Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/543,576

ATMOSPHERIC WATER HARVESTING COMPOSITE FOAMS, AND SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR FABRICATION AND USE THEREOF

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 18, 2023
Examiner
HOPKINS, ROBERT A
Art Unit
1776
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND, BALTIMORE
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allow Rate
1336 granted / 1577 resolved
+19.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
1611
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
33.2%
-6.8% vs TC avg
§102
33.7%
-6.3% vs TC avg
§112
26.0%
-14.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1577 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1,5,6,9,16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being clearly anticipated by Beckenhauer(6235219). Beckenhauer teaches a system comprising an atmospheric water harvesting composite(column 2 lines 66-67 stating “method for removing moisture from an enclosed and moisture-containing atmosphere”) comprising a foam comprising an organic polymer(column 6 lines 24-25 stating “a deliquescent material dispersed in an organic polymer”; column 7 lines 19-20 stating “preferred organic polymers are … , polyurethane”, wherein polyurethane is known to include a foam formulation), the foam having pore size of at least 1 micrometer; and a plurality of deliquescent particles disposed on internal surfaces of the foam, wherein the plurality of deliquescent materials is formed of one or more hydroscopic materials(column 6 lines 24-25 stating “a deliquescent material dispersed in an organic polymer”; column 3 lines 3-7 stating “steps of admixing components comprising a hygroscopic material and an organic polymer in a solvent to form a solution, and drying the solution to remove solvent and provide a moisture-deficient hygroscopic material dispersed in the organic polymer” ; column 3 lines 45-46 stating “the deliquescent material may comprise calcium chloride”). Examiner notes that the deliquescent material of Beckenhauer is dispersed in the organic polymer, and Beckenhauer states in column 6 lines 51-52 “the organic polymer is preferably a solid at room temperature”, therefore the organic polymer is a consequently a foam, with a plurality of deliquescent particles disposed on internal surfaces of the foam, as claimed. With regards to claim 5, Beckenhauer further teaches wherein the pore size of the foam is in a range of 25-500 micrometers, inclusive. With regards to claim 6, Beckenhauer further teaches wherein the AWH composite further comprises a plurality of water-soluble polymer particles disposed on the internal surfaces of the foam(column 8 lines 15-16 stating “the composition of the present invention may further include additional components”; column 8 lines 34-38 stating “compositions of the present invention may also include other materials … (but are not limited to): paper product, wood products “, wherein examiner notes that cellulose as a wood product is a well known water soluble polymer”) . With regards to claim 9, Beckenhauer further teaches wherein the AWH composite further comprises a plurality of carbon-based particles disposed on the internal surfaces of the foam( column 8 lines 15-16 stating “the composition of the present invention may further include additional components”; column 8 lines 34-38 stating “compositions of the present invention may also include other materials … (but are not limited to) … charcoal”, wherein examiner notes charcoal is a carbon based material. With regards to claim 16, Beckenhauer further teaches a water bottle, wherein the AWH composite is configured to be inserted into the water bottle(column 8 lines 59-62 stating “the novel composition may be formulated into disk shapes and adapted to fit inside the lid of a container(e.g. within the interior space of a bottle”). Claims 32,33,35,36 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being clearly anticipated by Beckenhauer(6235219). Beckenhauer teaches a method comprising providing an atmospheric water harvesting composite having a relative humidity (column 2 lines 66-67 stating “method for removing moisture from an enclosed and moisture-containing atmosphere”) , such that water in the atmosphere is captured by the AWH composite, and after the providing, releasing the captured water from the AWH composite by heating the AHW composite(column 9 lines 7-8 stating “determination of whether or not the composition useful as desiccant needs replacement and/or recharging”, wherein recharging including heating is common, and wherein an organic polymer of Beckenhauer would be heated to released the captured water), wherein the AWH composite comprises a foam and a plurality of deliquescent particles(column 6 lines 24-25 stating “a deliquescent material dispersed in an organic polymer”; column 3 lines 3-7 stating “steps of admixing components comprising a hygroscopic material and an organic polymer in a solvent to form a solution, and drying the solution to remove solvent and provide a moisture-deficient hygroscopic material dispersed in the organic polymer” ; column 3 lines 45-46 stating “the deliquescent material may comprise calcium chloride), the foam comprises an organic polymer (column 6 lines 24-25 stating “a deliquescent material dispersed in an organic polymer”; column 7 lines 19-20 stating “preferred organic polymers are … , polyurethane”, wherein polyurethane is known to include a foam formulation), the foam having pore size of at least 1 micrometer, and plurality of deliquescent particles disposed on internal surfaces of the foam, wherein the plurality of deliquescent materials is formed of one or more hydroscopic materials. Examiner notes that the deliquescent material of Beckenhauer is dispersed in the organic polymer, and Beckenhauer states in column 6 lines 51-52 “the organic polymer is preferably a solid at room temperature”, therefore the organic