Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/543,164

ELECTRIC-VEHICLE DRIVE UNIT SYSTEM WITH AXIAL COUPLING

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Dec 18, 2023
Priority
Dec 19, 2022 — provisional 63/476,061
Examiner
SWENSON, BRIAN L
Art Unit
3613
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Lucid Group Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
772 granted / 952 resolved
+29.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
963
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
51.4%
+11.4% vs TC avg
§102
26.3%
-13.7% vs TC avg
§112
18.4%
-21.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 952 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This Office Action is responsive to the response filed on July 23, 2026, where: Claims 1, 7, 8, 10, 11, 16, 17, 19 and 23 are pending; Claims 2-6, 9, 12-15, 18, 20-22 and 24 are Withdrawn. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 7, 8, 10, 11, 16, 17, 19 and 23 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by U.S. Patent Publication No. 2019/0248247 issued to Yamaguchi et al. Regarding Claim 1, Yamaguchi et al. teaches in Figures 1-27 and respective portions of the specification of: a drive unit system (1) for an axle of an electric vehicle, the drive unit system comprising: a first drive unit (2A) comprising a first rotor (15A) inside a first stator (14A); a first transmission (12A) for a first wheel (LWr) of the axle (1), the first transmission (12A) having a first input shaft (16a) coupled to a first gear (26A) having a first helix angle (θ1; see at least paragraph [0261]); a second transmission (12B) for a second wheel (RWr) of the axle (1), the second transmission (12B) having a second input shaft (16B) coupled to a second gear (26B) having a second helix angle (θ1) opposite to the first helix angle (θ1); and a coupling (50) connecting the first (16a) and second (16b) input shafts to each other (see Figures 2 and 3 shows the coupling 50 connects the input shaft 16a and 16b by connecting input shaft 16a to transmission 12A to coupling 50 to transmission 12B to shaft 16b). Regarding Claim 7, Yamaguchi et al. teach the coupling (50) provides load cancelation (via the two-way clutch 50) between the first (12A) and second (12B) transmissions. Regarding Claim 8, Yamaguchi et al. teach in the second embodiment in Figures 12-14 the coupling comprises a thrust bearing (42A, 42B) coupled to the first (16A) and second (16B) input shafts. Regarding Claim 10, Yamaguchi et al. teach a second drive unit (2B) comprising a second rotor (15B) inside a second stator (15B), the first (2A) and second drive units (2B) being a twin drive unit for the drive unit system (10, wherein the first drive unit (2A) drives the first input shaft (16a), and wherein the second drive unit (2B) drives the second input shaft (16B). Regarding Claim 11, Yamaguchi et al. teach the coupling (50) provides torque control (via the two-way clutch) between the first (16a) and second (16a) input shafts. Regarding Claim 16, Yamaguchi et al. teach the coupling (50) provides load cancelation (via the two-way clutch 50) between the first (12A) and second (12B) transmissions. Regarding Claim 17, Yamaguchi et al. teach in the second embodiment in Figures 12-14 the coupling comprises a thrust bearing (42A, 42B) coupled to the first (16A) and second (16B) input shafts. Regarding Claim 19, Yamaguchi et al. teach in Figures 1-27 and respective portions of the specification of a twin drive unit system for an axle of an electric vehicle, the twin drive unit system comprising: a first drive unit (2A) comprising a first rotor (15A) inside a first stator (14a); a second drive unit (2B) comprising a second rotor (15B) inside a second stator (14B); a first transmission (12A) for a first wheel (LWr) of the axle, the first transmission (12A) having a first input shaft (16a), wherein the first drive unit (2A) drives the first input shaft (1); a second transmission (12B) for a second wheel (RWr) of the axle (1), the second transmission (12B) having a second input shaft (16B), wherein the second drive unit (2B) drives the second input shaft (16B); and a coupling (50) connecting the first (16a) and second (16b) input shafts to each other (see Figures 2 and 3 shows the coupling 50 connects the input shaft 16a and 16b by connecting input shaft 16a to transmission 12A to coupling 50 to transmission 12B to shaft 16b). Regarding Claim 23, Yamaguchi et al. teach in the second embodiment in Figures 12-14 the coupling comprises a thrust bearing (42A, 42B) coupled to the first (16A) and second (16B) input shafts. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 23 July 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Regarding Applicant’s arguments, beginning page 5, that Yamaguchi does not show “a coupling connecting the first and second input shafts to each other.” The examiner respectfully disagrees. Figures 2 and 3 shows the coupling (the two-way clutch 50) connects the first (16a) and second (16b) inputs together. While there are intermediate elements of the planetary gear sets (ring gears 24A, 24B, pinions 26A, 26B, 27A, 27B, planetary gears 22A), there is no claim limitation requiring the first and second inputs to be directly coupled to each other. The two-way clutch (50) meets the claim limitation of “a coupling [50] connecting the first and second input shafts together”. It is noted that although the claims are interpreted in light of the specification, limitations from the specification are not read into the claims. See In re Van Geuns, 988 F.2d 1181, 26 USPQ2d 1057 (Fed. Cir. 1993). Regarding Applicant’s arguments, page 5, “claim 1 mapping does not adequately establish the required input-shaft/gear relationship”. As best understood, Applicant is arguing the claim limitation “the first transmission having a first input shaft coupled to a first gear”. As disclosed above, Yamaguchi et al. shows the first transmission (12A) has a first input shaft (the electric motor’s 2A output shaft 16A which is the input for the transmission 12A). Figures 2 and 3 show the input shaft (16A) is coupled to a first gear (26A)”. This arrangement meets the claim limitation of “the first transmission (12A) having a first input shaft (16a) coupled to a first gear (26A)”. Similarly, Yamaguchi et al. shows the second transmission (12B) has a first input shaft (the electric motor’s 2B output shaft 16B which is the input for the transmission 12B). Figures 2 and 3 show the input shaft (16B) is coupled to a first gear (26B)”. This arrangement meets the claim limitation of “the first transmission (12B) having a second input shaft (16B) coupled to a second gear (26B)”. Claims 1 and 19 have been clarified above without altering the basis of the claim rejection for the Office Action filed on February 23, 2026. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRIAN L SWENSON whose telephone number is (571)270-5572. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday (9-5). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Allen Shriver can be reached at (303) 297-4337. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. BRIAN SWENSON Primary Examiner Art Unit 3618 /BRIAN L SWENSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3613
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 18, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jul 23, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 22, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12746453
SKATEBOARDS WITH A MULTI-WHEEL TRUCK
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12741696
SPLASHGUARD DEVICE FOR A WHEELED VEHICLE AND ASSEMBLY COMPRISING SUCH A DEVICE
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12735933
DRIVE DEVICE FOR A VEHICLE FLAP
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12728714
Electric all-terrain vehicle and control method of vehicle braking
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12722479
A SUSPENSION ARRANGEMENT FOR AN ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+9.4%)
1y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 952 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month