Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/542,595

EXTERNAL TRIPLE-FREQUENCY ANTENNA FOR UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Dec 16, 2023
Priority
Jun 16, 2021 — CN 202110665219.3 +1 more
Examiner
LEVI, DAMEON E
Art Unit
2845
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Autel Robotics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
70%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allowance Rate
236 granted / 359 resolved
-2.3% vs TC avg
Minimal +5% lift
Without
With
+4.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
407
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
52.7%
+12.7% vs TC avg
§102
45.3%
+5.3% vs TC avg
§112
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 359 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment The amendment filed January 6, 2026 has been entered. The Applicant amended claims 1, 5, and 8-9. Claims 1-10 remain pending in the application. Applicant’s amendments to the Claims have overcome each and every objection and 112(b) rejections previously set forth in the Non-Final Office Action mailed October 21, 2025. The examiner withdraws the 112(b) rejections and the Claims objections in light of the amendments to the Claims. Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1-10 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on the combination of references applied in the prior rejection. Claim Objections Claims 8 and 10 are objected to because of the following informalities: In claims 8 and 10, “the front side and the back side of the substrate” lacks proper antecedent basis and should read “the front side of the substrate and the back side of the substrate” Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sone (US PGPUB 2019/0190136 A1) in view of Qu et al. (CN 110718752 B), hereinafter known as Qu. Regarding claim 1, Sone teaches (Fig. 1-2 and 9A-9B) An external triple-frequency antenna for an unmanned aerial vehicle ([0020], vehicle includes a unmanned aerial vehicle), comprising: a substrate (40, 55); vibrator circuits (30, 20, 50) laid on the substrate (40, 55), wherein the vibrator circuits comprise a high-frequency vibrator circuit (50), a middle-frequency vibrator circuit (30), and a low-frequency vibrator circuit (20); and a shared microstrip line ([0060]) is disposed between the middle-frequency vibrator circuit (30) and the low-frequency vibrator circuit (20); and a feed line (47, 57), comprising a first feed line (57) and a second feed line (47), wherein the first feed line (57) is connected to the high-frequency vibrator circuit (50); and the second feed line (47) is connected to the shared microstrip line ([0060]), and a capacitor (C1, C2) is disposed at a connection of the second feed line (47) and the shared microstrip line ([0060]) but does not specifically teach and configured to couple the middle-frequency vibrator circuit and the low-frequency vibrator circuit. However, Qu teaches (Fig. 3) a shared microstrip line (107) is disposed between the middle-frequency vibrator circuit (104 top) and the low-frequency vibrator circuit (104 bottom) and configured to couple the middle-frequency vibrator circuit (104 top) and the low-frequency vibrator circuit (104 bottom). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to modify the external triple-frequency antenna for the unmanned aerial vehicle of Sone with Qu to include “and configured to couple the middle-frequency vibrator circuit and the low-frequency vibrator circuit,” as taught by Qu, for the purpose of removing unwanted resonance (see also [0008] of machine translation). Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Song (CN 112886215 A with references made to corresponding US PGPUB 2024/0030605 A1) in view of Sone. Regarding claim 1, Song teaches (Fig. 1-2) An external triple-frequency antenna for an unmanned aerial vehicle (Abstract), comprising: a substrate (10); vibrator circuits (21, 22) laid on the substrate, wherein the vibrator circuits comprise a high-frequency vibrator circuit (221, 222), a middle-frequency vibrator circuit (212), and a low-frequency vibrator circuit (211); and a shared microstrip line (211a, 212a) is disposed between the middle-frequency vibrator circuit (212) and the low-frequency vibrator circuit (211) and configured to couple the middle-frequency vibrator circuit (212) and the low-frequency vibrator circuit (211); and a feed line (31, 32), comprising a first feed line (32) and a second feed line (31), wherein the first feed line (32) is connected to the high-frequency vibrator circuit (22); and the second feed line (31) is connected to the shared microstrip line (211a, 212a), but does not specifically teach and a capacitor is disposed at a connection of the second feed line and the shared microstrip line. However, Sone teaches (Fig. 3) a capacitor (C1, C2) is disposed at a connection of the second feed line (47) and the shared microstrip line ([0060]). