Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/542,742

MICRO LED STRUCTURE AND MICRO LED PANEL

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Dec 17, 2023
Examiner
LEE, KYOUNG
Art Unit
2817
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Jade Bird Display (Shanghai) Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
93%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 1m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 93% — above average
93%
Career Allow Rate
912 granted / 979 resolved
+25.2% vs TC avg
Minimal +5% lift
Without
With
+4.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
1002
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
§103
33.0%
-7.0% vs TC avg
§102
40.5%
+0.5% vs TC avg
§112
12.6%
-27.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 979 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 12/17/2023 and 9/13/2024 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1-3, 11-13 and 17-19 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-6 and 19 of U.S. Patent Appl. Pub. No. 2024/0213292 A1. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other. [Re claim 1] Reference (US 2024/0213292) discloses the micro light-emitting diode (LED) structure, comprising: an integrated circuit (IC) back plane; a stack of mesa structures comprising: a first mesa structure on the IC back plane, and a second mesa structure on the first mesa structure; and a dielectric layer between the first and second mesa structures, wherein the first mesa structure comprises: a first light emitting layer (first epitaxial layer, quantum well layer and second epitaxial layer), a first connecting layer formed on and electrically connected to the first light emitting layer, and a first conductive bonding layer formed under the first light emitting layer and electrically connecting the first light emitting layer to the IC back plane; wherein the second mesa structure comprises: a second light emitting layer (first epitaxial layer, quantum well layer and second epitaxial layer), a second connecting layer formed on and electrically connected to the second light emitting layer, a second conductive bonding layer formed under the second light emitting layer, and a third connecting layer formed under the second conductive bonding layer and electrically connected to the second light emitting layer via the second conductive bonding layer (see claim 1-3). [Re claim 2] Reference (US 2024/0213292) discloses the micro LED structure, wherein, in plan view, an outline of the second mesa structure is disposed within an outline of the first mesa structure (see claim 2). [Re claim 3] Reference (US 2024/0213292) discloses the micro LED structure wherein sidewalls of the first and second conductive bonding layers are respectively aligned with sidewalls of the first and second light emitting layers (see claim 4). [Re claim 11] Reference (US 2024/0213292) discloses the micro LED structure wherein each of the first and second conductive bonding layers comprises a metal, a composite metal, or a transparent conductive material (see claim 5). [Re claim 12] Reference (US 2024/0213292) discloses the micro LED structure wherein the transparent conductive material is SiO2 or ITO (see claim 6). [Re claim 13] Reference (US 2024/0213292) discloses the micro LED structure wherein each of the first, second, and third connecting layers comprises a transparent conductive material (see claim 19). [Re claim 17] Reference (US 2024/0213292) discloses the micro LED structure wherein each of the first and second light emitting layers comprises a P-type semiconductor layer (first conductive type) and an N-type semiconductor layer (second conductive type), the P- type semiconductor layer and N-type semiconductor layer forming a P-N junction (see claim 1). [Re claim 18] Reference (US 2024/0213292) discloses the micro LED structure wherein each of the first and second light emitting layers further comprises a quantum well layer formed between the P-type semiconductor layer and the N-type semiconductor layer (see claim 1). [Re claim 19] Reference (US 2024/0213292) discloses the micro LED structure wherein the stack of mesa structures further comprises a third mesa structure formed on the second mesa structure, the third mesa structure comprising: a third light emitting layer, a forth connecting layer formed on and electrically connected to the third light emitting layer, a third conductive bonding layer formed under the third light emitting layer, and a fifth connecting layer formed under the third conductive bonding layer and electrically connected to the third light emitting layer through the third conductive bonding layer (see claim 1-3). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-10, 14-16 and 21-24 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 20 allowed. The following is an examiner's statement of reasons for allowance: Claim 20 allowable because of the prior art, either singly or in combination, fails to anticipate or render obvious, the full color micro LED panel, wherein the first mesa structure comprises: a first light emitting layer, a first connecting layer formed on and electrically connected to the first light emitting layer, and a first conductive bonding layer formed under the first light emitting layer and electrically connecting the first light emitting layer to the IC back plane; wherein the second mesa structure comprises: a second light emitting layer, a second connecting layer formed on and electrically connected to the second light emitting layer, a second conductive bonding layer formed under the second light emitting layer, and a third connecting layer formed under the second conductive bonding layer and electrically connected to the second light emitting layer via the second conductive bonding layer. These features in combination with the other elements of the claim are neither disclosed nor suggested by the prior art of record. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KYOUNG LEE whose telephone number is (571)272-1982. The examiner can normally be reached M to F, 10am to 6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eliseo Ramos-Feliciano can be reached at (571)272-7925. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KYOUNG LEE/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2817
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 17, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 16, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598893
DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12599023
SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR FORMING THE SAME AND SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593601
DISPLAY PANEL AND MOBILE TERMINAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12581836
DISPLAY SUBSTRATE AND DISPLAY APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12581819
DISPLAY PANEL AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
93%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+4.9%)
2y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 979 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month