Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/543,975

RESOURCE INDICATION METHOD AND APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 18, 2023
Examiner
RAHMAN, SHAH M
Art Unit
2413
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allow Rate
372 granted / 461 resolved
+22.7% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+26.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
59 currently pending
Career history
520
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.0%
-37.0% vs TC avg
§103
57.1%
+17.1% vs TC avg
§102
20.5%
-19.5% vs TC avg
§112
12.9%
-27.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 461 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on 12/18/2024, 01/10/2025, 02/21/2025, 03/10/2025 and 03/12/2025 have been placed in record and considered by the examiner. Summary This action is in reply to Applicant’s Amendments and Remarks filed on 01/18/2024. Claims 1-18 are pending. NOTICE for all US Patent Applications filed on or after March 16, 2013 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2, 7-8 and 13-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a)(1) as anticipated by Seo et al. (US 20130034062 A1, of IDS, hereinafter ‘SEO’). Regarding claim 1, SEO teaches a resource indication method ( Fig. 22), comprising: receiving, by a first communication apparatus (Fig. 23 UE 60), resource indication information ( Fig. 22 S2210, [0184] A UE receives an uplink resource allocation from a BS (step S2210).), wherein the resource indication information comprises resource unit allocation information for indicating one or more first virtual resource units (VRUs) and station information of a station to which the one or more first VRUs are allocated ([0003] In 3GPP LTE, a resource block (RB) is used as a basic unit of resource allocation. The RB includes a plurality of subcarriers and a plurality of orthogonal frequency division multiplex (OFDM) symbols. The RB can be divided into a physical resource block (PRB) and a virtual resource block (VRB). According to a rule of mapping to the PRB, the VRB is divided again into a localized VRB (LVRB) and a distributed VRB (DVRB).[0004] The VRB is used in resource allocation for ….. uplink transmission. …… In uplink transmission, the BS reports a specific VRB through which the UE transmits an uplink data packet. Fig. 21, [0179] FIG. 21 shows a resource allocation method according to an embodiment of the present invention. In this method, an RBG is used for an uplink, and a type-0 VRB allocation is applied to uplink allocation. Fig. 23, [0188] A BS 50 includes a processor 51….[0189] The processor 51 can determine a VRB allocation for indicating a VRB allocated to a UE, and can report the allocated VRB to the UE by using an uplink resource allocation.(Construed the allocation information includes one or more first VRBs or VRUs and UE or station information indicating resources for uplink transmission)), and the first VRU comprises a plurality of subcarriers continuous in frequency domain ( [0009] The FDS scheme uses the DVRB since data is transmitted by using subcarriers distributed in the frequency domain. The FSS scheme uses the LVRB since data is transmitted by using contiguous subcarriers in the frequency domain. Fig. 3,[0080] FIG. 3 shows LVRB-PRB mapping. Although is it shown herein that an LVRB and a PRB each include 12 subcarriers in a subframe and one subframe includes 12 OFDM symbols, the number of OFDM symbols included in the subframe and the number of subcarriers included therein are for exemplary purposes only. [0081] An LVRB1 211 is mapped to a PRB1 201. An LVRB2 212 is mapped to a PRB2 202. An LVRB3 213 is mapped to a PRB3 203. The LVRB is one-to-one mapped to the PRB. An LVRB having an index i corresponds to a PRB having an index j. According to a VRB allocation scheme, i and j may be equal to or different from each other.); determining, by the first communication apparatus, a first physical resource unit (PRU} based on the resource indication information ( See [0003, 0004] … a rule of mapping to the PRB, the VRB is divided again into a localized VRB (LVRB) and a distributed VRB (DVRB). [0080] FIG. 3 shows LVRB-PRB mapping. Fig. S2220, [0185] The UE determines the allocated RB from the uplink resource allocation (step S2220) [0189] The processor 51 can determine a VRB allocation for indicating a VRB allocated to a UE, and can report the allocated VRB to the UE by using an uplink resource allocation. [0192] The processor 61 receives an uplink resource allocation, and determines an allocated RB. The processor 61 transmits an uplink transport block on a PUSCH determined from the allocated RB. (Construed UE or station or determines first communication apparatus determines PRB or PRU from indicated VRB or VRU)), wherein there is a mapping relationship between the first PRU and the first VRU, the first PRU comprises a plurality of subcarrier groups discrete in frequency domain, and one subcarrier group comprises one subcarrier or comprises at least two continuous subcarriers ( See Fig. 3, [0003, 0004, 0080] a rule of mapping to the PRB, the VRB, and LVRB-PRB mapping); and transmitting, by the first communication apparatus, data on the first PRU ( Fig. 21, [0179] FIG. 21 shows a resource allocation method