Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 23, 2026
Application No. 18/543,548

PRINTED WIRING BOARD AND MANUFACTURING METHOD FOR PRINTED WIRING BOARD

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Dec 18, 2023
Priority
Sep 25, 2019 — nonprovisional of PCTJP2019037724 +1 more
Examiner
CAZAN, LIVIUS RADU
Art Unit
3729
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Kyocera Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
63%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 63% of resolved cases
63%
Career Allowance Rate
608 granted / 966 resolved
-7.1% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+24.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
1010
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
45.8%
+5.8% vs TC avg
§102
25.1%
-14.9% vs TC avg
§112
26.1%
-13.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 966 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Interpretation Claims 1-8 are objected to because of the following informalities: In claim 1, line 11 and claim 6, line 16, “cavirty” should read –cavity--; In claim 1, line 18, “postion” (two instances) should read –portion—or –position--, as may be appropriate. In claim 6, penultimate line, “equivalanet” should read –equivalent--. Appropriate correction is required. Drawings The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, the claimed first through fourth insulating resin layers and the substrate must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). No new matter should be entered. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Claim 1 requires the limitations “a substrate made of insulating resin, the substrate comprising … a second face” and “forming an electrical conductor such that the electrical conductor layer is embedded in the second face”. See lines 2-6. Referring to Fig. 1, the substrate is 11, and 12 is the seed layer on the first and second face. Fig. 5 shows electrical conductor layer 17. Clearly, the electrical conductor is not embedded in the second face. There is no support in the original application for the limitation “forming an electrical conductor such that the electrical conductor layer is embedded in the second face.” Claim 6 requires the limitations “a substrate that is made of insulating resin, the substrate comprising … a second face”, “forming a second insulating resin on the second face; providing a seed layer on the second insulating resin layer; performing a pattern plating on a partial region of the seed layer to form an electrical conductor layer” and “forming a fourth insulating resin layer on the second insulating resin layer to embed the electrical conductor layer in at least the second face”. Referring to Fig. 1, the substrate is 11, and 12 is the seed layer on the first and second face. Fig. 5 shows electrical conductor layer 17. Clearly, the electrical conductor is not embedded in the second face. There is no support in the original application for the limitation “forming an electrical conductor such that the electrical conductor layer is embedded in the second face.” There is no support in the application as originally filed for the electrical conductor layer being embedded in the second face of the substrate. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In claim 1, last line, the limitation “the electrical conductor layer embedded in the second insulating layer” lacks proper antecedent basis, as the claim refers at line 6 to the electrical conductor being embedded in the second face. In claim 4, it is unclear what is meant by “continuously performed in order of nickel and copper”. Is the plating performed without stopping the plating process when switching metals, or what is meant by “continuously”? Similarly with respect to claim 5 limitation “continuously performed in order of nickel, gold, nickel and copper”. In claim 6, line 13, the limitation “removing the insulating resin constituting the second insulating resin layer” renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear what is meant. As written, the limitation appears to suggest the entire In claim 6, last line, the limitation “the electrical conductor layer embedded in the fourth insulating layer” lacks proper antecedent basis, as the claim refers at line 10 to the electrical conductor being embedded in the second face. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-3 and 6-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Furusawa (US2016/0113110A1) in view of Jiao (CN109219255A). Furusawa discloses the claimed invention as follows: Claim 1. A manufacturing method for a printed wiring board, the method comprising: performing pattern plating (compare Figs. 3C and 3B; see [0067]) on a substrate (20z) made of insulating resin (see [0064]), the substrate comprising a first face (S) and a second face (F) located on a side opposite to the first face; forming an electrical conductor layer (58F with 60FI) on a seed layer (34FI) provided on the second face (see Figs. 3C and 4B); forming a first insulating resin layer (50S, Fig. 3D) on the first face and forming a second insulating resin layer (150F, Fig. 4C) such that the electrical conductor layer is embedded in the second face; drilling (see “using a router” in [0085]) in a lamination direction from a side of the first insulating resin layer toward a partial region of the seed layer to penetrate the first insulating resin layer, and removing the insulating resin constituting the substrate (see Fig. 5B, 7D; see [0082]) wherein when forming the cavity, forming a side surface of the cavirty that extends linearly from the first face to the second face when the cavity is viewed in cross section (see Fig. 5B); removing the partial region exposed at the bottom portion by flash etching (see Fig. 5C; see [0082]) to expose a postion of a surface of the second insulating resin layer to be equivalent to a postion of a surface of the electrical conductor layer embedded in the second insulating resin layer. Claim 2. The manufacturing method for a printed wiring board according to claim 1, wherein in the drilling, the insulating resin is removed to a position that is located at a depth not less than 1/2 of a thickness of the substrate Claim 3. The manufacturing method for a printed wiring board according to claim 1, further comprising: forming a via hole (28, Fig. 3B; see [0066] and [0067]) in a predetermined region of the substrate or of the second insulating resin layer; and performing pattern plating on the predetermined region comprising the via hole. Claim 6. A manufacturing method for a printed wiring board, the method comprising: forming providing a seed layer (22F in Fig. 3B) on the second insulating resin layer; performing pattern plating (see [0067] and Fig. 