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to modify the external triple-frequency antenna for the unmanned aerial vehicle of Song with Sone to include “a capacitor is disposed at a connection of the second feed line and the shared microstrip line,” as taught by Sone, for the purpose of impedance matching (see also [0060]). Regarding claim 2, Song further teaches (Fig. 1) wherein the high-frequency vibrator circuit (22) comprises a first high-frequency vibrator circuit (221) and a second high-frequency vibrator circuit (222); and the first high-frequency vibrator circuit (221) and the second high-frequency vibrator circuit (222) are symmetrically disposed on a front side and a back side of the substrate ([0082]). Regarding claim 3, Song further teaches (Fig. 1) wherein the first high-frequency vibrator circuit (221) and the second high-frequency vibrator circuit (222) are both provided with two high-frequency vibrator circuit units (221, 222), and both of the high-frequency vibrator circuit units (221, 222) comprise a U-shaped microstrip line and an extended microstrip line (32) extending at two ends of the U-shaped microstrip line. Regarding claim 4, Song further teaches (Fig. 1) wherein the substrate (10) on one side of the extended microstrip line is provided with a notch (notch at bottom of 10). Regarding claim 5, Song further teaches (Fig. 1-2) wherein the shared microstrip line (211a, 212a, 213) comprises a first microstrip line (left 213) and a second microstrip line (right 213) disposed on the back side of the substrate (10) along a length direction of the substrate, and a third microstrip line (211a, 212a) disposed on the front side of the substrate along a width direction of the substrate, and wherein the third microstrip line (211a, 212a) is connected to the second feed line (31). Regarding claim 6, Song further teaches (Fig. 1-2) wherein two ends of the third microstrip line (211a, 212a) extend to two sides along the length direction of the substrate (10), respectively, with a fourth microstrip line (bottom left line of 212), a fifth microstrip line (bottom right line of 212), a sixth microstrip line (top left line of 211), and a seventh microstrip line (top right line of 211). Regarding claim 7, Song further teaches (Fig. 1-2) wherein the fourth microstrip line (bottom left line of 212), the fifth microstrip line (bottom right line of 212), and the shared microstrip line form the middle-frequency vibrator circuit (212); and the sixth microstrip line (top left line of 211), the seventh microstrip line (top right line of 211), and the shared microstrip line form the low-frequency vibrator circuit (211). Regarding claim 8, Song further teaches (Fig. 1-2) wherein an eighth microstrip line (221b) and a ninth microstrip line (222) are respectively disposed along the length direction of the substrate on the front side and the back side of the substrate (10), and the eighth microstrip line (221b) and the ninth microstrip line (222) are respectively connected to the high-frequency vibrator circuit unit (22). Regarding claim 9, Song further teaches (Fig. 1-2) wherein the substrate (10) is provided with a tenth microstrip line (top middle line of 211) connected to the third microstrip line (211a, 212a) along the length direction of the substrate (10). Regarding claim 10, Song further teaches (Fig. 1-2) wherein an eleventh microstrip line (221a) and a twelfth microstrip line (center line of 211 adjacent to middle line of 211) are respectively disposed along the width direction of the substrate (10) in middle parts of the front side and the back side of the substrate (10), the eleventh microstrip line (221a) being connected to the ninth microstrip line (222), and the twelfth microstrip line being connected to the tenth microstrip line (top middle line of 211). Claims 2-5 and 8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sone in view of Qu as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Yao et al. (CN 207852912 U), hereinafter known as Yao. Regarding claim 2, Sone does not specifically teach wherein the high-frequency vibrator circuit comprises a first high-frequency vibrator circuit and a second high-frequency vibrator circuit; and the first high-frequency vibrator circuit and the second high-frequency vibrator circuit are symmetrically disposed on a front side and a back side of the substrate. However, Yao teaches (Fig. 1-3) wherein the high-frequency vibrator circuit comprises a first high-frequency vibrator circuit (51 of 5) and a second high-frequency vibrator circuit (51 of 6); and the first high-frequency vibrator circuit (51) and the second high-frequency vibrator circuit (51) are symmetrically disposed on a front side and a back side of the substrate (2, 3). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to modify the external triple-frequency antenna for the unmanned aerial vehicle of Sone with Yao to include “wherein the high-frequency vibrator circuit comprises a first high-frequency vibrator circuit and a second high-frequency vibrator circuit; and the first high-frequency vibrator circuit and the second high-frequency vibrator circuit are symmetrically disposed on a front side and a back side of the substrate,” as taught by Yao, for the purpose of improving isolation and data throughout (see also final paragraph of page 3 of machine translation). Regarding claim 3, Sone does not specifically teach wherein the first high-frequency vibrator circuit and the second high-frequency vibrator circuit are both provided with two high-frequency vibrator circuit units, and both of the high-frequency vibrator circuit units comprise a U-shaped microstrip line and an extended microstrip line extending at two ends of the U-shaped microstrip line. However, Yao teaches (Fig. 1-3) wherein the first high-frequency vibrator circuit (5) and the second high-frequency vibrator circuit (6) are both provided with two high-frequency vibrator circuit units, and both of the high-frequency vibrator circuit units (5, 6) comprise a U-shaped microstrip line (5, 6) and an extended microstrip line extending at two ends of the U-shaped microstrip line (A, C). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to modify the external triple-frequency antenna for the unmanned aerial vehicle of Sone with Yao to include “wherein the first high-frequency vibrator circuit and the second high-frequency vibrator circuit are both provided with two high-frequency vibrator circuit units, and both of the high-frequency vibrator circuit units comprise a U-shaped microstrip line and an extended microstrip line extending at two ends of the U-shaped microstrip line,” as taught by Yao, for the purpose of improving isolation and data throughout (see also final paragraph of page 3 of machine translation). Regarding claim 4, Sone further teaches (Fig. 10) wherein the substrate (55) on one side of the extended microstrip line is provided with a notch (notches in 55). Regarding claim 5, Sone further teaches (Fig. 9A) wherein the shared microstrip line comprises a first microstrip line (P2) and a second microstrip line (P3) disposed on a back side of the substrate (40) along a length direction of the substrate, and a third microstrip line (P1) disposed on a front side of the substrate (40) along a width direction of the substrate, and wherein the third microstrip line (P1) is connected to the second feed line (47). Regarding claim 8, Sone further teaches (Fig. 10) wherein an eighth microstrip line (P13) and a ninth microstrip line (P14) are respectively disposed along the length direction on the front side and the back side of the substrate (55), and the eighth microstrip line (P13) and the ninth microstrip line (P14) are respectively connected to the high-frequency vibrator circuit unit (50). Conclusion The Examiner has pointed out particular references contained in the prior art of record within the body of this action for the convenience of the Applicant. Although the specified citations are representative of the teachings in the art and are applied to the specific limitations within the individual claim, other passages and figures may apply. Applicant, in preparing the response, should consider fully the entire reference as potentially teaching all or part of the claimed invention, as well as the context of the passage as taught by the prior art or disclosed by the Examiner. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to YONCHAN J KIM whose telephone number is (571)272-3204. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8:00 am - 5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dameon Levi can be reached at (571) 272-2105. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DAMEON E LEVI/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2845 /YONCHAN J KIM/ Examiner, Art Unit 2845
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 16, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 21, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jan 06, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 29, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12560977
ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 7m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12563667
MANUFACTURING METHOD OF CIRCUIT BOARD STRUCTURE
1y 9m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12532428
ALL-IN-ONE, END-TO-END, AND EXPANDABLE MODULAR DATA CENTERS
3y 3m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Patent 12513838
SHAFT AND DISPLAY DEVICE
1y 8m to grant Granted Dec 30, 2025
Patent 12490386
ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 11m to grant Granted Dec 02, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
70%
With Interview (+4.7%)
2y 8m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 359 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month