according to an embodiment of the present invention. In this method, an RBG is used for an uplink, and a type-0 VRB allocation is applied to uplink allocation. Fig. S2230, [0186] The UE transmits an uplink transport block on a PUSCH by using the allocated RB (step S2230). [0192] The processor 61 receives an uplink resource allocation, and determines an allocated RB. The processor 61 transmits an uplink transport block on a PUSCH determined from the allocated RB.). Regarding claim 7, SEO teaches a resource indication method (Fig. 22), comprising: sending, by a second communication apparatus (Fig. 23 BS 50), resource indication information ( Fig. 22 S2210, [0184] A UE receives an uplink resource allocation from a BS (step S2210).), Further claim 7 is interpreted mutatis mutandis of claim 1, and rejected for the same reason as set forth for claim 1. Regarding claim 13, SEO teaches a communication apparatus (Fig. 23, UE 60), wherein the apparatus comprises: at least one processor, and one or more memories coupled to the at least one processor and storing programming instructions for execution by the at least one processor to cause the apparatus to perform following operations ( [0191] A UE 60 includes a processor 61, a memory 62, and an RF unit 63. [0192] The processor 61 implements the proposed functions, procedures, and/or methods. An operation of the UE can be implemented by the processor 61 in the aforementioned examples of ….. FIG. 21. [0193] The memory 62 coupled to the processor 61 stores a parameter or protocol for the operation. [0194] ….. When the above-described embodiment is implemented in software, the above-described scheme may be implemented using a module (process or function) which performs the above function. The module may be stored in the memory and executed by the processor. ) Further claim 13 is interpreted mutatis mutandis of claim 1, and rejected for the same reason as set forth for claim 1. Regarding claim 2, SEO teaches the method according to claim 1, wherein the mapping relationship comprises: a difference between an index of one first VRU in the one or more first VRUs and an index of the first PRU corresponding to the one first VRU is a first specified value; or an index of one first VRU in the one or more first VRUs is the same as an index of the first PRU corresponding to the one first VRU ( Fig. 3, [0080] FIG. 3 shows LVRB-PRB mapping. Although is it shown herein that an LVRB and a PRB each include 12 subcarriers in a subframe and one subframe includes 12 OFDM symbols, the number of OFDM symbols included in the subframe and the number of subcarriers included therein are for exemplary purposes only. [0081] An LVRB1 211 is mapped to a PRB1 201. An LVRB2 212 is mapped to a PRB2 202. An LVRB3 213 is mapped to a PRB3 203. The LVRB is one-to-one mapped to the PRB. An LVRB having an index i corresponds to a PRB having an index j. According to a VRB allocation scheme, i and j may be equal to or different from each other.); and the index of the one first VRU in the one or more first VRUs is determined based on the resource unit allocation information ( See [0003, 0004] cited above for claim 1. [0189] An operation of the BS can be implemented by the processor 51 in the aforementioned examples of ….. FIG. 21. The processor 51 can determine a VRB allocation for indicating a VRB allocated to a UE, and can report the allocated VRB to the UE by using an uplink resource allocation. An operation of the UE can be implemented by the processor 61 in the aforementioned examples of FIG. 18 to FIG. 21. The processor 61 receives an uplink resource allocation, and determines an allocated RB. The processor 61 transmits an uplink transport block on a PUSCH determined from the allocated RB.). Regarding claim 8, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth for claim 2. Regarding claim 14, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth for claim 2. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-6, 9-12 and 15-18 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and in intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 3, SEO or any prior art of record either alone or in combination fails to teach that the method according to claim 2, wherein the mapping relationship comprises: mapping is performed by using each 26-tone RU of 9 26-tone RUs comprised in each 20 MHz as a minimum unit, indices of the 9 26-tone RUs are respectively {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9}+q, and indices obtained by mapping the 9 26-tone RUs are respectively {1, 7, 3, 9, 5, 6, 2, 8, 4}+q, {6, 2, 8, 4, 5, 1, 7, 3, 9}+q, {1, 2, 8, 9, 5, 6, 7, 3, 4}+q, or {6, 7, 3, 4, 5, 1, 2, 8, 9}+q, wherein q is an integer, q = 9*b, b is an integer, b indicates a quantity of 20 MHz comprised in a maximum resource bandwidth allocated by a second communication apparatus minus 1, and q = 0, 9, 18,or27; and one first VRU in the one or more first VRUs is one or more of the 26-tone RUs whose indices are {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9}+q, and the first PRU corresponding to the one first VRU in the one or more first VRUs is one or more of 26-tone RUs whose indices are {1, 7, 3, 9, 5, 6, 2, 8, 4}+q, or the first PRU corresponding to the one first VRU in the one or more first