3D) on a partial region of the seed layer to form an electrical conductor layer (158F with 160F; see Fig. 4C); drilling (see “using a router” in [0085]) in a lamination direction wherein when forming the cavity, forming a side surface of the cavirty that extends linearly from the first face to the second face when the cavity is viewed in cross section (see Fig. 5B); removing the partial region exposed at the bottom portion by flash etching (see Fig. 5C; see [0082]) to expose a position of a surface of the fourth insulating resin layer to be equivalanet to a position of a surface of the electrical conductor layer embedded in the fourth insulating resin layer. Claim 7. The manufacturing method for a printed wiring board according to claim 6, wherein in the drilling, the insulating resin is removed to a position that is located at a depth not less than 1/2 of a thickness of the second insulating layer Claim 8. The manufacturing method for a printed wiring board according to claim 6, further comprising: forming a via hole (70F, Fig. 4A; see [0071]) in a predetermined region of the substrate or of the fourth insulating resin layer; and performing pattern plating (at 60F; see Fig. 4B and [0071]) on the predetermined region comprising the via hole. Furusawa discloses the claimed invention, except for the drilling being such that the insulating resin is removed to a position that is located at a depth not less than 1/2 of a thickness of the substrate / second insulating layer, but that does not reach the partial region, the portion of the substrate / second insulating layer remaining at the bottom of the cavity being removed by laser machining. Jiao teaches forming a cavity in a multilayer board by controlled-depth milling until only a thin layer of an insulating material remains at the bottom of the cavity (see Fig. 3 and [0046] and [0047]). Laser ablation is performed to remove the remaining insulating material (see Fig. 4 and [0048]). This process is used as an alternative to controlled-depth milling alone, “which is not only difficult to control the depth, making it hard to mill to the specified circuit layer and thus failing to meet design requirements” (see [0006]). As mentioned above, Furusawa discloses forming cavity 26 using a router (e.g. deemed equivalent to drilling and milling, in this context). In view of the teachings of Jiao, one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention would have found it obvious to mill the substrate / second insulating layer such that a portion of the substrate remains on the partial region inside the substrate, and utilizing a laser to remove the portion, for the same advantages taught by Jiao. Regarding first and third insulating resin layers in claims 6-8, one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention would have found it obvious to vary the number of the layers defining the height of the cavity, as needed for a particular application, with predictable results. Claims 4 and 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Furusawa as modified in view of Jiao, further in view of Abe (US2006/0051895A1). Modified Furusawa renders obvious the claimed invention, except for the limitations of claims 4 and 5. In [0033] and [0034] Furusawa discusses the bottoms of the vias, exposed to opening 26, being C4 pads. [0073] discusses forming a metal film on the portions of the pattern 34FI, these functioning as C4 pads. The metal film can be metal other than copper, such as gold, palladium, and tin. Nickel can also be formed between the metal film and a C4 pad. However, the description in Furusawa is not very clear regarding the order of layers. Abe discloses an invention very similar to that of Furusawa and the claimed invention, wherein a substrate 10 (Fig. 1B) has a metal spacer 12 (e.g. copper foil; see [0032]) on one surface. On this spacer, a pattern plating process is used to form pads 21, which are functionally equivalent to the bottoms of the vias discussed by Fukusawa as being C4 pads (see Figs. 7C and 8A). An insulating layer 22 is disposed over the spacer and the pads, and via holes are filled with conductive material, as show in Fig. 3A-3C. See [0038] to [0040]. In forming the pads 21, Ni, Au, Ni and Cu are successively deposited in openings 41a. See Fig. 1D and [0034], the first nickel layer acting as a diffusion barrier. Taking into consideration the teachings of Abe, and the fact that Furusawa already mentions Au and Ni layers in forming the pad portion at the bottom of the vias 60FI, one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention would have found it obvious to successively plate Ni/Au/Ni/Cu in forming the metal film defining the C4 pad, discussed by Furusawa, since Abe shows it is conventional to use such a metal film arrangement in defining a pad portion to which a component with solder balls is to be attached. Compare Figs. 8A of Abe and 2A of Furusawa. Note that the order Ni/Au/Ni/Cu (claim 5) comprises the order Ni/Cu (claim 4). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: US2016/0081182A1 discloses a process in which a portion 112 of a substrate is removed, leaving a metal layer 115 (see Fig. 20) covering an electrical conductor layer (140) during removal of the portion 112. Later 115 is then removed. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LIVIUS R CAZAN whose telephone number is (571)272-8032. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday noon-8:30 pm ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Thomas Hong can be reached at 571-272-0993. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LIVIUS R. CAZAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3729
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 18, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12770783
WINDING CONFIGURATION AS PART OF AN INTEGRATED STRUCTURE FOR A MEDIUM FREQUENCY TRANSFORMER
4y 7m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12763652
PRODUCTION DEVICE FOR PRODUCING A COIL OF AN ELECTRIC MACHINE
3y 6m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12763316
METHOD FOR FORMING ALIGNED STRUCTURE OF GRAPHITE, METHOD FOR FABRICATING ELECTRODE FOR BATTERY HAVING ALIGNED GRAPHITE AND LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY HAVING ALIGNED GRAPHITE
3y 9m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12763234
MULTILAYER VARISTOR
3y 7m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12745940
MEDICAL PROTO MICROELECTRODE, METHOD FOR ITS MANUFACTURE, AND USE THEREOF
4y 4m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
63%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+24.9%)
3y 5m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 966 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month