polymer is a consequently a foam, with a plurality of deliquescent particles disposed on internal surfaces of the foam, as claimed. With regards to claim 33, Beckenhauer further teaches wherein the heating comprises directing solar radiation onto the AWH composite; the heating comprises heating by a fire; or the heating comprises using a heating system thermally coupled to the AWH composite to increase a temperature of the AWH composite. With regards to claim 35, Beckenhauer further teaches after the providing and prior to the releasing, inserting the AWH composite into a portable water bottle or other fluid container(column 8 lines 59-62 stating “the novel composition may be formulated into disk shapes and adapted to fit inside the lid of a container(e.g. within the interior space of a bottle”). With regards to claim 36, Beckenhauer further teaches wherein the providing and the releasing are such that the AWH composite adsorbs at least 100% of its weight in water at 90% relative humidity; provides a water uptake capacity at saturation of at least 0.9 g/g at 30% relative humidity; provides a water uptake speed of at least 0.2 g/g per hour at 30% relative humidity ; or any combination of the foregoing. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4,13,16,17,34 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 4 recites “wherein some of the deliquescent particles are nanoparticles having a size less than or equal to 500 nm, and others of the deliquescent particles form a dendritic structure having a size greater than or equal to 1 micrometer”. Beckenhauer teaches a plurality of deliquescent particles, however Beckenhauer does not teach or suggest wherein some of the deliquescent particles are nanoparticles having a size less than or equal to 500 nm, and others of the deliquescent particles form a dendritic structure having a size greater than or equal to 1 micrometer. Claim 13 recites “wherein the foam has been carbonized”. Beckenhauer teaches a foam comprising an organic polymer”, however Beckenhauer does not teach or suggest wherein the foam has been carbonized. Claim 17 recites “wherein the water bottle comprises: a heating system configured to heat the AWH composite within the water bottle or a refrigeration system configured to cool at least part of the water bottle; and an electrical power source operatively coupled to the heating or refrigeration system.”. Beckenhauer teaches a water bottle for retaining the AWH composite , however Beckenhauer does not teach or suggest wherein the water bottle comprises: a heating system configured to heat the AWH composite within the water bottle or a refrigeration system configured to cool at least part of the water bottle; and an electrical power source operatively coupled to the heating or refrigeration system. Claim 34 recites “further comprising cooling at least a portion of a container in which AWH composite is disposed using a refrigeration system thermally coupled to the container so as to condense the released water”. Beckenhauer teaches providing a AWH composite into a container, however Beckenhauer does not teach or suggest cooling at least a portion of a container in which AWH composite is disposed using a refrigeration system thermally coupled to the container so as to condense the released water. Claims 18, 21-23,26,29,31 are allowed. Claim 18 recites “a method comprising immersing at least part of a foam in a solution comprising a plurality of deliquescent particles, the plurality of deliquescent particles being formed of one or more hygroscopic materials, the foam comprising an organic polymer and having a pore size of at least 1 micrometer; and after the immersing , drying the foam to form an to form an atmospheric water harvesting (AWH) composite; wherein , after the drying, the plurality of deliquescent particles are disposed on internal surfaces of the foam.”. Beckenhauer teaches admixing a hygroscopic material(deliquescent particles) and an organic polymer in a solvent to form a solution, and drying the solution to remove solvent and provide a foam including deliquescent materials disposed on internal surfaces of a foam including the organic polymer. However Beckenhauer does not teach or suggest a method comprising immersing at least part of a foam in a solution comprising a plurality of deliquescent particles, the plurality of deliquescent particles being formed of one or more hygroscopic materials, the foam comprising an organic polymer and having a pore size of at least 1 micrometer; and after the immersing , drying the foam to form an to form an atmospheric water harvesting (AWH) composite; wherein , after the drying, the plurality of deliquescent particles are disposed on internal surfaces of the foam. Claims 21-23,26,29,31 depend on claim 18 and hence are also allowed. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ROBERT A HOPKINS whose telephone number is (571)272-1159. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Thurs 6am-4pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer Dieterle can be reached at 5712707872. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ROBERT A HOPKINS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1776 January 8, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 18, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12582946
ERGONOMIC DEVICE FOR MIXING FLUIDS WITH CONTROLLED METERING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12582931
DRYING OF FILTER ELEMENTS IN A FILTER SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12582934
SMART DUST SUPPRESSION SYSTEM THAT SPRAYS ATOMIZED WATER THROUGH A FAN
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12578106
AIR CLEANER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12577927
ADJUSTMENT STRUCTURE AND CARBURETOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+8.1%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1577 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month