendment filed on 04/14/2026 is being entered. Claims 1-2 and 4-10 are pending. Claims 1 and 9 are amended. Claim 3 is cancelled. The amendment overcomes the 35 U.S.C. 101 rejection to the claims and the objection to the claims. However, after further consideration, claims 1-2 and 4-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1-2 and 4-10 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Regarding claim 1, the claim recites in lines 19-20 “wherein the autonomous ship sails on a collision avoidance route.” There is no support for this limitation in the specification. At most, the specification describes at least at Paragraph 0033, that “the sailing ship domain V generated by an autonomous ship can be applied in addition to collision avoidance decision-making in actual navigation”. Therefore, the limitation “wherein the autonomous ship sails on a collision avoidance route” is new matter. Response to Arguments Applicants' arguments appear to be directed solely to the amended subject matter, and are not persuasive, as noted supra in the rejections of that claimed subject matter. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Shayne M Gilbertson whose telephone number is (571)272-4862. The examiner can normally be reached Tuesday - Friday: 10:30 AM - 9:30 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christian Chace can be reached at 571-272-4190. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SHAYNE M. GILBERTSON/Examiner, Art Unit 3665
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 15, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 10, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Oct 10, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 14, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Apr 14, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 23, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12626545
SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF DETECTING FLUID RELEASE
2y 10m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12623793
MACHINE-LEARNING-BASED FLIGHT DATA PARAMETER ESTIMATION
2y 1m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12618389
VEHICLE CONTROL METHOD AND VEHICLE CONTROL DEVICE
2y 1m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12583463
INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE FOR VEHICLE, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM
2y 0m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12552390
VEHICLE THAT DETECTS ROAD SURFACE INFORMATION USING CONTACT DETECTORS AND CONTACTLESS DETECTORS
2y 9m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+11.1%)
2y 10m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 172 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month