VRUs is one or more of 26-tone RUs whose indices are {6, 2, 8, 4, 5, 1, 7, 3, 9}+q, or the first PRU corresponding to the one first VRU in the one or more first VRUs is one or more of 26-tone RUs whose indices are {1, 2, 8, 9, 5, 6, 7, 3, 4}+q, or the first PRU corresponding to the one first VRU in the one or more first VRUs is one or more of 26-tone RUs whose indices are {6, 7, 3, 4, 5, 1, 2, 8, 9}+q. Regarding claim 4, SEO or any prior art of record either alone or in combination fails to teach the method according to claim 2, wherein the mapping relationship comprises: a maximum resource bandwidth allocated by a second communication apparatus is greater than or equal to 40 MHz, the maximum resource bandwidth comprises at least two 242- tone RUs, mapping is performed by using each 26-tone RU in 18 26-tone RUs comprised in the at least two 242-tone RUs as a minimum unit, indices of the 18 26-tone RUs are respectively { 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, 9}, {10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18}+m, and indices obtained by mapping the 18 26-tone RUs are respectively {1, 11+m, 3, 13+m, 5, 6, 16+m, 8, 18+m}, {10+m, 2, 12+m, 4, 14+m, 15+m, 7, 17+m, 9}, or {10+m, 2, 12+m, 4, 5, 15+m, 7, 17+m, 9}, {1, 11+m, 3, 13+m, 14+m, 6, 16+m, 8, 18+m}, wherein m is an integer, m = 9*a, a is an integer, a indicates a quantity of 242-tone RUs between the at least two 242-tone RUs, and m = 0, 9, 18, or 27. Regarding claim 5, SEO or any prior art of record either alone or in combination fails to teach the method according to claim 1, wherein a sequence number of a subcarrier in the first PRU determined for a subcarrier with a sequence number of k in the first VRUs based on the mapping relationship is k', and k' satisfies the following equation: k = Mt*x*mod(k,Mc)+[k/McJ, wherein MN indicates a quantity of first VRUs that participate in mapping in each 20 MHz, Mt is an integer, 1 K<9, x is an integer, x = 1, 2, 4,8,or 16, Mt*x indicates a total quantity of the first VRUs that participate in mapping, mod() indicates a modulo operation, Me indicates a quantity of subcarriers that participate in mapping in one first VRU, 1 <M< 26, k is an integer, and k = 0, 1, 2, ..., Mt*Mc*x-1. Regarding claim 6, the claim being dependent on claim 5, is also interpreted same as claim 5. Regarding claim 9, the claim with similar feature as in claim 3, is interpreted same as claim 3. Regarding claim 10, the claim with similar feature as in claim 4, is interpreted same as claim 4. Regarding claim 11, the claim with similar feature as in claim 5, is interpreted same as claim 5. Regarding claim 12, the claim being dependent on claim 11, is also interpreted same as claim 11. Regarding claim 15, the claim with similar feature as in claim 3, is interpreted same as claim 3. Regarding claim 16, the claim with similar feature as in claim 4, is interpreted same as claim 4. Regarding claim 17, the claim with similar feature as in claim 5, is interpreted same as claim 5. Regarding claim 18, the claim being dependent on claim 17, is also interpreted same as claim 17. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Hu et al. (US 20210099248 A1), describing Joint Encoding Schemes With Interleaver And Tone Mapper For Multi-RU Operation Hu et al. (US 20200383133 A1), describing VIRTUAL RESOURCE UNIT FOR MULTI-RESOURCE UNIT ASSIGNMENT TO A SINGLE STATION IN WLAN Wang et al. (US 20200244420 A1), describing BASE STATION, USER EQUIPMENT AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATION METHOD Choi et al. (US 20170303242 A1), describing METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ALLOCATING WIRELESS RESOURCES ACCORDING TO RESOURCE ALLOCATION SETTING IN WLAN Choi et al. (US 20170339701 A1), describing METHOD AND DEVICE FOR ALLOCATING RESOURCE UNIT ON BASIS OF CONTAINER IN WIRELESS LAN Choi et al. (US 20100009691 A1), describing PERMUTATION DEVICE AND METHOD HAVING IMPROVED RESOURCE GRANULARITY FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHAH M RAHMAN whose telephone number is (571)272-8951. The examiner can normally be reached 9:30AM-5:30PM PST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, UN C CHO can be reached at 571-272-7919. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SHAH M RAHMAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2413
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 18, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 18, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Apr 02, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598016
Communication Link Initiation Method and Apparatus
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593267
RADIO WAVE MAP GENERATOR DEVICE, RADIO WAVE MAP PROVIDER DEVICE, AND RADIO WAVE MAP ACQUIRING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587215
RADIO ACCESS TECHNOLOGY (RAT) SPECTRUM TRANSLATOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12574945
SWITCHING FROM AN ACTIVE BANDWIDTH PART TO A DEFAULT BANDWIDTH PART
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12574101
LOCATION DEPENDENT RELAY NODE CONFIGURATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+26.4%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 461 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month